FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Ireland

Think there arent many females on fab? Think again!

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

A few highlights found from analysing the Ashley Madison hacked database...

AM has 31 milliin male accounts, and 5.5 million female ones..

'the more I examined those 5.5 million female profiles, the more obvious it became that none of them had ever talked to men on the site, or even used the site at all after creating a profile. Actually, scratch that. As I’ll explain below, there’s a good chance that about 12,000 of the profiles out of millions belonged to actual, real women who were active users of Ashley Madison'

'There were about 10 thousand accounts with ashleymadison.com email addresses. Many of them sounded like they’d been generated by a bot, like the dozens of addresses listed as 100@ashleymadison.com, 200@ashleymadison.com, 300@ashleymadison, and so on'

'About two-thirds of the men, or 20.2 million of them, had checked the messages in their accounts at least once. But only 1,492 women had ever checked their messages'

'Roughly 11 million men had engaged in chat, but only 2400 women had'

'Overall, the picture is grim indeed. Out of 5.5 million female accounts, roughly zero percent had ever shown any kind of activity at all, after the day they were created'

http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-database-1725558944

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *0shadesofashWoman
over a year ago

DUBLIN

I'm confused haha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm confused haha"

I thought was just me being thick lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *0shadesofashWoman
over a year ago

DUBLIN


"I'm confused haha

I thought was just me being thick lol"
maybe where both thick haha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

OK.. you know this affair site that was hacked. Someone downloaded the data that was put on the internet. They analysed the data. They figured out that statistically 0% of the active users were women, and 100% were men. That means less than half a percentage women.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *0shadesofashWoman
over a year ago

DUBLIN

So was all just fake then to catch men out on purpose or am I still been thick? Haha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

It also looks a lot like many of the women on the site have Ashley Madison internal email addresses with non-resident names. This means they fake female user accounts to make the numbers look better.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So was all just fake then to catch men out on purpose or am I still been thick? Haha"

No. It's a real site. Women just weren't interested in using it and so the site faked up some women.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *etmebeurfantasyWoman
over a year ago

My town

It's too early for this my lickle brain hurts.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *0shadesofashWoman
over a year ago

DUBLIN


"So was all just fake then to catch men out on purpose or am I still been thick? Haha

No. It's a real site. Women just weren't interested in using it and so the site faked up some women. "
ah I get it now woooo not so thick now haha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

That's not surprising I mean really what sane, intelligent. Sexy woman is gona go to a site like that????? Much better being openly perverted like rest of us

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *etmebeurfantasyWoman
over a year ago

My town


"So was all just fake then to catch men out on purpose or am I still been thick? Haha

No. It's a real site. Women just weren't interested in using it and so the site faked up some women. ah I get it now woooo not so thick now haha "
me too I should go back to school

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *0shadesofashWoman
over a year ago

DUBLIN


"That's not surprising I mean really what sane, intelligent. Sexy woman is gona go to a site like that????? Much better being openly perverted like rest of us "
hahaha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So was all just fake then to catch men out on purpose or am I still been thick? Haha

No. It's a real site. Women just weren't interested in using it and so the site faked up some women. ah I get it now woooo not so thick now haha "

Shows we aren,t thick

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *0shadesofashWoman
over a year ago

DUBLIN


"So was all just fake then to catch men out on purpose or am I still been thick? Haha

No. It's a real site. Women just weren't interested in using it and so the site faked up some women. ah I get it now woooo not so thick now haha me too I should go back to school "
haha always feel like a dope wen I don't no what people are sayin on here then it's always somethin where I go ah sure I knew that haha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *0shadesofashWoman
over a year ago

DUBLIN


"So was all just fake then to catch men out on purpose or am I still been thick? Haha

No. It's a real site. Women just weren't interested in using it and so the site faked up some women. ah I get it now woooo not so thick now haha

Shows we aren,t thick "
exactly high 5 haha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lfieWoman
over a year ago

South Dublin

wow

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *randub69Man
over a year ago

city


"A few highlights found from analysing the Ashley Madison hacked database...

AM has 31 milliin male accounts, and 5.5 million female ones..

'the more I examined those 5.5 million female profiles, the more obvious it became that none of them had ever talked to men on the site, or even used the site at all after creating a profile. Actually, scratch that. As I’ll explain below, there’s a good chance that about 12,000 of the profiles out of millions belonged to actual, real women who were active users of Ashley Madison'

'There were about 10 thousand accounts with ashleymadison.com email addresses. Many of them sounded like they’d been generated by a bot, like the dozens of addresses listed as 100@ashleymadison.com, 200@ashleymadison.com, 300@ashleymadison, and so on'

'About two-thirds of the men, or 20.2 million of them, had checked the messages in their accounts at least once. But only 1,492 women had ever checked their messages'

'Roughly 11 million men had engaged in chat, but only 2400 women had'

'Overall, the picture is grim indeed. Out of 5.5 million female accounts, roughly zero percent had ever shown any kind of activity at all, after the day they were created'

http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-database-1725558944"

well that doesn't surprise me..Where there's money involved in them kind of sites,there's always a fiddle going on..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oghunter33Woman
over a year ago

on the hill NordWest of


"A few highlights found from analysing the Ashley Madison hacked database...

AM has 31 milliin male accounts, and 5.5 million female ones..

'the more I examined those 5.5 million female profiles, the more obvious it became that none of them had ever talked to men on the site, or even used the site at all after creating a profile. Actually, scratch that. As I’ll explain below, there’s a good chance that about 12,000 of the profiles out of millions belonged to actual, real women who were active users of Ashley Madison'

'There were about 10 thousand accounts with ashleymadison.com email addresses. Many of them sounded like they’d been generated by a bot, like the dozens of addresses listed as 100@ashleymadison.com, 200@ashleymadison.com, 300@ashleymadison, and so on'

'About two-thirds of the men, or 20.2 million of them, had checked the messages in their accounts at least once. But only 1,492 women had ever checked their messages'

'Roughly 11 million men had engaged in chat, but only 2400 women had'

'Overall, the picture is grim indeed. Out of 5.5 million female accounts, roughly zero percent had ever shown any kind of activity at all, after the day they were created'

http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-database-1725558944"

Some of those interpretations don't add up just alone from a mathematical point of view:

Just a little thought...1492 females have ever checked their mails and 2400 were engaged in a chat??? How did those 908 women chat if they never checked their mails?

And that's not the only thing that doesn't make sense...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It suprises me on how many people across the world used there work emails.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *randub69Man
over a year ago

city


"It suprises me on how many people across the world used there work emails."

it suprises me how many people across the world wastes their money on them sites...more money than sense I guess.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *auraxxWoman
over a year ago

east

I wonder will these stats this crop up in the divorce cases..."sure your honour I had no hope of meeting anyone anyway"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"A few highlights found from analysing the Ashley Madison hacked database...

AM has 31 milliin male accounts, and 5.5 million female ones..

'the more I examined those 5.5 million female profiles, the more obvious it became that none of them had ever talked to men on the site, or even used the site at all after creating a profile. Actually, scratch that. As I’ll explain below, there’s a good chance that about 12,000 of the profiles out of millions belonged to actual, real women who were active users of Ashley Madison'

'There were about 10 thousand accounts with ashleymadison.com email addresses. Many of them sounded like they’d been generated by a bot, like the dozens of addresses listed as 100@ashleymadison.com, 200@ashleymadison.com, 300@ashleymadison, and so on'

'About two-thirds of the men, or 20.2 million of them, had checked the messages in their accounts at least once. But only 1,492 women had ever checked their messages'

'Roughly 11 million men had engaged in chat, but only 2400 women had'

'Overall, the picture is grim indeed. Out of 5.5 million female accounts, roughly zero percent had ever shown any kind of activity at all, after the day they were created'

http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-database-1725558944

Some of those interpretations don't add up just alone from a mathematical point of view:

Just a little thought...1492 females have ever checked their mails and 2400 were engaged in a chat??? How did those 908 women chat if they never checked their mails?

And that's not the only thing that doesn't make sense...

"

Yes I thought that too, but I realised 'chat' probably means the online chat room function rather than messaging.

What other bit aren't you sure about?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *upoftea2Man
over a year ago

Dublin


"I wonder will these stats this crop up in the divorce cases..."sure your honour I had no hope of meeting anyone anyway""

Lol!! I smoked but I didn't inhale!! Lol!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *upoftea2Man
over a year ago

Dublin


"That's not surprising I mean really what sane, intelligent. Sexy woman is gona go to a site like that????? Much better being openly perverted like rest of us hahaha "

Just like the Pina Colada song!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

At least here the fake profiles are just created by saddos/losers/gobshites with nothing better to do.

AM, BeNaughty etc allow clearly fake profiles created by bots to be active and dupe users into parting with their hard earned.

fools and their money eh?

Now, must go mail JennaBigTitsBlondeHairBlueEyes21 who happens to live really clsoe and is keen for a no obligations encounter.

Come to daddy!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *j47Man
over a year ago

limerick

1000 people in Cavan registered

940 in Donegal

700 in Mayo

And lovely letrim had none,zero,Nada Micheal mc carthy will be disappointed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *randub69Man
over a year ago

city


"1000 people in Cavan registered

940 in Donegal

700 in Mayo

And lovely letrim had none,zero,Nada Micheal mc carthy will be disappointed "

cj..how many in Dublin

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *j47Man
over a year ago

limerick


"1000 people in Cavan registered

940 in Donegal

700 in Mayo

And lovely letrim had none,zero,Nada Micheal mc carthy will be disappointed

cj..how many in Dublin"

Not sure fran it was a price done on today FM only mentioned a few

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"1000 people in Cavan registered

940 in Donegal

700 in Mayo

And lovely letrim had none,zero,Nada Micheal mc carthy will be disappointed

cj..how many in Dublin

Not sure fran it was a price done on today FM only mentioned a few "

Think I read there were over 75 thousand from Dublin.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Ireland had a total of just over 6k "users" I saw on rté.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"1000 people in Cavan registered

940 in Donegal

700 in Mayo

And lovely letrim had none,zero,Nada Micheal mc carthy will be disappointed "

Give Leitrim a chance! When they get internet....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oghunter33Woman
over a year ago

on the hill NordWest of

I had a look at the article quoted. It's a journalist who tried to get another round out of the AM crash. Statistics and interpreting figures should be left to those who have the skills. The figure of 12'000 real women she puts forward is based on the fact that 12'000 have paid to delete their accounts as this is the only hard figure she has.

All the other figures are based on some sort of assumptions and the site activity figures of man - woman checking mailbox, replying, chatting etc. don't add up and she tries to explain that with the AM auto response.

All she demonstrates and proves is that the ratio men-women was highly imbalanced - nothing new there - and that AM made up 10000 or maybe some more fake profiles, actually a quite low figure in comparison to the member figures.

And of course it's all over the media again as they just love those stories...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"1000 people in Cavan registered

940 in Donegal

700 in Mayo

And lovely letrim had none,zero,Nada Micheal mc carthy will be disappointed

Give Leitrim a chance! When they get internet...."

shite coverage in leitrim to many mountains and bogs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *al2001Man
over a year ago

kildare

Did anyone else here ever get 100s of fabs or winks from obviously fake accounts with usernames like wrytrjyrh usually from uk or wales all done at the same time?

Seemed like some glitch in a fake profile making programme or something to me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"1000 people in Cavan registered

940 in Donegal

700 in Mayo

And lovely letrim had none,zero,Nada Micheal mc carthy will be disappointed

Give Leitrim a chance! When they get internet...."
Leitrim is ok lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I had a look at the article quoted. It's a journalist who tried to get another round out of the AM crash. Statistics and interpreting figures should be left to those who have the skills. The figure of 12'000 real women she puts forward is based on the fact that 12'000 have paid to delete their accounts as this is the only hard figure she has.

All the other figures are based on some sort of assumptions and the site activity figures of man - woman checking mailbox, replying, chatting etc. don't add up and she tries to explain that with the AM auto response.

All she demonstrates and proves is that the ratio men-women was highly imbalanced - nothing new there - and that AM made up 10000 or maybe some more fake profiles, actually a quite low figure in comparison to the member figures.

And of course it's all over the media again as they just love those stories..."

While I'd agree with a lot of that, stats like 'only 1,492 women had ever checked their messages' are hard to argue with.

It's one scandal that a high profile website is hacked and has its entire database downloaded.

It's an entirely different area of interest that it appears that greater than 99% of the active users on the site were male.

It's another scandal again that the site themselves may have created thousands of fake profiles on their own systems.

I'd say it's newsworthy personally.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Women never had to pay to join ashley madison , its only men who needed to purchase credits to interact on there . The only verifiable details for female profiles are gleaned from data where a woman wanted a total delete of her info from their system , which would mean she had to pay to have the infor removed , but not pay to join or interact , so those figures quoted might not be actually accurate and just showing those who used a credit card to remove their profile .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I had a look at the article quoted. It's a journalist who tried to get another round out of the AM crash. Statistics and interpreting figures should be left to those who have the skills. The figure of 12'000 real women she puts forward is based on the fact that 12'000 have paid to delete their accounts as this is the only hard figure she has.

All the other figures are based on some sort of assumptions and the site activity figures of man - woman checking mailbox, replying, chatting etc. don't add up and she tries to explain that with the AM auto response.

All she demonstrates and proves is that the ratio men-women was highly imbalanced - nothing new there - and that AM made up 10000 or maybe some more fake profiles, actually a quite low figure in comparison to the member figures.

And of course it's all over the media again as they just love those stories...

While I'd agree with a lot of that, stats like 'only 1,492 women had ever checked their messages' are hard to argue with.

It's one scandal that a high profile website is hacked and has its entire database downloaded.

It's an entirely different area of interest that it appears that greater than 99% of the active users on the site were male.

It's another scandal again that the site themselves may have created thousands of fake profiles on their own systems.

I'd say it's newsworthy personally. "

Its been going on for years that some sites would create "bots" to get people to spend. Interesting maybe, newsworthy not sure.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It doesn't really show men in a good light does it? Car crash.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *etmebeurfantasyWoman
over a year ago

My town


"Did anyone else here ever get 100s of fabs or winks from obviously fake accounts with usernames like wrytrjyrh usually from uk or wales all done at the same time?

Seemed like some glitch in a fake profile making programme or something to me

"
someone setting up fake profiles just to send winks or fabs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I always fancied those fembots in the 007 and Austin Powers films.

Does this now mean that I'm never going to smell the heavy odour of gun smoke and oil in the air as I bonk her from behind wearing my earmuffs?? and yes I will remember to bring my stilts to compensate for the high heels on her thighboots.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *j47Man
over a year ago

limerick


"It doesn't really show men in a good light does it? Car crash."

Awe now we are not all bad

As midnight said women didn't need to register with a credit card as the free aspect was used by the site to lure women on they only had tp pay to have details removed. where as men are in plenty supply so it made its major money off them going on the figures of 11 million men and 2400 women would have had the women walking around with matresses strapped to their backs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Any way you look at it. Even looking very conservatively at this data, the male to female ratio there is very very very poor.

Men of fab, feel happy with your lot. It could be worse.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It doesn't really show men in a good light does it? Car crash.

Awe now we are not all bad

As midnight said women didn't need to register with a credit card as the free aspect was used by the site to lure women on they only had tp pay to have details removed. where as men are in plenty supply so it made its major money off them going on the figures of 11 million men and 2400 women would have had the women walking around with matresses strapped to their backs "

Of course you're not all bad CJ. I'm just thinking the way it's going is taking the focus off the enablers & pointing at the men almost like "well if they're that gullible who are we to stop them?".

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I thought the AM site owners were mailed and told to take down the site because of this. That basically the majority of women users didn't exist and that the male users were being duped out of money for a service that didn't have the female users it advertised. AM site owners refused and the hackers did what they said they would do and reveal the e-mail ads of their users. I didn't get the impression the hackers were out to name and shame but only to highlight the behind the scene false advertising for gain.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I thought the AM site owners were mailed and told to take down the site because of this. That basically the majority of women users didn't exist and that the male users were being duped out of money for a service that didn't have the female users it advertised. AM site owners refused and the hackers did what they said they would do and reveal the e-mail ads of their users. I didn't get the impression the hackers were out to name and shame but only to highlight the behind the scene false advertising for gain. "

Ah! That sounds very plausible. A disgruntled site user who realised it was a sham instead of a moral crusader on very boggy high ground.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hocko87Man
over a year ago

dublin

Most of those site have fake women to entice guys on cos d women r free but it's d men who have to pay so that's where they make d money from scamming us guys

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *j47Man
over a year ago

limerick


"Any way you look at it. Even looking very conservatively at this data, the male to female ratio there is very very very poor.

Men of fab, feel happy with your lot. It could be worse. "

I alwYs liks feeling my lot it could be bigger but it makes me happy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I thought the AM site owners were mailed and told to take down the site because of this. That basically the majority of women users didn't exist and that the male users were being duped out of money for a service that didn't have the female users it advertised. AM site owners refused and the hackers did what they said they would do and reveal the e-mail ads of their users. I didn't get the impression the hackers were out to name and shame but only to highlight the behind the scene false advertising for gain.

Ah! That sounds very plausible. A disgruntled site user who realised it was a sham instead of a moral crusader on very boggy high ground. "

It could be a disgruntled site user or maybe someone not connected to AM but clever enough just to sit back and prove that the majority of female members don't exist. I've a feeling other sites that run in the same manner will be a little panicked.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *j47Man
over a year ago

limerick


"It doesn't really show men in a good light does it? Car crash.

Awe now we are not all bad

As midnight said women didn't need to register with a credit card as the free aspect was used by the site to lure women on they only had tp pay to have details removed. where as men are in plenty supply so it made its major money off them going on the figures of 11 million men and 2400 women would have had the women walking around with matresses strapped to their backs

Of course you're not all bad CJ. I'm just thinking the way it's going is taking the focus off the enablers & pointing at the men almost like "well if they're that gullible who are we to stop them?"."

In all fairness candy if u meet an ass in the middle of the road ur entitled to kick him. Any site where u sign up and have immediate cock hungry women in ur area looking to meet now once u give us ur credit card should sound alarm bells

, if guys think with their cocks and divulge personal info on an unsecured site it kind of meets the ass requirment however I do feel for the ones they have hurt trough their stupidity

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I read somewhere last year that the proportion of female to male on,for want of a better word "hookup" sites is around 13%.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oghunter33Woman
over a year ago

on the hill NordWest of


"I read somewhere last year that the proportion of female to male on,for want of a better word "hookup" sites is around 13%."

Taking the only precise figure of members having paid to delete their profile, the ratio men - women is 14% which would be in line with that quoted above and most likely the ratio of active members +- a few percent.

All the other figures are to vague to make any useful conclusions respectively doubtful in general as they are created by programming loops which are prone to programming flaws, while a payment is a fact.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *randub69Man
over a year ago

city


"I read somewhere last year that the proportion of female to male on,for want of a better word "hookup" sites is around 13%.

Taking the only precise figure of members having paid to delete their profile, the ratio men - women is 14% which would be in line with that quoted above and most likely the ratio of active members +- a few percent.

All the other figures are to vague to make any useful conclusions respectively doubtful in general as they are created by programming loops which are prone to programming flaws, while a payment is a fact.

"

better off going to lisdoonvarna at least you can see what your dealing with.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *j47Man
over a year ago

limerick


"I read somewhere last year that the proportion of female to male on,for want of a better word "hookup" sites is around 13%.

Taking the only precise figure of members having paid to delete their profile, the ratio men - women is 14% which would be in line with that quoted above and most likely the ratio of active members +- a few percent.

All the other figures are to vague to make any useful conclusions respectively doubtful in general as they are created by programming loops which are prone to programming flaws, while a payment is a fact.

better off going to lisdoonvarna at least you can see what your dealing with."

And the charges are up front no credit cards there

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's a bit like the Simpsons episode when Homer rings a sex chat line and after 15 minutes of intro ends up chatting to Apoo and Chief Wigam.......

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"OK.. you know this affair site that was hacked. Someone downloaded the data that was put on the internet. They analysed the data. They figured out that statistically 0% of the active users were women, and 100% were men. That means less than half a percentage women. "

I know I didn't sleep well but who then were the men chatting to?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

I'd imagine the guys were sending message after message to the small number of women on the site. Probably a lot of these women were inactive (and some totally fake) profiles.

I'm sure the truth about the number of real active female profiles lies somewhere in the middle. The only ones who have full access are the site themselves and they have proven to be totally untrustworthy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Internet 101: There are no women on the internet.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *obbie65Man
over a year ago

kildare

I like fake women

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top