Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Site help |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Fabs is inclusive so welcomes new people. Why penalise new people or people not yet (or opt not to get) verified? Everyone starts as new and people just looking does no harm "Both good cases for debate Like that you are the defender of the new and inexperienced......  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What harm does people looking do? I never understand this, there’s no way to know what someone’s looking for without looking at their profile for a start. I just don’t see how it hurts anyone." Totally agree with this. Happy for anyone to look at my profile. And when I have public photos don't care who fabs them | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Fabs is inclusive so welcomes new people. Why penalise new people or people not yet (or opt not to get) verified? Everyone starts as new and people just looking does no harm "as we all know, a large portion of new profiles have the wrong motive for being on the website I.E. picture collecting, false impersonation, stalking, harassment. It’s these profile that we should be trying to keep out. We wouldn’t be penalising new genuine profile’s by giving all user the ability to filter out these new unverified profiles. New(Genuine member) still have the ability to get photo/cam/meet verified and are no longer filtered out. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it the fault of unverified members that there not verified. Its up to others to verify a member .so you want to penalise some one whome have no control over circumstances. Are ,are you just getting started. Next it will be men and wemon over sixty not wanted ? " It’s not really “up to others” to verify new members, you make it sound like you think people are obliged to verify other people. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it the fault of unverified members that there not verified. Its up to others to verify a member .so you want to penalise some one whome have no control over circumstances. Are ,are you just getting started. Next it will be men and wemon over sixty not wanted ? " hope not, I like wemons over 60  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m not sure if this has been discussed in great detail already but I couldn’t seem to find any post relating to this topic. Why has fabswingers not introduced a system whereby you can chose to filter out certain traffic from your profile, for example. prohibit all non photo verified profiles from viewing your profile. prohibit all Profiles with no verification from viewing your profile. prohibit all males profiles from viewing your profile. Am I the only one who would welcome this idea? " Hi If you go to filters you can do some of what you list. Hope that helps Op | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
