Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I fully understand the reasoning for having message filters, thus preventing messages being sent from unwanted groups whether that be age, sex or whatever, and I have myself deployed them too. It is frustrating though when you see something you'd like to pass onto a couple as a message, but are prevented from doing so. An example is a couple from Ireland have looked at my profile, and as they only wish to deal with couples understandably haven't messaged, winked or added me as a friend. However when I glanced at their profile, they say they wish to know about parties and events at swinger clubs. By chance, I am aware of a large party taking place at a swinger club in May which they may have been interested in, not to attend with me, but simply to attend, but there appears to be no way to communicate this information to them. Maybe there could be a solution, like a tweet sized message that can only be used once, unless that receiptiant responds by perhaps saying accept "tweets" from this person, to pass useful information on, or am i simply being naive." In this tale of two people, it's only frustrating for you. For the couple, things are working exactly as expected and since they have no idea what they're missing out on, it's not frustrating for them. If things were changed so you (and everyone else) could bypass their explicit requests (no single guys), things would probably be more frustrating for them? Admin x Admin x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I fully understand the reasoning for having message filters, thus preventing messages being sent from unwanted groups whether that be age, sex or whatever, and I have myself deployed them too. It is frustrating though when you see something you'd like to pass onto a couple as a message, but are prevented from doing so. An example is a couple from Ireland have looked at my profile, and as they only wish to deal with couples understandably haven't messaged, winked or added me as a friend. However when I glanced at their profile, they say they wish to know about parties and events at swinger clubs. By chance, I am aware of a large party taking place at a swinger club in May which they may have been interested in, not to attend with me, but simply to attend, but there appears to be no way to communicate this information to them. Maybe there could be a solution, like a tweet sized message that can only be used once, unless that receiptiant responds by perhaps saying accept "tweets" from this person, to pass useful information on, or am i simply being naive." Some people dont appreciate being contacted by those they don't want to meet even if it is to give them some help | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I fully understand the reasoning for having message filters, thus preventing messages being sent from unwanted groups whether that be age, sex or whatever, and I have myself deployed them too. It is frustrating though when you see something you'd like to pass onto a couple as a message, but are prevented from doing so. An example is a couple from Ireland have looked at my profile, and as they only wish to deal with couples understandably haven't messaged, winked or added me as a friend. However when I glanced at their profile, they say they wish to know about parties and events at swinger clubs. By chance, I am aware of a large party taking place at a swinger club in May which they may have been interested in, not to attend with me, but simply to attend, but there appears to be no way to communicate this information to them. Maybe there could be a solution, like a tweet sized message that can only be used once, unless that receiptiant responds by perhaps saying accept "tweets" from this person, to pass useful information on, or am i simply being naive. In this tale of two people, it's only frustrating for you. For the couple, things are working exactly as expected and since they have no idea what they're missing out on, it's not frustrating for them. If things were changed so you (and everyone else) could bypass their explicit requests (no single guys), things would probably be more frustrating for them? Admin x Admin x" Fair point admin, i guess what you don't know, you'll never miss and as I said in the OP, I understood the reasoning for the filter option. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |