Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Ireland |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"how important are looks? Iv had extremely good looking (in my opinion) girlfriends that are great at the aul sex. And Iv had some great 1 nighters with normal looks. I'm not saying this is always the case. And I don't proclaim to be model material myself. I just wonder at everyone's request for face pics, are you missing out on great sex!!" ......well we're both gorgeous. ..so this doesn't really apply to us. . We believe that sending face pics on fab is far too risky. You're best friend today, could be you're sworn enemy tomorrow. We live in Ni....so we're not going to travel to cork for a meet. Its much safer to have a social. ..imo of course | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Of course looks are important,other than prostitutes who would have sex with someone they weren't attracted to?" Attraction comes in different forms. Iv been very attracted to someone in the past that was not as good looking in traditional terms. But I loved the craic with her. My point was if I judged her on looks in the first instance. I would never have met her, and never have had such a FAB time! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But you still felt an attraction to her,and most likely would never had met her had there been no attraction" No I did t meet her on here, it was in the real world. Should have made that clearer sorry | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But you still felt an attraction to her,and most likely would never had met her had there been no attraction No I did t meet her on here, it was in the real world. Should have made that clearer sorry" is this not real life? Haha | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Of course looks are important,other than prostitutes who would have sex with someone they weren't attracted to? Attraction comes in different forms. Iv been very attracted to someone in the past that was not as good looking in traditional terms. But I loved the craic with her. My point was if I judged her on looks in the first instance. I would never have met her, and never have had such a FAB time! " Your initial post was about how you had relationships with 'extremely' good looking women and had sex with 'normal' looking people. What any of that really means is beyond me (beyond some vague humble-brag). Society has a vaguely standardised scale of attraction for both men and women. Individuals may vary on what they find attractive. Some may go on about looks not being as important as personality but you cant tell a joke at 40 paces. Obviously attraction is a mix of looks and personality but i doubt many people here really vary too far from the standard societal conventions of beauty. What they settle for, of course, is different... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the saying goes. U can't wank over a personality " ..don't think I saw that saying in the transfer test homework!!!... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hi jilly...x Yeah its different strokes for different folks....i like seeing a face pic just to see who im talking to in places like this sometimes...its often the first point of attraction, or first point of non-attraction for people...its pretty obvious why someone would want to see your face. " My pic would scare the shit out of u | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hi jilly...x Yeah its different strokes for different folks....i like seeing a face pic just to see who im talking to in places like this sometimes...its often the first point of attraction, or first point of non-attraction for people...its pretty obvious why someone would want to see your face. My pic would scare the shit out of u " ..haha....is it the early morning face | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the saying goes. U can't wank over a personality " You have a fantastic picture to wank over | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the saying goes. U can't wank over a personality You have a fantastic picture to wank over " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the saying goes. U can't wank over a personality You have a fantastic picture to wank over " Oh my | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was chatting a good friend about this the other day.. .this is a little crass..but for me, the attraction bit, is as a guy..after you orgasm..if there isn't much attraction, your instinct are to leave..go, pleasantly...but honestly..its undeniable as a male, spread seed, then go..now..ive never done that, but its a basic instinct as a male ...but ..getting back on point..when there us a strong attraction..this instinct is heavily overtaken by....fuck me I wanna do that again, lets kiss, cuddle, fondle and start again... .sorry if that's a little too honest for some, but having chatted more than met, I know from girls and couples that guys leaving pretty quickly after cumming with a plethora of ready made excuses is really common...now you know why... " ^^^ what he said | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the saying goes. U can't wank over a personality " Really? I can | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the saying goes. U can't wank over a personality Really? I can " Have u sat down n wanked over her personality? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the saying goes. U can't wank over a personality Really? I can Have u sat down n wanked over her personality?" Yes The personality can bring alive a lot of fantasies about them | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone is looking for a sub/Dom then surely that's a personality trait and not a look? So then personality is key? I find it hard to believe if your good looking your better at sex, I've had great meets with people who would be "average" but are great fun to be around, afew of the "hotter" lads would be left standing. In my experience the hotter the lad the less likely they are to want to try and make the sex fun, they expect you to fawn over them. So yes you can't wank over someone's personality but boils down to what turns you on and what you classify as a good meet?" personality is key to a good meet but it won't get there for alot unless physical attraction is there, through this site anyway. In a pub club is diff as your initially talking in person | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone is looking for a sub/Dom then surely that's a personality trait and not a look? So then personality is key? I find it hard to believe if your good looking your better at sex, I've had great meets with people who would be "average" but are great fun to be around, afew of the "hotter" lads would be left standing. In my experience the hotter the lad the less likely they are to want to try and make the sex fun, they expect you to fawn over them. So yes you can't wank over someone's personality but boils down to what turns you on and what you classify as a good meet?personality is key to a good meet but it won't get there for alot unless physical attraction is there, through this site anyway. In a pub club is diff as your initially talking in person " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone is looking for a sub/Dom then surely that's a personality trait and not a look? So then personality is key? I find it hard to believe if your good looking your better at sex, I've had great meets with people who would be "average" but are great fun to be around, afew of the "hotter" lads would be left standing. In my experience the hotter the lad the less likely they are to want to try and make the sex fun, they expect you to fawn over them. So yes you can't wank over someone's personality but boils down to what turns you on and what you classify as a good meet?personality is key to a good meet but it won't get there for alot unless physical attraction is there, through this site anyway. In a pub club is diff as your initially talking in person " Very true, but I was more replying to the point of good looks equals good sex. We are all here for fantasies and a bit of something extra, so yes there has to be physical attraction for most, but like I mentioned, some people like those in Dom sub relationships (and I am saying some) are very much turned on though thoughts and fantasies and personality etc and not "just" looks But yes for the vast majority looks are what get you in the door on here. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone is looking for a sub/Dom then surely that's a personality trait and not a look? So then personality is key? I find it hard to believe if your good looking your better at sex, I've had great meets with people who would be "average" but are great fun to be around, afew of the "hotter" lads would be left standing. In my experience the hotter the lad the less likely they are to want to try and make the sex fun, they expect you to fawn over them. So yes you can't wank over someone's personality but boils down to what turns you on and what you classify as a good meet?personality is key to a good meet but it won't get there for alot unless physical attraction is there, through this site anyway. In a pub club is diff as your initially talking in person Very true, but I was more replying to the point of good looks equals good sex. We are all here for fantasies and a bit of something extra, so yes there has to be physical attraction for most, but like I mentioned, some people like those in Dom sub relationships (and I am saying some) are very much turned on though thoughts and fantasies and personality etc and not "just" looks But yes for the vast majority looks are what get you in the door on here. " agree with all that | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone is looking for a sub/Dom then surely that's a personality trait and not a look? So then personality is key? " I agree with that, personality definitely comes first and mutual interests, but when you get that combined with physical attraction it's fantastic | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We've been told we're a good looking couple (one of us looks like Eva Green) but we don't see looks as the be all and end all. Looks will get you to the door but personality will open it. " I hope it's her that looks like Eva | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We've been told we're a good looking couple (one of us looks like Eva Green) but we don't see looks as the be all and end all. Looks will get you to the door but personality will open it. I hope it's her that looks like Eva " No it's him. He's got the child bearing hips an all. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah, the forum of fabs... Where men rush to say the opposite of what they say in real life... Our rule is (1) is there physical attraction (2) are they not an asshole (racist, d*unk, sectarian etc)' (3) do they not smell (because some here have serious odour issues). Beyond that we don't get hung up about whether you are witty, charming, educated, erudite, etc. But no amount of slick rehearsed lines or doe eyes will get you beyond the 1st physical baseline. We can think you are a great person but if the physical attraction isnt there its not going to get physical. (As for the sub/dom debate - the fetish community is hugely hung up on looks and aesthetic. Granted the strands of such may vary more than the lifestyle community but looks are vital in the fetish world)." That’s your preference and what works for you two, it’s perfectly understandable. However, I don’t see why anyone would feel the need to generalise the preferences of others; let alone undermine their words and intentions. A pretty face isn’t necessarily an attribute worthy of being placed above any other; such as intelligence, wit, manners etc. Of course it works both ways and looks will never be completely disregarded when seeking a partner but as attractive a quality a six pack may be people can be equally as attracted to someone who, for example, makes them laugh. People will often have a "type" aesthetically but again they'll also have a 'type' personality wise. I see no correlation between looks and good sex in fact I’d argue sex enjoyed at its fullest and most basic is with someone you feel comfortable with giving yourself to, so much so that you can both let all of your inhibitions go. Why then can’t someone who makes you laugh or that you can hold a conversation with be as compatible in bed as someone blessed with a pretty face? Each person has their preferences, yours is focused more on physical attributes and again that’s fair. What isn’t fair is to generalise the preferences of others. For some it may be “good looks with a nice personality a bonus” for others it may be the other way around. Both and everyone’s surely on to a winner | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I belive face pic are dangerous to put up on fab' attractions as ive read on here can be a good body' good looks' when it shpuld be on how nice they are to chat'there fore a meet' is a good plan' it opion but people make there own minds up'" ???????? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah, the forum of fabs... Where men rush to say the opposite of what they say in real life... Our rule is (1) is there physical attraction (2) are they not an asshole (racist, d*unk, sectarian etc)' (3) do they not smell (because some here have serious odour issues). Beyond that we don't get hung up about whether you are witty, charming, educated, erudite, etc. But no amount of slick rehearsed lines or doe eyes will get you beyond the 1st physical baseline. We can think you are a great person but if the physical attraction isnt there its not going to get physical. (As for the sub/dom debate - the fetish community is hugely hung up on looks and aesthetic. Granted the strands of such may vary more than the lifestyle community but looks are vital in the fetish world). That’s your preference and what works for you two, it’s perfectly understandable. However, I don’t see why anyone would feel the need to generalise the preferences of others; let alone undermine their words and intentions. " An aggregate of preferences is inevitable. A multitude of preferences naturally yields a generalisation. You cant unwish a basic of metaphysics. On the fabs forums 'truth' is not an adherence to the world or even what the same author admits in private, 'truth' is simply whatever helps the image to produce an 'in' with the target audience. Unless, of course, Fabs isnt a swingers site but a venue for people who prefer sex with people who make them laugh. Or just a place for people who will fuck anyone provided SOME pretext can be found. Meanwhile the reality of fabs is that the successful single males tend to have six packs, the older couples lop decades off their ages to 'get with' the younger couples and the world of sex revolves around fairly standardised norms of physical attraction. But yet each day people will dance on here like politicians trying to seduce the electorate.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah, the forum of fabs... Where men rush to say the opposite of what they say in real life... Our rule is (1) is there physical attraction (2) are they not an asshole (racist, d*unk, sectarian etc)' (3) do they not smell (because some here have serious odour issues). Beyond that we don't get hung up about whether you are witty, charming, educated, erudite, etc. But no amount of slick rehearsed lines or doe eyes will get you beyond the 1st physical baseline. We can think you are a great person but if the physical attraction isnt there its not going to get physical. (As for the sub/dom debate - the fetish community is hugely hung up on looks and aesthetic. Granted the strands of such may vary more than the lifestyle community but looks are vital in the fetish world). That’s your preference and what works for you two, it’s perfectly understandable. However, I don’t see why anyone would feel the need to generalise the preferences of others; let alone undermine their words and intentions. An aggregate of preferences is inevitable. A multitude of preferences naturally yields a generalisation. You cant unwish a basic of metaphysics. On the fabs forums 'truth' is not an adherence to the world or even what the same author admits in private, 'truth' is simply whatever helps the image to produce an 'in' with the target audience. Unless, of course, Fabs isnt a swingers site but a venue for people who prefer sex with people who make them laugh. Or just a place for people who will fuck anyone provided SOME pretext can be found. Meanwhile the reality of fabs is that the successful single males tend to have six packs, the older couples lop decades off their ages to 'get with' the younger couples and the world of sex revolves around fairly standardised norms of physical attraction. But yet each day people will dance on here like politicians trying to seduce the electorate.. " I'll assume for arguments sake you wore your thesaurus out before you could address the entirety of my reply The OP wasn't in reference to who or what breeds a 'successful' profile, in fact, given the mention of girlfriends you could argue it wasn't even in reference to fab in general. It was about a direct link between good looks and good sex, of which there isn't. Compatibility, be it in regards to the bedroom or other aspects of a relationship, transcends a six pack and a pretty face. As for undermining the intentions and words of any and all of the men on here, perhaps that says more about you and your state of mind. I know what I say, I mean. Someone once put it to me that fab is merely an extension of ourselves; I'm just me | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah, the forum of fabs... Where men rush to say the opposite of what they say in real life... Our rule is (1) is there physical attraction (2) are they not an asshole (racist, d*unk, sectarian etc)' (3) do they not smell (because some here have serious odour issues). Beyond that we don't get hung up about whether you are witty, charming, educated, erudite, etc. But no amount of slick rehearsed lines or doe eyes will get you beyond the 1st physical baseline. We can think you are a great person but if the physical attraction isnt there its not going to get physical. (As for the sub/dom debate - the fetish community is hugely hung up on looks and aesthetic. Granted the strands of such may vary more than the lifestyle community but looks are vital in the fetish world). That’s your preference and what works for you two, it’s perfectly understandable. However, I don’t see why anyone would feel the need to generalise the preferences of others; let alone undermine their words and intentions. An aggregate of preferences is inevitable. A multitude of preferences naturally yields a generalisation. You cant unwish a basic of metaphysics. On the fabs forums 'truth' is not an adherence to the world or even what the same author admits in private, 'truth' is simply whatever helps the image to produce an 'in' with the target audience. Unless, of course, Fabs isnt a swingers site but a venue for people who prefer sex with people who make them laugh. Or just a place for people who will fuck anyone provided SOME pretext can be found. Meanwhile the reality of fabs is that the successful single males tend to have six packs, the older couples lop decades off their ages to 'get with' the younger couples and the world of sex revolves around fairly standardised norms of physical attraction. But yet each day people will dance on here like politicians trying to seduce the electorate.. I'll assume for arguments sake you wore your thesaurus out before you could address the entirety of my reply The OP wasn't in reference to who or what breeds a 'successful' profile, in fact, given the mention of girlfriends you could argue it wasn't even in reference to fab in general. It was about a direct link between good looks and good sex, of which there isn't. Compatibility, be it in regards to the bedroom or other aspects of a relationship, transcends a six pack and a pretty face. As for undermining the intentions and words of any and all of the men on here, perhaps that says more about you and your state of mind. I know what I say, I mean. Someone once put it to me that fab is merely an extension of ourselves; I'm just me " My original point (perhaps not communicated clearly enough) was that if everyone is fixated on looks, you could potentially miss a great sexual partner. All people do in here (generalisation) is ask for face pics. Take a chance, go on a blind meet. There are other ways to figure out if you know someone or not. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe I sould shallow .. but I cant sleep with someone unless Im attracted to them .. " I don't know how someone would sleep with a person they don't think is good lookin | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe I sould shallow .. but I cant sleep with someone unless Im attracted to them .. I don't know how someone would sleep with a person they don't think is good lookin" And the point others are making is that, for them, there is more to attraction than looks. There is room for both, surely? Nobody is being forced to have sex with someone they are not attracted to, however they choose to define attraction. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe I sould shallow .. but I cant sleep with someone unless Im attracted to them .. I don't know how someone would sleep with a person they don't think is good lookin And the point others are making is that, for them, there is more to attraction than looks. There is room for both, surely? Nobody is being forced to have sex with someone they are not attracted to, however they choose to define attraction." Yeah I get that too, but should have said personally I dunno how people do it. I am attracted to people due to personality too of course but if they are ugly I wouldn't have physical contact lol. Each to their own though but I get | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe I sould shallow .. but I cant sleep with someone unless Im attracted to them .. I don't know how someone would sleep with a person they don't think is good lookin And the point others are making is that, for them, there is more to attraction than looks. There is room for both, surely? Nobody is being forced to have sex with someone they are not attracted to, however they choose to define attraction. Yeah I get that too, but should have said personally I dunno how people do it. I am attracted to people due to personality too of course but if they are ugly I wouldn't have physical contact lol. Each to their own though but I get" I'm sure we all have our limits | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe I sould shallow .. but I cant sleep with someone unless Im attracted to them .. I don't know how someone would sleep with a person they don't think is good lookin And the point others are making is that, for them, there is more to attraction than looks. There is room for both, surely? Nobody is being forced to have sex with someone they are not attracted to, however they choose to define attraction. Yeah I get that too, but should have said personally I dunno how people do it. I am attracted to people due to personality too of course but if they are ugly I wouldn't have physical contact lol. Each to their own though but I get I'm sure we all have our limits " Im not all about looks .. I value personality too .. but at the end of the day no matter how nice they are,how much they make me laugh If im not sexually attracted to them it wont happen | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Of course looks are important,other than prostitutes who would have sex with someone they weren't attracted to? Attraction comes in different forms. Iv been very attracted to someone in the past that was not as good looking in traditional terms. But I loved the craic with her. My point was if I judged her on looks in the first instance. I would never have met her, and never have had such a FAB time! Your initial post was about how you had relationships with 'extremely' good looking women and had sex with 'normal' looking people. What any of that really means is beyond me (beyond some vague humble-brag). Society has a vaguely standardised scale of attraction for both men and women. Individuals may vary on what they find attractive. Some may go on about looks not being as important as personality but you cant tell a joke at 40 paces. Obviously attraction is a mix of looks and personality but i doubt many people here really vary too far from the standard societal conventions of beauty. What they settle for, of course, is different..." A brilliant post. Spot on | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And as for the OP's point, I have personally found no correlation between conventional good looks and great sex." That wasn't my point | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well I don't demand face pics for this reason. People might not photograph that well and then you discount them and personality plays a big part for me. I prefer to chat on kik. I can usually tell if I'm interested that way. Meet for a coffee or whatever and I may pounce then...have done before grrr yummy " This is exactly my point. How many good people might you have missed otherwise I tip my cap to you ?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |