FabSwingers.com forum: Photo rejected - you don't seem to be in it

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Recently uploaded some pics from a meet I had. They showed my play mate, legs spread, with just my hand present in the shot, all were approved by one mod only to be rejected by another later in the day.

It's very frustrating that this can happen. I think it would be far better if the second mod could get in touch with the poster to discuss the images before they get rejected, after all, they have been approved by a site appointed moderator to start with.

It feels like there isn't a uniform approval process if something is approved by one then that decision over ridden by another with no recourse with the image poster.

If a guy uploads a pic of a woman deep throating him and all that can be seen is a tiny exposure of his shaft, is he in the photo any more than my hand playing with a toy between my playmates legs? Also the angle at which my shots were taken would make it impossible for said hand to belong to anyone other than the person taking the photo - me.

Admin?

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

correct me if im mistaken but your profile is that of a male and the photo rules say that the pics uploaded must be of you , the two newest pics on your profile depict a spreadlegged ladys pussy and boobs , clearly not you . when a person looks at a profile they want to see pics of that person who owns the profile. That might be the reason the pics were rejected saying they appear to not depict you (which is actually true)

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Apart from the fact my hand is in both, and unless my play mate has very long and double jointed forearms, I can't see how the hands shown can be anyone's but mine

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *oluptuousWetOneWoman
over a year ago

Wokingham / Reading

Mistakes are made with the volume that get uploaded sounds like someone reported the pics for them to be removed later

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Apart from the fact my hand is in both, and unless my play mate has very long and double jointed forearms, I can't see how the hands shown can be anyone's but mine"

in that case why not just upload a pic of your hand on its own ( the hand is yours and you can display it ) whereas the boobs and spread pussy are NOT yours and therefore dont qualify to be on your pics in this circumstance.You seem to be missing the glaringly obvious issue with the pics .

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Mistakes are made with the volume that get uploaded sounds like someone reported the pics for them to be removed later "

That's what I thought

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Apart from the fact my hand is in both, and unless my play mate has very long and double jointed forearms, I can't see how the hands shown can be anyone's but mine

What if I uploaded a shot receiving a blowjob though, showing just a small part of my cock and the rest being her face, would that qualify?

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Apart from the fact my hand is in both, and unless my play mate has very long and double jointed forearms, I can't see how the hands shown can be anyone's but mine

I also happen to have her full permission to post the pics, in which I am present.

I think you're just being argumentative for the sake of it and aren't adding or contributing anything of actual value to this thread, the pics show me in them, if only a small part, enjoying the moment my playmate was bound.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

the main focus of the pic is supposed to be the account holder , in the case of the likely pics youve had removed the main focus was of a female . I think this is where the issue lies . IF you come across pics of a full face lady sucking cock on a single male profile with only the corner of his todger on view then those pics are also in breach and will likely be removed by mods too .

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"the main focus of the pic is supposed to be the account holder , in the case of the likely pics youve had removed the main focus was of a female . I think this is where the issue lies . IF you come across pics of a full face lady sucking cock on a single male profile with only the corner of his todger on view then those pics are also in breach and will likely be removed by mods too ."

Photo Rules

Strictly adults 18+ only. You and anyone in the photos must be aged 18+ and MUST have been 18+ at the time the photos were taken.

The photos must be yours and you must be in the photos. You must be in any photo you upload. This means that photos of your bike/car/dildo collection for example, will be rejected unless you are in the photo too.

Nothing nasty. The photo can't show anyone who might be being hurt, or who has been hurt. It also can't show anything that is outside the norms. If it's too rude, taboo or unpleasant, or if it puts us off our dinner, it is not welcome here.

We're not Facebook. The site isn't for family shots, it's not facebook. That means ONLY pictures of adults aged 18+ at the time the photo was taken, no matter what the context.

No watermarks. Photo can't be watermarked. If your photo is watermarked either by this site or another site, it will be rejected. We can only accept original photos.

Others in your photo OK so long as faces are obscured and you have permission. You can have other people in your photos too (to clarify, you must also be in the photo) so long as you have their permission to upload to your account on here AND their faces are obscured (face pixellated or blacked out; just blacking out the eyes is NOT ok).

Legal. The photo can't show any illegal activity.

No pets / animals. Sorry, but you can't include your pets in the photos. Unfortunately, this turns some perverts on and we don't want their kind on Fab.

No public scenes with identifiable adults or under 18s. Photos taken in public places with other people in the background who can be identified OR under 18 will be rejected. If you have photos like this you want on the site, crop them in a graphics program or blank everyone in the background.

Hmmm... pretty sure there's no mention of specific focus of a photo being the account holder who has uploaded it, just that the uploader must be in the photo... hmmm

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

apologies , you might be right . I mod a similar site ( not this one) and I assumed the rules stated what I posted above . Hopefully someone can clarify for you .

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"apologies , you might be right . I mod a similar site ( not this one) and I assumed the rules stated what I posted above . Hopefully someone can clarify for you ."

It's cool, I get where you're coming from. It's just frustrating to have something approved and then unapproved hours later.

As someone else pointed out, they were probably reported, but again, I think there needs to be a better way of managing photos when that happens. What if you scorn another member, they could effectively stop you from ever being able to post a photo again, and you'd never know as all you'd get as the poster would be seeing your pics rejected when you go to manage them.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ilmiss75Woman
over a year ago

Thornton

maybe coz there is much more of another person than there is of the profile holder.

I mean, why post a pic of just your hand anyway

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *he Queen of TartsWoman
Forum Mod
over a year ago

My Own Little World

"apologies , you might be right . I mod a similar site ( not this one) and I assumed the rules stated what I posted above . Hopefully someone can clarify for you ."

The rules quoted are correct.

The profile holder has to be in all pics, any other person's identity has to be obscured and have given their permission for their pics to be displayed.

So yes, just a hand is fine.

" .....all were approved by one mod only to be rejected by another later in the day.

How would you know who accepted or rejected your pics?

I have never known who has, if it were one mod or more, or if the pics were reported and removed by Admin.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *MistressDee!Woman
over a year ago

Chester-le-Street

I'm sick of having photos rejected when they are clearly of me.! I've just had another rejected. It's a screen shot of a video of me flogging MY boots! Annoying to say the least.

And it's annoying when you see other profiles with Bart Simpson pics or stupid cartoon images as profile pics which have obviously been accepted!

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *MistressDee!Woman
over a year ago

Chester-le-Street

I uploaded another but typed on 'this is me in image' and it's been approved. What a carry on. I can understand if the image is kinda random and doesn't resemble your other pics or you but when it is clearly you, it just doesn't make sense to me.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

As always, leave the rejected pic in your gallery and ask Admin from the contact button to review

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately