FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Ireland

Orgy

Jump to newest
 

By *asual777 OP   Man
over a year ago

i travel all over

By this I mean a minimum of two people of each gender and a minimum of 5 people in Total. This is to differentiate it from a gangbang , reverse gangbang . 3sum and 4sum.

Who are you inviting for your fantasy one ? No corklad you can’t make love to yourself 4 times

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aucyladMan
over a year ago

Dublin

Can Corklad make love to himself 3 times and then invite another?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *astelloWoman
over a year ago

Far far away

Probably make love 5 times and go back for seconds

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aucyladMan
over a year ago

Dublin


"Probably make love 5 times and go back for seconds "

He might just love langer.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asual777 OP   Man
over a year ago

i travel all over


"Can Corklad make love to himself 3 times and then invite another?!"

Auto love making not allowed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Out

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Out "

I'll be giving or getting allll the orgasms tyvm

I don't share well

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asual777 OP   Man
over a year ago

i travel all over

Sharing is caring

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sharing is caring "

Not in my book

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sharing is caring

Not in my book "

Pretty sure the opposite is a requirement to be able to share.

Either you don't care about the person themselves as they're a random or you don't care who your partner chooses to share their body with

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

if we satisfy ourselves at least someone is satisfied

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eard and BoobsCouple
over a year ago

Portstewart

An orgy would be fantastic maybe in the future we will build up to one but then again we like to ensure that we provide appropriate levels of pleasure for anyone who is invited to join us

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sharing is caring

Not in my book

Pretty sure the opposite is a requirement to be able to share.

Either you don't care about the person themselves as they're a random or you don't care who your partner chooses to share their body with "

Or there is mutual desire for group sex & you care enough to participate and share in your partner's enjoyment.

Or the group is carefully curated

Or any number of other scenarios where both are taking part willing & consensually for mutual pleasure and the pleasure of the other participants

One viewpoint doesn't constitute absolute truth

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sharing is caring

Not in my book

Pretty sure the opposite is a requirement to be able to share.

Either you don't care about the person themselves as they're a random or you don't care who your partner chooses to share their body with

Or there is mutual desire for group sex & you care enough to participate and share in your partner's enjoyment.

Or the group is carefully curated

Or any number of other scenarios where both are taking part willing & consensually for mutual pleasure and the pleasure of the other participants

One viewpoint doesn't constitute absolute truth"

Of course it doesn't, I did say 'in my book'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sharing is caring

Not in my book

Pretty sure the opposite is a requirement to be able to share.

Either you don't care about the person themselves as they're a random or you don't care who your partner chooses to share their body with

Or there is mutual desire for group sex & you care enough to participate and share in your partner's enjoyment.

Or the group is carefully curated

Or any number of other scenarios where both are taking part willing & consensually for mutual pleasure and the pleasure of the other participants

One viewpoint doesn't constitute absolute truth

Of course it doesn't, I did say 'in my book' "

But really, equally, nothing that you said makes what I said untrue. It would be agreed, but there would also be a lack of being bothered by it in order to tolerate it or enjoy it = 'not caring' about it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asual777 OP   Man
over a year ago

i travel all over


"Sharing is caring

Not in my book

Pretty sure the opposite is a requirement to be able to share.

Either you don't care about the person themselves as they're a random or you don't care who your partner chooses to share their body with

Or there is mutual desire for group sex & you care enough to participate and share in your partner's enjoyment.

Or the group is carefully curated

Or any number of other scenarios where both are taking part willing & consensually for mutual pleasure and the pleasure of the other participants

One viewpoint doesn't constitute absolute truth

Of course it doesn't, I did say 'in my book'

But really, equally, nothing that you said makes what I said untrue. It would be agreed, but there would also be a lack of being bothered by it in order to tolerate it or enjoy it = 'not caring' about it."

If both partners are interested in group sex there is no ‘tolerance’. It’s what they would be on this site to do . And sharing would be caring as it would involve their needs being met with other group sex enthusiasts , Whom they choose based on attraction .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sharing is caring

Not in my book

Pretty sure the opposite is a requirement to be able to share.

Either you don't care about the person themselves as they're a random or you don't care who your partner chooses to share their body with

Or there is mutual desire for group sex & you care enough to participate and share in your partner's enjoyment.

Or the group is carefully curated

Or any number of other scenarios where both are taking part willing & consensually for mutual pleasure and the pleasure of the other participants

One viewpoint doesn't constitute absolute truth

Of course it doesn't, I did say 'in my book'

But really, equally, nothing that you said makes what I said untrue. It would be agreed, but there would also be a lack of being bothered by it in order to tolerate it or enjoy it = 'not caring' about it.

If both partners are interested in group sex there is no ‘tolerance’. It’s what they would be on this site to do . And sharing would be caring as it would involve their needs being met with other group sex enthusiasts , Whom they choose based on attraction . "

For some? Yes

For all who participate? No

There are many who post on here about making compromises or 'taking one for the team'.

Each person draws their own line.

But I think there's a vast amount of 'tolerating' going on.

It's just hidden coz it's an unpopular reality.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't want to rain on the orgy parade so I'll leave the orgy-fans to their thing

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ilthyNightsCouple
over a year ago

East / North, Cork

Not for us

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top