Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Ireland |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
"If you post on your profile a dislike of Bi men, or BBC . And use the excuse it's my choice . Does this somehow excuse you from being called either. " A dislike or a preference not to meet? Because there is a hell of a difference | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm not saying people don't have a choice. Of course they have choices. But do you not accept it's discrimination ." The term and concept "BBC" is pretty racist in itself, although of course some people identify with it an use it (much like 'BBW' which I hate for similar reasons). Literally everyone on earth's preferences are informed by societal prejudices that include racism and homophobia, it's not possible for your preferences to not be effected by the society you live in. Doesn't mean it's malicious or even conscious - but yes, "no bi men" and BBC are homophobic/biphobic and racist preferences. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm not saying people don't have a choice. Of course they have choices. But do you not accept it's discrimination ." OP we all like who we like; we have rules, preferences and standards. We aren't being discriminatory it's just human nature. Do you fuck anyone and everyone who shows interest in you to avoid discrimination? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We prefer not to meet bi guys but have absolutely nothing against them ,each to their own and all that .It's a preference that's all ,nothing more and nothing less ." preference false its the fact an mentality of people automatically assume we have AIDS and HIV and we bang each other without no condoms!! Just because we like cocks from to time it doesn't make us less of a straight man or unclean. No doubt you would meet a bi girl whats the difference in the sex if their bisexual? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Its the hole bisexual thing that doesn't add up with me. You would be very shocked in the amount of straight guys that mail me and meet me. That strictly says straight and have even met people who strictly wont meet bi guys. The hole point is how do you know tom banged mick?. But when it comes to bi girls I'm yet to see a profile that says no bi girls lol" With you on most of what your saying, the problem is that some guys that are bi or bi curious don’t feel comfortable stating in there profile that’s what they are . So even in fab where everything goes there is still some bigotry(why should fab be different from real life) but while that is not a good thing people are still entitled to have there preferences and to state what they are. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"With all due respect to posters above who disagree I think people that dislike Bi men or bbc are very discriminatory ,the colour or their skin or the fact that they are bi shouldn’t be a deciding factor on here No different than any other walk or life,skin colour and sexuality shouldn’t be a deciding factor, Yes it’s a sex site,but deciding factors should be the usual,clicking with someone,soundness,having similar interests,even bloody hygiene reasons,not sexuality or colour of their skin! And talking from experience here the couples that won’t play with Bi guys or black men have ABSOLUTLY no problem sleeping with Bi girls or black girls! Total double standard ! We live in an inclusive world these days,pity everyone not on board with it.xx " nailed it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"But anyway OP there is a lot homophobic people on here. And a lot of racist people as well. " Of course there are!..that's the world we live in!..but we all have personal tastes,if someone chooses to say they want someone athletic ,does that make them fattist?..or under 50 ageist?..over 6 foot heightist?..unless someone says to you I dislike you because of your sexuality or colour,don't always make assumptions! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"With all due respect to posters above who disagree I think people that dislike Bi men or bbc are very discriminatory ,the colour or their skin or the fact that they are bi shouldn’t be a deciding factor on here No different than any other walk or life,skin colour and sexuality shouldn’t be a deciding factor, Yes it’s a sex site,but deciding factors should be the usual,clicking with someone,soundness,having similar interests,even bloody hygiene reasons,not sexuality or colour of their skin! And talking from experience here the couples that won’t play with Bi guys or black men have ABSOLUTLY no problem sleeping with Bi girls or black girls! Total double standard ! We live in an inclusive world these days,pity everyone not on board with it.xx " What a ridiculous statement!,they choose to share a bed with whoever and for whatever reason they please!...what next the rooney rule? for every 5 people (I should be so lucky)I sleep with,one has to be a gay man and one has to be of an ethnic minority? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"With all due respect to posters above who disagree I think people that dislike Bi men or bbc are very discriminatory ,the colour or their skin or the fact that they are bi shouldn’t be a deciding factor on here No different than any other walk or life,skin colour and sexuality shouldn’t be a deciding factor, Yes it’s a sex site,but deciding factors should be the usual,clicking with someone,soundness,having similar interests,even bloody hygiene reasons,not sexuality or colour of their skin! And talking from experience here the couples that won’t play with Bi guys or black men have ABSOLUTLY no problem sleeping with Bi girls or black girls! Total double standard ! We live in an inclusive world these days,pity everyone not on board with it.xx nailed it " So you're saying someone that would meet a bi black girl is still a homophobic racist? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What I'm trying accomplish is. That when you post such preference or choice. You need to know and understand that you are justifiably open to the accusation of Homophobia or Racism." I think you should add “ in my opinion” to your last statement in my opinion | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't see why anyone has to explain or debate what preferences they have or who they want to meet.. You're allowed to decide who you want to meet the same as everyone else. I'm sure you've discriminated against people who've contacted you. If you're offended by people saying "we are not interested in X", they are being honest about what they want. It's not their problem that you don't like it. It's yours. Offense is taken, not given." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"But anyway OP there is a lot homophobic people on here. And a lot of racist people as well. Of course there are!..that's the world we live in!..but we all have personal tastes,if someone chooses to say they want someone athletic ,does that make them fattist?..or under 50 ageist?..over 6 foot heightist?..unless someone says to you I dislike you because of your sexuality or colour,don't always make assumptions! " but they do thats the point!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You have no Tvs Cd or Ts on your profile..just not your thing you say. So are you discriminating against them? Or is it just not what you're into?" thats just not what im into I discriminate the same person not wearing the wifes knickers. Saying that I do like a fit person in knickers over a fat hairy guy in them massive difference think about it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"With all due respect to posters above who disagree I think people that dislike Bi men or bbc are very discriminatory ,the colour or their skin or the fact that they are bi shouldn’t be a deciding factor on here No different than any other walk or life,skin colour and sexuality shouldn’t be a deciding factor, Yes it’s a sex site,but deciding factors should be the usual,clicking with someone,soundness,having similar interests,even bloody hygiene reasons,not sexuality or colour of their skin! And talking from experience here the couples that won’t play with Bi guys or black men have ABSOLUTLY no problem sleeping with Bi girls or black girls! Total double standard ! We live in an inclusive world these days,pity everyone not on board with it.xx nailed it " Dislike bi or bbc is something completely different to preferences..... I'm not bi at all but have met some fantastic women who are. Just because I dont want to sleep with them doesnt mean I dislike them. It's my preference | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There is an issue . It's hurtful when I've organised a meet with a couple. Only for the woman to come back and say . Sorry we only noticed your bi . My husband doesn't like bi men. When you have been having the Craic with him all week . Slagging eachother about football . And talking about what his wife loves sexually. Even for him to say . Jaysus you know your stuff . I can certainly learn a lot from you . To suddenly be told your somehow no longer a man in his eyes. And then they get abusive when I question there "Choice" " yup weekly thing with me | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"With all due respect to posters above who disagree I think people that dislike Bi men or bbc are very discriminatory ,the colour or their skin or the fact that they are bi shouldn’t be a deciding factor on here No different than any other walk or life,skin colour and sexuality shouldn’t be a deciding factor, Yes it’s a sex site,but deciding factors should be the usual,clicking with someone,soundness,having similar interests,even bloody hygiene reasons,not sexuality or colour of their skin! And talking from experience here the couples that won’t play with Bi guys or black men have ABSOLUTLY no problem sleeping with Bi girls or black girls! Total double standard ! We live in an inclusive world these days,pity everyone not on board with it.xx nailed it So you're saying someone that would meet a bi black girl is still a homophobic racist?" What???did u actually read that properly?? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"This racist shit is gone fucking mad can't say anything now without someone say it racist or inpropper also who gives a fuck is someone is straight bi gay or what ever. Just be who you are be happy and enjoy life..... By the way I'm not a racist if your a cunt your a cunt no matter the colour of you skin or where you put you cock " haha right job | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You have no Tvs Cd or Ts on your profile..just not your thing you say. So are you discriminating against them? Or is it just not what you're into? thats just not what im into I discriminate the same person not wearing the wifes knickers. Saying that I do like a fit person in knickers over a fat hairy guy in them massive difference think about it :- D" So it's just not what your into? And you can openly state that on your profile but we can't openly state that we don't want to meet by guy's cause it's just not what we are into without being accused of being homophobic and discrimination. Double standard's maybe? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You have no Tvs Cd or Ts on your profile..just not your thing you say. So are you discriminating against them? Or is it just not what you're into? thats just not what im into I discriminate the same person not wearing the wifes knickers. Saying that I do like a fit person in knickers over a fat hairy guy in them massive difference think about it " No, discrimination comes in many different forms, it's not just based on race or sexuality. If that's your preference on tvs and CDs why can't someones preference be that they won't meet a bi guy? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I've kept my dislikes or preferences to myself . I don't express it on my profile . For fear of being offensive. " That because your a big softy with a big hart matt | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You have no Tvs Cd or Ts on your profile..just not your thing you say. So are you discriminating against them? Or is it just not what you're into? thats just not what im into I discriminate the same person not wearing the wifes knickers. Saying that I do like a fit person in knickers over a fat hairy guy in them massive difference think about it No, discrimination comes in many different forms, it's not just based on race or sexuality. If that's your preference on tvs and CDs why can't someones preference be that they won't meet a bi guy?" again its false preference I've bin told cause im bi and play around with men my chances of being clean is slim (preference you say) yup sure is | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You have no Tvs Cd or Ts on your profile..just not your thing you say. So are you discriminating against them? Or is it just not what you're into? thats just not what im into I discriminate the same person not wearing the wifes knickers. Saying that I do like a fit person in knickers over a fat hairy guy in them massive difference think about it :- D So it's just not what your into? And you can openly state that on your profile but we can't openly state that we don't want to meet by guy's cause it's just not what we are into without being accused of being homophobic and discrimination. Double standard's maybe?" again its false preference I've bin told cause im bi and play around with men my chances of being clean is slim (preference you say) yup sure is | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"With all due respect to posters above who disagree I think people that dislike Bi men or bbc are very discriminatory ,the colour or their skin or the fact that they are bi shouldn’t be a deciding factor on here No different than any other walk or life,skin colour and sexuality shouldn’t be a deciding factor, Yes it’s a sex site,but deciding factors should be the usual,clicking with someone,soundness,having similar interests,even bloody hygiene reasons,not sexuality or colour of their skin! And talking from experience here the couples that won’t play with Bi guys or black men have ABSOLUTLY no problem sleeping with Bi girls or black girls! Total double standard ! We live in an inclusive world these days,pity everyone not on board with it.xx nailed it So you're saying someone that would meet a bi black girl is still a homophobic racist? What???did u actually read that properly?? " Yes I did thanks, a couple of times. If you read my comment properly you'd realise I replied to the comment under yours, given the other comments made by the same poster on the thread. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There is an issue . It's hurtful when I've organised a meet with a couple. Only for the woman to come back and say . Sorry we only noticed your bi . My husband doesn't like bi men. When you have been having the Craic with him all week . Slagging eachother about football . And talking about what his wife loves sexually. Even for him to say . Jaysus you know your stuff . I can certainly learn a lot from you . To suddenly be told your somehow no longer a man in his eyes. And then they get abusive when I question there "Choice" " Being abusive to you because of your sexuality would defo show their homophobic nature. Don't think you stated this in your original post OP. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You have no Tvs Cd or Ts on your profile..just not your thing you say. So are you discriminating against them? Or is it just not what you're into? thats just not what im into I discriminate the same person not wearing the wifes knickers. Saying that I do like a fit person in knickers over a fat hairy guy in them massive difference think about it :- D So it's just not what your into? And you can openly state that on your profile but we can't openly state that we don't want to meet by guy's cause it's just not what we are into without being accused of being homophobic and discrimination. Double standard's maybe?again its false preference I've bin told cause im bi and play around with men my chances of being clean is slim (preference you say) yup sure is " That's an opinion that whoever you were talking to had, it doesn't mean that everyone who isn't interested in bi men has that same opinion or mindset. You can't assume that everyone else who doesn't want to meet bi men thinks the same. There are a couples on here who only meet bi men and state it clearly in their profile. Are they discriminating against straight males or is just their preference to meet bi men? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You have no Tvs Cd or Ts on your profile..just not your thing you say. So are you discriminating against them? Or is it just not what you're into? thats just not what im into I discriminate the same person not wearing the wifes knickers. Saying that I do like a fit person in knickers over a fat hairy guy in them massive difference think about it :- D So it's just not what your into? And you can openly state that on your profile but we can't openly state that we don't want to meet by guy's cause it's just not what we are into without being accused of being homophobic and discrimination. Double standard's maybe?again its false preference I've bin told cause im bi and play around with men my chances of being clean is slim (preference you say) yup sure is " The only person here who has mentioned std's in relation to bi men is you. Your comment's make no sense. You openly called it discrimination because we don't meet bi men. Yet the fact you don't meet cd Tv Ts is simply just preference. You are entitled to choose who you are comfortable meeting so are we. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You have no Tvs Cd or Ts on your profile..just not your thing you say. So are you discriminating against them? Or is it just not what you're into? thats just not what im into I discriminate the same person not wearing the wifes knickers. Saying that I do like a fit person in knickers over a fat hairy guy in them massive difference think about it :- D So it's just not what your into? And you can openly state that on your profile but we can't openly state that we don't want to meet by guy's cause it's just not what we are into without being accused of being homophobic and discrimination. Double standard's maybe?again its false preference I've bin told cause im bi and play around with men my chances of being clean is slim (preference you say) yup sure is That's an opinion that whoever you were talking to had, it doesn't mean that everyone who isn't interested in bi men has that same opinion or mindset. You can't assume that everyone else who doesn't want to meet bi men thinks the same. There are a couples on here who only meet bi men and state it clearly in their profile. Are they discriminating against straight males or is just their preference to meet bi men?" I can assure its not a once or twice off situation far from opinions and far from one couple. But low an be hole they meet bi girls | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You have no Tvs Cd or Ts on your profile..just not your thing you say. So are you discriminating against them? Or is it just not what you're into? thats just not what im into I discriminate the same person not wearing the wifes knickers. Saying that I do like a fit person in knickers over a fat hairy guy in them massive difference think about it :- D So it's just not what your into? And you can openly state that on your profile but we can't openly state that we don't want to meet by guy's cause it's just not what we are into without being accused of being homophobic and discrimination. Double standard's maybe?again its false preference I've bin told cause im bi and play around with men my chances of being clean is slim (preference you say) yup sure is The only person here who has mentioned std's in relation to bi men is you. Your comment's make no sense. You openly called it discrimination because we don't meet bi men. Yet the fact you don't meet cd Tv Ts is simply just preference. You are entitled to choose who you are comfortable meeting so are we." did you miss the part we I cleary SAID what I've bin told in regarding my sexuality?? And I can assure you its not a once off. I certainly dont go into crap like that if im not into certain people. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Munsterlass how do you know the men you meet are straight btw?" I can only believe what they tell me and would hope at this age people can be honest. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Munsterlass how do you know the men you meet are straight btw? I can only believe what they tell me and would hope at this age people can be honest." lol people are not as honest as they say on here. I'd trust anyone with their open sexuality more than someone who hides it. And trust me there is a lot of straight guys meeting bi guys here an at some stage you will meet an undercover bi guy I will put my life on it.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Munsterlass how do you know the men you meet are straight btw? I can only believe what they tell me and would hope at this age people can be honest." The amount of straight guys who want to suck cock here is astounding. People lie because they know being truthful won't get them what they want, loads of attached males pretending to be single also. It's very naive to think that age makes people honest. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Munsterlass how do you know the men you meet are straight btw? I can only believe what they tell me and would hope at this age people can be honest. lol people are not as honest as they say on here. I'd trust anyone with their open sexuality more than someone who hides it. And trust me there is a lot of straight guys meeting bi guys here an at some stage you will meet an undercover bi guy I will put my life on it.. " No doubt and maybe I already have. At the end of the day it make's no difference as I protect myself regardless who I meet. The fact that someone lie's to get a meet should be the issue not anything else | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Munsterlass how do you know the men you meet are straight btw? I can only believe what they tell me and would hope at this age people can be honest. lol people are not as honest as they say on here. I'd trust anyone with their open sexuality more than someone who hides it. And trust me there is a lot of straight guys meeting bi guys here an at some stage you will meet an undercover bi guy I will put my life on it.. No doubt and maybe I already have. At the end of the day it make's no difference as I protect myself regardless who I meet. The fact that someone lie's to get a meet should be the issue not anything else " and so do us bi guys best of luck girl | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Munsterlass how do you know the men you meet are straight btw? I can only believe what they tell me and would hope at this age people can be honest. The amount of straight guys who want to suck cock here is astounding. People lie because they know being truthful won't get them what they want, loads of attached males pretending to be single also. It's very naive to think that age makes people honest. " Well all you can do is take people at their word. Simple as that | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Munsterlass how do you know the men you meet are straight btw? I can only believe what they tell me and would hope at this age people can be honest. The amount of straight guys who want to suck cock here is astounding. People lie because they know being truthful won't get them what they want, loads of attached males pretending to be single also. It's very naive to think that age makes people honest. " fact | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Munsterlass how do you know the men you meet are straight btw? I can only believe what they tell me and would hope at this age people can be honest. lol people are not as honest as they say on here. I'd trust anyone with their open sexuality more than someone who hides it. And trust me there is a lot of straight guys meeting bi guys here an at some stage you will meet an undercover bi guy I will put my life on it.. No doubt and maybe I already have. At the end of the day it make's no difference as I protect myself regardless who I meet. The fact that someone lie's to get a meet should be the issue not anything else and so do us bi guys best of luck girl " No doubt you will meet a guy at some stage that secretly crossdresses it's the nature of life. Best of luck yourself | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Munsterlass how do you know the men you meet are straight btw? I can only believe what they tell me and would hope at this age people can be honest. lol people are not as honest as they say on here. I'd trust anyone with their open sexuality more than someone who hides it. And trust me there is a lot of straight guys meeting bi guys here an at some stage you will meet an undercover bi guy I will put my life on it.. No doubt and maybe I already have. At the end of the day it make's no difference as I protect myself regardless who I meet. The fact that someone lie's to get a meet should be the issue not anything else and so do us bi guys best of luck girl No doubt you will meet a guy at some stage that secretly crossdresses it's the nature of life. Best of luck yourself " doesn't bother me in the slightest and I have met cds that where not wearing the gear. So yup you could say I have met an undercovered few | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There is an issue . It's hurtful when I've organised a meet with a couple. Only for the woman to come back and say . Sorry we only noticed your bi . My husband doesn't like bi men. When you have been having the Craic with him all week . Slagging eachother about football . And talking about what his wife loves sexually. Even for him to say . Jaysus you know your stuff . I can certainly learn a lot from you . To suddenly be told your somehow no longer a man in his eyes. And then they get abusive when I question there "Choice" " Poor form from that couple but it still doesn’t make it homophobic or racist for people to put their preferences on their profile. If you had put up a thread about people that were ignorant and abusive about your preferred sexuality then l would be behind all the way but you didn’t | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There is an issue . It's hurtful when I've organised a meet with a couple. Only for the woman to come back and say . Sorry we only noticed your bi . My husband doesn't like bi men. When you have been having the Craic with him all week . Slagging eachother about football . And talking about what his wife loves sexually. Even for him to say . Jaysus you know your stuff . I can certainly learn a lot from you . To suddenly be told your somehow no longer a man in his eyes. And then they get abusive when I question there "Choice" Poor form from that couple but it still doesn’t make it homophobic or racist for people to put their preferences on their profile. If you had put up a thread about people that were ignorant and abusive about your preferred sexuality then l would be behind all the way but you didn’t " Yeah there's a big difference between having a preference and being abusive - do you mean, op, that having a preference is discriminatory against you? or was it the abuse? In the second instance, with you all the way, in the first instance, not so much! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There is an issue . It's hurtful when I've organised a meet with a couple. Only for the woman to come back and say . Sorry we only noticed your bi . My husband doesn't like bi men. When you have been having the Craic with him all week . Slagging eachother about football . And talking about what his wife loves sexually. Even for him to say . Jaysus you know your stuff . I can certainly learn a lot from you . To suddenly be told your somehow no longer a man in his eyes. And then they get abusive when I question there "Choice" Poor form from that couple but it still doesn’t make it homophobic or racist for people to put their preferences on their profile. If you had put up a thread about people that were ignorant and abusive about your preferred sexuality then l would be behind all the way but you didn’t Yeah there's a big difference between having a preference and being abusive - do you mean, op, that having a preference is discriminatory against you? or was it the abuse? In the second instance, with you all the way, in the first instance, not so much!" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It's there choice and preference to say what they like correct . But no where are they asked to choose black or bi guy's. So why do they. But somehow it's perfectly acceptable on fab to state on your profile no black or bi guy's . There is absolutely no genuine reason to state these choices. Just don't answer or delete your preference. " So is it ok to say you don't want to meet men? Because if that is ok but saying you don't want to meet bi men isn't, then you are putting bi men in a special category and thereby being discriminatory. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It's there choice and preference to say what they like correct . But no where are they asked to choose black or bi guy's. So why do they. But somehow it's perfectly acceptable on fab to state on your profile no black or bi guy's . There is absolutely no genuine reason to state these choices. Just don't answer or delete your preference. " I kind of agree with you here considering we are in ireland and there isn't a whole lot of black males here so the amount of mails you might receive you could count one one hand. On the other hand then if you're in the UK the amount of black males is massive so it's probably easier to be upfront. I have seen black female and couple profiles where they have stated BBC ONLY.. Did I get upset? Nope. Its their preference. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We prefer not to meet bi guys but have absolutely nothing against them ,each to their own and all that .It's a preference that's all ,nothing more and nothing less . preference false its the fact an mentality of people automatically assume we have AIDS and HIV and we bang each other without no condoms!! Just because we like cocks from to time it doesn't make us less of a straight man or unclean. No doubt you would meet a bi girl whats the difference in the sex if their bisexual? " Please don't presume to know our reasons for not meeting bi guys-you don't know us !! We play safe with straight guys too,in fact we play safe with everyone and for your information we ve no preference for bi girls either . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"This is just blatant attention seeking from OP. As a single gay man I find OP ‘preference’ to not meet single guys homophobic. Why would a bisexual man not want to meet a single gay man? There is deep hypocrisy on this thread. Op complaining some couples won’t meet him but I can’t even contact him. To me there is one clear homophobe." Strange we shall await his explanation, as he has said earlier in this thread or possibly on his status that people should explain their preferences | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"This is just blatant attention seeking from OP. As a single gay man I find OP ‘preference’ to not meet single guys homophobic. Why would a bisexual man not want to meet a single gay man? There is deep hypocrisy on this thread. Op complaining some couples won’t meet him but I can’t even contact him. To me there is one clear homophobe." Has he got just gay men blocked from contacting him or just single men in general? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If you post on your profile a dislike of Bi men, or BBC . And use the excuse it's my choice . Does this somehow excuse you from being called either. " This is becoming the bisexual Mantra on fab now. Implying those who have preferences and reasons for not meeting them, homophobic or rasist. If people are going to try to stir at least get the information and definitions right or allienation becomes an issue. For a start racism has nothing to do with sexual orientation, but about race, and it is fundementally a belief that one's own race is superior. Homophobia is having or showing a dislike of or prejudice against homosexual people. That's nothing to do with preference. That's don't showing or demonstrating a dislike towards them, but rather choosing not to play with them. I may have bisexual friends whom I socialise with, work with or hangout with but does that mean I have to play with them or I'm labelled homophobic? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What about the smokers? Or the bbws or the guys who are not hung? Should they feel shunned because people wont meet them? Its just preference really. " Or no one under 6' or smaller than 6". It's not about wording as such someone said above, implying the use of not instead of wanting, both exclude, but it's about understanding the correct definition and not fudging it to suit ones gripe. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"This is one of those threads and subjects where I can see where every side is coming from. Prehaps the wording is the issue? State your preference with inclusive language stating what you are looking for rather than what your not? Im looking for staight single women instead of no bi women? I dont see an issue with having preferences based on skin color or sexual oriantation, the same way people have them for age, height, body shape, relationship status, body hair, pubic hair the list goes on so long thats what it is a preference for a sexual encounter." The inclusive language excludes those outside the parameters so no difference imo. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What about the smokers? Or the bbws or the guys who are not hung? Should they feel shunned because people wont meet them? Its just preference really. " Or us poor old folk | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"but it's about understanding the correct definition and not fudging it to suit ones gripe." The most sensible thing said here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No but posting your preference can be discrimination. " No it can’t. By calling it discrimination you are basing this on Removal of rights: no person has the right to fuck or be fucked another person. It’s discrimination to say No Bi men apply for this job as there is a right to be considered for a job if you are able to do it. Sexual preference is one of the most personal things there is, especially when it comes to this sort of thing which isn’t about a bond or relationship - it’s about desire and fulfilment. You are not racist or homophobic or transphobic if your fantasy does not include a black bi trans woman - you could have a person married to a black man but doesn’t want to fuck one on the side as it doesn’t play into their fantasy. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The OP has a valid point here too. If I seen "no white males" on someones profile I would consider it racism. It's clearly saying we don't want to play it you because you're white. They know nothing else about me but just because I'm white they don't want me. Same goes when a white couple or single says "no black men" (it's always black men mentioned, no one ever says no to a black woman as far as I've seen myself). The OPs point was, somethings are better left unsaid and just ignore people who message u that u don't want to play it..i don't get offended either way. " You see "no white men" all the time, even in Ireland it's common. As for men not wanting black women, it's probably a numbers thing, there are only a few, they don't message etc. I have never had a message from a black girl on here. On dating websites I do, but never on here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"but it's about understanding the correct definition and not fudging it to suit ones gripe. The most sensible thing said here. " The problem is there is no such this as a correct definition. There are several different definitions and all are correct. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/amp/english/discrimination | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"but it's about understanding the correct definition and not fudging it to suit ones gripe. The most sensible thing said here. The problem is there is no such this as a correct definition. There are several different definitions and all are correct. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/amp/english/discrimination" Generally speaking though, these definitions refer to everyday events rather than intimate relationships, however brief they may be. When it comes to sex, it’s 100% what you want and especially buy today’s standards it would be considered wrong to try to tell someone what they want to do or not do sexually (as long as it’s legal) is wrong. There is no such thing as “you have to” when it comes to sexual preferences. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"but it's about understanding the correct definition and not fudging it to suit ones gripe. The most sensible thing said here. " But sensibility has little to do with anything when you have an agenda. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"For some it's simply a preference, for others it will be because they are actually racist or homophobic. Only they can answer. You can't paint everyone who rejects you, for whatever reason, as being one thing or another. Tbh, when I see people cry racism or homophobia on Fab, I tend to just see someone with a chip on their shoulder who wants to blame and shame, rather than someone who simply had the grace to accept that they were rejected... Yes, rejection hurts, but you got an honest answer from that couple when they told you that your being bi made him uncomfortable sexually. They didn't ghost you, they didn't just block you and leave you wondering what happened. From your own comments above, you've made it clear that you made it an issue. Instead of accepting that it wasn't going to go any further, and bowing out gracefully (which might have actually lead to them to think twice and maybe changing their mind at a later date) you pushed the issue, got angry and questioned their 'choice', and from what I gather from your comments they then got 'abusive' in return. Can you in all honesty OP say that this have not happened anyway if they'd given another reason... If they'd said you were older/younger than they had realised, or weren't as close by as they realised, or were balder, or shorter, or any of a multitude of other reasons, would you not have felt equally as indignant about the rejection and have reacted in much the same way? Sometimes it's easy to make a bigger issue of something simply because it can be a touch point... To accuse someone of racism, or homophobia or something else hateful, simply because you feel hurt by their rejection. Women on Fab experience this all the time... The angry rejected male saying hurtful things, and a conversation going from polite and pleasant to pure hatred in the blink of an eye. You go from being a goddess to being a fat ugly old cunt in seconds... and depending on your mood, that might lead you to lash back too, or just block and move on. In hindsight OP, do you not think maybe you just handled the rejection badly, and probably missed out on the chance to be the better man... Who knows, grace and maturity might have made them reflect on their decision at a later point, but anger, volatility and hostility only ever does one thing.. It reinforces a person's belief that they made the right decision in the first place... even if the original reason at some time is no longer valid or may have simply been a concern or doubt that gave them a brief moment of pause, they now have a much stronger reason for saying no. " Sweet. X | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if I've read this right... In summary... " i got turned down at the last minute and I'm playing the racist and homophobic card". Seems about right " The next big thing will be calling someone victimphobic - how dare you call someone out for trying to play the victim! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if I've read this right... In summary... " i got turned down at the last minute and I'm playing the racist and homophobic card". Seems about right The next big thing will be calling someone victimphobic - how dare you call someone out for trying to play the victim!" How dare you call me victimiphobic for being the victim of your victumness | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It depends on the thought process behind your 'preferences'. If your choice is based on prejudice (ie bi man are sti riddled) your preference is discriminatory hence homophobic. If you prefer to meet ie tall peeps because ie your're tall yourself it's a simple preference, there's no preconceived untrue generalization behind it. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It depends on the thought process behind your 'preferences'. If your choice is based on prejudice (ie bi man are sti riddled) your preference is discriminatory hence homophobic. If you prefer to meet ie tall peeps because ie your're tall yourself it's a simple preference, there's no preconceived untrue generalization behind it. " What if I want to meet someone white because I am white? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"For some it's simply a preference, for others it will be because they are actually racist or homophobic. Only they can answer. You can't paint everyone who rejects you, for whatever reason, as being one thing or another. Tbh, when I see people cry racism or homophobia on Fab, I tend to just see someone with a chip on their shoulder who wants to blame and shame, rather than someone who simply had the grace to accept that they were rejected... Yes, rejection hurts, but you got an honest answer from that couple when they told you that your being bi made him uncomfortable sexually. They didn't ghost you, they didn't just block you and leave you wondering what happened. From your own comments above, you've made it clear that you made it an issue. Instead of accepting that it wasn't going to go any further, and bowing out gracefully (which might have actually lead to them to think twice and maybe changing their mind at a later date) you pushed the issue, got angry and questioned their 'choice', and from what I gather from your comments they then got 'abusive' in return. Can you in all honesty OP say that this have not happened anyway if they'd given another reason... If they'd said you were older/younger than they had realised, or weren't as close by as they realised, or were balder, or shorter, or any of a multitude of other reasons, would you not have felt equally as indignant about the rejection and have reacted in much the same way? Sometimes it's easy to make a bigger issue of something simply because it can be a touch point... To accuse someone of racism, or homophobia or something else hateful, simply because you feel hurt by their rejection. Women on Fab experience this all the time... The angry rejected male saying hurtful things, and a conversation going from polite and pleasant to pure hatred in the blink of an eye. You go from being a goddess to being a fat ugly old cunt in seconds... and depending on your mood, that might lead you to lash back too, or just block and move on. In hindsight OP, do you not think maybe you just handled the rejection badly, and probably missed out on the chance to be the better man... Who knows, grace and maturity might have made them reflect on their decision at a later point, but anger, volatility and hostility only ever does one thing.. It reinforces a person's belief that they made the right decision in the first place... even if the original reason at some time is no longer valid or may have simply been a concern or doubt that gave them a brief moment of pause, they now have a much stronger reason for saying no. " Perfect reply xx | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It depends on the thought process behind your 'preferences'. If your choice is based on prejudice (ie bi man are sti riddled) your preference is discriminatory hence homophobic. If you prefer to meet ie tall peeps because ie your're tall yourself it's a simple preference, there's no preconceived untrue generalization behind it. What if I want to meet someone white because I am white?" That's perfectly fine. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fab have a designed set of choices. To which people tick at box. They don't have boxes to choose black or Bi Men . Why? Because they can't on the grounds of discrimination. There is no need to express these choices.. there offensive. End of. " Fab also have sections to state ethnicity and sexual orientation, so that we can select who we wish to contact based on what we are “shopping” for. You were offended because you felt that you are entitled to be considered for sexual contact despite the preferences of the other people involved, I’ll make it clear that you are not entitled to anything here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fab have a designed set of choices. To which people tick at box. They don't have boxes to choose black or Bi Men . Why? Because they can't on the grounds of discrimination. There is no need to express these choices.. there offensive. End of. Fab also have sections to state ethnicity and sexual orientation, so that we can select who we wish to contact based on what we are “shopping” for. You were offended because you felt that you are entitled to be considered for sexual contact despite the preferences of the other people involved, I’ll make it clear that you are not entitled to anything here." Totally agree with this | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ok so if i have read this properly which i have btw,the op has a gripe with someone for refusing to meet him cause hes bi and thats not how they play. How can the op then call them out on it,it is their preference and everybody has their preferences. That would be like me calling somebody out on the forum because they say they don't like slim women or short women,being honest it has been said numerous times and you know what thats fine i don't get bent out of shape by it i just move on because that is their choice. In my book that does not make these people sizeist,just like a woman chats to us and doesn't like playing with women can i then call her sexist,no because that is her choice. This discussion could carry on till the end of time and it will unfortunetly because somebody is always gonna be offended in this new pc world we live in" Well said | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry. But I meet gay guys . I even have a profile on fab guy. " And if people don’t want to meet you because you meet gay guys that’s their prerogative. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry. But I meet gay guys . I even have a profile on fab guy. And if people don’t want to meet you because you meet gay guys that’s their prerogative." You seem so much sense | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fab have a designed set of choices. To which people tick at box. They don't have boxes to choose black or Bi Men . Why? Because they can't on the grounds of discrimination. There is no need to express these choices.. there offensive. End of. " By that logic Fab is discriminating on gender grounds because I can select not to meet men. Hell I can even block all of them from messaging me to even say hello | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"but it's about understanding the correct definition and not fudging it to suit ones gripe. The most sensible thing said here. The problem is there is no such this as a correct definition. There are several different definitions and all are correct. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/amp/english/discrimination" "The practice of..." Unfortunately most of what I've read here leveling the accusation is all based on assumption of what the person's reasons are without any evidence. This is the point where it's wrongly used. Unfortunately too many people are simply looking to take personal offense any way they can. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry. But I meet gay guys . I even have a profile on fab guy. And if people don’t want to meet you because you meet gay guys that’s their prerogative." Of course. It's their prerogative to be discriminatory. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"but it's about understanding the correct definition and not fudging it to suit ones gripe. The most sensible thing said here. The problem is there is no such this as a correct definition. There are several different definitions and all are correct. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/amp/english/discrimination "The practice of..." Unfortunately most of what I've read here leveling the accusation is all based on assumption of what the person's reasons are without any evidence. This is the point where it's wrongly used. Unfortunately too many people are simply looking to take personal offense any way they can. " You cant be certain of anyone's motivations for doing nor saying anything ever. I can make my decisions and my assumptions based upon the information i have.. and sometimes that will lead me to think someone has racist or homophobic reasoning. That's MY prerogative. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fab have a designed set of choices. To which people tick at box. They don't have boxes to choose black or Bi Men . Why? Because they can't on the grounds of discrimination. There is no need to express these choices.. there offensive. End of. Fab also have sections to state ethnicity and sexual orientation, so that we can select who we wish to contact based on what we are “shopping” for. You were offended because you felt that you are entitled to be considered for sexual contact despite the preferences of the other people involved, I’ll make it clear that you are not entitled to anything here." Fab doesn't allow you to make discriminatory selection in the search feature based on sexual orientation and ethnicity isn't there at all | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry. But I meet gay guys . I even have a profile on fab guy. And if people don’t want to meet you because you meet gay guys that’s their prerogative. Of course. It's their prerogative to be discriminatory. " It can’t be discriminatory if the person does not have a right to it. It’s not discriminatory to only buy meat from a halal butcher or for a vegetarian to refuse to eat from a non vegan cafe - applying limits your own choices is just that, a choice. We are ok to refuse to meet smokers, but not with people who we feel is a sexuality incompatible with our own very specific desires? This is pure insanity and pandering. It’s a case of my feelings are more important than yours because I see myself as part of a marginalised group of some description. Are you actually going to say that a woman should HAVE to consider having sex with a man who is not attractive to her for WHATEVER reason, because otherwise he might be offended? If sexuality is the only reason she doesn’t want to should she push that aside and just do it to save his feelings? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I would like to think that most people who base their preference on not meeting a bi guy is not actually based on homophobia but more based on statistics especially in regards to catching sti’s. The data is available on the hse website if you look." Yes, for many it’s about the numbers - it’s considered offensive to say so though | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fab have a designed set of choices. To which people tick at box. They don't have boxes to choose black or Bi Men . Why? Because they can't on the grounds of discrimination. There is no need to express these choices.. there offensive. End of. Fab also have sections to state ethnicity and sexual orientation, so that we can select who we wish to contact based on what we are “shopping” for. You were offended because you felt that you are entitled to be considered for sexual contact despite the preferences of the other people involved, I’ll make it clear that you are not entitled to anything here. Fab doesn't allow you to make discriminatory selection in the search feature based on sexual orientation and ethnicity isn't there at all" Then why do we list sexual orientation and ethnicity if not to allow us to select what we are attracted to and avoid what we are not? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"but it's about understanding the correct definition and not fudging it to suit ones gripe. The most sensible thing said here. The problem is there is no such this as a correct definition. There are several different definitions and all are correct. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/amp/english/discrimination "The practice of..." Unfortunately most of what I've read here leveling the accusation is all based on assumption of what the person's reasons are without any evidence. This is the point where it's wrongly used. Unfortunately too many people are simply looking to take personal offense any way they can. You cant be certain of anyone's motivations for doing nor saying anything ever. I can make my decisions and my assumptions based upon the information i have.. and sometimes that will lead me to think someone has racist or homophobic reasoning. That's MY prerogative." The evidence is what though? Based upon their written preferences, if that's the evidence and much of this thread is talking about the written text and box ticking as preferences then are you then wrongly judging in your 'thinking' and assumptions? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry. But I meet gay guys . I even have a profile on fab guy. And if people don’t want to meet you because you meet gay guys that’s their prerogative. Of course. It's their prerogative to be discriminatory. It can’t be discriminatory if the person does not have a right to it. It’s not discriminatory to only buy meat from a halal butcher or for a vegetarian to refuse to eat from a non vegan cafe - applying limits your own choices is just that, a choice. We are ok to refuse to meet smokers, but not with people who we feel is a sexuality incompatible with our own very specific desires? This is pure insanity and pandering. It’s a case of my feelings are more important than yours because I see myself as part of a marginalised group of some description. Are you actually going to say that a woman should HAVE to consider having sex with a man who is not attractive to her for WHATEVER reason, because otherwise he might be offended? If sexuality is the only reason she doesn’t want to should she push that aside and just do it to save his feelings?" I would strongly disagree with your contention that you need to have "a right" to something before excluding it solely on the basis of race of sexual orientation for it to be considered discriminatory. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"but it's about understanding the correct definition and not fudging it to suit ones gripe. The most sensible thing said here. The problem is there is no such this as a correct definition. There are several different definitions and all are correct. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/amp/english/discrimination "The practice of..." Unfortunately most of what I've read here leveling the accusation is all based on assumption of what the person's reasons are without any evidence. This is the point where it's wrongly used. Unfortunately too many people are simply looking to take personal offense any way they can. You cant be certain of anyone's motivations for doing nor saying anything ever. I can make my decisions and my assumptions based upon the information i have.. and sometimes that will lead me to think someone has racist or homophobic reasoning. That's MY prerogative. The evidence is what though? Based upon their written preferences, if that's the evidence and much of this thread is talking about the written text and box ticking as preferences then are you then wrongly judging in your 'thinking' and assumptions? " You only have the information that's provided to you to in order to make decisions on people. Sure it's not always accurate. It's all we have though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ?" Nothing wrong with gay guys - nobody said there was. You are not entitled to call someone homophobic because that is a defamatory statement. You could be an lgbt rights activist and still not want to have sex with bi guys. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"but it's about understanding the correct definition and not fudging it to suit ones gripe. The most sensible thing said here. The problem is there is no such this as a correct definition. There are several different definitions and all are correct. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/amp/english/discrimination "The practice of..." Unfortunately most of what I've read here leveling the accusation is all based on assumption of what the person's reasons are without any evidence. This is the point where it's wrongly used. Unfortunately too many people are simply looking to take personal offense any way they can. You cant be certain of anyone's motivations for doing nor saying anything ever. I can make my decisions and my assumptions based upon the information i have.. and sometimes that will lead me to think someone has racist or homophobic reasoning. That's MY prerogative. The evidence is what though? Based upon their written preferences, if that's the evidence and much of this thread is talking about the written text and box ticking as preferences then are you then wrongly judging in your 'thinking' and assumptions? You only have the information that's provided to you to in order to make decisions on people. Sure it's not always accurate. It's all we have though." Or you could just not judge people because of their sexual preferences. Not wanting to have sex with someone isn’t a judgement, it’s a lack of attraction, for whatever reason. Calling someone homophobic because they don’t want to have sex with someone is just illogical. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fab have a designed set of choices. To which people tick at box. They don't have boxes to choose black or Bi Men . Why? Because they can't on the grounds of discrimination. There is no need to express these choices.. there offensive. End of. Fab also have sections to state ethnicity and sexual orientation, so that we can select who we wish to contact based on what we are “shopping” for. You were offended because you felt that you are entitled to be considered for sexual contact despite the preferences of the other people involved, I’ll make it clear that you are not entitled to anything here. Fab doesn't allow you to make discriminatory selection in the search feature based on sexual orientation and ethnicity isn't there at all Then why do we list sexual orientation and ethnicity if not to allow us to select what we are attracted to and avoid what we are not?" I don't know where you find/have/list ethnicity on here. It's not there. All I'm saying is that fab search features only allow to make positive selections. But of course you can state negative ones on your profile if you so wish. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Op you are basically stating that straightcouple's and women should not have a choice to meet only straight men. Yet you are free to choose to meet women and men, straight bi or gay. What make's you or any other bisexual person here different from anyone else. Every one regardless of sexuality has freedom of choice. No one questioned your personal preferences what give's you or anyone else the right to question another person's." He gets to be offended because he identifies at part of a “marginalised” group. His feelings are more important than everyone else’s. That’s basically what all this comes down to. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ?" Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ?Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. " Oh, you went there! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Your entitled to say whatever you want but you’re not entitled to be right " You're also not entitled to an explanation from anyone | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ?Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. " Now this is homophobia. Answering a question about what is wrong with gay guys and quoting sti stats to tar us all with the same brush. Statistically swingers are also a high risk group in sti terms so why would a swinger cherry pick stats on gay and bi guys and ignore the same stats on swingers. There is as much high risk and unprotected sex among straight swinging couples as there is among the gay as bi community. Your prejudice, which is what this is, is disgusting | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ?Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. Now this is homophobia. Answering a question about what is wrong with gay guys and quoting sti stats to tar us all with the same brush. Statistically swingers are also a high risk group in sti terms so why would a swinger cherry pick stats on gay and bi guys and ignore the same stats on swingers. There is as much high risk and unprotected sex among straight swinging couples as there is among the gay as bi community. Your prejudice, which is what this is, is disgusting " Agreed | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ?Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. Now this is homophobia. Answering a question about what is wrong with gay guys and quoting sti stats to tar us all with the same brush. Statistically swingers are also a high risk group in sti terms so why would a swinger cherry pick stats on gay and bi guys and ignore the same stats on swingers. There is as much high risk and unprotected sex among straight swinging couples as there is among the gay as bi community. Your prejudice, which is what this is, is disgusting " How is it prejudice when its a fact? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ?Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. Now this is homophobia. Answering a question about what is wrong with gay guys and quoting sti stats to tar us all with the same brush. Statistically swingers are also a high risk group in sti terms so why would a swinger cherry pick stats on gay and bi guys and ignore the same stats on swingers. There is as much high risk and unprotected sex among straight swinging couples as there is among the gay as bi community. Your prejudice, which is what this is, is disgusting " I’d be interested in reading those stats, genuinely as I haven’t found any on the swinging community. Is stating a fact homophobic? I can understand your position but it is a fact that bi men are considered the highest risk of sti,is this not a valid reason for a person to avoid having sex with them? Certain areas have higher crime rate, not all the people there are criminals but is it wrong not to walk through the areas at night? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ?Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. Now this is homophobia. Answering a question about what is wrong with gay guys and quoting sti stats to tar us all with the same brush. Statistically swingers are also a high risk group in sti terms so why would a swinger cherry pick stats on gay and bi guys and ignore the same stats on swingers. There is as much high risk and unprotected sex among straight swinging couples as there is among the gay as bi community. Your prejudice, which is what this is, is disgusting I’d be interested in reading those stats, genuinely as I haven’t found any on the swinging community. Is stating a fact homophobic? I can understand your position but it is a fact that bi men are considered the highest risk of sti,is this not a valid reason for a person to avoid having sex with them? Certain areas have higher crime rate, not all the people there are criminals but is it wrong not to walk through the areas at night?" I also am very interested in these stats on swingers. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ?Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. Now this is homophobia. Answering a question about what is wrong with gay guys and quoting sti stats to tar us all with the same brush. Statistically swingers are also a high risk group in sti terms so why would a swinger cherry pick stats on gay and bi guys and ignore the same stats on swingers. There is as much high risk and unprotected sex among straight swinging couples as there is among the gay as bi community. Your prejudice, which is what this is, is disgusting I’d be interested in reading those stats, genuinely as I haven’t found any on the swinging community. Is stating a fact homophobic? I can understand your position but it is a fact that bi men are considered the highest risk of sti,is this not a valid reason for a person to avoid having sex with them? Certain areas have higher crime rate, not all the people there are criminals but is it wrong not to walk through the areas at night?" Oh and thanks for standing up for me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ?Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. Now this is homophobia. Answering a question about what is wrong with gay guys and quoting sti stats to tar us all with the same brush. Statistically swingers are also a high risk group in sti terms so why would a swinger cherry pick stats on gay and bi guys and ignore the same stats on swingers. There is as much high risk and unprotected sex among straight swinging couples as there is among the gay as bi community. Your prejudice, which is what this is, is disgusting I’d be interested in reading those stats, genuinely as I haven’t found any on the swinging community. Is stating a fact homophobic? I can understand your position but it is a fact that bi men are considered the highest risk of sti,is this not a valid reason for a person to avoid having sex with them? Certain areas have higher crime rate, not all the people there are criminals but is it wrong not to walk through the areas at night?Oh and thanks for standing up for me." Facts are facts and as a very smart man likes to say, “Facts don’t care about your feelings”. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ?Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. Now this is homophobia. Answering a question about what is wrong with gay guys and quoting sti stats to tar us all with the same brush. Statistically swingers are also a high risk group in sti terms so why would a swinger cherry pick stats on gay and bi guys and ignore the same stats on swingers. There is as much high risk and unprotected sex among straight swinging couples as there is among the gay as bi community. Your prejudice, which is what this is, is disgusting I’d be interested in reading those stats, genuinely as I haven’t found any on the swinging community. Is stating a fact homophobic? I can understand your position but it is a fact that bi men are considered the highest risk of sti,is this not a valid reason for a person to avoid having sex with them? Certain areas have higher crime rate, not all the people there are criminals but is it wrong not to walk through the areas at night?Oh and thanks for standing up for me." A quote from an article in June on medicinenet site. May not be Irish stats but is from a progressive European country “A Dutch study has found that swingers -- heterosexual adults who engage in partner swapping or attend sex clubs for couples -- have rates of sexually transmitted diseases comparable to teenagers and gay or bisexual men, both considered high-risk groups for catching herpes, HIV and chlamydia, among other infections.” The prejudice is you using a fact to apply to me and everyone who identifies as gay and ignore the studies and facts on swingers. You are implying I am a lesser person due to my sexual orientation and using facts also relevant to your lifestyle choice to discriminate me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ?Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. Now this is homophobia. Answering a question about what is wrong with gay guys and quoting sti stats to tar us all with the same brush. Statistically swingers are also a high risk group in sti terms so why would a swinger cherry pick stats on gay and bi guys and ignore the same stats on swingers. There is as much high risk and unprotected sex among straight swinging couples as there is among the gay as bi community. Your prejudice, which is what this is, is disgusting I’d be interested in reading those stats, genuinely as I haven’t found any on the swinging community. Is stating a fact homophobic? I can understand your position but it is a fact that bi men are considered the highest risk of sti,is this not a valid reason for a person to avoid having sex with them? Certain areas have higher crime rate, not all the people there are criminals but is it wrong not to walk through the areas at night?Oh and thanks for standing up for me. A quote from an article in June on medicinenet site. May not be Irish stats but is from a progressive European country “A Dutch study has found that swingers -- heterosexual adults who engage in partner swapping or attend sex clubs for couples -- have rates of sexually transmitted diseases comparable to teenagers and gay or bisexual men, both considered high-risk groups for catching herpes, HIV and chlamydia, among other infections.” The prejudice is you using a fact to apply to me and everyone who identifies as gay and ignore the studies and facts on swingers. You are implying I am a lesser person due to my sexual orientation and using facts also relevant to your lifestyle choice to discriminate me." Can you post the stats that relate to ireland please? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fab have a designed set of choices. To which people tick at box. They don't have boxes to choose black or Bi Men . Why? Because they can't on the grounds of discrimination. There is no need to express these choices.. there offensive. End of. Fab also have sections to state ethnicity and sexual orientation, so that we can select who we wish to contact based on what we are “shopping” for. You were offended because you felt that you are entitled to be considered for sexual contact despite the preferences of the other people involved, I’ll make it clear that you are not entitled to anything here. Fab doesn't allow you to make discriminatory selection in the search feature based on sexual orientation and ethnicity isn't there at all" I disagree... Fab does allow you to search for bisexual or bi curious people in the advanced search facility. They ask for your ethnicity in your 'my details' section of your account. Ethnicity is used to categorise photographs. You can search for black, asian, or interracial photographs and choose to contact the people they belong to, or indeed block the people they belong to, depending on your views. Aside from the option to say you will or won't meet smokers, Fab doesn't overtly give anyone the option to choose or discriminate... But overtly is the key word, because if it wasn't an issue, why ask your ethnicity or offer those photo categories at all? While it can be argued that they are for positive reasons, and allow those who fetishise race the means to find the people they want quicker, they also allow the opposite. The means to discriminate are provided, just not in an obvious way. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ?Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. Now this is homophobia. Answering a question about what is wrong with gay guys and quoting sti stats to tar us all with the same brush. Statistically swingers are also a high risk group in sti terms so why would a swinger cherry pick stats on gay and bi guys and ignore the same stats on swingers. There is as much high risk and unprotected sex among straight swinging couples as there is among the gay as bi community. Your prejudice, which is what this is, is disgusting I’d be interested in reading those stats, genuinely as I haven’t found any on the swinging community. Is stating a fact homophobic? I can understand your position but it is a fact that bi men are considered the highest risk of sti,is this not a valid reason for a person to avoid having sex with them? Certain areas have higher crime rate, not all the people there are criminals but is it wrong not to walk through the areas at night?Oh and thanks for standing up for me. A quote from an article in June on medicinenet site. May not be Irish stats but is from a progressive European country “A Dutch study has found that swingers -- heterosexual adults who engage in partner swapping or attend sex clubs for couples -- have rates of sexually transmitted diseases comparable to teenagers and gay or bisexual men, both considered high-risk groups for catching herpes, HIV and chlamydia, among other infections.” The prejudice is you using a fact to apply to me and everyone who identifies as gay and ignore the studies and facts on swingers. You are implying I am a lesser person due to my sexual orientation and using facts also relevant to your lifestyle choice to discriminate me. Can you post the stats that relate to ireland please? " Do you think Irish stats are more accurate or more under reported? Are you practising unprotected sex with multiple swinging partners? And if so are you a regular user of prep? There are lots of facts to support different positions. To use certain facts is to degrade me is homophobia. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ok so if i have read this properly which i have btw,the op has a gripe with someone for refusing to meet him cause hes bi and thats not how they play. How can the op then call them out on it,it is their preference and everybody has their preferences. That would be like me calling somebody out on the forum because they say they don't like slim women or short women,being honest it has been said numerous times and you know what thats fine i don't get bent out of shape by it i just move on because that is their choice. In my book that does not make these people sizeist,just like a woman chats to us and doesn't like playing with women can i then call her sexist,no because that is her choice. This discussion could carry on till the end of time and it will unfortunetly because somebody is always gonna be offended in this new pc world we live in" He got turned down get over it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ?Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. Now this is homophobia. Answering a question about what is wrong with gay guys and quoting sti stats to tar us all with the same brush. Statistically swingers are also a high risk group in sti terms so why would a swinger cherry pick stats on gay and bi guys and ignore the same stats on swingers. There is as much high risk and unprotected sex among straight swinging couples as there is among the gay as bi community. Your prejudice, which is what this is, is disgusting I’d be interested in reading those stats, genuinely as I haven’t found any on the swinging community. Is stating a fact homophobic? I can understand your position but it is a fact that bi men are considered the highest risk of sti,is this not a valid reason for a person to avoid having sex with them? Certain areas have higher crime rate, not all the people there are criminals but is it wrong not to walk through the areas at night?Oh and thanks for standing up for me. A quote from an article in June on medicinenet site. May not be Irish stats but is from a progressive European country “A Dutch study has found that swingers -- heterosexual adults who engage in partner swapping or attend sex clubs for couples -- have rates of sexually transmitted diseases comparable to teenagers and gay or bisexual men, both considered high-risk groups for catching herpes, HIV and chlamydia, among other infections.” The prejudice is you using a fact to apply to me and everyone who identifies as gay and ignore the studies and facts on swingers. You are implying I am a lesser person due to my sexual orientation and using facts also relevant to your lifestyle choice to discriminate me." Nobody is implying you are a lesser person, you’ll have to qualify that statement with some proof from this thread. We are using facts relevant to your lifestyle to make the decision not to have sex with you. If I am at a higher risk of sti, does it not make it a logical move to try to negate the risk as much as possible? Do you expect me to say oh well, why bother taking any precautions if I’m at a high risk anyway! Those already at a higher risk should in fact do everything they can to be careful. Safe sex is a good one obviously but also avoiding sex with bi men is a choice that some people make - it’s nothing personal, but you are trying to make it personal. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The prejudice on here is unbelievable towards heterosexuals who have a preference. Shakes my head. " If people don’t want to have sex with me because of my preferences or for any reason in fact, I’m cool with it and wish them well. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ? Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. " This is the prejudice. The question asked was what is wrong with gay guys? The answer given was they are a higher risk of sti than swingers. Evidence given that that is not an absolute fact. Dutch studies disprove it absolutism. A point of clarification being gay or any other sexual orientation is not a lifestyle choice. How to express that sexuality is. I have never disagreed with someone having preferences. I have taken great offence at bring told what was wrong with being gay. There is nothing wrong with being gay. I have every right as you do to live and express myself. Being told my sti risk is something that is wrong with every gay man is offensive. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ? Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. This is the prejudice. The question asked was what is wrong with gay guys? The answer given was they are a higher risk of sti than swingers. Evidence given that that is not an absolute fact. Dutch studies disprove it absolutism. A point of clarification being gay or any other sexual orientation is not a lifestyle choice. How to express that sexuality is. I have never disagreed with someone having preferences. I have taken great offence at bring told what was wrong with being gay. There is nothing wrong with being gay. I have every right as you do to live and express myself. Being told my sti risk is something that is wrong with every gay man is offensive. " Ok,, I’ll give you that. Personally I said there is nothing wrong with gay guys - I don’t care who you have sex with but I don’t want to have any of your sexual partners involved in my own sex life. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ? Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. This is the prejudice. The question asked was what is wrong with gay guys? The answer given was they are a higher risk of sti than swingers. Evidence given that that is not an absolute fact. Dutch studies disprove it absolutism. A point of clarification being gay or any other sexual orientation is not a lifestyle choice. How to express that sexuality is. I have never disagreed with someone having preferences. I have taken great offence at bring told what was wrong with being gay. There is nothing wrong with being gay. I have every right as you do to live and express myself. Being told my sti risk is something that is wrong with every gay man is offensive. Ok,, I’ll give you that. Personally I said there is nothing wrong with gay guys - I don’t care who you have sex with but I don’t want to have any of your sexual partners involved in my own sex life." I don’t take issue with your assertion. That’s your preference. I do take offence at being told being gay is wrong for the stated reasons, | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ? Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. This is the prejudice. The question asked was what is wrong with gay guys? The answer given was they are a higher risk of sti than swingers. Evidence given that that is not an absolute fact. Dutch studies disprove it absolutism. A point of clarification being gay or any other sexual orientation is not a lifestyle choice. How to express that sexuality is. I have never disagreed with someone having preferences. I have taken great offence at bring told what was wrong with being gay. There is nothing wrong with being gay. I have every right as you do to live and express myself. Being told my sti risk is something that is wrong with every gay man is offensive. Ok,, I’ll give you that. Personally I said there is nothing wrong with gay guys - I don’t care who you have sex with but I don’t want to have any of your sexual partners involved in my own sex life. I don’t take issue with your assertion. That’s your preference. I do take offence at being told being gay is wrong for the stated reasons," That’s fair, are you open to the suggestion that the person who posted that was mistaken? Given that this has been mainly a discussion on sexual preferences? Again, I see how you could be offended. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There in titled to meet and say what ever they like. Am I not in titled say it's still homophobic ? What is wrong With gay guys ? Did you not see the part where i said they are more of a high risk in catching a sti? This i would think is the reason a lot of people choose not too meet, at least I would hope that is. This is the prejudice. The question asked was what is wrong with gay guys? The answer given was they are a higher risk of sti than swingers. Evidence given that that is not an absolute fact. Dutch studies disprove it absolutism. A point of clarification being gay or any other sexual orientation is not a lifestyle choice. How to express that sexuality is. I have never disagreed with someone having preferences. I have taken great offence at bring told what was wrong with being gay. There is nothing wrong with being gay. I have every right as you do to live and express myself. Being told my sti risk is something that is wrong with every gay man is offensive. Ok,, I’ll give you that. Personally I said there is nothing wrong with gay guys - I don’t care who you have sex with but I don’t want to have any of your sexual partners involved in my own sex life. I don’t take issue with your assertion. That’s your preference. I do take offence at being told being gay is wrong for the stated reasons, That’s fair, are you open to the suggestion that the person who posted that was mistaken? Given that this has been mainly a discussion on sexual preferences? Again, I see how you could be offended." No I don’t think that person was mistaken. They stated it more than once and defended it once it was pointed out to them. I’m done in this now. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I disagree... Fab does allow you to search for bisexual or bi curious people in the advanced search facility. They ask for your ethnicity in your 'my details' section of your account. Ethnicity is used to categorise photographs. You can search for black, asian, or interracial photographs and choose to contact the people they belong to, or indeed block the people they belong to, depending on your views. Aside from the option to say you will or won't meet smokers, Fab doesn't overtly give anyone the option to choose or discriminate... But overtly is the key word, because if it wasn't an issue, why ask your ethnicity or offer those photo categories at all? While it can be argued that they are for positive reasons, and allow those who fetishise race the means to find the people they want quicker, they also allow the opposite. The means to discriminate are provided, just not in an obvious way. " Yes you can search for bi people but you can't search for non bi people. In other words you can't search-exclude people because they're bi. Yes ethnicity was a detail asked to set up account but it's not a search option. Yes you can filter photos based on ethnicity but it's down to each fabber if they wish to label their photos accordingly. There's always possibilities to negatively use tool and options and if someone goes around and filters photos based on skin color in order to block them, we surely agree that such person is a sad fuck and most likely a racist. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Despite clearly stating on my profile im straight i still get ignorant gay men messaging me..i mean can they not read?? It gotten to the stage where i have to be abusive to get rid of them..i dont want to block anyone dont see why i should have to..just read the profile before messaging simple " Why are they ignorant? There's no need to be abusive to anyone. Block who you don't want to contact you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Despite clearly stating on my profile im straight i still get ignorant gay men messaging me..i mean can they not read?? It gotten to the stage where i have to be abusive to get rid of them..i dont want to block anyone dont see why i should have to..just read the profile before messaging simple Why are they ignorant? There's no need to be abusive to anyone. Block who you don't want to contact you. " You can't just block people based on their sexuality, that's homophobic apparently, even though, in this user's case, it's warranted. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We can be accused of it by people who wish to make it an issue when there is none. It Doesn't make it true. " I agree with this. People today are terrified of being accused of being racist *phobic by overly sensitive people looking for issues where there are none. Racism/phobia is obviously someone who does not want to be around a person from each bracket in any sense. Or that person is discriminated against. My preference sexually is not for BBC or a bi guy............that does not make me racist/phobic. However if I did not want to go for a beer or be in the same room because that person is black or Bi than yes I can justifiably be considered racist/phobic. If I don't want to sleep with a 70 year old.......does that mean I hate older people. 'In my opinion' ...... people need to get a grip. I would not consider myself highly intelligent but I would consider myself a good person who knows the difference between 'hate' and a 'sexual preference'. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Despite clearly stating on my profile im straight i still get ignorant gay men messaging me..i mean can they not read?? It gotten to the stage where i have to be abusive to get rid of them..i dont want to block anyone dont see why i should have to..just read the profile before messaging simple Why are they ignorant? There's no need to be abusive to anyone. Block who you don't want to contact you. " Because they read the bio then message offering sex acts knowing full well im not into that ..most ignorant thing ever..have no problem talking to men on this just not interested in them sexually..thats why i dont block | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I disagree... Fab does allow you to search for bisexual or bi curious people in the advanced search facility. They ask for your ethnicity in your 'my details' section of your account. Ethnicity is used to categorise photographs. You can search for black, asian, or interracial photographs and choose to contact the people they belong to, or indeed block the people they belong to, depending on your views. Aside from the option to say you will or won't meet smokers, Fab doesn't overtly give anyone the option to choose or discriminate... But overtly is the key word, because if it wasn't an issue, why ask your ethnicity or offer those photo categories at all? While it can be argued that they are for positive reasons, and allow those who fetishise race the means to find the people they want quicker, they also allow the opposite. The means to discriminate are provided, just not in an obvious way. Yes you can search for bi people but you can't search for non bi people. In other words you can't search-exclude people because they're bi. Yes ethnicity was a detail asked to set up account but it's not a search option. Yes you can filter photos based on ethnicity but it's down to each fabber if they wish to label their photos accordingly. There's always possibilities to negatively use tool and options and if someone goes around and filters photos based on skin color in order to block them, we surely agree that such person is a sad fuck and most likely a racist. " You actually can select ethnicity in the search option but I think it’s only if your location is in the UK. It’s been quite interesting reading this debate and I guess there is no right answer but my take on this is Racism is when your racial predudice impacts upon another persons life in a negative way. Wanted to only meet someone that looks like you does not impact somebody else’s life negatively. Having preferences with who you want to intimately meet is your prerogative and nobody has the right to question that. I’m sure the majority of us will agree that attraction and beauty is subjective but there is beauty in everyone regardless or race, sexual orientation etc however when you denounce an entire race based on preferences it’s sexually racist and it ignores the greater impact it has on there self esteem of those who may be effected by this. I know plenty of people that won’t even date within their own race and again this is sexually racist. You can be sexually racist due to your preferences but that does not mean you are racist and again we are all entitled to our preferences and all of us have them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The long and short of it is this: Just because someone doesn’t want to fuck you does not mean they hate you or are afraid of you. Stop looking for a reason to be a victim and grow up." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |