 |
By *oppaea OP Woman
21 hours ago
Bristol |
Is anybody else getting their own videos of themselves rejected by the approvers because they think the content is from the internet?
I'd be interested to know the criteria they use to come to this decision, as they are telling me that videos of me (taken in my bedroom, and not currently shared with anyone else) look like they've been taken off the internet & they can only accept the original. They ARE the originals, taken on my phone (which is the phone I'm using to upload them), & my face is clearly shown. Do they not have access to my other pictures when they review, as they could easily see it's me if they did?
It's most frustrating as there isn't any way to add an explanation, & the latest video is one that I'd like to share with the other person (his face isn't shown, only his cock), & this is currently the only way I can show it to him.
Is there anyway I can submit evidence to allow this video to be uploaded? I wasn't intending it to be public anyway, & the content is no difference to a number of my existing videos.
I've also often had items rejected as "too rude" (which I find bewildering, given the nature of the site), only to see other users post videos of the same acts. The published photo guidelines are at best vague, as we will all have our own individual opinions on what constitutes "nasty". It's very unclear to me why a video of someone using a monster dildo on me is ok, but fisting is not, especially when I've seen other users post fisting videos. Perhaps I'm missing something, but I have looked at the guidance & drawn a blank.
Perhaps the admins could publish the more detailed guidance they presumably give to approvers, which might help us to avoid frustration, as well as saving the approvers time?
It would be useful to know the thoughts of other users, & of course of admin too.
Thanks |
