FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Ireland

marriage equality

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

now that we have marriage equality.

was just wondering how two lesbians might consummate their marriage.

traditionally this would involve intercourse between a man and a woman.

just wondering.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"now that we have marriage equality.

was just wondering how two lesbians might consummate their marriage.

traditionally this would involve intercourse between a man and a woman.

just wondering. "

Seriously, come on dude, dont be silly

Obviously theyll rent a man for the evening

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ichael McCarthyMan
over a year ago

Lucan


"now that we have marriage equality.

was just wondering how two lesbians might consummate their marriage.

traditionally this would involve intercourse between a man and a woman.

just wondering. "

There are phone numbers you can ring for smutty talk you know?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would suggest one lady might fuck the other same as one man might fuck another

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

a marriage can be legally annulled if it hasn't been consummated.

not being smutty

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"a marriage can be legally annulled if it hasn't been consummated.

not being smutty "

Yeah but why would you think they wouldn't have sex?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *j47Man
over a year ago

limerick


"a marriage can be legally annulled if it hasn't been consummated.

not being smutty "

In the eyes of the church or the state

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Google is great

The relevance of consummation in a civil marriage varies by jurisdiction. For example, under section 12 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, a refusal or inability to consummate a marriage is a ground of annulment in England and Wales,[2] but this only applies to heterosexual marriage, because Paragraph 4 of schedule 4 of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 specifically excludes non-consummation as a ground for the annulment of a same-sex marriage.[3] Other common law jurisdictions, such as Australia, have abolished the legal concept of consummation.[4] [5]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"

Google is great

The relevance of consummation in a civil marriage varies by jurisdiction. For example, under section 12 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, a refusal or inability to consummate a marriage is a ground of annulment in England

and Wales,[2] but this only applies to heterosexual marriage, because Paragraph 4 of schedule 4 of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 specifically excludes non-consummation as a ground for the annulment of a same-sex marriage.[3] Other common law jurisdictions, such as Australia, have abolished the legal concept of consummation.[4] [5][/ "

that May be true. but we have voted to change the constitution not the law.

this might all come up again.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Google is great

The relevance of consummation in a civil marriage varies by jurisdiction. For example, under section 12 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, a refusal or inability to consummate a marriage is a ground of annulment in England

and Wales,[2] but this only applies to heterosexual marriage, because Paragraph 4 of schedule 4 of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 specifically excludes non-consummation as a ground for the annulment of a same-sex marriage.[3] Other common law jurisdictions, such as Australia, have abolished the legal concept of consummation.[4] [5][/

that May be true. but we have voted to change the constitution not the law.

this might all come up again. "

To be fair my answer didn't really answer your question cos none of those are irish acts lol

Google failed me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ardy cowboyMan
over a year ago

every wheat field around Midlands


"

Google is great

The relevance of consummation in a civil marriage varies by jurisdiction. For example, under section 12 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, a refusal or inability to consummate a marriage is a ground of annulment in England and Wales,[2] but this only applies to heterosexual marriage, because Paragraph 4 of schedule 4 of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 specifically excludes non-consummation as a ground for the annulment of a same-sex marriage.[3] Other common law jurisdictions, such as Australia, have abolished the legal concept of consummation.[4] [5]"
you must have brains to burn.with all that info.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osafewordneededMan
over a year ago

City

In Ireland the law was not changed, the constitution was.

Meaning if they cant consummate the marriage it can be voided. They will be cleaning up the law for years to come over it.

The government will have to fix all the laws because Ireland voted that one of the most important things in Ireland is two people married, and the Irish government should zealously protect their rights.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *j47Man
over a year ago

limerick


"

Google is great

The relevance of consummation in a civil marriage varies by jurisdiction. For example, under section 12 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, a refusal or inability to consummate a marriage is a ground of annulment in England

and Wales,[2] but this only applies to heterosexual marriage, because Paragraph 4 of schedule 4 of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 specifically excludes non-consummation as a ground for the annulment of a same-sex marriage.[3] Other common law jurisdictions, such as Australia, have abolished the legal concept of consummation.[4] [5][/

that May be true. but we have voted to change the constitution not the law.

this might all come up again. "

And now the constitutional change is happening its up to the law makers to amend the law to stay within the constitution

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Google is great

The relevance of consummation in a civil marriage varies by jurisdiction. For example, under section 12 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, a refusal or inability to consummate a marriage is a ground of annulment in England and Wales,[2] but this only applies to heterosexual marriage, because Paragraph 4 of schedule 4 of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 specifically excludes non-consummation as a ground for the annulment of a same-sex marriage.[3] Other common law jurisdictions, such as Australia, have abolished the legal concept of consummation.[4] [5]you must have brains to burn.with all that info."

No I googled. But I googled incorrect legislation for Ireland lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"

Google is great

The relevance of consummation in a civil marriage varies by jurisdiction. For example, under section 12 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, a refusal or inability to consummate a marriage is a ground of annulment in England

and Wales,[2] but this only applies to heterosexual marriage, because Paragraph 4 of schedule 4 of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 specifically excludes non-consummation as a ground for the annulment of a same-sex marriage.[3] Other common law jurisdictions, such as Australia, have abolished the legal concept of consummation.[4] [5][/

that May be true. but we have voted to change the constitution not the law.

this might all come up again.

And now the constitutional change is happening its up to the law makers to amend the law to stay within the constitution"

that the hard part that could be argued over for a while to come through the courts.

we could end up voting to change the constitution again to fix it properly

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osafewordneededMan
over a year ago

City

This is why I wanted to remove marriage from the constitution, for straight people to step down a rung on the ladder to be equal with gay people, not bring gay people up to the shaky rung with them.

Marriage in the constitution is a load of nonsense if you ask me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"now that we have marriage equality.

was just wondering how two lesbians might consummate their marriage.

traditionally this would involve intercourse between a man and a woman.

just wondering. "

I guess with a post like this you don't believe in equality !!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"now that we have marriage equality.

was just wondering how two lesbians might consummate their marriage.

traditionally this would involve intercourse between a man and a woman.

just wondering.

I guess with a post like this you don't believe in equality !! "

incorrect.

voted for it.

just worried about its workability in law.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *j47Man
over a year ago

limerick


"

Google is great

The relevance of consummation in a civil marriage varies by jurisdiction. For example, under section 12 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, a refusal or inability to consummate a marriage is a ground of annulment in England

and Wales,[2] but this only applies to heterosexual marriage, because Paragraph 4 of schedule 4 of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 specifically excludes non-consummation as a ground for the annulment of a same-sex marriage.[3] Other common law jurisdictions, such as Australia, have abolished the legal concept of consummation.[4] [5][/

that May be true. but we have voted to change the constitution not the law.

this might all come up again.

And now the constitutional change is happening its up to the law makers to amend the law to stay within the constitution

that the hard part that could be argued over for a while to come through the courts.

we could end up voting to change the constitution again to fix it properly "

No the constitution is the base stone for the law and the law reflects that or is changed to uphold it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"now that we have marriage equality.

was just wondering how two lesbians might consummate their marriage.

traditionally this would involve intercourse between a man and a woman.

just wondering.

Wonder or indeed wander I say... your initial post screams... well you decide. My lesson is think before you post....... bi !!!

I guess with a post like this you don't believe in equality !!

incorrect.

voted for it.

just worried about its workability in law."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This is why I wanted to remove marriage from the constitution, for straight people to step down a rung on the ladder to be equal with gay people, not bring gay people up to the shaky rung with them.

Marriage in the constitution is a load of nonsense if you ask me."

Our Constitution is old, do we still want/need to live under a document that was written what, nearly 80 years ago? Do things just change on the surface and need amending, is our general way of life still the same as then?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"now that we have marriage equality.

was just wondering how two lesbians might consummate their marriage.

traditionally this would involve intercourse between a man and a woman.

just wondering. "
...strapon...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top