Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Ireland |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're very optimistic, swinging as we remember it won't take place until at least there is a reliable vaccine in place so perhaps 2-3 years. The only swinging we'll be doing will be with very special and trusted friends, absolutely no 'new friends' " If you think most people will wait that long you are so wrong. Way to many have had meets and dates with many others while this was happening | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're very optimistic, swinging as we remember it won't take place until at least there is a reliable vaccine in place so perhaps 2-3 years. The only swinging we'll be doing will be with very special and trusted friends, absolutely no 'new friends' If you think most people will wait that long you are so wrong. Way to many have had meets and dates with many others while this was happening " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're very optimistic, swinging as we remember it won't take place until at least there is a reliable vaccine in place so perhaps 2-3 years. The only swinging we'll be doing will be with very special and trusted friends, absolutely no 'new friends' " Fine for a couple but any single man or woman that says they're going to wait 3 years, I want 24/7 video evidence of | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're very optimistic, swinging as we remember it won't take place until at least there is a reliable vaccine in place so perhaps 2-3 years. The only swinging we'll be doing will be with very special and trusted friends, absolutely no 'new friends' Fine for a couple but any single man or woman that says they're going to wait 3 years, I want 24/7 video evidence of " I'd much prefer video evidence of the people who say that they ARE going to meet! Lulz | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People need to realise it was safer to meet people 3/4 weeks ago than it is today. Only because people are getting fatigued are they now thinking about coming out of lockdown there’s no medical evidence it will be safe until there’s a vaccine! Also people saying only meeting old friends, that’s about as stupid as you can get ANYBODY can contract it, old friends new friends ANYBODY. " Meeting friends isn't as stupid as you try to make it out. Depending where you live, what you do, your hygiene standards, your attitude towards others etc. can put you at higher risk or lower risk of contracting it. So the better you know someone the better you can make such 'risk assessment'. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're very optimistic, swinging as we remember it won't take place until at least there is a reliable vaccine in place so perhaps 2-3 years. The only swinging we'll be doing will be with very special and trusted friends, absolutely no 'new friends' " There is just as much chance of your 'trusted' friends having the virus, Kind of a silly statement | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The idea that you can trust someone not to have coronavirus is just silly. " Agree. But who would you trust more when it comes to adhering consequently to covid-19 rules in order to reduce risk of contracting/spreading it? A friend you know well or a stranger? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It won’t make any difference. I came across three female profiles last night that had been verified Friday, Saturday and Monday. These are women that are here over a year on their profile, so the bullshit that they are new and here before can’t be pulled now. Cute too that they have hidden the verifications but it still shows up that they’ve had a recent meet. Personal choice if they wanted to meet while restrictions were in place but I’ve just added them to my block list along with the rest of the fucking dirt that were seeking meets or were verified in the last two months. If they are prepared to risk their health with something like this, there’s a good chance they are taking other risks too." I was verified by meet last night. But that was by a friend who had returned to the site and needed to be verified. He made it clear it was a pre Covid19 coffee but Fab has turned off the publish button so it now looks I had a recent meet. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The idea that you can trust someone not to have coronavirus is just silly. Agree. But who would you trust more when it comes to adhering consequently to covid-19 rules in order to reduce risk of contracting/spreading it? A friend you know well or a stranger? " No one, to be honest, I know of perfectly sensible people who think it's fine to pressure a hairdresser to call to their house,my neighbour who is a Garda definitely had some kind of gathering at his house one night a couple of weeks ago, lots of teens/young adults wandering around in groups or sitting chatting in cars, then going home to their middle-aged parents | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It won’t make any difference. I came across three female profiles last night that had been verified Friday, Saturday and Monday. These are women that are here over a year on their profile, so the bullshit that they are new and here before can’t be pulled now. Cute too that they have hidden the verifications but it still shows up that they’ve had a recent meet. Personal choice if they wanted to meet while restrictions were in place but I’ve just added them to my block list along with the rest of the fucking dirt that were seeking meets or were verified in the last two months. If they are prepared to risk their health with something like this, there’s a good chance they are taking other risks too. I was verified by meet last night. But that was by a friend who had returned to the site and needed to be verified. He made it clear it was a pre Covid19 coffee but Fab has turned off the publish button so it now looks I had a recent meet. " I think you need to be spanked for that! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're very optimistic, swinging as we remember it won't take place until at least there is a reliable vaccine in place so perhaps 2-3 years. The only swinging we'll be doing will be with very special and trusted friends, absolutely no 'new friends' " It doesn't matter if they're people you have seen regularly. Anyone can contract it, your very special friends could have been out doing their shopping and came into contact the same way as any person could. Your logic makes absolutely zero sense | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The idea that you can trust someone not to have coronavirus is just silly. Agree. But who would you trust more when it comes to adhering consequently to covid-19 rules in order to reduce risk of contracting/spreading it? A friend you know well or a stranger? No one, to be honest, I know of perfectly sensible people who think it's fine to pressure a hairdresser to call to their house,my neighbour who is a Garda definitely had some kind of gathering at his house one night a couple of weeks ago, lots of teens/young adults wandering around in groups or sitting chatting in cars, then going home to their middle-aged parents" Well that's no sex for you until vaccine day. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The idea that you can trust someone not to have coronavirus is just silly. Agree. But who would you trust more when it comes to adhering consequently to covid-19 rules in order to reduce risk of contracting/spreading it? A friend you know well or a stranger? No one, to be honest, I know of perfectly sensible people who think it's fine to pressure a hairdresser to call to their house,my neighbour who is a Garda definitely had some kind of gathering at his house one night a couple of weeks ago, lots of teens/young adults wandering around in groups or sitting chatting in cars, then going home to their middle-aged parents Well that's no sex for you until vaccine day. " Oh I'll be having the best kind when restrictions lifted, with my other half | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The idea that you can trust someone not to have coronavirus is just silly. Agree. But who would you trust more when it comes to adhering consequently to covid-19 rules in order to reduce risk of contracting/spreading it? A friend you know well or a stranger? No one, to be honest, I know of perfectly sensible people who think it's fine to pressure a hairdresser to call to their house,my neighbour who is a Garda definitely had some kind of gathering at his house one night a couple of weeks ago, lots of teens/young adults wandering around in groups or sitting chatting in cars, then going home to their middle-aged parents Well that's no sex for you until vaccine day. Oh I'll be having the best kind when restrictions lifted, with my other half " Ahh you trust your other half then. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The idea that you can trust someone not to have coronavirus is just silly. Agree. But who would you trust more when it comes to adhering consequently to covid-19 rules in order to reduce risk of contracting/spreading it? A friend you know well or a stranger? No one, to be honest, I know of perfectly sensible people who think it's fine to pressure a hairdresser to call to their house,my neighbour who is a Garda definitely had some kind of gathering at his house one night a couple of weeks ago, lots of teens/young adults wandering around in groups or sitting chatting in cars, then going home to their middle-aged parents Well that's no sex for you until vaccine day. Oh I'll be having the best kind when restrictions lifted, with my other half Ahh you trust your other half then. " Neither he nor I can completely eliminate the risk of coronavirus, but that's worth it. Sex with others,not so much... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Neither he nor I can completely eliminate the risk of coronavirus, but that's worth it. Sex with others,not so much..." In fairness, if your other half gets the virus you're gonna get it whether you fuck them or not. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It won’t make any difference. I came across three female profiles last night that had been verified Friday, Saturday and Monday. These are women that are here over a year on their profile, so the bullshit that they are new and here before can’t be pulled now. Cute too that they have hidden the verifications but it still shows up that they’ve had a recent meet. Personal choice if they wanted to meet while restrictions were in place but I’ve just added them to my block list along with the rest of the fucking dirt that were seeking meets or were verified in the last two months. If they are prepared to risk their health with something like this, there’s a good chance they are taking other risks too. I was verified by meet last night. But that was by a friend who had returned to the site and needed to be verified. He made it clear it was a pre Covid19 coffee but Fab has turned off the publish button so it now looks I had a recent meet. I think you need to be spanked for that! " I wish I will be spanking myself for the considerable future | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Neither he nor I can completely eliminate the risk of coronavirus, but that's worth it. Sex with others,not so much... In fairness, if your other half gets the virus you're gonna get it whether you fuck them or not. " Right now, he's living 30 miles away so not much chance ...but possibly not, there have been couples where one but not the other has tested positive. But it's difficult to imagine they were in any way intimate. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The idea that you can trust someone not to have coronavirus is just silly. Agree. But who would you trust more when it comes to adhering consequently to covid-19 rules in order to reduce risk of contracting/spreading it? A friend you know well or a stranger? " Exactly. If you know the person well and their habits. Know they are WFH and isolating, know that they are responsible when leaving the house, and can trust that they would admit if they were experiencing symptoms etc, then you will know that the risk is lower then a randomer. I'm not saying it's a great idea to meet someone just because you trust them, but I can see the point of the argument. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Exactly. If you know the person well and their habits. Know they are WFH and isolating, know that they are responsible when leaving the house, and can trust that they would admit if they were experiencing symptoms etc, then you will know that the risk is lower then a randomer. I'm not saying it's a great idea to meet someone just because you trust them, but I can see the point of the argument." Nonesense. Lots of people have it without any symptoms at all. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The idea that you can trust someone not to have coronavirus is just silly. Agree. But who would you trust more when it comes to adhering consequently to covid-19 rules in order to reduce risk of contracting/spreading it? A friend you know well or a stranger? Exactly. If you know the person well and their habits. Know they are WFH and isolating, know that they are responsible when leaving the house, and can trust that they would admit if they were experiencing symptoms etc, then you will know that the risk is lower then a randomer. I'm not saying it's a great idea to meet someone just because you trust them, but I can see the point of the argument." You really think someone with the prospect of their first shag in months is going to admit to waking up this morning with a sore throat? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The idea that you can trust someone not to have coronavirus is just silly. Agree. But who would you trust more when it comes to adhering consequently to covid-19 rules in order to reduce risk of contracting/spreading it? A friend you know well or a stranger? No one, to be honest, I know of perfectly sensible people who think it's fine to pressure a hairdresser to call to their house,my neighbour who is a Garda definitely had some kind of gathering at his house one night a couple of weeks ago, lots of teens/young adults wandering around in groups or sitting chatting in cars, then going home to their middle-aged parents Well that's no sex for you until vaccine day. Oh I'll be having the best kind when restrictions lifted, with my other half Ahh you trust your other half then. Neither he nor I can completely eliminate the risk of coronavirus, but that's worth it. Sex with others,not so much..." For me same applies to a good friend. Btw sex reduces stress, stress isn't good for your immune system. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Exactly. If you know the person well and their habits. Know they are WFH and isolating, know that they are responsible when leaving the house, and can trust that they would admit if they were experiencing symptoms etc, then you will know that the risk is lower then a randomer. I'm not saying it's a great idea to meet someone just because you trust them, but I can see the point of the argument. Nonesense. Lots of people have it without any symptoms at all. " You're missing the point. I know that, sure everyone who gets it is assymptomatic for at least a few days. That's not the point. The point is, Covid in 'never' going to be irradiated! There are far too many anti-vaxers and immune impaired people. And even if you get a vaccine, there is a chance that your body just doesnt take it. Eventually people are going to start meeting again. And you're better off meeting people who you know have been doing their best to isolate, rather than meeting a stranger that you know nothing about, except the fact that they ride strangers on the internet. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You really think someone with the prospect of their first shag in months is going to admit to waking up this morning with a sore throat? " I always ask anyway partners day of meet anyway,even pre covid "Did you wake up with sore throat this morning?" "Eh no" "Well you're going to tomorrow" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The idea that you can trust someone not to have coronavirus is just silly. Agree. But who would you trust more when it comes to adhering consequently to covid-19 rules in order to reduce risk of contracting/spreading it? A friend you know well or a stranger? Exactly. If you know the person well and their habits. Know they are WFH and isolating, know that they are responsible when leaving the house, and can trust that they would admit if they were experiencing symptoms etc, then you will know that the risk is lower then a randomer. I'm not saying it's a great idea to meet someone just because you trust them, but I can see the point of the argument. You really think someone with the prospect of their first shag in months is going to admit to waking up this morning with a sore throat? " Of course not! That's why I'm saying people shouldn't trust people you've just met on Fab for a long time. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Life without sex or sex without life. I know which I'd be choosing." Going by your pics I hope it's the sex option? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The idea that you can trust someone not to have coronavirus is just silly. Agree. But who would you trust more when it comes to adhering consequently to covid-19 rules in order to reduce risk of contracting/spreading it? A friend you know well or a stranger? No one, to be honest, I know of perfectly sensible people who think it's fine to pressure a hairdresser to call to their house,my neighbour who is a Garda definitely had some kind of gathering at his house one night a couple of weeks ago, lots of teens/young adults wandering around in groups or sitting chatting in cars, then going home to their middle-aged parents Well that's no sex for you until vaccine day. Oh I'll be having the best kind when restrictions lifted, with my other half Ahh you trust your other half then. Neither he nor I can completely eliminate the risk of coronavirus, but that's worth it. Sex with others,not so much... For me same applies to a good friend. Btw sex reduces stress, stress isn't good for your immune system. " You think I dont know that ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You really think someone with the prospect of their first shag in months is going to admit to waking up this morning with a sore throat? I always ask anyway partners day of meet anyway,even pre covid "Did you wake up with sore throat this morning?" "Eh no" "Well you're going to tomorrow" " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see Tony Holohan is already making shapes to deny us the lifting of restrictions planned for 18th May, he will shortly be going from hero to zero in public opinion. " If experts believe it’s unsafe to lift restrictions and recommend so; it’s crazy that people will complain. If CMO knows it’s dangerous and says nothing and more people die; what will the public think & say then? I for one am happy to live a different life for a year or more if it keeps me and my loved ones safe | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You really think someone with the prospect of their first shag in months is going to admit to waking up this morning with a sore throat? I always ask anyway partners day of meet anyway,even pre covid "Did you wake up with sore throat this morning?" "Eh no" "Well you're going to tomorrow" " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see Tony Holohan is already making shapes to deny us the lifting of restrictions planned for 18th May, he will shortly be going from hero to zero in public opinion. If experts believe it’s unsafe to lift restrictions and recommend so; it’s crazy that people will complain. If CMO knows it’s dangerous and says nothing and more people die; what will the public think & say then? I for one am happy to live a different life for a year or more if it keeps me and my loved ones safe " You are most probably in a minority there. Unfortunately it's not as simple as locking people up for their own good. Financial ruin and mental health issues aren't going to be good for anyone either. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see Tony Holohan is already making shapes to deny us the lifting of restrictions planned for 18th May, he will shortly be going from hero to zero in public opinion. " I wouldnt be surprised. Reports today from Department of Justice has said that more than a third of passengers arriving into Dublin are not giving quarantine plans. They are talking about hundreds of passengers over a 6 day period. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see Tony Holohan is already making shapes to deny us the lifting of restrictions planned for 18th May, he will shortly be going from hero to zero in public opinion. I wouldnt be surprised. Reports today from Department of Justice has said that more than a third of passengers arriving into Dublin are not giving quarantine plans. They are talking about hundreds of passengers over a 6 day period. " Yes,it's farcical that those living here can be fined for going too far from home,yet people are allowed into the country daily with no control whatsoever | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see Tony Holohan is already making shapes to deny us the lifting of restrictions planned for 18th May, he will shortly be going from hero to zero in public opinion. I wouldnt be surprised. Reports today from Department of Justice has said that more than a third of passengers arriving into Dublin are not giving quarantine plans. They are talking about hundreds of passengers over a 6 day period. Yes,it's farcical that those living here can be fined for going too far from home,yet people are allowed into the country daily with no control whatsoever" If it wasnt so serious it would be funny. Its one thing letting flights in. People working or Irish people coming home but to not force them to self isolate beggers belief. Especially when they have paid god knows how much to city west till the end of the year. It has not been used once. If they had got a grip at the start we would be looking at coming out of lockdown now not looking at another 11 weeks. At best. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see Tony Holohan is already making shapes to deny us the lifting of restrictions planned for 18th May, he will shortly be going from hero to zero in public opinion. I wouldnt be surprised. Reports today from Department of Justice has said that more than a third of passengers arriving into Dublin are not giving quarantine plans. They are talking about hundreds of passengers over a 6 day period. " And 8 weeks ago we were scouring the country for people returned from skiing holidays. Like the other major gaffs this too will contribute to the ongoing spread in the community. The correct protocol is not rocket science, but like a lot of the controls in this country the system is more engaged with products or services created domestically and very little regard to what is imported into the country be it products or people. So box ticking those kept to 5km and controlling us is not the complete solution to reducing the spread of this disease. I don't believe that the testing it tracing will ever be a close to what our more efficient European neighbours can attain but we're dealing with a beaurocracy that couldn't run a bath. When most of us can see the faukts in the system how can we expect them to manage it properly. New cases and new clusters are appearing in nursing home daily. They cannot be trusted to fix this. It will run its course. L | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see Tony Holohan is already making shapes to deny us the lifting of restrictions planned for 18th May, he will shortly be going from hero to zero in public opinion. I wouldnt be surprised. Reports today from Department of Justice has said that more than a third of passengers arriving into Dublin are not giving quarantine plans. They are talking about hundreds of passengers over a 6 day period. Yes,it's farcical that those living here can be fined for going too far from home,yet people are allowed into the country daily with no control whatsoever" I don't understand why peeps regard Holohan as a hero in the first place. For reading out the daily death and infection figures without context while covering up their failures? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see Tony Holohan is already making shapes to deny us the lifting of restrictions planned for 18th May, he will shortly be going from hero to zero in public opinion. I wouldnt be surprised. Reports today from Department of Justice has said that more than a third of passengers arriving into Dublin are not giving quarantine plans. They are talking about hundreds of passengers over a 6 day period. And 8 weeks ago we were scouring the country for people returned from skiing holidays. Like the other major gaffs this too will contribute to the ongoing spread in the community. The correct protocol is not rocket science, but like a lot of the controls in this country the system is more engaged with products or services created domestically and very little regard to what is imported into the country be it products or people. So box ticking those kept to 5km and controlling us is not the complete solution to reducing the spread of this disease. I don't believe that the testing it tracing will ever be a close to what our more efficient European neighbours can attain but we're dealing with a beaurocracy that couldn't run a bath. When most of us can see the faukts in the system how can we expect them to manage it properly. New cases and new clusters are appearing in nursing home daily. They cannot be trusted to fix this. It will run its course. L" Well said. They cannot be trusted to fix this. Could be here all day naming the bad decisions that have been made but to KEEP making them. And they can talk about all the testing they want but when u cant get the results back for days whats the point. They have improved in that regard but its still taking days from start to finish in alot of cases. Which makes contact tracing impossible. Which was the whole point of supposedly following the South Korea model. They are some spoofers. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see Tony Holohan is already making shapes to deny us the lifting of restrictions planned for 18th May, he will shortly be going from hero to zero in public opinion. I wouldnt be surprised. Reports today from Department of Justice has said that more than a third of passengers arriving into Dublin are not giving quarantine plans. They are talking about hundreds of passengers over a 6 day period. Yes,it's farcical that those living here can be fined for going too far from home,yet people are allowed into the country daily with no control whatsoever I don't understand why peeps regard Holohan as a hero in the first place. For reading out the daily death and infection figures without context while covering up their failures? " Its the natural inclination of bewildered population feeling under threat to look for a "saviour". | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People have gone way off topic here, he asked when do you think people will meet, not how good a job is holohan et al are doing" The OP asked when do you think it will be safe to meet, not when people will meet. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The idea that you can trust someone not to have coronavirus is just silly. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People have gone way off topic here, he asked when do you think people will meet, not how good a job is holohan et al are doing" I think as mr Holohan is the spokesperson for the medical/scientific findings, so people look to him for advice as to how to proceed. So can see how both connected? Many will follow the guidelines as suggested. Others have from day one chosen not to and hence will do what they want regardless, which includes meeting people for casual sex | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The idea that you can trust someone not to have coronavirus is just silly. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It won’t make any difference. I came across three female profiles last night that had been verified Friday, Saturday and Monday. These are women that are here over a year on their profile, so the bullshit that they are new and here before can’t be pulled now. Cute too that they have hidden the verifications but it still shows up that they’ve had a recent meet. Personal choice if they wanted to meet while restrictions were in place but I’ve just added them to my block list along with the rest of the fucking dirt that were seeking meets or were verified in the last two months. If they are prepared to risk their health with something like this, there’s a good chance they are taking other risks too." They could be receiving older verifications from pre lock down meets. Fab won't allow new veris to be shown at the moment, the profile has no control over that. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We live in a risk averse society. Life would be very boring if there was no risk taking, sometimes you just do a good risk assessment, accept you can't control every possible thing that might happen, and take a chance. And take responsibility for your actions. If you become infected, you may spread Covid, but also if you've been on hols in a tropical country you have unknowingly been exposed to many tropical diseases, but we take the risk. Calculate the risk, then make your decision. " Love your perspective man! Winner winner chicken dinner. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It won’t make any difference. I came across three female profiles last night that had been verified Friday, Saturday and Monday. These are women that are here over a year on their profile, so the bullshit that they are new and here before can’t be pulled now. Cute too that they have hidden the verifications but it still shows up that they’ve had a recent meet. Personal choice if they wanted to meet while restrictions were in place but I’ve just added them to my block list along with the rest of the fucking dirt that were seeking meets or were verified in the last two months. If they are prepared to risk their health with something like this, there’s a good chance they are taking other risks too." I verified a couple yesterday that have returned here after a break. Fab does not allow this veri to be displayed on their profile but it shows up that they were verified on their profile. So your post if pure rubbish and you are blocking people for no reason. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We live in a risk averse society. Life would be very boring if there was no risk taking, sometimes you just do a good risk assessment, accept you can't control every possible thing that might happen, and take a chance. And take responsibility for your actions. If you become infected, you may spread Covid, but also if you've been on hols in a tropical country you have unknowingly been exposed to many tropical diseases, but we take the risk. Calculate the risk, then make your decision. " Agree to a point. Think if u take calculated risks with urself that’s ur choice but must then be prepared to safeguard any vulnerable people in ur life. Meet up if u wish but please don’t then insist on still visiting ur at risk friends/relatives. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When do u think it will be safe" When a vaccination appears | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It won’t make any difference. I came across three female profiles last night that had been verified Friday, Saturday and Monday. These are women that are here over a year on their profile, so the bullshit that they are new and here before can’t be pulled now. Cute too that they have hidden the verifications but it still shows up that they’ve had a recent meet. Personal choice if they wanted to meet while restrictions were in place but I’ve just added them to my block list along with the rest of the fucking dirt that were seeking meets or were verified in the last two months. If they are prepared to risk their health with something like this, there’s a good chance they are taking other risks too. I verified a couple yesterday that have returned here after a break. Fab does not allow this veri to be displayed on their profile but it shows up that they were verified on their profile. So your post if pure rubbish and you are blocking people for no reason. " we were also verified by someone who has come back on the site, we can't display it site rules | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It won’t make any difference. I came across three female profiles last night that had been verified Friday, Saturday and Monday. These are women that are here over a year on their profile, so the bullshit that they are new and here before can’t be pulled now. Cute too that they have hidden the verifications but it still shows up that they’ve had a recent meet. Personal choice if they wanted to meet while restrictions were in place but I’ve just added them to my block list along with the rest of the fucking dirt that were seeking meets or were verified in the last two months. If they are prepared to risk their health with something like this, there’s a good chance they are taking other risks too. I was verified by meet last night. But that was by a friend who had returned to the site and needed to be verified. He made it clear it was a pre Covid19 coffee but Fab has turned off the publish button so it now looks I had a recent meet. I think you need to be spanked for that! I wish I will be spanking myself for the considerable future " Pics or it didn't happen | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When do u think it will be safe for meets I'm thinking August " August 2021 ?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think people are too invested in Fab. There are people who speak off this site through whatsapp or kik with connections they've made here or elsewhere in life. You could have someone here saying they're not meeting but have their regular fuck buddy pop over on the weekend. Don't assume peoples lives are as they appear on Fab. " Now that's a brilliant piece...fair play ..l would agree strongly with your point of view ..l certainly think that even though they might be giving the " not meeting " message here ..it only means they're not " meeting new " and they are still meeting their regular FB's but aren't gonna say that here ... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It won’t make any difference. I came across three female profiles last night that had been verified Friday, Saturday and Monday. These are women that are here over a year on their profile, so the bullshit that they are new and here before can’t be pulled now. Cute too that they have hidden the verifications but it still shows up that they’ve had a recent meet. Personal choice if they wanted to meet while restrictions were in place but I’ve just added them to my block list along with the rest of the fucking dirt that were seeking meets or were verified in the last two months. If they are prepared to risk their health with something like this, there’s a good chance they are taking other risks too. I verified a couple yesterday that have returned here after a break. Fab does not allow this veri to be displayed on their profile but it shows up that they were verified on their profile. So your post if pure rubbish and you are blocking people for no reason. " Today I am getting messages looking to meet up today as I verified a friend that had returned to Fab yesterday. Fab blocking the publish button now means it appears I had a recent meet. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It won’t make any difference. I came across three female profiles last night that had been verified Friday, Saturday and Monday. These are women that are here over a year on their profile, so the bullshit that they are new and here before can’t be pulled now. Cute too that they have hidden the verifications but it still shows up that they’ve had a recent meet. Personal choice if they wanted to meet while restrictions were in place but I’ve just added them to my block list along with the rest of the fucking dirt that were seeking meets or were verified in the last two months. If they are prepared to risk their health with something like this, there’s a good chance they are taking other risks too. I verified a couple yesterday that have returned here after a break. Fab does not allow this veri to be displayed on their profile but it shows up that they were verified on their profile. So your post if pure rubbish and you are blocking people for no reason. Today I am getting messages looking to meet up today as I verified a friend that had returned to Fab yesterday. Fab blocking the publish button now means it appears I had a recent meet. " See ya tomorrow | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Honestly , the suicide rate is gonna go up Massively. Lost business, relationships strained etc. I think the approach to it wasn't ideal. In any sense. I think the way we counted cases was so half arsed. Those with underlying conditions should definitely be quarantined. But I would of left it to personal responsibility , similar approach to Sweden and they're doing great. The death of healthy people who contract Corona is less than 0.2% which is less than the flue. Also, the number of deaths this time last year was less (Ireland). Though all that said, I'm staying inside. I'm not an expert in this. And I trust they're doing the right job. I feel like when we look back we'll slap our wrists at our stupidity. I'd rather we over estimate this then under estimate it. For now, there's little we know. Just gotta stop eating at each others necks " Is the date rate for the year really lower than last year? Have you a link to that? Thanks | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Honestly , the suicide rate is gonna go up Massively. Lost business, relationships strained etc. I think the approach to it wasn't ideal. In any sense. I think the way we counted cases was so half arsed. Those with underlying conditions should definitely be quarantined. But I would of left it to personal responsibility , similar approach to Sweden and they're doing great. The death of healthy people who contract Corona is less than 0.2% which is less than the flue. Also, the number of deaths this time last year was less (Ireland). Though all that said, I'm staying inside. I'm not an expert in this. And I trust they're doing the right job. I feel like when we look back we'll slap our wrists at our stupidity. I'd rather we over estimate this then under estimate it. For now, there's little we know. Just gotta stop eating at each others necks Is the date rate for the year really lower than last year? Have you a link to that? Thanks" https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-1916/1916irl/bmd/deaths/ That's the link to the CSO. Click on this and last year. Almost a thousand less But if we eased to early it could easily jump . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It won’t make any difference. I came across three female profiles last night that had been verified Friday, Saturday and Monday. These are women that are here over a year on their profile, so the bullshit that they are new and here before can’t be pulled now. Cute too that they have hidden the verifications but it still shows up that they’ve had a recent meet. Personal choice if they wanted to meet while restrictions were in place but I’ve just added them to my block list along with the rest of the fucking dirt that were seeking meets or were verified in the last two months. If they are prepared to risk their health with something like this, there’s a good chance they are taking other risks too." 'Meeting in person' verifications are not permitted atm so these women probably got webcam veries? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think people are too invested in Fab. There are people who speak off this site through whatsapp or kik with connections they've made here or elsewhere in life. You could have someone here saying they're not meeting but have their regular fuck buddy pop over on the weekend. Don't assume peoples lives are as they appear on Fab. Now that's a brilliant piece...fair play ..l would agree strongly with your point of view ..l certainly think that even though they might be giving the " not meeting " message here ..it only means they're not " meeting new " and they are still meeting their regular FB's but aren't gonna say that here ..." go me. I say that too because I would choose one of the two couples I've met away from this site before I would choose anyone on here. I prefer familiarity and comfort so making a new connection is very difficult for me and requires real effort. And I'm picky. But anyone could have sex tomorrow and no one here would be any the wiser unless they're on fab and also decide to verify you. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think people are too invested in Fab. There are people who speak off this site through whatsapp or kik with connections they've made here or elsewhere in life. You could have someone here saying they're not meeting but have their regular fuck buddy pop over on the weekend. Don't assume peoples lives are as they appear on Fab. Now that's a brilliant piece...fair play ..l would agree strongly with your point of view ..l certainly think that even though they might be giving the " not meeting " message here ..it only means they're not " meeting new " and they are still meeting their regular FB's but aren't gonna say that here ... go me. I say that too because I would choose one of the two couples I've met away from this site before I would choose anyone on here. I prefer familiarity and comfort so making a new connection is very difficult for me and requires real effort. And I'm picky. But anyone could have sex tomorrow and no one here would be any the wiser unless they're on fab and also decide to verify you." The same applies to your two couples whom you met away from here..... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're very optimistic, swinging as we remember it won't take place until at least there is a reliable vaccine in place so perhaps 2-3 years. The only swinging we'll be doing will be with very special and trusted friends, absolutely no 'new friends' " A vaccine does not take 2-3 years to make and mass produce. I've heard a few people say this and its just wrong. It'll take anywhere from year to 18 months. The virus is not as complicated as some might think. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"^ exactly but that's only an issue if I decide to meet either of them. Also one is a friend for many many years so there's 100% trust between us. Friends before sex came into it. " I hear you but this is a virus which ignores trust and friendship... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"^ exactly but that's only an issue if I decide to meet either of them. Also one is a friend for many many years so there's 100% trust between us. Friends before sex came into it. I hear you but this is a virus which ignores trust and friendship..." But my point was don't just go by fab verifications.... I'm not meeting anyone, even people I know outside here | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're very optimistic, swinging as we remember it won't take place until at least there is a reliable vaccine in place so perhaps 2-3 years. The only swinging we'll be doing will be with very special and trusted friends, absolutely no 'new friends' A vaccine does not take 2-3 years to make and mass produce. I've heard a few people say this and its just wrong. It'll take anywhere from year to 18 months. The virus is not as complicated as some might think." I'm still waiting for the hiv vaccine. Anyone know when it's coming out? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see an opening here ,DISCLAIMER i do not have covid19 nor do i plan on getting it ,but if a person on this website had it and made a full recovery and wanted to meet another person who already had it and made a recovery then they have very very very little and as far as i know only one person has recorded getting ot twice risk ,so the next thing you could see in meets is "covid19 recovery looking for like minded covid19 recovery for naughty fun " It could be useful if you got a certificate with the results of an anti body test whenever they start doing them here. Of course they have yet to prove definitively that you can't get it second time L | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It won’t make any difference. I came across three female profiles last night that had been verified Friday, Saturday and Monday. These are women that are here over a year on their profile, so the bullshit that they are new and here before can’t be pulled now. Cute too that they have hidden the verifications but it still shows up that they’ve had a recent meet. Personal choice if they wanted to meet while restrictions were in place but I’ve just added them to my block list along with the rest of the fucking dirt that were seeking meets or were verified in the last two months. If they are prepared to risk their health with something like this, there’s a good chance they are taking other risks too. 'Meeting in person' verifications are not permitted atm so these women probably got webcam veries?" Well you are wrong because on one of the women’s profile it says verified by x people newest Monday x men by x meets. That’s what it says on her profile. Not by webcam or anything else. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It won’t make any difference. I came across three female profiles last night that had been verified Friday, Saturday and Monday. These are women that are here over a year on their profile, so the bullshit that they are new and here before can’t be pulled now. Cute too that they have hidden the verifications but it still shows up that they’ve had a recent meet. Personal choice if they wanted to meet while restrictions were in place but I’ve just added them to my block list along with the rest of the fucking dirt that were seeking meets or were verified in the last two months. If they are prepared to risk their health with something like this, there’s a good chance they are taking other risks too. 'Meeting in person' verifications are not permitted atm so these women probably got webcam veries? Well you are wrong because on one of the women’s profile it says verified by x people newest Monday x men by x meets. That’s what it says on her profile. Not by webcam or anything else. " I'm wrong?? My meet verifications have been locked and I cannot show them because Fab told me 'meeting in person' verifications have been forbidden? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Honestly , the suicide rate is gonna go up Massively. Lost business, relationships strained etc. I think the approach to it wasn't ideal. In any sense. I think the way we counted cases was so half arsed. Those with underlying conditions should definitely be quarantined. But I would of left it to personal responsibility , similar approach to Sweden and they're doing great. The death of healthy people who contract Corona is less than 0.2% which is less than the flue. Also, the number of deaths this time last year was less (Ireland). Though all that said, I'm staying inside. I'm not an expert in this. And I trust they're doing the right job. I feel like when we look back we'll slap our wrists at our stupidity. I'd rather we over estimate this then under estimate it. For now, there's little we know. Just gotta stop eating at each others necks " Well said | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Honestly , the suicide rate is gonna go up Massively. Lost business, relationships strained etc. I think the approach to it wasn't ideal. In any sense. I think the way we counted cases was so half arsed. Those with underlying conditions should definitely be quarantined. But I would of left it to personal responsibility , similar approach to Sweden and they're doing great. The death of healthy people who contract Corona is less than 0.2% which is less than the flue. Also, the number of deaths this time last year was less (Ireland). Though all that said, I'm staying inside. I'm not an expert in this. And I trust they're doing the right job. I feel like when we look back we'll slap our wrists at our stupidity. I'd rather we over estimate this then under estimate it. For now, there's little we know. Just gotta stop eating at each others necks Well said " Sweden are not doing great! Their leaders have admitted that they made a huge mistake as death toll is multiple times larger than similar countries and deaths include young children. Do people not realise that there has been countless pandemics and endemics in the past, and without a vaccine, the only thing that ever worked at reducing deaths is social distancing, isolation, and do it as early as possible. Why do people think that this time would be any different? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Honestly , the suicide rate is gonna go up Massively. Lost business, relationships strained etc. I think the approach to it wasn't ideal. In any sense. I think the way we counted cases was so half arsed. Those with underlying conditions should definitely be quarantined. But I would of left it to personal responsibility , similar approach to Sweden and they're doing great. The death of healthy people who contract Corona is less than 0.2% which is less than the flue. Also, the number of deaths this time last year was less (Ireland). Though all that said, I'm staying inside. I'm not an expert in this. And I trust they're doing the right job. I feel like when we look back we'll slap our wrists at our stupidity. I'd rather we over estimate this then under estimate it. For now, there's little we know. Just gotta stop eating at each others necks Well said Sweden are not doing great! Their leaders have admitted that they made a huge mistake as death toll is multiple times larger than similar countries and deaths include young children. Do people not realise that there has been countless pandemics and endemics in the past, and without a vaccine, the only thing that ever worked at reducing deaths is social distancing, isolation, and do it as early as possible. Why do people think that this time would be any different?" You seem like good craic? Fancy a dirty ride?ha | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |