Rejected photos "too rude"

Jump to newest

By *oxxy OP Man
41 weeks ago

Nr Kettering

Posted this in site feedback as something clearly needs updating on the rules, but I'll try here. I keep getting photos rejected and I can't see why. Just poses in fetishwear outfits, and not particularly good ones. Certainly nothing too rude, scary and absolutely nowhere near lots of apparently allowed content such as hard anal etc! I'm at a loss as to what I'm doing wrong, and if there's a rule being broken then surely that should be in the rules? Is fetishwear banned?

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *oxxy OP Man
41 weeks ago

Nr Kettering

And now someone has gone and rejected my older photos too?

Surely Fab, isn't *that* closed minded?

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *uliette500Woman
41 weeks ago

Hull

Apparently some types of fetish wear is banned. I believe gimp masks, for example, are not allowed.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *oxxy OP Man
41 weeks ago

Nr Kettering

That's good to know, although that's absolutely something that should be made clear - we are after all, not mind readers. Happy to abide by rules, after all it's their site, but if we don't know them...

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *uliette500Woman
41 weeks ago

Hull

"And now someone has gone and rejected my older photos too?

Surely Fab, isn't *that* closed minded?"

Remember this is a swinging site not a fetish site. They are quite strict on where they draw the lines.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *oxxy OP Man
41 weeks ago

Nr Kettering

Agree, but catering for one fetish but not another is just odd.

Needs documenting of course, hence the original post in the feedback section.

Would any moderator like to elaborate, for instance if the images were cropped to remove the head (that sounds wrong, sorry!

) or it "blurred" out, would that satisfy requirements please?

Thanks for the responses so far by the way, appreciated.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately