Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Ireland |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I read the article last night and I'll be truthful, just reading about it made my brain hurt. I felt like I needed a diagram or some sort of crib sheet, and it all felt a bit like hard work. The "feelings are not facts" part made me uncomfortable for several reasons." I found the article and I thought much the same. It's hard to read and understand. I feel it would have been better written by someone from the outside looking in as an editorial rather than the insiders own voice. Seems like a little bit of being radical to be radical, and I'd have liked a bit more about how it feels rather than seemingly attempting to tick off all the buzzwords (and inventing a few new ones). | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I read the article last night and I'll be truthful, just reading about it made my brain hurt. I felt like I needed a diagram or some sort of crib sheet, and it all felt a bit like hard work. The "feelings are not facts" part made me uncomfortable for several reasons." Well I did read it twice second time round understood more, but I have been reading up on this anyway. Also comes across as a very U.S. structured story, like the new type terminologies used. Found it interesting enough to wonder how it would work socially in this part of the world. Thank you for taking the time to read and comment tho | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I read the article last night and I'll be truthful, just reading about it made my brain hurt. I felt like I needed a diagram or some sort of crib sheet, and it all felt a bit like hard work. The "feelings are not facts" part made me uncomfortable for several reasons. I found the article and I thought much the same. It's hard to read and understand. I feel it would have been better written by someone from the outside looking in as an editorial rather than the insiders own voice. Seems like a little bit of being radical to be radical, and I'd have liked a bit more about how it feels rather than seemingly attempting to tick off all the buzzwords (and inventing a few new ones). " Yes agreed, also it did seem all pros too I'm sure there are negative point as with all social structures, None mentioned really! Still thank you for taking the time and your comment. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |