Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Site help |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can you imagine how quickly all the paying single guys would vanish from the site if they could only “see” the couples who they matched with! The site only works by enticing single guys (and some couples) into thinking there are 1000’s of cpls and fems they can contact for possible sex! So if your search / browse only showed up the 3/4 cpls who want single guys, those couples would get bobmarded and then leave!! Then your search would bring up 0 couples and what would the hopeful paying guys do then.... well they would see the reality and leave = stop paying... and the site would die! They have to advertise the web cam users, the “hot” single fem pics and the illusion there is an abundance of willing to meet single fems for all!! Which is why Pre-search filters/blocks would never be allowed! IMHO anyway!! " You do realise that you don't need to be a site supporter to use Fab, that being a SS only adds a few extra features. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seemsto me if you cannot message or wink people who are out of your age age in what there looking for. Why doesn' it just block you from looking at peoples profile out of age range period. Would save a lot of time?" That's true, but it's in your power to do that if you wish to filter them out. It's not such an uncommon practice to use it as a general filter. As has been said you have to go in each time to tick that and if you forget it just frustrating to say the least...As is the need to tick ones preference for smokers or non smokers. Admin if your listening... Please can this page be set up so one can set the preferences once and if one wants to say meet a smoker then one can change it...But this feature should be rolled out that if I'm not interested in meeting smokers then I shouldn't have to keep remembering to tick it as I don't meet smokers. The same with age thing... why would I want to view profiles in a search that don't want to meet anyone of my sex or age? Please consider changing it. It's only use atm is to deliberately put on smokers only...search and them block them all so they don't appear in future searches as I'd never meet them anyway. I feel there are alot of profiles being blocked because the filtering system is very poor. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You do realise that you don't need to be a site supporter to use Fab, that being a SS only adds a few extra features." Yes totally understand that, but wasn’t my point at all if i am honest!! My point was that if the site ONLY showed the profiles that the OP (and others) were a) aligned with based on profile preferences i.e. not showing all the “no single guys” profiles b) not showing profiles that they are not able to contact. Then there would be a much reduced searchable “pool” and this would impact the perception of how many people were even in their target demographic or interested in them in their demographic!! Believe that would quickly drop the number of guys and as such the potential revenue stream!! Hence why such basic search filters are not implimented!! All only in my honest opinion of course not stating anything as a fact!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You do realise that you don't need to be a site supporter to use Fab, that being a SS only adds a few extra features. Yes totally understand that, but wasn’t my point at all if i am honest!! My point was that if the site ONLY showed the profiles that the OP (and others) were a) aligned with based on profile preferences i.e. not showing all the “no single guys” profiles b) not showing profiles that they are not able to contact. Then there would be a much reduced searchable “pool” and this would impact the perception of how many people were even in their target demographic or interested in them in their demographic!! Believe that would quickly drop the number of guys and as such the potential revenue stream!! Hence why such basic search filters are not implimented!! All only in my honest opinion of course not stating anything as a fact!! " Think most people realise that is the case and for that reason you suggest know it won't change. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
