FabSwingers.com forum: Who do you the BBC presenter will be when they are named...

By *andsomelad OP Man
over a year ago

belfast

Thought and ideas

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

My thoughts are I'll not be rushing to add to the distress of those who've already had the public finger pointed at them wrongly.

It has no bearing on my life and I'm sure when the BBC HR team have concluded their investigation into the allegations the person will be named if it's appropriate to do so.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ohng69Man
over a year ago

athenry

"My thoughts are I'll not be rushing to add to the distress of those who've already had the public finger pointed at them wrongly.

It has no bearing on my life and I'm sure when the BBC HR team have concluded their investigation into the allegations the person will be named if it's appropriate to do so."
well said

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *andsomelad OP Man
over a year ago

belfast

Very good thought, and wonderfully said to always see a different perspective. It is quite a strange a subject, as BBC not releasing any names untill investigation has been been conducted. Which is also pretty clever.

Maybe I should of rephrased the question; thankyou for the input

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *andsomelad OP Man
over a year ago

belfast

I agree John, always wonderful to have open discussions.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Very good thought, and wonderfully said to always see a different perspective. It is quite a strange a subject, as BBC not releasing any names untill investigation has been been conducted. Which is also pretty clever.

Maybe I should of rephrased the question; thankyou for the input

No it's not clever, it's standard HR procedure. An investigation should be carried out impartially. The employer has a duty of care to the employee which is why

a) the employee will be suspended on full pay pending investigation

and

b) the employee won't be named

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *og-ManMan
over a year ago

somewhere

Please don't name anyone on here

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *andsomelad OP Man
over a year ago

belfast

Maybe I should of rephrased the question; thankyou for the input

No it's not clever, it's standard HR procedure. An investigation should be carried out impartially. The employer has a duty of care to the employee which is why

a) the employee will be suspended on full pay pending investigation

and

b) the employee won't be named"

Interesting, also valid point

, thankyou for the replies which have been very educational and actually not meaning anything personal.

Just interested in healthy conversation on a sensitive topic.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *andR2019Couple
over a year ago

Nunya

I’ve seen a name banded around as the person in question and seen their behaviour online before, so not shocked but I also don’t care and see why it’s anyone else business.

Although if it did indeed start at 17, I wouldn’t be shocked if the police didn’t chap the door soon, if they’ve not already chapped it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *angero3aMan
over a year ago

swords

yes do not name any one seem some all named not fair if the wrong person

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *andsomelad OP Man
over a year ago

belfast

"I’ve seen a name banded around as the person in question and seen their behaviour online before, so not shocked but I also don’t care and see why it’s anyone else business.

Although if it did indeed start at 17, I wouldn’t be shocked if the police didn’t chap the door soon, if they’ve not already chapped it."

If I could re-word the question that would better but I'm not sure how to be fair.

Was looking more options on the matter, I do like a healthy debate and always open to everyone's views.

If there is a way to modify the question please feel free to let me know.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *andsomelad OP Man
over a year ago

belfast

"yes do not name any one seem some all named not fair if the wrong person "

Couldn't agree more, was badly worded and actually some valid points. Not sure how to rename the topic to just get thought on the situation.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *andR2019Couple
over a year ago

Nunya

"I’ve seen a name banded around as the person in question and seen their behaviour online before, so not shocked but I also don’t care and see why it’s anyone else business.

Although if it did indeed start at 17, I wouldn’t be shocked if the police didn’t chap the door soon, if they’ve not already chapped it.

If I could re-word the question that would better but I'm not sure how to be fair.

Was looking more options on the matter, I do like a healthy debate and always open to everyone's views.

If there is a way to modify the question please feel free to let me know.

I wasn’t having a dig btw. Just saying that there’s one prominent name now but I don’t see why people really care. It’s not like it affects anyone bar the person they paid for the photos.

I’m sure they’ll come out themselves and explain their pov soon enough, similar to Philip Schofield.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *andsomelad OP Man
over a year ago

belfast

"I’ve seen a name banded around as the person in question and seen their behaviour online before, so not shocked but I also don’t care and see why it’s anyone else business.

Although if it did indeed start at 17, I wouldn’t be shocked if the police didn’t chap the door soon, if they’ve not already chapped it.

If I could re-word the question that would better but I'm not sure how to be fair.

Was looking more options on the matter, I do like a healthy debate and always open to everyone's views.

If there is a way to modify the question please feel free to let me know.

I wasn’t having a dig btw. Just saying that there’s one prominent name now but I don’t see why people really care. It’s not like it affects anyone bar the person they paid for the photos.

I’m sure they’ll come out themselves and explain their pov soon enough, similar to Philip Schofield.

I know you weren't my friend that's grand. But your correct. That's why this questione is like playing devil's advocate. But does get some great responses.

Hope everybody had a fab weekend and have a beautiful week

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *adrarfjordr VoyeurMan
over a year ago

Waterford

Police have come out and said they are not investigating the individual concerned and that nothing illegal appears to have happened.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ohng69Man
over a year ago

athenry

"Police have come out and said they are not investigating the individual concerned and that nothing illegal appears to have happened. "
that's a good reason for not naming names

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *hyeyesMan
over a year ago

meath

Who is it ?

Give me a clue ...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *asual777Man
over a year ago

i travel all over

There is a spectrum of possible events . Absolutely anything is possible here from a family seeking a media war to generate as much money to possible (even though it might be much a do about nothing) , to something ethically dubious but not illegal, all the way to something illegal .

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *unlinguyMan
over a year ago

South Dublin

Heard on radio last night that the "child" at the time had their solicitor come out with a statement to claim that what the parents are claiming happened actually never happened.. saying the parents are wrong.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *vgloryholebs16TV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol.

Maybe I should of rephrased the question; thankyou for the input

No it's not clever, it's standard HR procedure. An investigation should be carried out impartially. The employer has a duty of care to the employee which is why

a) the employee will be suspended on full pay pending investigation

and

b) the employee won't be named"

Although the employee won't be named, everyone in the BBC building knows who it is..Are they sworn to secrecy??

I think it's quite natural for people to wonder and guess who it might be..household name etc.

It may not affect my life and have little to do with me , but I am still intrigued and discuss it with friends and family....

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Of course.

The issue, when it's brought to online platforms, is that mud sticks. Worse still, some newspapers are peddling the story with impunity - for example deliberately putting the photo of someone who the rumour mongers fancied it was, without any proof, alongside their headline on the story - causing emotional distress and potentially damaging people's careers.

On Twitter particularly, it's being treated almost like a game. Names are being thrown about without any foundation. It's unfair and cruel.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ursecretmischiefCouple
over a year ago

The West

"Heard on radio last night that the "child" at the time had their solicitor come out with a statement to claim that what the parents are claiming happened actually never happened.. saying the parents are wrong. "

This has come out just yesterday and when you consider the parents first port of call was The Sun, its understandable that people will now draw their own conclusions about what might be going on here....Still all just hearsay, either way!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *an25Man
over a year ago

Newtownabbey

I think we shouldn't forget it's the Sun newspaper reporting on this they aren't well renowned for accuracy and just want a big headline to make a few £££s

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *unlinguyMan
over a year ago

South Dublin

I fully agree with you, and guilty or not.. its gonna stick because no matter what there will be people who will always say guilty..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *og-ManMan
over a year ago

somewhere

I think at this stage most people know who it is and who it isn't

Looking at some of the 4 stories that are being told now about the star

First one seems to be someone with an O.F account and got paid accordingly

O.F is over 18s so he assumed he was legal

Second one ...adult male gets chatting to another Adult male on a gay hook up app

Then the Adult male threatened the BBC star by mentioning going public and gets fucked out of it by The BBC star...wouldn't blame him

Touch of homophobia about the whole thing

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I think at this stage most people know who it is and who it isn't

Looking at some of the 4 stories that are being told now about the star

First one seems to be someone with an O.F account and got paid accordingly

O.F is over 18s so he assumed he was legal

Second one ...adult male gets chatting to another Adult male on a gay hook up app

Then the Adult male threatened the BBC star by mentioning going public and gets fucked out of it by The BBC star...wouldn't blame him

Touch of homophobia about the whole thing "

Exactly BM. I'm kinda at the point now where I'm wondering what all the fuss is about. But hey, it's The Sun.

As an aside, I had to explain to my 75 year old stepfather today what OF is. "35 grand to take my shirt off!?!" he says "They'd need to be paying a lot more than that to see my fine physique!"

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ilthyNightsCouple
over a year ago

East / North, Cork

"I think at this stage most people know who it is and who it isn't

Looking at some of the 4 stories that are being told now about the star

First one seems to be someone with an O.F account and got paid accordingly

O.F is over 18s so he assumed he was legal

Second one ...adult male gets chatting to another Adult male on a gay hook up app

Then the Adult male threatened the BBC star by mentioning going public and gets fucked out of it by The BBC star...wouldn't blame him

Touch of homophobia about the whole thing "

That's pretty much my take on it also

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *og-ManMan
over a year ago

somewhere

So for those naming Graham Norton as the sure thing you can put your homophobia away now as the man has been named now by his wife

Can't be easy for them as a family

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ew dublinMan
over a year ago

Dublin

Just been named in sun newspaper online

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So for those naming Graham Norton as the sure thing you can put your homophobia away now as the man has been named now by his wife

Can't be easy for them as a family"

Indeed. Especially since the Met have confirmed there is no criminal case to be answered.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *astelloWoman
over a year ago

Far far away

The wife just confirmed Huw Edwards now. News presenter

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *asual777Man
over a year ago

i travel all over

Terribly sad . No lessons learnt after Caroline flack

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *amieLDN22Man
over a year ago

London

Stories like this make you realise that giving everyone a smartphone was a really bad idea.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *thloneros38Man
over a year ago

athlone/roscommon

"So for those naming Graham Norton as the sure thing you can put your homophobia away now as the man has been named now by his wife

Can't be easy for them as a family"
(bog... man )can you really say your a nice person i cant really see it theres a mike not to far behind you either both causing bother on here

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So for those naming Graham Norton as the sure thing you can put your homophobia away now as the man has been named now by his wife

Can't be easy for them as a family (bog... man )can you really say your a nice person i cant really see it theres a mike not to far behind you either both causing bother on here

He actually is

I don't see how this is causing bother either

There was a post earlier in the thread naming - wrongly - Graham Norton. It was reported and removed. For me it's that post that was the bothersome one

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ursecretmischiefCouple
over a year ago

The West

As always, if it's first reported in The Sun, then it's most likely a lie.

Yet some people will still belive it. That paper has a target audience. If you are to ever find yourself in that audience, you probably need to take a step back and reevaluate!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *hyeyesMan
over a year ago

meath

"So for those naming Graham Norton as the sure thing you can put your homophobia away now as the man has been named now by his wife

Can't be easy for them as a family (bog... man )can you really say your a nice person i cant really see it theres a mike not to far behind you either both causing bother on here

He actually is

I don't see how this is causing bother either

There was a post earlier in the thread naming - wrongly - Graham Norton. It was reported and removed. For me it's that post that was the bothersome one "

Nortons is a respected author . I felt it was 'fake news' when his name was speculated

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ilthyNightsCouple
over a year ago

East / North, Cork

I'm sure the sun did really well out of this and got a nice little sales uplift.... But it's a sad loss for nearly everyone else

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *etmebeurfantasyWoman
over a year ago

My town

Bbc is always around predators

Jimmy Saville for one the BBC turned a blind eye to that.

The sun always has the sleezy stories Rupert Murdoch isn't a Saint either.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ichael McCarthyMan
over a year ago

Lucan

"So for those naming Graham Norton as the sure thing you can put your homophobia away now as the man has been named now by his wife

Can't be easy for them as a family (bog... man )can you really say your a nice person i cant really see it theres a mike not to far behind you either both causing bother on here

Wait.. Is that me you're talking about?

You're clearly trolling but you're not very good at it.

Carry on though. It's amusing.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *og-ManMan
over a year ago

somewhere

"Bbc is always around predators

Jimmy Saville for one the BBC turned a blind eye to that.

The sun always has the sleezy stories Rupert Murdoch isn't a Saint either. "

There's a few Tory M.P 's being investigated for r.ape so they had to get them off the front page

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *og-ManMan
over a year ago

somewhere

"So for those naming Graham Norton as the sure thing you can put your homophobia away now as the man has been named now by his wife

Can't be easy for them as a family (bog... man )can you really say your a nice person i cant really see it theres a mike not to far behind you either both causing bother on here

Wait.. Is that me you're talking about?

You're clearly trolling but you're not very good at it.

Carry on though. It's amusing.

I thought he meant a microphone

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So for those naming Graham Norton as the sure thing you can put your homophobia away now as the man has been named now by his wife

Can't be easy for them as a family (bog... man )can you really say your a nice person i cant really see it theres a mike not to far behind you either both causing bother on here

Wait.. Is that me you're talking about?

You're clearly trolling but you're not very good at it.

Carry on though. It's amusing.

I thought he meant a microphone

Mike drop

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rish In DubaiMan
over a year ago

Carlow

"I’ve seen a name banded around as the person in question and seen their behaviour online before, so not shocked but I also don’t care and see why it’s anyone else business.

Although if it did indeed start at 17, I wouldn’t be shocked if the police didn’t chap the door soon, if they’ve not already chapped it."

Why? The legal age in the uk is 16.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rish In DubaiMan
over a year ago

Carlow

Think it's important to note, they did nothing wrong or unlawful yet.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *og-ManMan
over a year ago

somewhere

"I’ve seen a name banded around as the person in question and seen their behaviour online before, so not shocked but I also don’t care and see why it’s anyone else business.

Although if it did indeed start at 17, I wouldn’t be shocked if the police didn’t chap the door soon, if they’ve not already chapped it.

Why? The legal age in the uk is 16."

The legal age for sharing photo's online is 18

Back in the day The sun newspaper ran a counter on page 3 to count down to a young school girls 16th birthday so she was 15

On her 16th birthday Sam Fox made her debut as a page 3 girl but the pics were taken when she was 15

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rish In DubaiMan
over a year ago

Carlow

"I’ve seen a name banded around as the person in question and seen their behaviour online before, so not shocked but I also don’t care and see why it’s anyone else business.

Although if it did indeed start at 17, I wouldn’t be shocked if the police didn’t chap the door soon, if they’ve not already chapped it.

Why? The legal age in the uk is 16.

The legal age for sharing photo's online is 18

Back in the day The sun newspaper ran a counter on page 3 to count down to a young school girls 16th birthday so she was 15

On her 16th birthday Sam Fox made her debut as a page 3 girl but the pics were taken when she was 15 "

I wasn't aware the photos were shared online.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *etmebeurfantasyWoman
over a year ago

My town

"Bbc is always around predators

Jimmy Saville for one the BBC turned a blind eye to that.

The sun always has the sleezy stories Rupert Murdoch isn't a Saint either.

There's a few Tory M.P 's being investigated for r.ape so they had to get them off the front page "
murdoch and news International sure murdoch was friends with Robert maxwell and his daughter you mean to tell me he didn't know bout jeffrey epstein. Its all corrupt. And again the sun was gonna out philip scofield then the story changed to him coming out as gay. Nothing against him being gay but the story with the young runner than was forgotten about.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ORDERMANMan
over a year ago

wrexham

Celebrity morals...

One thinks in era of social media we live in today...

If we become celebrities is it best to to have only a vanilla sex life...

If you are celebrity and enjoy kinky sex/swinging sex run the risk of being exposed...

Everyone has kinks in the bedroom providing they're legal...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ildGroverMan
over a year ago

rathfarnham

One of the complaints against him was that he got aggressive when the third party threatened to out him...

Well duh....

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *acob12369Man
over a year ago

URPANTS

"So for those naming Graham Norton as the sure thing you can put your homophobia away now as the man has been named now by his wife

Can't be easy for them as a family (bog... man )can you really say your a nice person i cant really see it theres a mike not to far behind you either both causing bother on here

He actually is

I don't see how this is causing bother either

There was a post earlier in the thread naming - wrongly - Graham Norton. It was reported and removed. For me it's that post that was the bothersome one

Nortons is a respected author . I felt it was 'fake news' when his name was speculated "

Everyone is respected until the truth about one comes out. Jimmy saville was respected too.

Sure this BBC guy nameais all over the media now. His wife named him sure.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"One of the complaints against him was that he got aggressive when the third party threatened to out him...

Well duh...."

Yep he apparently sent sweary messages...like who wouldn't?!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread