FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Ireland

The Evolutionary Psychology of Sex

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Hello All,

I trust and hope everyone is doing well given the circumstances...

Seeing as many of us are stuck indoors for the majority of time I thought I'd take this opportunity to have a wee rambling rant about a subject that I find intensely interesting and that is very relevant to our sexual habits, it is, as the title indicates, The Evolutionary Psychology of Sex!

So; have you ever wondered why the women can seemingly have sex for hours? Or why it is that males tend to get very "tender" and experience a rush of negativity post orgasm (there's actually a name for this experience, it's referred to as PCT or Post-Coital Tristesse, have a Google!) Or why they can't simply continue on fucking after they've cum? Why does it take men anywhere between 10 and 30 minutes to develop an erection or interest in sexual once they've ejaculated? Why do women remain in a state of excitement and 'receptive' even though the male is spent? Why can women remain in a state of excitement longer than the male?

Some of these questions have been addressed by evolutionary psychologists and I find their suggested answers fascinating. If you'd like to know more please do read on!

To begin we need to look at what the sexual act is ultimately trying to achieve, and, in a strictly biological sense, sex is about reproduction. We engage in sex to propagate our species. Male plus female, sperm plus egg, equals baby, a new member of our species. We need a motivator to engage in this behavior so sex becomes something pleasurable, hopefully for both parties! Now if we strip away our society, our culture and our civilization and go back to what we essentially are, which is a very sneaky hairless apes, we can begin to look at our sexual behavior as a biological phenomenon. Humans feel a desire to procreate. Let's take a sample group from the herd; 3 males, 1 female. They are wandering around the wild plains of pre-history. There's all sorts of predators out there too. Sabretooth Kitties and the likes. The lady human is ovulating and thusly feels amorous.

She goes around doing Lady Hairless Ape flirty things, twerking or yoga or whatever. Our 3 males eventually notice Lady Human, catching her scent and becoming aroused. One of the braver (or dumber) males simply can't contain himself and rushes to mount our Lady Human. Let's pause there, and examine our scenario.

We are in pre-history. We have two baseline early humans keen to fuck on the plains of wild pre-historical plains, surrounded by larger animals who wish to eat them. Much like going to the bathroom, engaging in the penetrative sexual act will leave both our humans particularly vunerable to attack. And seeing as Cosmopolitan or John Holmes have yet to exist our Brave Early Male isn't all concerned with staying power. In fact, biologically speaking, the most advantageous thing our Early Man could do would be to ejaculate as soon as he entered our Early Lady. His desire would be sated, his genetic material safely deposited and could head back to his mates and smoke a cigar or whatever. Nature however, has other plans. In most cases our Male would be required to engage in what we colloquially refer to as "fucking". He will be required to mount our receptive Female and "hump", that is to say, move his penis in and out of the Female's vagina in a see-sawing motion for approximately 10 minutes.

Lucky Lady.

But why? If we accept our two earlier suppositions, that sex is about procreation and that in this pre-historic era such an act leaves our two humans particularly at risk to predators, why does Nature seek to draw the act out longer than it should be?

The answer dear friends, lies in the Early Human Males that are left behind to watch.

Let's recall that there was originally a group of three Males admiring our Female. We've already watched our Brave Male move to mount our Female. The other two are a little shyer, maybe a little less quick to *ahem* rise to the occasion... However, as they watch our Brave Male have sex with our Female they become more and more excited themselves. They have also noticed that the Female is indeed receptive, she didn't bite or scratch or shriek at our Brave Male when he penetrated her. Our two left behind males become more and more aroused at the act being enjoyed in front of them. (not to get side tracked but this theory also explains our penchant for pornography).

So let us leave our Males here in a state of willing arousal and return to our Fucking Friends.

The Brave Male has done his duty, he has given it his all for 10 minutes (in reality maybe 6) and finally climaxes inside our Female.

Ah, such bliss.

But lo, what is this? Post orgasm our Brave Male doesn't feel so brave any more, his cock begins to wilt, he suddenly feels very vunerable, a bit down and kinda hungry. Why is he even bothering with this female? Ugh. He dismounts and wanders off, looking for some fruit. This is our aforementioned post-coital triesste. Why does this happen? Surely Nature would encourage as much sex as possible to ensure our Female collects as much genetic material as possible? To guarantee insemination?

Enter Male 2.

Our Female is still aroused. Still naturally lubricated and displaying an impressive wide-on. Our two spare males are fully erect from watching the previous Live Sex Show and have lost their reservations, and newly emboldened, Male 2 strides confidently forward and mounts our grateful Female.

Herein lies the crux of the argument.

Gentlemen. Take a moment and look at your penis. Have you ever wondered why it looks as it does? Why it is shaped as it is? The shaft is easily explainable from an engineering perspective, we need it to penetrate the vagina. But why the head? Why it it shaped kinda like a mushroom?

Lets go back to what sex is for. To procreate. Male 2 has watched our Brave Male enter and deposit his genetic material into our Female. Male 2, as a biological entity who's imperative is to ensure the survival of his own genes, feels hugely encouraged to deposit his own genetic material. Is it a case of may the best swimmers win?

Kinda.

See our female is geared, biologically and by evolution, to remain receptive to multiple partners. The more diverse the sampling of genetic material she collects the more chances she has of conceiving a child with preferable genes. She can't rely on our Brave Male to simply have the best, so she will collect samples from Brave Male, Male 2, and ultimately Male 3. Of the 3 males only one will impregnate her. So this is evolution down to it's essence. Samples from 3 males. One egg. May the best Hairless Ape win. Evolutionary reproduction via Thunderdome.

Three males in, One baby out.

But us sneaky males have an ace up our sleeve. Our weirdly shaped cocks. At this point I'd also like to remind you of our earlier problem, why does sex take so long (relatively speaking) when it should be in and out, done and dusted, to safe guard against predators?

The answer once again lies with our cocks. Our receptive Female is full of Brave Male's genetic material. Male 2 feels a desire to replace that with his own, well and good. But in engaging in the act of fucking, in see-sawing in and out of our Female, he is using the head of his mushroom shaped cock to scrape out or remove as much as is possible of our Brave Male's deposit!

This 10 minutes worth of frantic humping, in conjunction with the shape of a males penis, is designed by nature to enable males to attempt to remove any other males semen from a receptive female. This also explains why males suffer from a floppy cock, a distinct lack of interest in sexual matters and some negative emotions immediately after orgasm; if we were continue to fuck after orgasm we run the inherent risk of accidentally removing our own deposit. So we get the post-coital trissete, wander off or go to sleep, seemingly allowing our sperm to make the hazardous journey toward the egg. This also explains why watching other people fuck, or watching pornography excites us. We feel a compulsion to fuck as we perceive other males depositing their material and desire to replace it with our own. This of course goes a long way to explaining the frantic excitement of a sex club, a swingers party, cuckolding, HotWives, etc. - we see other males mating with our partners and seek to replace their material with out own (evolution didn't account for condoms or other forms of birth control - toldja we were sneaky).

Ask any swinger or anyone who engages in sharing or swapping and most will say there's nothing hotter than "reclaim sex". Nature wholeheartedly agrees with you and this is apparently why!

Now, I've been fairly male centric here and I must admit this may be a symptom of the patriarchy and for that I apologize but the sad fact is that quite a lot regarding female sexuality has still to be discovered. The female orgasm for instance has never been adequately explained. There are some theories (the rhythmic clenching of the vaginal walls helps push semen toward the egg etc.) but no one has come across a decisive theory. If we wanted to get into the psychology of HOW women supposedly choose their mates (contrary to the simplistic scenario I constructed above it is NOT as straight forward as Female presents vagina and welcomes all Males) we'd be here for hours and mired in controversy. Female ejaculation is another mystery, in so far as no one can come up with a satisfactory evolutionary explain for it. (aside - it is most definitely not urine as some people claim, it does contain urea but that doesn't make it pee!).

The only thing most evolutionary psychologists seem to be able to agree upon is that women are geared toward sex with mutiple partners. They seek a carer male (one who hunts and can fight off aggressive males and dinosaurs and shit) but whilst searching for a Baby Daddy it makes sense for a female to have sex with as many males as she safely can. This provides the female with a broad diverse cross section of genetic material, ensuring then that she is fertilized with the strongest genes.

Anyone who has seen a liberated woman at a sex party or club can attest to women's frankly impressive capacity for engaging in sexual acts with multiple partners.

I am jealous.

If anyone has any other little factoids or discussion points surrounding this topic I'd love to hear back from you, as I've mentioned I find the whole thing endlessly fascinating!

(also I don't mean to offend anyone as I've mentioned the above are simply theories, not my own but I do think they make a lot of inherent sense!)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *og-ManMan
over a year ago

somewhere

Eating my lunch in my office and have just read the most informative post ever here on fab

Thank you OP

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *antra MassageMan
over a year ago

South Side.

Read Sex at Dawn. I'm reading it at the moment, and it dispels a lot of myths, and covers our human and pre hominid mating activities. It explains why monogamy is unnatural to us as a species, covers swinging and polyamoury. Yes, I'm envious of multi orgasmic women too!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We are animals with our primary instinct being survival of our species

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eralt80Man
over a year ago

cork

Interesting and well writen.

On a side note I’ve noticed I can’t say the word phenomenon without (A) singing the LL Cool J song in my head or (B) the Seasame Street song.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ealitybitesMan
over a year ago

Belfast


"Interesting and well writen.

On a side note I’ve noticed I can’t say the word phenomenon without (A) singing the LL Cool J song in my head or (B) the Seasame Street song. "

That's what I call multitasking

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eralt80Man
over a year ago

cork


"Interesting and well writen.

On a side note I’ve noticed I can’t say the word phenomenon without (A) singing the LL Cool J song in my head or (B) the Seasame Street song.

That's what I call multitasking "

I need to lie down after it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Interesting and well writen.

On a side note I’ve noticed I can’t say the word phenomenon without (A) singing the LL Cool J song in my head or (B) the Seasame Street song.

That's what I call multitasking

I need to lie down after it"

10 minutes to a half an hour later you'll be good to go again

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eralt80Man
over a year ago

cork


"Interesting and well writen.

On a side note I’ve noticed I can’t say the word phenomenon without (A) singing the LL Cool J song in my head or (B) the Seasame Street song.

That's what I call multitasking

I need to lie down after it

10 minutes to a half an hour later you'll be good to go again "

#bouncebackability

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ndefiniteSparkMan
over a year ago

ignites minds to unite ...

Not bad read Bull

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Ok so..interesting and digesting now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Not bad read Bull

"

Thanks Indefinite

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Ok so..interesting and digesting now "

Happy to be of some service

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *s LollyWoman
over a year ago

The pub then supermacs ...

I never read long messages but that one i did very interesting indeed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I never read long messages but that one i did very interesting indeed "

Apologies for the long length Miss....

That's the first time I've ever uttered those particular words!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ustBoWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in Co. Down

An interesting read definitely the longest I've stayed reading on the forums as well.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"An interesting read definitely the longest I've stayed reading on the forums as well. "

Probably the longest I've managed to keep a lady's attention as well Bo!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ealitybitesMan
over a year ago

Belfast

You had me at hello...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ustBoWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in Co. Down


"An interesting read definitely the longest I've stayed reading on the forums as well.

Probably the longest I've managed to keep a lady's attention as well Bo! "

Ah no I very much doubt that PB

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ustBoWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in Co. Down


"You had me at hello..."

Well if I had known that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes indeed- we humans are the product of millions of years of evolution.

The mighty mountain gorilla eats a plant based diet, has tiny testicles and his hareem of female s are completely monogamous to him.

Chimpanzees- by comparison are omnivores, have enormous fucking testicles, and are incredibly promiscuous and hedonistic. They will have sex with any other chimp who feels the need for a bit of naughty fun, anything goes including mating between father and daughter or mother and son.

Us Humans occupy the middle ground between the monogamous mountain gorilla and the incredibly promiscuous chimpanzee. We humans are omnivores, and human males have tend to medium sized testicles. (Unless they have been completely emasculated by the radical feminist left)

Some humans mate for life, and are completely monogamous, while others are almost as promiscuous as their naughty chimpanzee cousins.

Most human females exhibit a peculiar trait know as monkey branching- They find a higher value male in close proximity and attempt to pair-bond with him. If the higher value male is receptive to her advances, they build a nest together and she attempts to lock down her new suitor by chasing away all his friends and associates.

Once the human female has a firm hold on her new mate, she becomes bored and she scans the horizon in search of a higher value male. Once she finds a male of higher value, she begins to transfer her affection to him, while attempting to maintain a firm hold on her incumbent mate. If she is successful in pair bonding with her new suitor, she immediately releases her grip on the lower value male discarding him.

Human males tend to employ a totally different mating strategy to females- They attempt to mate with as many slightly lower status females as possible. The lower the status of the human female, the more enthusiastic she is to pair bond with a higher value male.

I'm forever amused by the comedic value of human frailty.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"

I'm forever amused by the comedic value of human frailty. "

Cool story bro, needs more dragons and shit.

No offense intended friend but I'd humbly ask you peddle your anti-woman incel crap elsewhere.

The grown ups are talking.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You my good man are clearly a simp, a beta male orbiter and a male feminist.

Go cry yourself to sleep

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

A most entertaining and informative thread, thank you bull.

I always love reading about how biological functions have had an impact and been impacted by the evolutionary process.

Having read your post, a possible theory about female ejaculation occurred to me. As you stated the male cock is shaped to clear out another males semen, would female ejaculation help in the process. Say the female found Male 2 a more suitable source of genetic material for her offspring than Brave Male, it could possible heighten her desire for his semen and maybe heighten her excitement resulting in her ejaculating Brave Males semen.

Now I could be talking a load of bollix, which wouldnt surprise me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"You my good man are clearly a simp, a beta male orbiter and a male feminist.

Go cry yourself to sleep "

My dear Boy, you're a trifle too long in the tooth to claim the ignorance of youth, a little bit too literate to claim the excuse of a lack of education and frankly seem to be far less successful with the opposite sex as your bravado would lead one to believe.

But to answer your accusations;

I am indeed a feminist and a particularly proud one at that.

I don't subscribe to the disproven theories of male hierarchies.

I actually had to Google what a "simp" was - the Urban Dictionary provides this nugget: "A man that puts himself in a subservient/submissive position under women in hopes of winning them over, without the female bringing anything to the table." - I can assure you, Dear Boy, I've never been subservient to anyone before in my life.

It must be a sad, cold, lonely, bitter existence you lead if you truly see the world in such a heartless fashion.

I genuinely have sympathy for you.

If at all possible I'd advise therapy.

Or a good pegging from a strong woman.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A most entertaining and informative thread, thank you bull.

I always love reading about how biological functions have had an impact and been impacted by the evolutionary process.

Having read your post, a possible theory about female ejaculation occurred to me. As you stated the male cock is shaped to clear out another males semen, would female ejaculation help in the process. Say the female found Male 2 a more suitable source of genetic material for her offspring than Brave Male, it could possible heighten her desire for his semen and maybe heighten her excitement resulting in her ejaculating Brave Males semen.

Now I could be talking a load of bollix, which wouldnt surprise me "

I would say he shamelessly plagiarized this article from some website on evolutionary biology.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"

I would say he shamelessly plagiarized this article from some website on evolutionary biology. "

Well. Duh.

How the hell else are we supposed to learn?!

I'm nowhere near an Evolutionary Psychologist or an Evolutionary Biologist. I barely passed my Leaving Cert!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"You my good man are clearly a simp, a beta male orbiter and a male feminist.

Go cry yourself to sleep

My dear Boy, you're a trifle too long in the tooth to claim the ignorance of youth, a little bit too literate to claim the excuse of a lack of education and frankly seem to be far less successful with the opposite sex as your bravado would lead one to believe.

But to answer your accusations;

I am indeed a feminist and a particularly proud one at that.

I don't subscribe to the disproven theories of male hierarchies.

I actually had to Google what a "simp" was - the Urban Dictionary provides this nugget: "A man that puts himself in a subservient/submissive position under women in hopes of winning them over, without the female bringing anything to the table." - I can assure you, Dear Boy, I've never been subservient to anyone before in my life.

It must be a sad, cold, lonely, bitter existence you lead if you truly see the world in such a heartless fashion.

I genuinely have sympathy for you.

If at all possible I'd advise therapy.

Or a good pegging from a strong woman.

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *man79Man
over a year ago

newry dundalk. warrenpoint

Well holy fuck that’s helped pass 10 minutes of my life Thankyou all

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parklySassWoman
over a year ago

Sassville

Thanks OP for posting that, I found it a very interesting read!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ealitybitesMan
over a year ago

Belfast


"

I would say he shamelessly plagiarized this article from some website on evolutionary biology.

Well. Duh.

How the hell else are we supposed to learn?!

I'm nowhere near an Evolutionary Psychologist or an Evolutionary Biologist. I barely passed my Leaving Cert! "

And every evolutionary tale has a missing link.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I would say he shamelessly plagiarized this article from some website on evolutionary biology.

Well. Duh.

How the hell else are we supposed to learn?!

I'm nowhere near an Evolutionary Psychologist or an Evolutionary Biologist. I barely passed my Leaving Cert! "

Well I suppose you aren't doing too badly for someone of limited intellectual capacity so. Here is a pearl of wisdom for savvy well traveled worldly wise dude- Don't speak for women or defend their opinions. Women are more than capable of defending their own opinions, as almost seventy percent of college graduates are women nowadays. Any woman with an modicum of common sense knows full well that feminism is all fine and dandy in theory, but only a very tiny minority of women are capable of making shit happen.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"

Well I suppose you aren't doing too badly for someone of limited intellectual capacity so. Here is a pearl of wisdom for savvy well traveled worldly wise dude- Don't speak for women or defend their opinions. Women are more than capable of defending their own opinions, as almost seventy percent of college graduates are women nowadays. Any woman with an modicum of common sense knows full well that feminism is all fine and dandy in theory, but only a very tiny minority of women are capable of making shit happen. "

My Dear Boy, I'm afraid you have absolutely no idea as to my intellectual capacity. Like a lot of the great unwashed, you're confusing formal education with intelligence.

I would advise you, however, to hoard whatever it is you think passes for wisdom for two simple reasons;

1. Apparently you're in short supply.

2. Every post you write is absolute drivel.

There really is no need to expose your ignorance in so blatant and public a fashion. Best keep such "pearls" to yourself Dear Boy.

If you were capable or removing your head from Jordan Peterson's sphincter you'd actually note that I didn't defend any women. We are in fact in agreement on that note, women and men, are more than capable of defending themselves. But they shouldn't really have to you see. It's only people with such a limited and fragmented view of the world and it's inhabitants, who delight in labelling and pigeon holing people that necessitates any sort of defence at all.

Thankfully your brand of troglodyte is dying out. Make haste Dear Boy. Join the rest of the dinosaurs in bitter obscurity and leave the rest of us to just get on it with eh?!

(but you really should try the pegging

)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rmrs1234Couple
over a year ago

Waterford


"

Well I suppose you aren't doing too badly for someone of limited intellectual capacity so. Here is a pearl of wisdom for savvy well traveled worldly wise dude- Don't speak for women or defend their opinions. Women are more than capable of defending their own opinions, as almost seventy percent of college graduates are women nowadays. Any woman with an modicum of common sense knows full well that feminism is all fine and dandy in theory, but only a very tiny minority of women are capable of making shit happen.

My Dear Boy, I'm afraid you have absolutely no idea as to my intellectual capacity. Like a lot of the great unwashed, you're confusing formal education with intelligence.

I would advise you, however, to hoard whatever it is you think passes for wisdom for two simple reasons;

1. Apparently you're in short supply.

2. Every post you write is absolute drivel.

There really is no need to expose your ignorance in so blatant and public a fashion. Best keep such "pearls" to yourself Dear Boy.

If you were capable or removing your head from Jordan Peterson's sphincter you'd actually note that I didn't defend any women. We are in fact in agreement on that note, women and men, are more than capable of defending themselves. But they shouldn't really have to you see. It's only people with such a limited and fragmented view of the world and it's inhabitants, who delight in labelling and pigeon holing people that necessitates any sort of defence at all.

Thankfully your brand of troglodyte is dying out. Make haste Dear Boy. Join the rest of the dinosaurs in bitter obscurity and leave the rest of us to just get on it with eh?!

(but you really should try the pegging

) "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Well holy fuck that’s helped pass 10 minutes of my life Thankyou all "

You're very welcome

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Well I suppose you aren't doing too badly for someone of limited intellectual capacity so. Here is a pearl of wisdom for savvy well traveled worldly wise dude- Don't speak for women or defend their opinions. Women are more than capable of defending their own opinions, as almost seventy percent of college graduates are women nowadays. Any woman with an modicum of common sense knows full well that feminism is all fine and dandy in theory, but only a very tiny minority of women are capable of making shit happen.

My Dear Boy, I'm afraid you have absolutely no idea as to my intellectual capacity. Like a lot of the great unwashed, you're confusing formal education with intelligence.

I would advise you, however, to hoard whatever it is you think passes for wisdom for two simple reasons;

1. Apparently you're in short supply.

2. Every post you write is absolute drivel.

There really is no need to expose your ignorance in so blatant and public a fashion. Best keep such "pearls" to yourself Dear Boy.

If you were capable or removing your head from Jordan Peterson's sphincter you'd actually note that I didn't defend any women. We are in fact in agreement on that note, women and men, are more than capable of defending themselves. But they shouldn't really have to you see. It's only people with such a limited and fragmented view of the world and it's inhabitants, who delight in labelling and pigeon holing people that necessitates any sort of defence at all.

Thankfully your brand of troglodyte is dying out. Make haste Dear Boy. Join the rest of the dinosaurs in bitter obscurity and leave the rest of us to just get on it with eh?!

(but you really should try the pegging

) "

post of the year right there

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eaAndBenCouple
over a year ago

Dublin

Interesting as always PB x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *og-ManMan
over a year ago

somewhere

PB

I once had Jordan Peterson

In work talking for 2 hours to 10,000 people

I have to be honest to this day I haven't got a clue what he was talking about

You've just explained his thinking to me in your last few posts so I really appreciate it

Great thread

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Well I suppose you aren't doing too badly for someone of limited intellectual capacity so. Here is a pearl of wisdom for savvy well traveled worldly wise dude- Don't speak for women or defend their opinions. Women are more than capable of defending their own opinions, as almost seventy percent of college graduates are women nowadays. Any woman with an modicum of common sense knows full well that feminism is all fine and dandy in theory, but only a very tiny minority of women are capable of making shit happen.

My Dear Boy, I'm afraid you have absolutely no idea as to my intellectual capacity. Like a lot of the great unwashed, you're confusing formal education with intelligence.

I would advise you, however, to hoard whatever it is you think passes for wisdom for two simple reasons;

1. Apparently you're in short supply.

2. Every post you write is absolute drivel.

There really is no need to expose your ignorance in so blatant and public a fashion. Best keep such "pearls" to yourself Dear Boy.

If you were capable or removing your head from Jordan Peterson's sphincter you'd actually note that I didn't defend any women. We are in fact in agreement on that note, women and men, are more than capable of defending themselves. But they shouldn't really have to you see. It's only people with such a limited and fragmented view of the world and it's inhabitants, who delight in labelling and pigeon holing people that necessitates any sort of defence at all.

Thankfully your brand of troglodyte is dying out. Make haste Dear Boy. Join the rest of the dinosaurs in bitter obscurity and leave the rest of us to just get on it with eh?!

(but you really should try the pegging

) "

Well pray to whatever God you believe in, that the feminist left doesn't succeed in dismantling the patriarchy. Because if the radical feminist movement ever managed to seize power, big rough men who are willing to defend our modern Democratic way of living will become disenfranchised and disillusioned when their masculinity is no longer appreciated. Military services in all Western countries are already hemorrhaging male personnel at an alarming rate. Nature hates a vacuum, so once radical Islam gains a foothold, and Sharia law is declared- all those delusional feminists will be forced to spread their legs and accept the authority of their new masters, or be put to the sword.

Radical feminism and radical Islam cannot occupy the same space. So feminism will defeat itself.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"

Well pray to whatever God you believe in, that the feminist left doesn't succeed in dismantling the patriarchy. Because if the radical feminist movement ever managed to seize power, big rough men who are willing to defend our modern Democratic way of living will become disenfranchised and disillusioned when their masculinity is no longer appreciated. Military services in all Western countries are already hemorrhaging male personnel at an alarming rate. Nature hates a vacuum, so once radical Islam gains a foothold, and Sharia law is declared- all those delusional feminists will be forced to spread their legs and accept the authority of their new masters, or be put to the sword.

Radical feminism and radical Islam cannot occupy the same space. So feminism will defeat itself. "

Dear Boy, I sincerely hope you are playing a character here. If not then I strongly advocate that you seek out the services of a mental health specialist.

If not a team of them.

Please, stay away from sharp objects, avoid operating heavy machinery and try not talk to children.

I'd also advise a break from the Internet in general, for your own sake (and for ours) because it clearly isn't doing you any favours.

Just an FYI, out there, in the real world, all those big rough military men whose masculinity you clearly idolise so much are just waiting for a guy like you to show your appreciation, preferably orally. I'd wager some of them may even hate women as much as you do.

Best of luck out there you virulent little incel.

Remember, we're not conspiring against you, it's all in your head, your thoughts are not reality and if you want it then help is out there.

Take care Dear Boy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *man79Man
over a year ago

newry dundalk. warrenpoint

I think we should organize a mud fight between the pb and Juan. And settle this the good old fashioned way

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouncytitsbitchWoman
over a year ago

wouldnt you like to know.

Well done and very interesting

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I think we should organize a mud fight between the pb and Juan. And settle this the good old fashioned way "

I'm a lover not a fighter!

And I'm fond of the following affirmation,

"Just as a man who struggles to walk will come to rely on a cane, so will an idiot who struggles to reason will come to rely on the use of his fists."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"PB

I once had Jordan Peterson

In work talking for 2 hours to 10,000 people

I have to be honest to this day I haven't got a clue what he was talking about

You've just explained his thinking to me in your last few posts so I really appreciate it

Great thread "

No one should try and 'understand' Peterson, while he may once have been a respected academic I'm afraid he's swallowed the Kool-Aid and is now full on fringe lunatic. Or he's doing a bit to amass as much money as possible. It's hard to tell with these fudruckers.

Suffice to say if you want an accurate image of Peterson simply imagine him butt nekkid masturbating to a Soviet Era propaganda poster of Stalin whilst using his other hand to shove copious amounts of salted beef into his cavernous gob. And there's probably tonnes of trans porn there too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Thought your post was great OP

Normally with long winded posts I just skim over them

I enjoyed that post alot

Just ashame some idiot had to rail road your thread getting away from the actual topic

Well done for an enjoyable read

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Great read OP, you should put this on the Lounge forum too as we desperately need something interesting to read there

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Well pray to whatever God you believe in, that the feminist left doesn't succeed in dismantling the patriarchy. Because if the radical feminist movement ever managed to seize power, big rough men who are willing to defend our modern Democratic way of living will become disenfranchised and disillusioned when their masculinity is no longer appreciated. Military services in all Western countries are already hemorrhaging male personnel at an alarming rate. Nature hates a vacuum, so once radical Islam gains a foothold, and Sharia law is declared- all those delusional feminists will be forced to spread their legs and accept the authority of their new masters, or be put to the sword.

Radical feminism and radical Islam cannot occupy the same space. So feminism will defeat itself. "

Radical feminism? In ref to what’s been said in this thread? Nah. Feminism being scary? Only for a certain type of sad and lonely man. You know, the type that always complains he can’t get anyone to meet him?

Humming ‘Sisters are doing it for themselves’ as I go off and chat to some incredibly sexy men who understand the world...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Great read OP, you should put this on the Lounge forum too as we desperately need something interesting to read there "

Thank you

Have just done so

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Thought I'd slide across the water....its bizarre over here isnt it. Some hottie men and some strange view points...how lovely

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Thought I'd slide across the water....its bizarre over here isnt it. Some hottie men and some strange view points...how lovely "

We wouldn't have it any other than bizarre

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *man79Man
over a year ago

newry dundalk. warrenpoint


"I think we should organize a mud fight between the pb and Juan. And settle this the good old fashioned way

I'm a lover not a fighter!

And I'm fond of the following affirmation,

"Just as a man who struggles to walk will come to rely on a cane, so will an idiot who struggles to reason will come to rely on the use of his fists."

"

I like that. I like that a lot!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"

I like that. I like that a lot! "

I wish I could claim credit.... Think it originally came from Cicero!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *og-ManMan
over a year ago

somewhere

I've just realised i was getting confused with the opposite viewpoints of the same person on these threads

There's a bmann77 and a bman 79....makes sense now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Great thread, PB, and an informative read. Thank you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 21/04/20 14:43:06]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Great read PB , a lot makes sense from a woman's perspective and as for the female ejeculation, its only happened to be once can catagorically deny it's urine. It's such a weird sensation that I can only imagine is likened to the point of male one. It's not as intense as an orgasm different feeling for me anyway. Sending virtual kisses your way

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 21/04/20 14:50:36]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oghunter33Woman
over a year ago

on the hill NordWest of

Just to add something on the female side of sexuality a simple explanation for the female orgasm might just be that sexual pleasure encourages women to have more sex, making them more likely to conceive. Another theory is that once ovulation was triggered by sexual copulation and over time it mutated into once a month ovulation and the orgasm is the happy left over bit of it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

To be honest once I orgasm I'm too sensitive to orgasm again for a while so those ten minutes of recovery time is vital for me. That's why you need good pillow talk

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Good to see the ladies contributing with their own experiences!

H'on the Girlos!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I know, the neck of us

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *og-ManMan
over a year ago

somewhere

I remember seeing a documentary a few years ago where it said that a woman's orgasm also helped conception

It actually showed an orgasm from the inside and during the contractions the cervix literally dipped down into the pool of semen and sucked it up to help the swimmers on their way

Isn't nature feckin wonderful all the same

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ealitybitesMan
over a year ago

Belfast


"I know, the neck of us "

Careful now. You aren't allowed an opinion.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I know, the neck of us "

How's my sandwich coming along?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *un chickWoman
over a year ago

Fermanagh

Interesting read thanks PB

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Interesting read thanks PB "

De nada.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rmrs1234Couple
over a year ago

Waterford

hmmmm interesting take

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"hmmmm interesting take"

It ain't mine unfortunately, I just think it's a very interesting group of theories!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I must admit that was a riveting thread right to the end.... PB kudos

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onkeykong2020Man
over a year ago

galway

Really informative and interesting , best I’ve ever read on here, (by a long ways), the inner child just wants to say Juan sheet is plenty (sorry!!)..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

OP sorry I couldn't read all that but the bit I did read I have a Q on.

3 males, 1 female, best chance of impregnating her so she stays 'receptive'.. what about the obvious, STIs? Wouldn't make sense to be receptive to multiple partners when along comes mr STI. Lol

It may have been addressed and apologies if so but this is way too long and I've a list of news programmes to watch before bed!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"OP sorry I couldn't read all that but the bit I did read I have a Q on.

3 males, 1 female, best chance of impregnating her so she stays 'receptive'.. what about the obvious, STIs? Wouldn't make sense to be receptive to multiple partners when along comes mr STI. Lol

It may have been addressed and apologies if so but this is way too long and I've a list of news programmes to watch before bed!"

Well that depends on the STI. In the era we're talking about there is no globalisation. 'Herds' of humans would be relatively small and tend to breed within their own group. Usually a group of 40-50. Outside genes might have been introduced on occasions bit said outside genes would still be relatively local, no planes, trains or automobiles.

And when we're discussing STI's we have to remember that most are actually mostly benign and only cause cosmetic or minor discomfort. Gential warts, chlamydia, gonorrhea and herpes (depending on the severity) would all be happily ignored by more of our early humans. HIV and AIDS were still hundreds of thousands or years away. Syphilis could present a problem but only in some cases and most likely not until later in life, with a life expectancy running to around 35-40 most early humans probably wouldn't be all that affected.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilthyNightsCouple
over a year ago

East / North, Cork

Brilliant thread well done. On the subject of the female orgasm.. there are theories that explain it in the following way... For the first 6 weeks or so after conception, human foetal development is indistinguishable between male and female. It is only once the testes begin to produce male sex hormones in those with male chromosomes that they diverge. This is the reason that men have nipples (because women need them to produce milk) and the reason that women have a clitoris (because men need a penis to reproduce). The early development of (what would go on to be) the penis is what becomes a clitoris in females once the male sex hormone is not released in the body of a future-female fetus. Therefore female orgasms exist because women once had little pre-cock in early development. Just a theory

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Brilliant thread well done. On the subject of the female orgasm.. there are theories that explain it in the following way... For the first 6 weeks or so after conception, human foetal development is indistinguishable between male and female. It is only once the testes begin to produce male sex hormones in those with male chromosomes that they diverge. This is the reason that men have nipples (because women need them to produce milk) and the reason that women have a clitoris (because men need a penis to reproduce). The early development of (what would go on to be) the penis is what becomes a clitoris in females once the male sex hormone is not released in the body of a future-female fetus. Therefore female orgasms exist because women once had little pre-cock in early development. Just a theory "

One that is finely elegant!

Would go a ways to debunking the notion that the female orgasm is a psychological phenomenon (it's actually not unheard of for women to orgasm during a sexual assault) but is actually a physical response to sexual stimulation.

Also helps encourage females to be promiscuous. Male 1 didn't get you there? Maybe male 2 or 3 will....

Thank you for the feedback

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilthyNightsCouple
over a year ago

East / North, Cork

No thank YOU for the best thread in ages.

I'd also encourage anyone who is unconvinced (or bored) to type "big clit" into your favourite pornsite.. and then come back and tell me that this theory is wrong

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 22/04/20 08:09:36]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"No thank YOU for the best thread in ages.

I'd also encourage anyone who is unconvinced (or bored) to type "big clit" into your favourite pornsite.. and then come back and tell me that this theory is wrong "

Steroid abuse can also contribute.... Too much testosterone causes the clitoris to swell and grow. It can also stop menstruation.

Best not to fuck with the body's hormone balance.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Thanks that answered it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilthyNightsCouple
over a year ago

East / North, Cork


"No thank YOU for the best thread in ages.

I'd also encourage anyone who is unconvinced (or bored) to type "big clit" into your favourite pornsite.. and then come back and tell me that this theory is wrong

Steroid abuse can also contribute.... Too much testosterone causes the clitoris to swell and grow. It can also stop menstruation.

Best not to fuck with the body's hormone balance. "

Absolutely. And it's the reason that natural increases or decreases in hormone levels in early development can bring about intersex people.. and that the line between male and female isn't QUITE as clear cut as some think they are. Nature doesn't make these distinctions in the same way as we like to do.. and just goes with the hormonal flow.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"No thank YOU for the best thread in ages.

I'd also encourage anyone who is unconvinced (or bored) to type "big clit" into your favourite pornsite.. and then come back and tell me that this theory is wrong

Steroid abuse can also contribute.... Too much testosterone causes the clitoris to swell and grow. It can also stop menstruation.

Best not to fuck with the body's hormone balance.

Absolutely. And it's the reason that natural increases or decreases in hormone levels in early development can bring about intersex people.. and that the line between male and female isn't QUITE as clear cut as some think they are. Nature doesn't make these distinctions in the same way as we like to do.. and just goes with the hormonal flow."

Nature doesn't do duality, or straight lines! Or straight sexuality or gender, which is why I'm a believer in the Kinsey Scale as well!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We're well overdue a date

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"We're well overdue a date "

Ready, able and VERY willing Dear Lady

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *man79Man
over a year ago

newry dundalk. warrenpoint


"I've just realised i was getting confused with the opposite viewpoints of the same person on these threads

There's a bmann77 and a bman 79....makes sense now

"

There’s only one Bman that’s Bman79!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top