Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Ireland |
| Jump to newest |  |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what I'm saying Sending unsolicited nudes to others is to be made illegal " Not sure how that's going to be policed on here, | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what I'm saying Sending unsolicited nudes to others is to be made illegal " The legislation at moment xovers sending pics of someone without the persons consent, so if you sned me a dick pic and I send it to someone else it's illegal. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what I'm saying Sending unsolicited nudes to others is to be made illegal The legislation at moment xovers sending pics of someone without the persons consent, so if you sned me a dick pic and I send it to someone else it's illegal. " Is that not classed as revenge porn and been out a while? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what I'm saying Sending unsolicited nudes to others is to be made illegal The legislation at moment xovers sending pics of someone without the persons consent, so if you sned me a dick pic and I send it to someone else it's illegal. Is that not classed as revenge porn and been out a while?" Yep Feb 21, think people are just becoming more aware of it as their are adverts running for it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what I'm saying Sending unsolicited nudes to others is to be made illegal The legislation at moment xovers sending pics of someone without the persons consent, so if you sned me a dick pic and I send it to someone else it's illegal. Is that not classed as revenge porn and been out a while? Yep Feb 21, think people are just becoming more aware of it as their are adverts running for it" I'm not 100% sure about it all but think it's been a thing in the North for a while. To rights this should of be done way before now. For to long people have been using others in their pics without that person's consent. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what I'm saying Sending unsolicited nudes to others is to be made illegal The legislation at moment xovers sending pics of someone without the persons consent, so if you sned me a dick pic and I send it to someone else it's illegal. Is that not classed as revenge porn and been out a while? Yep Feb 21, think people are just becoming more aware of it as their are adverts running for it I'm not 100% sure about it all but think it's been a thing in the North for a while. To rights this should of be done way before now. For to long people have been using others in their pics without that person's consent." Off the top of my head I think it has been on the cards since 2015 but never actually put into legislation by our friends on the hill. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what I'm saying Sending unsolicited nudes to others is to be made illegal The legislation at moment xovers sending pics of someone without the persons consent, so if you sned me a dick pic and I send it to someone else it's illegal. Is that not classed as revenge porn and been out a while? Yep Feb 21, think people are just becoming more aware of it as their are adverts running for it I'm not 100% sure about it all but think it's been a thing in the North for a while. To rights this should of be done way before now. For to long people have been using others in their pics without that person's consent. Off the top of my head I think it has been on the cards since 2015 but never actually put into legislation by our friends on the hill." I knew I read something about it ages ago wasn't sure if it was implemented or not. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what I'm saying Sending unsolicited nudes to others is to be made illegal The legislation at moment xovers sending pics of someone without the persons consent, so if you sned me a dick pic and I send it to someone else it's illegal. Is that not classed as revenge porn and been out a while? Yep Feb 21, think people are just becoming more aware of it as their are adverts running for it I'm not 100% sure about it all but think it's been a thing in the North for a while. To rights this should of be done way before now. For to long people have been using others in their pics without that person's consent. Off the top of my head I think it has been on the cards since 2015 but never actually put into legislation by our friends on the hill." Sorry my mistake. I know there had been issues with it. It had been in law since 2016 but no-one has ever been prosecuted. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what I'm saying Sending unsolicited nudes to others is to be made illegal The legislation at moment xovers sending pics of someone without the persons consent, so if you sned me a dick pic and I send it to someone else it's illegal. Is that not classed as revenge porn and been out a while? Yep Feb 21, think people are just becoming more aware of it as their are adverts running for it I'm not 100% sure about it all but think it's been a thing in the North for a while. To rights this should of be done way before now. For to long people have been using others in their pics without that person's consent. Off the top of my head I think it has been on the cards since 2015 but never actually put into legislation by our friends on the hill. Sorry my mistake. I know there had been issues with it. It had been in law since 2016 but no-one has ever been prosecuted. " Just reading further and there are conflicting reports. One says no prosecutions while another says there has been a successful prosecution. I know there was a hue and cry last year that because of Stormont dragging their heels it was having a knock-on effect on legislation. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what I'm saying Sending unsolicited nudes to others is to be made illegal The legislation at moment xovers sending pics of someone without the persons consent, so if you sned me a dick pic and I send it to someone else it's illegal. Is that not classed as revenge porn and been out a while? Yep Feb 21, think people are just becoming more aware of it as their are adverts running for it" https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/politics/arid-40985765.html | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Good job i read back I was about to send all me nudes to everyone before it happens.. phew..." Damn | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what I'm saying Sending unsolicited nudes to others is to be made illegal The legislation at moment xovers sending pics of someone without the persons consent, so if you sned me a dick pic and I send it to someone else it's illegal. Is that not classed as revenge porn and been out a while? Yep Feb 21, think people are just becoming more aware of it as their are adverts running for it https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/politics/arid-40985765.html" Interesting | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what I'm saying Sending unsolicited nudes to others is to be made illegal The legislation at moment xovers sending pics of someone without the persons consent, so if you sned me a dick pic and I send it to someone else it's illegal. Is that not classed as revenge porn and been out a while? Yep Feb 21, think people are just becoming more aware of it as their are adverts running for it https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/politics/arid-40985765.html Interesting" It might mage some difference but I wouldn't put much money on it. Paying for sex was made illegal but the figures don't seem to show that working either. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the ad, Legislation is in since Feb 21, If you record, distribute or publish intimate images without the permission of the person featured in the images. Not sure if receiving an unsolicited dick is considered illegal.just yet " Receiving and unsolicited dick is highly illegal... not sure about a pic ...  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what I'm saying Sending unsolicited nudes to others is to be made illegal Not sure how that's going to be policed on here, " It won't be ... its for people sending them out of context ..I'd imagine anyone one here is considered fare game .. probably not the legal term ... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what I'm saying Sending unsolicited nudes to others is to be made illegal The legislation at moment xovers sending pics of someone without the persons consent, so if you sned me a dick pic and I send it to someone else it's illegal. Is that not classed as revenge porn and been out a while? Yep Feb 21, think people are just becoming more aware of it as their are adverts running for it" this isn't what the op is referring too .. its a new law to stop people send pics of themselves to people who don't want them ... its the virtual version of public exposure law | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is some confusion here. There is the revenge porn passed some time ago, and then there is this new law which bans online flashing where someone is threatened or offended. 2 different laws" Yes 
Combined they make it illegal to send/share intimate photos unless all parties involved are consenting. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Goddammit am I going to have to quit sending people pictures of my meat on Insta? And here I thought it was nice tempting people with the sweet sizzling sight of bbq "Maybe disguised as a hotdog it might be ok  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what I'm saying Sending unsolicited nudes to others is to be made illegal The legislation at moment xovers sending pics of someone without the persons consent, so if you sned me a dick pic and I send it to someone else it's illegal. Is that not classed as revenge porn and been out a while? Yep Feb 21, think people are just becoming more aware of it as their are adverts running for itthis isn't what the op is referring too .. its a new law to stop people send pics of themselves to people who don't want them ... its the virtual version of public exposure law" If its the advert that I seen that op is referring to there is 2 parts yo the legislation and one states if a person shares an intimate pic of another person without said persons consent to cause harm etc And the second part is if a person is sent an intimate pic of another person without ehir consent but doesn't mean any malicious harm it is still an offence Have been doing some reading up on it for work. Thankfully it's about time something was brought into legislation unfortunately not enough people will report the incidents anyway but at least it's a start. Someone sending me a pic of their own dick isn't illegal but if saud person shared a pic of your dick without your consent they are in bother  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what I'm saying Sending unsolicited nudes to others is to be made illegal The legislation at moment xovers sending pics of someone without the persons consent, so if you sned me a dick pic and I send it to someone else it's illegal. Is that not classed as revenge porn and been out a while? Yep Feb 21, think people are just becoming more aware of it as their are adverts running for itthis isn't what the op is referring too .. its a new law to stop people send pics of themselves to people who don't want them ... its the virtual version of public exposure law If its the advert that I seen that op is referring to there is 2 parts yo the legislation and one states if a person shares an intimate pic of another person without said persons consent to cause harm etc And the second part is if a person is sent an intimate pic of another person without ehir consent but doesn't mean any malicious harm it is still an offence Have been doing some reading up on it for work. Thankfully it's about time something was brought into legislation unfortunately not enough people will report the incidents anyway but at least it's a start. Someone sending me a pic of their own dick isn't illegal but if saud person shared a pic of your dick without your consent they are in bother ""Someone sending me a pic of their own dick isn't illegal" Under the new law it will be a criminal offence if the recipient reports it as offensive. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Under the new law it will be a criminal offence if the recipient reports it as offensive. " This. In all seriousness this does raise some questions about sending ANY unsolicited intimate pics of yourself. If someone takes offence then you potentially committed a crime. It remains to be seen how and when this might be enforced / prosecuted | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's what I'm saying Sending unsolicited nudes to others is to be made illegal The legislation at moment xovers sending pics of someone without the persons consent, so if you sned me a dick pic and I send it to someone else it's illegal. Is that not classed as revenge porn and been out a while? Yep Feb 21, think people are just becoming more aware of it as their are adverts running for itthis isn't what the op is referring too .. its a new law to stop people send pics of themselves to people who don't want them ... its the virtual version of public exposure law If its the advert that I seen that op is referring to there is 2 parts yo the legislation and one states if a person shares an intimate pic of another person without said persons consent to cause harm etc And the second part is if a person is sent an intimate pic of another person without ehir consent but doesn't mean any malicious harm it is still an offence Have been doing some reading up on it for work. Thankfully it's about time something was brought into legislation unfortunately not enough people will report the incidents anyway but at least it's a start. Someone sending me a pic of their own dick isn't illegal but if saud person shared a pic of your dick without your consent they are in bother
"Someone sending me a pic of their own dick isn't illegal" Under the new law it will be a criminal offence if the recipient reports it as offensive. "So in other words guys stop sending ugly dick pics  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Under the new law it will be a criminal offence if the recipient reports it as offensive. This. In all seriousness this does raise some questions about sending ANY unsolicited intimate pics of yourself. If someone takes offence then you potentially committed a crime. It remains to be seen how and when this might be enforced / prosecuted" It's a tricky one alright. All open to interpretation really. Especially in today's society where people seem to be offended by anything at all. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's a tricky one alright. All open to interpretation really. Especially in today's society where people seem to be offended by anything at all. Its not tricky, not 'open to interpretation' and not a new offence. " I didn't say it wasn't a new offence, just saying im thinking it might be a bit messy in a court situation, hence tricky, and if you've ever been in a court of law you'll have found everything is argued to a matter of interpretation. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is some confusion here. There is the revenge porn passed some time ago, and then there is this new law which bans online flashing where someone is threatened or offended. 2 different laws Technically, unless all are consenting or none are offended! Yes
Combined they make it illegal to send/share intimate photos unless all parties involved are consenting." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is some confusion here. There is the revenge porn passed some time ago, and then there is this new law which bans online flashing where someone is threatened or offended. 2 different laws Yes
Combined they make it illegal to send/share intimate photos unless all parties involved are consenting."Technically, unless all are consenting or none are offended! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Good! Old folks sending nudes to teens is gross. " Hopefully they will apply some common sense and these will be the ones they go after | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Hopefully they will apply some common sense and these will be the ones they go after" Nope, Not only ‘those ones’ they need to go after…. The pathetic boyfriends sending their ex’s photos and videos to ‘the lads’ for fun. It’s as gross and disgusting as the former…..Hopefully one lad in the group with ‘common sense’ will report it and say ‘nope I didn’t want that’……yeah I know that’s utopia  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Hopefully they will apply some common sense and these will be the ones they go after Nope, Not only ‘those ones’ they need to go after…. The pathetic boyfriends sending their ex’s photos and videos to ‘the lads’ for fun. It’s as gross and disgusting as the former…..Hopefully one lad in the group with ‘common sense’ will report it and say ‘nope I didn’t want that’……yeah I know that’s utopia "The legislation thankfully covers that | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The legislation thankfully covers that " Great, let’s hope it’s not selectively enforced…. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sounds like many of the Kik and WhatsApp groups need to be a lot more careful than they currently are, which wouldn't be a bad thing with some of the stuff that's shared around." As does fab. It still baffles me that I can publicly post a pic of me fucking a random girl without fab looking for any proof of her consent. They wouldn't let me post a pic of my PlayStation controller for a photo challenge | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sounds like many of the Kik and WhatsApp groups need to be a lot more careful than they currently are, which wouldn't be a bad thing with some of the stuff that's shared around. As does fab. It still baffles me that I can publicly post a pic of me fucking a random girl without fab looking for any proof of her consent. They wouldn't let me post a pic of my PlayStation controller for a photo challenge "You can report and they should remove them. I'm not sure how the can request proof of consent unless both parties send a consent in. A good idea but would they implement it or if they did they'll need far more pic mods and better trained. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ya I can't see how this applies to fab. By signing up to a 'sex site' I assume you're kinda giving consent for any sexual content that you come across when login into fab. Different story with messengers." There is definitely content that I would find offensive if I was sent it. That's the test necessary to fall foul of this law. Agreeing to be on a sex site doesn't mean you waive the right to not be sent horrible offensive content | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The legislation thankfully covers that Great, let’s hope it’s not selectively enforced…." It WILL be selectively enforced. Beginning with the worst cases. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ya I can't see how this applies to fab. By signing up to a 'sex site' I assume you're kinda giving consent for any sexual content that you come across when login into fab. Different story with messengers. There is definitely content that I would find offensive if I was sent it. That's the test necessary to fall foul of this law. Agreeing to be on a sex site doesn't mean you waive the right to not be sent horrible offensive content" Not sure what you refer to here, unless you mean much more serious offenses covered by different laws. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ya I can't see how this applies to fab. By signing up to a 'sex site' I assume you're kinda giving consent for any sexual content that you come across when login into fab. Different story with messengers. There is definitely content that I would find offensive if I was sent it. That's the test necessary to fall foul of this law. Agreeing to be on a sex site doesn't mean you waive the right to not be sent horrible offensive content" Fab quite simply need to improve their technology. There are plenty platforms where have algorithms that block explicit content being send in dms unless you choose for it to be viewable from either friends or all dms. That or state that joining implies consent to any and all explicit material. But I can definitely see more liability on the part of websites and social media platforms down the line | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
