Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Ireland |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We were discussing earlier the thread which took a little diversion regarding preferences. We all have them and, as Kenny Rogers famously said, there's someone for everyone. But do you consider how you and others express preferences? If someone expresses a preference but in doing so is insulting to another group do you view the person differently? Do you laud the person regardless for asking for what they want? Are there right & wrong ways to express truthfully held preferences? Have you encountered any shockers? Can you tell the difference? I prefer fit, toned men. Fit, toned men only. If you can't see your cock without using a mirror then don't contact me. There's no point...you leave me drier than the Sahara. BBC only please BBC only. Choady white cocks need not apply. No offence meant, I have lots of friends with choady white cocks. But don't bring one near my fanjita because I'm not taking one of those, not even if I'm off my tits *the views expressed above are for illustrative purposes only* " so your basically saying you like big strong black men | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We were discussing earlier the thread which took a little diversion regarding preferences. We all have them and, as Kenny Rogers famously said, there's someone for everyone. But do you consider how you and others express preferences? If someone expresses a preference but in doing so is insulting to another group do you view the person differently? Do you laud the person regardless for asking for what they want? Are there right & wrong ways to express truthfully held preferences? Have you encountered any shockers? Can you tell the difference? I prefer fit, toned men. Fit, toned men only. If you can't see your cock without using a mirror then don't contact me. There's no point...you leave me drier than the Sahara. BBC only please BBC only. Choady white cocks need not apply. No offence meant, I have lots of friends with choady white cocks. But don't bring one near my fanjita because I'm not taking one of those, not even if I'm off my tits *the views expressed above are for illustrative purposes only* " Interesting. We all have preferences and we all have a way of expressing preferences. We all also have good and bad days. I think when it comes to the regular Forum users, most of us "know" what's "supposed" to be tongue in cheek and who the "trolls" are when it comes to discussions over preferences on the Forum. As for reading a profile for the first time which explicitly state certain preferences, first impressions and all that, so negativity or insults would sit with me to an extent. But I wouldn't approach a profile off the bat where I get the impression that any kind of preferences are expressed with an "attitude" unless it comes across as an attitude with a sense of humour. But sense of humour is very subjective! And, in fact, I think my profile text might very well fall into one or the other category, depending on your sense of humour? If you catch my drift | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We were discussing earlier the thread which took a little diversion regarding preferences. We all have them and, as Kenny Rogers famously said, there's someone for everyone. But do you consider how you and others express preferences? If someone expresses a preference but in doing so is insulting to another group do you view the person differently? Do you laud the person regardless for asking for what they want? Are there right & wrong ways to express truthfully held preferences? Have you encountered any shockers? Can you tell the difference? I prefer fit, toned men. Fit, toned men only. If you can't see your cock without using a mirror then don't contact me. There's no point...you leave me drier than the Sahara. BBC only please BBC only. Choady white cocks need not apply. No offence meant, I have lots of friends with choady white cocks. But don't bring one near my fanjita because I'm not taking one of those, not even if I'm off my tits *the views expressed above are for illustrative purposes only* " Thank fuck for the ** | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm all for people having preferences and discussing those. If they use those preferences as a stick to beat others with I've no interest in engaging with them. " Indeed. It's a bit like "I'm not like those people who ruin it for the rest of us" It's totally fine to be yourself and express your needs and desires. Dragging others down whilst doing so can be dreadfully off-putting | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We were discussing earlier the thread which took a little diversion regarding preferences. We all have them and, as Kenny Rogers famously said, there's someone for everyone. But do you consider how you and others express preferences? If someone expresses a preference but in doing so is insulting to another group do you view the person differently? Do you laud the person regardless for asking for what they want? Are there right & wrong ways to express truthfully held preferences? Have you encountered any shockers? Can you tell the difference? I prefer fit, toned men. Fit, toned men only. If you can't see your cock without using a mirror then don't contact me. There's no point...you leave me drier than the Sahara. BBC only please BBC only. Choady white cocks need not apply. No offence meant, I have lots of friends with choady white cocks. But don't bring one near my fanjita because I'm not taking one of those, not even if I'm off my tits *the views expressed above are for illustrative purposes only* Interesting. We all have preferences and we all have a way of expressing preferences. We all also have good and bad days. I think when it comes to the regular Forum users, most of us "know" what's "supposed" to be tongue in cheek and who the "trolls" are when it comes to discussions over preferences on the Forum. As for reading a profile for the first time which explicitly state certain preferences, first impressions and all that, so negativity or insults would sit with me to an extent. But I wouldn't approach a profile off the bat where I get the impression that any kind of preferences are expressed with an "attitude" unless it comes across as an attitude with a sense of humour. But sense of humour is very subjective! And, in fact, I think my profile text might very well fall into one or the other category, depending on your sense of humour? If you catch my drift " I do. I know our profile also skirts that fine line and not everyone will appreciate the humour. But that's ok too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We were discussing earlier the thread which took a little diversion regarding preferences. We all have them and, as Kenny Rogers famously said, there's someone for everyone. But do you consider how you and others express preferences? If someone expresses a preference but in doing so is insulting to another group do you view the person differently? Do you laud the person regardless for asking for what they want? Are there right & wrong ways to express truthfully held preferences? Have you encountered any shockers? Can you tell the difference? I prefer fit, toned men. Fit, toned men only. If you can't see your cock without using a mirror then don't contact me. There's no point...you leave me drier than the Sahara. BBC only please BBC only. Choady white cocks need not apply. No offence meant, I have lots of friends with choady white cocks. But don't bring one near my fanjita because I'm not taking one of those, not even if I'm off my tits *the views expressed above are for illustrative purposes only* Thank fuck for the ** " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We were discussing earlier the thread which took a little diversion regarding preferences. We all have them and, as Kenny Rogers famously said, there's someone for everyone. But do you consider how you and others express preferences? If someone expresses a preference but in doing so is insulting to another group do you view the person differently? Do you laud the person regardless for asking for what they want? Are there right & wrong ways to express truthfully held preferences? Have you encountered any shockers? Can you tell the difference? I prefer fit, toned men. Fit, toned men only. If you can't see your cock without using a mirror then don't contact me. There's no point...you leave me drier than the Sahara. BBC only please BBC only. Choady white cocks need not apply. No offence meant, I have lots of friends with choady white cocks. But don't bring one near my fanjita because I'm not taking one of those, not even if I'm off my tits *the views expressed above are for illustrative purposes only* Interesting. We all have preferences and we all have a way of expressing preferences. We all also have good and bad days. I think when it comes to the regular Forum users, most of us "know" what's "supposed" to be tongue in cheek and who the "trolls" are when it comes to discussions over preferences on the Forum. As for reading a profile for the first time which explicitly state certain preferences, first impressions and all that, so negativity or insults would sit with me to an extent. But I wouldn't approach a profile off the bat where I get the impression that any kind of preferences are expressed with an "attitude" unless it comes across as an attitude with a sense of humour. But sense of humour is very subjective! And, in fact, I think my profile text might very well fall into one or the other category, depending on your sense of humour? If you catch my drift I do. I know our profile also skirts that fine line and not everyone will appreciate the humour. But that's ok too. " You have a great profile - very appealing, you know what you want, what you don't want. It's not offensive, in my opinion, and laced with humour. Straight up (or not , as the case may be), and no bullsh*t | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Being in the presence of someone comfortable with there sexuality not shy and can laugh would be a “type” that would make me stand up and notice " That certainly resonates with us. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Everyone has they’re own preferences. If you don’t like them, move on. No amount of coercion is going help you. If anything it will go against you. Yes this is a site that allows you to explore but you shouldn’t feel pressured to go out of your comfort zone or about what you want. That’s a decision that is up to you and everyone needs to respect each other’s preferences and boundaries." 100% | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Everyone has preferences and I have no issue with anyone saying theirs. If they say it in a way that is derogatory to others though it's a major turn off and I won't bother interacting with them ." That's it...if someone doesn't have the ability to express their preference in a way which isn't derogatory to others whilst doing so, it colours my general opinion of them. I don't understand what purpose it serves. It's less about the preferences themselves but how they're communicated and where the line is crossed. "You're not my type" "You're not my type as I'm not interested in guys with beards" "I'm not interested in guys with beards. Beards are horrible food encrusted dirt traps and you're not coming near with that on your face" "You're not my type" "You're not my type because I'm only interested in slim women" "No offence love but I couldn't get it up for a fat woman no matter how d*unk I was" "You're not my type" "You're not my type because I prefer plus size women" "BBWs only. They're real women. Nobody wants to cuddle a stick insect" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We were discussing earlier the thread which took a little diversion regarding preferences. We all have them and, as Kenny Rogers famously said, there's someone for everyone. But do you consider how you and others express preferences? If someone expresses a preference but in doing so is insulting to another group do you view the person differently? Do you laud the person regardless for asking for what they want? Are there right & wrong ways to express truthfully held preferences? Have you encountered any shockers? Can you tell the difference? I prefer fit, toned men. Fit, toned men only. If you can't see your cock without using a mirror then don't contact me. There's no point...you leave me drier than the Sahara. BBC only please BBC only. Choady white cocks need not apply. No offence meant, I have lots of friends with choady white cocks. But don't bring one near my fanjita because I'm not taking one of those, not even if I'm off my tits *the views expressed above are for illustrative purposes only* so your basically saying you like big strong black men " Ehmmmmm yes please | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |