Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Ireland |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Covering the event last week in Malone House - behind firewall so no more detail (I wouldn’t give a penny to that comic). Maybe someone can cut and paste? " It's named the organisers and location, apparently will be releasing pictures of attendees, as it's on public property they are entitled to if an investigation is launched. Woke brigade trying to scare people into not attending such partied. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo " Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles." Not being funny but the hosts have done nothing wrong in this they have tried to put their side across and make it clear that it wasn't some sort of sleezy party. No one is identifiable except the hosts! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. Not being funny but the hosts have done nothing wrong in this they have tried to put their side across and make it clear that it wasn't some sort of sleezy party. No one is identifiable except the hosts! " It's good to see you don't understand what swinging is. They have done wrong. And if you can't see it that's on you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles." What's ridiculous is the headline. Good on the hosts for counteracting it with fact. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. Not being funny but the hosts have done nothing wrong in this they have tried to put their side across and make it clear that it wasn't some sort of sleezy party. No one is identifiable except the hosts! It's good to see you don't understand what swinging is. They have done wrong. And if you can't see it that's on you." It was being put into the paper regardless so they were better to get their side across! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. What's ridiculous is the headline. Good on the hosts for counteracting it with fact. " Ok so sunday life were there they've countless pictures from the event. If an investigation is launched they can publish pictures without pixelation. Some people here are not going to want to public about their lifestyle. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. Not being funny but the hosts have done nothing wrong in this they have tried to put their side across and make it clear that it wasn't some sort of sleezy party. No one is identifiable except the hosts! It's good to see you don't understand what swinging is. They have done wrong. And if you can't see it that's on you. It was being put into the paper regardless so they were better to get their side across!" When you are met with negativity you don't engage the negativity. If negativity has you talking you are never winning. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. What's ridiculous is the headline. Good on the hosts for counteracting it with fact. Ok so sunday life were there they've countless pictures from the event. If an investigation is launched they can publish pictures without pixelation. Some people here are not going to want to public about their lifestyle. " Were they there? Do they have countless pictures? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. What's ridiculous is the headline. Good on the hosts for counteracting it with fact. Ok so sunday life were there they've countless pictures from the event. If an investigation is launched they can publish pictures without pixelation. Some people here are not going to want to public about their lifestyle. Were they there? Do they have countless pictures?"  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. Not being funny but the hosts have done nothing wrong in this they have tried to put their side across and make it clear that it wasn't some sort of sleezy party. No one is identifiable except the hosts! It's good to see you don't understand what swinging is. They have done wrong. And if you can't see it that's on you." It's good to see you've made a comment and have all the information and not just gone on what a scandal newspaper says. The hosts dealt with this in the best was possible and every guest was informed of the situation. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. What's ridiculous is the headline. Good on the hosts for counteracting it with fact. Ok so sunday life were there they've countless pictures from the event. If an investigation is launched they can publish pictures without pixelation. Some people here are not going to want to public about their lifestyle. Were they there? Do they have countless pictures? "What kind of answer is that supposed to be?? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. What's ridiculous is the headline. Good on the hosts for counteracting it with fact. Ok so sunday life were there they've countless pictures from the event. If an investigation is launched they can publish pictures without pixelation. Some people here are not going to want to public about their lifestyle. Were they there? Do they have countless pictures? "People are posting here without knowing what the situation is. BCC is investigating, in an active investigation pictures can be made public to identify those attending. This is under the control of BCC. Its not private. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. Not being funny but the hosts have done nothing wrong in this they have tried to put their side across and make it clear that it wasn't some sort of sleezy party. No one is identifiable except the hosts! It's good to see you don't understand what swinging is. They have done wrong. And if you can't see it that's on you. It's good to see you've made a comment and have all the information and not just gone on what a scandal newspaper says. The hosts dealt with this in the best was possible and every guest was informed of the situation." I'm 110% not going on what a scandal newspaper is saying haha | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. What's ridiculous is the headline. Good on the hosts for counteracting it with fact. Ok so sunday life were there they've countless pictures from the event. If an investigation is launched they can publish pictures without pixelation. Some people here are not going to want to public about their lifestyle. Were they there? Do they have countless pictures?
People are posting here without knowing what the situation is. BCC is investigating, in an active investigation pictures can be made public to identify those attending. This is under the control of BCC. Its not private."That's not what I asked. I asked how do you know that The Sunday Life were there and how do you know they have countless photos? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. What's ridiculous is the headline. Good on the hosts for counteracting it with fact. Ok so sunday life were there they've countless pictures from the event. If an investigation is launched they can publish pictures without pixelation. Some people here are not going to want to public about their lifestyle. Were they there? Do they have countless pictures?
People are posting here without knowing what the situation is. BCC is investigating, in an active investigation pictures can be made public to identify those attending. This is under the control of BCC. Its not private.
That's not what I asked. I asked how do you know that The Sunday Life were there and how do you know they have countless photos?"Because they posted a picture to twitter before the article broke last night then deleted and resubmitted that was very clearly taken of a bunch of people inside the event. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. Not being funny but the hosts have done nothing wrong in this they have tried to put their side across and make it clear that it wasn't some sort of sleezy party. No one is identifiable except the hosts! It's good to see you don't understand what swinging is. They have done wrong. And if you can't see it that's on you. It was being put into the paper regardless so they were better to get their side across! When you are met with negativity you don't engage the negativity. If negativity has you talking you are never winning." I haven’t read the article so I’m not going to comment on that but just on the negativity comment I feel that it should always be challenged. Negativity can’t be left the fester | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. Not being funny but the hosts have done nothing wrong in this they have tried to put their side across and make it clear that it wasn't some sort of sleezy party. No one is identifiable except the hosts! It's good to see you don't understand what swinging is. They have done wrong. And if you can't see it that's on you. It was being put into the paper regardless so they were better to get their side across! When you are met with negativity you don't engage the negativity. If negativity has you talking you are never winning. I haven’t read the article so I’m not going to comment on that but just on the negativity comment I feel that it should always be challenged. Negativity can’t be left the fester " Swinging isn't public, without a doubt some where at the event without their wider circles knowledge, if these are publicised after this engagement it could affect people's home lives. Professions. That's what I'm against. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. What's ridiculous is the headline. Good on the hosts for counteracting it with fact. Ok so sunday life were there they've countless pictures from the event. If an investigation is launched they can publish pictures without pixelation. Some people here are not going to want to public about their lifestyle. Were they there? Do they have countless pictures?
People are posting here without knowing what the situation is. BCC is investigating, in an active investigation pictures can be made public to identify those attending. This is under the control of BCC. Its not private.
That's not what I asked. I asked how do you know that The Sunday Life were there and how do you know they have countless photos?
Because they posted a picture to twitter before the article broke last night then deleted and resubmitted that was very clearly taken of a bunch of people inside the event."So not countless photos and no evidence the Sunday Life were there. Glad we got that cleared up 
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. What's ridiculous is the headline. Good on the hosts for counteracting it with fact. Ok so sunday life were there they've countless pictures from the event. If an investigation is launched they can publish pictures without pixelation. Some people here are not going to want to public about their lifestyle. Were they there? Do they have countless pictures?
People are posting here without knowing what the situation is. BCC is investigating, in an active investigation pictures can be made public to identify those attending. This is under the control of BCC. Its not private.
That's not what I asked. I asked how do you know that The Sunday Life were there and how do you know they have countless photos?
Because they posted a picture to twitter before the article broke last night then deleted and resubmitted that was very clearly taken of a bunch of people inside the event.
So not countless photos and no evidence the Sunday Life were there. Glad we got that cleared up
"Good deflection. Sadly the non sheep seen it for what it was a feeble attempt at publicity. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does anyone actually read the Sunday life?" Sadly yeah | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. What's ridiculous is the headline. Good on the hosts for counteracting it with fact. Ok so sunday life were there they've countless pictures from the event. If an investigation is launched they can publish pictures without pixelation. Some people here are not going to want to public about their lifestyle. Were they there? Do they have countless pictures?
People are posting here without knowing what the situation is. BCC is investigating, in an active investigation pictures can be made public to identify those attending. This is under the control of BCC. Its not private.
That's not what I asked. I asked how do you know that The Sunday Life were there and how do you know they have countless photos?
Because they posted a picture to twitter before the article broke last night then deleted and resubmitted that was very clearly taken of a bunch of people inside the event.
So not countless photos and no evidence the Sunday Life were there. Glad we got that cleared up
Good deflection. Sadly the non sheep seen it for what it was a feeble attempt at publicity."Ah yes. Roll out the sheep line when it's shown you know nothing about it really. So to dispel the scaremongering, the article says they have more than one photo. Two is more than one, yes? Not countless photos. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. What's ridiculous is the headline. Good on the hosts for counteracting it with fact. Ok so sunday life were there they've countless pictures from the event. If an investigation is launched they can publish pictures without pixelation. Some people here are not going to want to public about their lifestyle. Were they there? Do they have countless pictures?
People are posting here without knowing what the situation is. BCC is investigating, in an active investigation pictures can be made public to identify those attending. This is under the control of BCC. Its not private.
That's not what I asked. I asked how do you know that The Sunday Life were there and how do you know they have countless photos?
Because they posted a picture to twitter before the article broke last night then deleted and resubmitted that was very clearly taken of a bunch of people inside the event.
So not countless photos and no evidence the Sunday Life were there. Glad we got that cleared up
Good deflection. Sadly the non sheep seen it for what it was a feeble attempt at publicity.
Ah yes. Roll out the sheep line when it's shown you know nothing about it really.
So to dispel the scaremongering, the article says they have more than one photo. Two is more than one, yes? Not countless photos. "Oh so you're saying they only have 2 hahaha | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does anyone actually read the Sunday life?" I would if there was pics of u in it lol c | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. What's ridiculous is the headline. Good on the hosts for counteracting it with fact. Ok so sunday life were there they've countless pictures from the event. If an investigation is launched they can publish pictures without pixelation. Some people here are not going to want to public about their lifestyle. Were they there? Do they have countless pictures?
People are posting here without knowing what the situation is. BCC is investigating, in an active investigation pictures can be made public to identify those attending. This is under the control of BCC. Its not private.
That's not what I asked. I asked how do you know that The Sunday Life were there and how do you know they have countless photos?
Because they posted a picture to twitter before the article broke last night then deleted and resubmitted that was very clearly taken of a bunch of people inside the event.
So not countless photos and no evidence the Sunday Life were there. Glad we got that cleared up
Good deflection. Sadly the non sheep seen it for what it was a feeble attempt at publicity.
Ah yes. Roll out the sheep line when it's shown you know nothing about it really.
So to dispel the scaremongering, the article says they have more than one photo. Two is more than one, yes? Not countless photos.
Oh so you're saying they only have 2 hahaha"No I haven't said how many they have because I don't know. You're the one who has baselessly claimed they have countless photos. I'm calling you out on scaremongering attendees without any actual knowledge or facts | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read the article and don't know whether it was a good idea to do an interview from the hosts, brings extra spotlight to the event etc. Difficult situation imo Ridiculous from the hosts, attracting a light onto others who are anonymous in their lifestyles. What's ridiculous is the headline. Good on the hosts for counteracting it with fact. Ok so sunday life were there they've countless pictures from the event. If an investigation is launched they can publish pictures without pixelation. Some people here are not going to want to public about their lifestyle. Were they there? Do they have countless pictures?
People are posting here without knowing what the situation is. BCC is investigating, in an active investigation pictures can be made public to identify those attending. This is under the control of BCC. Its not private.
That's not what I asked. I asked how do you know that The Sunday Life were there and how do you know they have countless photos?
Because they posted a picture to twitter before the article broke last night then deleted and resubmitted that was very clearly taken of a bunch of people inside the event.
So not countless photos and no evidence the Sunday Life were there. Glad we got that cleared up
Good deflection. Sadly the non sheep seen it for what it was a feeble attempt at publicity.
Ah yes. Roll out the sheep line when it's shown you know nothing about it really.
So to dispel the scaremongering, the article says they have more than one photo. Two is more than one, yes? Not countless photos.
Oh so you're saying they only have 2 hahaha
No I haven't said how many they have because I don't know. You're the one who has baselessly claimed they have countless photos. I'm calling you out on scaremongering attendees without any actual knowledge or facts"Haha scaremongering OK | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Theres 2 pictures including the one from Twitter. People's faces are not shown Most people are facing away from the camera anyway It looks like a member of staff took the picture to be honest It was a good night,something different, Fab is not mentioned in the newspaper The organisers let us all know that the story would appear Nothing happened at the function Before anyone castigates the organisers we don't know the pressure they were under when they knew the story was coming out If they're reading this....thanks for a great night and sorry you've been hung out to dry " 100% BM | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think you’ll probably find those you consider ‘woke’ are far more in favour of sexual liberation than those considered anything but woke. A quick scan of the few comments under the story on their facebook page shows people just do not care." That’s what I was thinking. Tabloids have been running this sort of story as long as I can remember, long before anyone used the word “woke” to do with anything other than what you did before you got out of bed. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone got a link to the article. I haven't read that rag in years " It's behind a pay wall | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"as party organisers ourselves, who have had not only our events but also our personal life scandalised both in the press and on social media, we stand with the couple who planned the event. in terms of social events, nothing 'we' as organisers do, is in anyway wrong. We simply want to provide a safe fun environment for open minded adults to get to know each other. my understanding is that a member of staff 'worked it out' and instead of going to a supervisor or manager, went directly to the press. belfast council, will now spend time and money investigating a NON STORY! nothing illegal happened on council premises and the 'masque ball' took place as planned. so the attendees all follow a certain lifestyle... SO WHAT! that is no business of the press or BCC. for your information a copy of the front page has been added to the hedonismni facebook page. it will be deleted tomorrow. once again we stand with all party planners who work hard to provide places for us all to meet without being judged! " Wow.....48 months interest free credit at Harvey Norman!!  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"as party organisers ourselves, who have had not only our events but also our personal life scandalised both in the press and on social media, we stand with the couple who planned the event. in terms of social events, nothing 'we' as organisers do, is in anyway wrong. We simply want to provide a safe fun environment for open minded adults to get to know each other. my understanding is that a member of staff 'worked it out' and instead of going to a supervisor or manager, went directly to the press. belfast council, will now spend time and money investigating a NON STORY! nothing illegal happened on council premises and the 'masque ball' took place as planned. so the attendees all follow a certain lifestyle... SO WHAT! that is no business of the press or BCC. for your information a copy of the front page has been added to the hedonismni facebook page. it will be deleted tomorrow. once again we stand with all party planners who work hard to provide places for us all to meet without being judged! " I just checked it. I would have loved to be there!! I hope all parties and organisers can keep doing what they do for the people in this lifestyle to enjoy their sexuality as they freaking want. It’s about damn time to stop demonising sex. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
