FabSwingers.com forum: Yes or no?

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Drink drivers & area named on Twitter by cops after arrest from official Garda twitter feed? Name & shame.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *etmebeurfantasyWoman
over a year ago

My town

Yes

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes 100%

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

100% agree. Name and shame these irresponsible and selfish idiots. Civil responsibility isn't a good enough reason to not drink and drive - maybe naming them publically will cop them on.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Soon we'll be back to public flogging.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Name and shame.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes and kinky idea CaseyLee

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Yes and kinky idea CaseyLee "

I knew someone would be pleased

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Soon we'll be back to public flogging."

Is that a no guys?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Soon we'll be back to public flogging.

Is that a no guys?"

I have mixed feelings about it, am a fan of due process.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Soon we'll be back to public flogging.

Is that a no guys?

I have mixed feelings about it, am a fan of due process."

Then flog 'em!!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I agree but they will be named and shamed in court and media after due process.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Soon we'll be back to public flogging.

Is that a no guys?

I have mixed feelings about it, am a fan of due process."

Me too, But. If you are found to be over the limit & the station breathalyzer concurs, surely the only way you are getting out of a charge is by proving that the machinery is faulty.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Absofuckinlutely yes!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

defo

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think as it's a black and white finding then yes, it's such a stupid thing to do and people should be ashamed, it may even act as a deterant.

Although I would imagine after the initial nosiness dies down that a lot of people wouldn't bother with the names that are published. Like a modern day Stubbs gazette, used to be a huge stigma attached to being published in that and now no one cares anymore

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

In theory - yes.

However if I read on Twitter that someone 200 miles away has been done for DD, I have no idea who they are. All the locals will know the person without it having to be twittered.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I bet my life on it that some of the people posting above have driven a car

after drinking alcohol. But as usual they want to be seen as the perfect man or woman.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"I bet my life on it that some of the people posting above have driven a car

after drinking alcohol. But as usual they want to be seen as the perfect man or woman.

*Management would like to thank you for your response but feels you may not understand the question.

The Stickle Bricks are over on the table.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've never driven my car with so much as half a drink taken. I make sure I've a way getting there and back so I don't have to worry about driving. I won't even get back in my car until the following evening and mostly I wouldn't bother driving the next day.

Where I live drink driving is rampant and 5 people from my town have been killed drink driving in the past 2 years. The only good thing about it is the didn't hurt anyone else.

Absolutely name and shame. But as loncav says we'll already know about it before that's done. And tbh most don't care that they've been caught as it's the done thing. All they care about is that they'll lose their licence.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *oghunter33Woman
over a year ago

on the hill NordWest of

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Soon we'll be back to public flogging.

Is that a no guys?

I have mixed feelings about it, am a fan of due process.

Me too, But. If you are found to be over the limit & the station breathalyzer concurs, surely the only way you are getting out of a charge is by proving that the machinery is faulty.

As has been done.

I don't see why this crime, as opposed to so many others, should be singled out for "naming and shaming".

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

IMO, it's a very dangerous road to start down.

But I'm sure the Daily Mail is all for it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *etmebeurfantasyWoman
over a year ago

My town

When you have know someone who has lost a loved one, due to someone selfishness too drink and driving .... I think naming and shaming is the right thing to do..... and if it stops others or maybe one person that potentially saves a innocent persons life.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I agree but they will be named and shamed in court and media after due process. "

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What about speeding isn't it as dangerous as d*unk drivers.should they not be named and shamed also.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Any driver caught drink driving should get a life time ban

Also there should be severe penalties for excess speeding

Way way way too many people and families destroyed by both acts

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Drink driving 100% NO, I'd throw the book at them have known a couple of families where tragedy has occurred through this . Their lives have & will never be the same ......totally destroyed. How anyone can justify drink driving it is totally outside of my comprehension !!!!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

All sounds well and good but it's illegal to name and shame.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *al2001Man
over a year ago

kildare

"Soon we'll be back to public flogging.

Is that a no guys?

I have mixed feelings about it, am a fan of due process.

Me too, But. If you are found to be over the limit & the station breathalyzer concurs, surely the only way you are getting out of a charge is by proving that the machinery is faulty.

Breathalyser not good enough for court just give them right to take pee or blood

The machine could be faulty and how would you know but with pee in a vial there is no doubts

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rossflow daveMan
over a year ago

Mullingar

I'll admit I did it when I was younger but wouldn't dream of doing it now, I think a lot of people who do it never think about the risk of causing an accident or killing someone, only the chances off getting stopped by the guards

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *Belfast_FellaMan
over a year ago

belfast

Once they're convicted, sure but not until then.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Once they're convicted, sure but not until then."

Yes I'd agree with this once convicted go for it but I don't think it will make much difference tbh. I had an idea that cars should have a built in breathalyser whereby u must blow into and register negative before the engine could start....never gonna happen I know, just a thought

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *oghunter33Woman
over a year ago

on the hill NordWest of

Drivers who are texting while behind the wheel have a 23% higher chance of causing a crash. That is equivalent to downing four beers and then getting behind the wheel. What about them???

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Drivers who are texting while behind the wheel have a 23% higher chance of causing a crash. That is equivalent to downing four beers and then getting behind the wheel. What about them???"

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Drivers who are texting while behind the wheel have a 23% higher chance of causing a crash. That is equivalent to downing four beers and then getting behind the wheel. What about them???"

Not to mention the ones who'll be reading about the drink drivers on Twitter while driving.....

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *al2001Man
over a year ago

kildare

"Drivers who are texting while behind the wheel have a 23% higher chance of causing a crash. That is equivalent to downing four beers and then getting behind the wheel. What about them???"

How can anyone have stats on that. Compared to a person who drank 3 pints or 23?

And anyway what about them?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 06/12/16 14:14:34]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Drivers who are texting while behind the wheel have a 23% higher chance of causing a crash. That is equivalent to downing four beers and then getting behind the wheel. What about them???"
you're only 23% more likely to crash when driving after downing 4 beers? 77% is a good enough chance to risk it in that case

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *oghunter33Woman
over a year ago

on the hill NordWest of

"Drivers who are texting while behind the wheel have a 23% higher chance of causing a crash. That is equivalent to downing four beers and then getting behind the wheel. What about them???

How can anyone have stats on that. Compared to a person who drank 3 pints or 23?

And anyway what about them?"

Not defending drink driving, simply pointing out that there are other careless drivers who put themselves and others at risk. And why would you shame and name one group and not another? Not a fan of naming and shaming it does no good but fuelling gossip.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *xplicitlyricsMan
over a year ago

south dublin

The sooner google and tesla get self driving cars on Irish roads the better. Then drink driving will become a thing of the past.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rossflow daveMan
over a year ago

Mullingar

"The sooner google and tesla get self driving cars on Irish roads the better. Then drink driving will become a thing of the past."

I doubt you will legally be allowed to be in control of a self driving car while under the influence, but I does sound handy all the same

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Absolutely not

In the case of drink driving I agree but out of principle it is a shit idea, I HATE twitter shaming of any sort. There is an established legal process for punishing drink driver. The idea only serves local busy bodies and their gossip.

It's the default mode of the feminazi and it is the primary source of post truth misinformation. This effect works both ways and is why trump is now in power.

Idiots getting their facts wrong on a of misunderstanding and then letting that grain gather momentum among the gullible who take it is as fact as it propagates.

Look at YouTube comments and you see the mental attitudes people develop.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Drink drivers & area named on Twitter by cops after arrest from official Garda twitter feed? Name & shame."

Swingers named and shamed in their local area by religious groups

Same idea, different context

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Drivers who are texting while behind the wheel have a 23% higher chance of causing a crash. That is equivalent to downing four beers and then getting behind the wheel. What about them???

How can anyone have stats on that. Compared to a person who drank 3 pints or 23?

And anyway what about them?

Have to agree DH

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *xplicitlyricsMan
over a year ago

south dublin

"The sooner google and tesla get self driving cars on Irish roads the better. Then drink driving will become a thing of the past.

I doubt you will legally be allowed to be in control of a self driving car while under the influence, but I does sound handy all the same

Well the idea is that in a couple years there will be no steering wheel and you just put in your destination and the car drives you there.

On the one hand its going to put a lot of people out of jobs, but on the other it will reduce road deaths almost completely, will allow people who want to go out for a drink have a safe way home and let older people maintain their independence for longer.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *longshottMan
over a year ago

Limerick

"Absolutely not

It's the default mode of the feminazi and it is the primary source of post truth misinformation. This effect works both ways and is why trump is now in power.

Idiots getting their facts wrong on a of misunderstanding and then letting that grain gather momentum among the gullible who take it is as fact as it propagates.

Look at YouTube comments and you see the mental attitudes people develop."

I would agree with this. Lynch mob great in theory but bad in reality.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Drivers who are texting while behind the wheel have a 23% higher chance of causing a crash. That is equivalent to downing four beers and then getting behind the wheel. What about them???

How can anyone have stats on that. Compared to a person who drank 3 pints or 23?

And anyway what about them?"

It is less dangerous but much more prevalent

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"The sooner google and tesla get self driving cars on Irish roads the better. Then drink driving will become a thing of the past.

I doubt you will legally be allowed to be in control of a self driving car while under the influence, but I does sound handy all the same

Well the idea is that in a couple years there will be no steering wheel and you just put in your destination and the car drives you there.

It'll never catch on for us out of towners

Takes me an hour to get a cab out to me - imagine how long I'd have to wait for a self drive to venture out here never mind find me

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Have you never seen knight rider geordie?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *isdirtygirlWoman
over a year ago

Dublin

"The sooner google and tesla get self driving cars on Irish roads the better. Then drink driving will become a thing of the past.

I doubt you will legally be allowed to be in control of a self driving car while under the influence, but I does sound handy all the same

Well the idea is that in a couple years there will be no steering wheel and you just put in your destination and the car drives you there.

How many do you reckon youll see on the roads of Ireland at approx 390k a pop and another 2k to have the autopilot activated?

Even with the autopilot activated, Tesla tells you to comply with your hands on the wheel at all times and be ready to take over the car at any time. We re not ready for them yet as theres so many disputes going on and regulations to be put in place surrounding them. They dont recognise country roads or unmarked streets like housing estates, so in effect, the driver ends up driving the car anyway.

Its not going to get rid of the d*unk drivers on our roads anytime soon, im sad to say

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Absolutely not

It's the default mode of the feminazi and it is the primary source of post truth misinformation. This effect works both ways and is why trump is now in power.

Idiots getting their facts wrong on a of misunderstanding and then letting that grain gather momentum among the gullible who take it is as fact as it propagates.

Look at YouTube comments and you see the mental attitudes people develop."

But if a journalist reports it in a court report or a drink driver kills someone and a journalist reports it on a news paper is it not the same thing?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

JD think of my example of the swingers being named and shamed

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *oupleuncutCouple
over a year ago

dun laoghaire

I'm on the fence with this one, what happens if the d*unk driver has a family who suffer because of their actions.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Name and shame does little to deter it. It is already a stigmatised activity. Those who will do it don't give a fuck

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *xplicitlyricsMan
over a year ago

south dublin

"The sooner google and tesla get self driving cars on Irish roads the better. Then drink driving will become a thing of the past.

I doubt you will legally be allowed to be in control of a self driving car while under the influence, but I does sound handy all the same

Well the idea is that in a couple years there will be no steering wheel and you just put in your destination and the car drives you there.

How many do you reckon youll see on the roads of Ireland at approx 390k a pop and another 2k to have the autopilot activated?

Its not going to get rid of the d*unk drivers on our roads anytime soon, im sad to say

Its not quite there yet, but I think we'll have a (relatively) affordable range of self driving cars on the road in thebnext 5 years. Teslas going for incremental improvements while Googles going for full self driving or nothing. Its not as close as we'd like but its a lot closer than most realise.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Name and shame does little to deter it. It is already a stigmatised activity. Those who will do it don't give a fuck "

Agree, applying logic to an irrational thought process doesn't work.

Gossip mongering only hurt's the people attached and why should they be further punished.

All stupid driving (drink, speed, distracted) is punished through due process but not severely enough in my opinion

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Name and shame does little to deter it. It is already a stigmatised activity. Those who will do it don't give a fuck

Agree, applying logic to an irrational thought process doesn't work.

Gossip mongering only hurt's the people attached and why should they be further punished.

All stupid driving (drink, speed, distracted) is punished through due process but not severely enough in my opinion "
Do you drive.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Name and shame does little to deter it. It is already a stigmatised activity. Those who will do it don't give a fuck

Agree, applying logic to an irrational thought process doesn't work.

Gossip mongering only hurt's the people attached and why should they be further punished.

All stupid driving (drink, speed, distracted) is punished through due process but not severely enough in my opinion Do you drive. "

Yes, do you?

I have a full licence, am driving over 20 year's, never had point's or an accident and am a careful driver. I have driven here and in various places across Europe.

We can all make silly mistakes but certain ones that increase risk of harm to yourself and other road users is a different matter.

I think a lot of court sentences don't fit the crime or deter other's for that matter.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I'm on the fence with this one, what happens if the d*unk driver has a family who suffer because of their actions."

Initially I thought to myself hell yeah name and shame them!

But like DH said texting and driving is just as dangerous...

Also look at all the drivers who have caused fatalities due to being tired and fall asleep at the wheel....

I agree with you, I think it's the wrong people who will suffer...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We all like to think we are perfect drivers. But we all make mistakes and we don't have to be d*unk to make them.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"We all like to think we are perfect drivers. But we all make mistakes and we don't have to be d*unk to make them. "

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes because if you knew someone was about to commit a murder on an innocent person then you would shop them, drink driving is the same

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The idea as presented; We're talking about the cops here.... They aren't going to let someone who is locked drive off once they get the tweet out

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Yes because if you knew someone was about to commit a murder on an innocent person then you would shop them, drink driving is the same "

If you knew someone was about to commit an immoral act and have sex with his wife and their gf all at the same time.... You would be a good Catholic and shop them right?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Yes because if you knew someone was about to commit a murder on an innocent person then you would shop them, drink driving is the same

If you knew someone was about to commit an immoral act and have sex with his wife and their gf all at the same time.... You would be a good Catholic and shop them right? "

How is that relevant to drink driving,

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nothing.

I'm just making the point that shame tactics aren't a good idea. I said more about it earlier in the thread

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Nothing.

I'm just making the point that shame tactics aren't a good idea. I said more about it earlier in the thread "

Having lost a relative due to a drink driver I have no problem with shame it's easier to get over than a family of 3 children under 5 growing up without a father

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I also know victims of drink driving and am 1 million percent against it

It's asking should the cops tweet about who they catch. They are already impeded from driving at that stage, the tweet will not prevent anything from happening

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Yes because if you knew someone was about to commit a murder on an innocent person then you would shop them, drink driving is the same "
What about the man or woman going down the road at 100 miles per hour is he not just as dangerous.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't agree. I have not read the thread but i dont think i need to. We have laws and a court system. They are flawed. But they are better than the alternative. There is a reason punishments have a set period of time. Because if you set no time limit then the punishment goes on forever. That has a serious effect on people. If the punishment doesn't end why would you behave??

I have seen a fatal car crash. There was no phone or alcohol involved. He just drove into a stream of traffic. i have seen sober drivers nearly cause accidents. I have seen tired drivers forget to turn the steering wheel. Should these not also be named and shamed? Why only on twitter? There is only a fraction of the population on that. Broadcast the names on the radio news and 6 one on rte one... page 3 of the herald. Really get the shame out there. Let's get these people kicked out of their jobs. Banned from civil society for life.

So how long should the shame last?

What if someone does it twice? Should the shame be more intense? Maybe pelt them with eggs. Really rub it in. If they do it three times brand them. Burn it into their skin.

We could roll it out for other things too. Name and shame cheaters, repeat offenders could be stoned until they learn their lesson. Shop lifters get named and shamed. Repeat offenders lose a hand maybe? Obviously that's extreme. We should wait til they offend at least 4 times before that.

Seriously tho, How many people would need to kill themselves from the bullying before we stop? And imagine the outrage when that happens. People turning on fellow outragers because they supported this thing that caused these people to die.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I don't agree. I have not read the thread but i dont think i need to. We have laws and a court system. They are flawed. But they are better than the alternative. There is a reason punishments have a set period of time. Because if you set no time limit then the punishment goes on forever. That has a serious effect on people. If the punishment doesn't end why would you behave??

So how long should the shame last?

What if someone does it twice? Should the shame be more intense? Maybe pelt them with eggs. Really rub it in. If they do it three times brand them. Burn it into their skin.

You made the point much better than I could but maybe went a bit Hollywood towards the end!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"You made the point much better than I could but maybe went a bit Hollywood towards the end!

sadly it's not Hollywood. Individuals are generally good moral people. If you gather them into a crowd however their own morals get subverted to the groups morals. The group usually ends up being led by the extremes. One angry person, using reason, can turn a group of good people into an angry mob. Or a determined mod. The mob gets a little endorphin rush from "doing the right thing" but that high doesn't last and it gets harder to find. So over time you have to go a little bit more extreme, just a smidge, to get your high. Those smidges add up over time. Soon the original purpose isn't what you are doing now. It's not morals that keeps you in the mob it's fear.

Last year a 14 yr old girl was stoned to death by her brother after she "allowed" herself to be gang raped and then shamed her family even more by reporting on it. 34 people were arrested eventually for the gang rape. No one was found guilty. But that is Afghanistan. Not us.

My mum was shunned because she wouldn't take her husband back after he left her. Yes he was a dangerous alcoholic who abused her, but she was wrong and they were right. That was only in the 80s. It still goes on in small parishes to this day.

History is littered with extreme people who turn rational people into dangerous groups. The nazi party, the french revolution, the easter rising, trump and of course, the internet. It's a slippery slope and in my humble opinion, it's one we should avoid

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"I also know victims of drink driving and am 1 million percent against it

It's asking should the cops tweet about who they catch. They are already impeded from driving at that stage, the tweet will not prevent anything from happening

Impeded? Are they banned drom driving before being found guilty in front of a judge?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Candy you are a smart women

Do you think they get handed back the keys after failing a breathalyser?

@Arrows, I agree completely..look at some of those mental mob videos in the states where people get so worked up over nothing

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Candy you are a smart women

Do you think they get handed back the keys after failing a breathalyser?

@Arrows, I agree completely..look at some of those mental mob videos in the states where people get so worked up over nothing "

Pitchforks at dawn! It's very easy to rouse a rabble.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 08/12/16 19:18:56]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Candy you are a smart women

Do you think they get handed back the keys after failing a breathalyser? "

Thanks, you misunderstood. I meant as soon as they are sober they can drive as far as I'm aware.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yeah but anyone who is that wreck less to get caught and go out the next day and do it again won't give a shit about tweety twits of twitter

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Yeah but anyone who is that wreck less to get caught and go out the next day and do it again won't give a shit about tweety twits of twitter"

I'm guessing the Tweets aren't aimed at the driver, more people who know them.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Who are then supposed to take the law into their own hands? Slash their tyres? Steal their car key?

It sounds good on paper... But any name and shame mob rule stuff is a stupid idea as Arrows eloquently pointed out

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

And who would be lame/nosey neighbour enough to follow the gardai drink driver alerts on Twitter?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Who are then supposed to take the law into their own hands? Slash their tyres? Steal their car key?

It sounds good on paper... But any name and shame mob rule stuff is a stupid idea as Arrows eloquently pointed out "

The process is already underway in the UK.

Mob rule? That sounds like a violent mind, I'd be thinking if everyone they knew expressed their disappointment to the driver they may take notice. Vigilantes are no heroes most times.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Mob rule doesn't have to be forceful

Do you endorse the concept in other realms?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Mob rule doesn't have to be forceful

Do you endorse the concept in other realms?

Dunno.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Well that's my beef.... I think it's very destructive

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Well that's my beef.... I think it's very destructive "

What?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

All things name and shame in place of due process, weighing of evidence and trial by rational analysis of facts

Let the judge assign a shameful punishment if needs be... After the trial

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"All things name and shame in place of due process, weighing of evidence and trial by rational analysis of facts

Let the judge assign a shameful punishment if needs be... After the trial "

I think the point here is that essentially at the time you blow a positive sample twice on a calibrated machine, you're done. There is no reason why you were driving with alcohol in your system so the judge, although necessary is almost redundant as there is no defence. The UK police obviously feel confident enough to do so. I was wondering how it would go down here. (Positively I think now)

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If there d*unk driving and caught regardless of who they are car taken off them straight away, court the next morning and banned why should it take months and they can organise there life.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm talking about the concept....in any other realm it's am abhorrent idea

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It wouldn't go down well because it's not a real deterrent

The guy above is right... Punish quicker and harder

Tweeting... Just makes a joke of it

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread