Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"1- why do the photo admins allow filtered photos Photos of just legs or close up bum cheeks Surely neither of these are acceptable as they do not show an adequate representation of the subjects and only clog up your server 2- Why when we have blocked single men can they access our profile to fab our photos 3- Why when we have blocked smokers, they still show up in our who is near based on our filters " 1. You have pics of just your bum. 2. Everyone can see your profile and pics if they have an account. 3. I don't think who's near is based on your filters, it's just who's near. None of these are exactly serious issues. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"1- why do the photo admins allow filtered photos Photos of just legs or close up bum cheeks Surely neither of these are acceptable as they do not show an adequate representation of the subjects and only clog up your server 2- Why when we have blocked single men can they access our profile to fab our photos 3- Why when we have blocked smokers, they still show up in our who is near based on our filters 1. You have pics of just your bum. 2. Everyone can see your profile and pics if they have an account. 3. I don't think who's near is based on your filters, it's just who's near. None of these are exactly serious issues. " Oh dear Ok here goes 1, we have more than 1 type of photo on here that shows our entire body apart from our face, we don’t just have legs and close up of arse to hide everything else 2. We have selected to block men but they can still access our profile 3. Who’s near is based on the filters, read the rope of the page on who’s near Please refrain from replying unless you’re the site owners as it isn’t a discussion, it’s a question to the site owners | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"You can't be serious. "Absolutely serious why wouldn’t we be Are we not allowed to raise questions? If you’re not the site owners what does it matter to you? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"1- why do the photo admins allow filtered photos Photos of just legs or close up bum cheeks Surely neither of these are acceptable as they do not show an adequate representation of the subjects and only clog up your server 2- Why when we have blocked single men can they access our profile to fab our photos 3- Why when we have blocked smokers, they still show up in our who is near based on our filters 1. You have pics of just your bum. 2. Everyone can see your profile and pics if they have an account. 3. I don't think who's near is based on your filters, it's just who's near. None of these are exactly serious issues. Oh dear Ok here goes 1, we have more than 1 type of photo on here that shows our entire body apart from our face, we don’t just have legs and close up of arse to hide everything else 2. We have selected to block men but they can still access our profile 3. Who’s near is based on the filters, read the rope of the page on who’s near Please refrain from replying unless you’re the site owners as it isn’t a discussion, it’s a question to the site owners " The who's near also shows that sex and age are the filters they use so smokers aren't filtered out. People can use any pics they like, as long as it is of them. Anyone can look at your profile, men just can't message you if you blocked them. You posted on a public forum, I'm allowed to respond. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Who near are supposed to be matched to our preferences We have clicked no smokers So why is that preference not adhered to Again unless you’re the site owners there is no need to reply as you are not responsible for the site development " No I'm not but I was trying to help you answer the questions, there's honestly no need for your attitude. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I didn't think you could block smokers, it would be a great option though. " You can’t! Just a preference for others to see. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I didn't think you could block smokers, it would be a great option though. You can’t! Just a preference for others to see. " Yep, a preference that isn't included in the who's near preferences. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I didn't think you could block smokers, it would be a great option though. You can’t! Just a preference for others to see. Yep, a preference that isn't included in the who's near preferences. "  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I didn't think you could block smokers, it would be a great option though. You can’t! Just a preference for others to see. Yep, a preference that isn't included in the who's near preferences. " Who’s near works on gprs , not on your preferences aswell I assume. So if I block all new members messaging me they will still show up on who’s near. I think that’s how it works | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I didn't think you could block smokers, it would be a great option though. You can’t! Just a preference for others to see. Yep, a preference that isn't included in the who's near preferences. Who’s near works on gprs , not on your preferences aswell I assume. So if I block all new members messaging me they will still show up on who’s near. I think that’s how it works " You can choose to show who's near based on your preferences but it only takes into account age and sex I think. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Folks with the greatest of respect and it is out of respect Please unless you’re the people in charge of fixing the bugs, developing the site, or the actual person that can answer these issue Don’t comment It isn't a discussion, it is a highlight of things that we feel are wrong with the site But here goes again you will notice we have a variety of photos, some of close ups but others of full body, this isn’t just a profile of 8 photos of our legs or 3 photos of an arse cheek, so your comments are invalid and as useful as a bucket of warm spit " You have an awful attitude, don't post in a public forum if you don't want people to respond, you can contact admin privately. Also, saying its respectful doesn't make it so. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"You’ll find that people’s attitude is based on the way that they are treated If there was an undercurrent of attitude it would not have been addressed with politeness and the manners to ask people to refrain If you do not have the actual skills to know the in depth knowledge of the way this site is developed that the responses are nothing more than piss in wind They aren’t helpful, if the questions we’ve raised are offensive to you then report them, if the questions aren’t specifically targeting you then ignore them It’s really is that simple But walking the entire length of a stick to get to the wrong end of it so you can label us as having an attitude is just well childish behaviour Unless you are safe in the knowledge and 100% know us personally (which you don’t) you can’t assume that the written word is to be taken the way you’ve taken it And I assure you, if it wasn’t with respect, we wouldn’t have bothered our 12 photos of close up arses to write it " And you think this isn't a bad attitude? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"You’ll find that people’s attitude is based on the way that they are treated If there was an undercurrent of attitude it would not have been addressed with politeness and the manners to ask people to refrain If you do not have the actual skills to know the in depth knowledge of the way this site is developed that the responses are nothing more than piss in wind They aren’t helpful, if the questions we’ve raised are offensive to you then report them, if the questions aren’t specifically targeting you then ignore them It’s really is that simple But walking the entire length of a stick to get to the wrong end of it so you can label us as having an attitude is just well childish behaviour Unless you are safe in the knowledge and 100% know us personally (which you don’t) you can’t assume that the written word is to be taken the way you’ve taken it And I assure you, if it wasn’t with respect, we wouldn’t have bothered our 12 photos of close up arses to write it " Well I know how gprs works and “who’s near functionality works on this so therefore I do know how it works and your smoking preferences aren’t included in who’s near. One question answered for you | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I didn't think you could block smokers, it would be a great option though. You can’t! Just a preference for others to see. Yep, a preference that isn't included in the who's near preferences. Who’s near works on gprs , not on your preferences aswell I assume. So if I block all new members messaging me they will still show up on who’s near. I think that’s how it works " But it shouldn’t though It states who is nearby that match your preferences Our preferences are No single men Won’t meet smokers Yet both still show up so surely it’s a site glitch that can be fixed, hence why were asking and more importantly its only something the person who developed the site can answer | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I didn't think you could block smokers, it would be a great option though. You can’t! Just a preference for others to see. Yep, a preference that isn't included in the who's near preferences. Who’s near works on gprs , not on your preferences aswell I assume. So if I block all new members messaging me they will still show up on who’s near. I think that’s how it works But it shouldn’t though It states who is nearby that match your preferences Our preferences are No single men Won’t meet smokers Yet both still show up so surely it’s a site glitch that can be fixed, hence why were asking and more importantly its only something the person who developed the site can answer" Only works on your filters and smoking isn’t on filters | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I didn't think you could block smokers, it would be a great option though. You can’t! Just a preference for others to see. Yep, a preference that isn't included in the who's near preferences. Who’s near works on gprs , not on your preferences aswell I assume. So if I block all new members messaging me they will still show up on who’s near. I think that’s how it works But it shouldn’t though It states who is nearby that match your preferences Our preferences are No single men Won’t meet smokers Yet both still show up so surely it’s a site glitch that can be fixed, hence why were asking and more importantly its only something the person who developed the site can answer" It isn't a glitch, it specifies at the top of the who's near page which preferences are included, smoking isn't included. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I simply answered the original post with information that would help you, you responded with a bad attitude which was unnecessary. As I said, if you don't want people responding, contact admin privately, they don't respond personally to feedback messages but they will read them. " Again, it seems to be a site glitch, nothing that you or us or the others so far that have commented can fix Hence why we politely pointed out that unless you can fix it, there really is no point in commenting And there really isn’t, we can all have ideas as to fix things or have an opinion that will differ from ours But There really is no point on this thread, the reason we ask about the photos is that, how can they be a representation of the person who has posted the profile, they could be of anything or anyone, Kim Kardashian’s left arse cheek for all we know, yet people who have obviously filtered the life out of themselves are allowed to post too It seems the photo mods are being very lazy, if we had the job we would reverse image search every single photo, at least one full body pic on every profile of each person, no filters In this day and age of catfish and internet fraud surely fab should be on the ball especially when there are naked photos of the genuine people at stake | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It isn't a glitch, it specifies at the top of the who's near page which preferences are included, smoking isn't included. " Where? We can’t see that, is it on a desktop site as we only use mobile? If it is the desktop site then yes it’s defo a glitch that you can’t see that on mobile | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"You’ll find that people’s attitude is based on the way that they are treated If there was an undercurrent of attitude it would not have been addressed with politeness and the manners to ask people to refrain If you do not have the actual skills to know the in depth knowledge of the way this site is developed that the responses are nothing more than piss in wind They aren’t helpful, if the questions we’ve raised are offensive to you then report them, if the questions aren’t specifically targeting you then ignore them It’s really is that simple But walking the entire length of a stick to get to the wrong end of it so you can label us as having an attitude is just well childish behaviour Unless you are safe in the knowledge and 100% know us personally (which you don’t) you can’t assume that the written word is to be taken the way you’ve taken it And I assure you, if it wasn’t with respect, we wouldn’t have bothered our 12 photos of close up arses to write it Well I know how gprs works and “who’s near functionality works on this so therefore I do know how it works and your smoking preferences aren’t included in who’s near. One question answered for you " Thank you  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I simply answered the original post with information that would help you, you responded with a bad attitude which was unnecessary. As I said, if you don't want people responding, contact admin privately, they don't respond personally to feedback messages but they will read them. Again, it seems to be a site glitch, nothing that you or us or the others so far that have commented can fix Hence why we politely pointed out that unless you can fix it, there really is no point in commenting And there really isn’t, we can all have ideas as to fix things or have an opinion that will differ from ours But There really is no point on this thread, the reason we ask about the photos is that, how can they be a representation of the person who has posted the profile, they could be of anything or anyone, Kim Kardashian’s left arse cheek for all we know, yet people who have obviously filtered the life out of themselves are allowed to post too It seems the photo mods are being very lazy, if we had the job we would reverse image search every single photo, at least one full body pic on every profile of each person, no filters In this day and age of catfish and internet fraud surely fab should be on the ball especially when there are naked photos of the genuine people at stake " But you don't have that job and those aren't the rules. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Oh the irony when most of your pics op are of just body parts, why not legs! Some men love legs and have a thing for them. " We would call 12 out of 54 most and of those 12 only 7 are actually close up in which you can’t see any other body part  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I simply answered the original post with information that would help you, you responded with a bad attitude which was unnecessary. As I said, if you don't want people responding, contact admin privately, they don't respond personally to feedback messages but they will read them. Again, it seems to be a site glitch, nothing that you or us or the others so far that have commented can fix Hence why we politely pointed out that unless you can fix it, there really is no point in commenting And there really isn’t, we can all have ideas as to fix things or have an opinion that will differ from ours But There really is no point on this thread, the reason we ask about the photos is that, how can they be a representation of the person who has posted the profile, they could be of anything or anyone, Kim Kardashian’s left arse cheek for all we know, yet people who have obviously filtered the life out of themselves are allowed to post too It seems the photo mods are being very lazy, if we had the job we would reverse image search every single photo, at least one full body pic on every profile of each person, no filters In this day and age of catfish and internet fraud surely fab should be on the ball especially when there are naked photos of the genuine people at stake But you don't have that job and those aren't the rules. " Which is why we are raising the questions | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I simply answered the original post with information that would help you, you responded with a bad attitude which was unnecessary. As I said, if you don't want people responding, contact admin privately, they don't respond personally to feedback messages but they will read them. Again, it seems to be a site glitch, nothing that you or us or the others so far that have commented can fix Hence why we politely pointed out that unless you can fix it, there really is no point in commenting And there really isn’t, we can all have ideas as to fix things or have an opinion that will differ from ours But There really is no point on this thread, the reason we ask about the photos is that, how can they be a representation of the person who has posted the profile, they could be of anything or anyone, Kim Kardashian’s left arse cheek for all we know, yet people who have obviously filtered the life out of themselves are allowed to post too It seems the photo mods are being very lazy, if we had the job we would reverse image search every single photo, at least one full body pic on every profile of each person, no filters In this day and age of catfish and internet fraud surely fab should be on the ball especially when there are naked photos of the genuine people at stake " I just use my common sense in judging pics and if I don’t like them I just don’t reply or block. No biggie. I’ve seen awful pics on here but yhe rules say as long as your in a pic then it’s ok. I wouldn’t work yourselves up over what pictures people put up or are allowed. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Oh the irony when most of your pics op are of just body parts, why not legs! Some men love legs and have a thing for them. We would call 12 out of 54 most and of those 12 only 7 are actually close up in which you can’t see any other body part "I’d say More than 12 are just body parts, a few are just arms and legs or tongue and boobs. Where do you draw the line OP? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It isn't a glitch, it specifies at the top of the who's near page which preferences are included, smoking isn't included. Where? We can’t see that, is it on a desktop site as we only use mobile? If it is the desktop site then yes it’s defo a glitch that you can’t see that on mobile " I just saw it on mobile, after you choose the option to filter by your preferences, it tells you at the top of the page. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I simply answered the original post with information that would help you, you responded with a bad attitude which was unnecessary. As I said, if you don't want people responding, contact admin privately, they don't respond personally to feedback messages but they will read them. Again, it seems to be a site glitch, nothing that you or us or the others so far that have commented can fix Hence why we politely pointed out that unless you can fix it, there really is no point in commenting And there really isn’t, we can all have ideas as to fix things or have an opinion that will differ from ours But There really is no point on this thread, the reason we ask about the photos is that, how can they be a representation of the person who has posted the profile, they could be of anything or anyone, Kim Kardashian’s left arse cheek for all we know, yet people who have obviously filtered the life out of themselves are allowed to post too It seems the photo mods are being very lazy, if we had the job we would reverse image search every single photo, at least one full body pic on every profile of each person, no filters In this day and age of catfish and internet fraud surely fab should be on the ball especially when there are naked photos of the genuine people at stake But you don't have that job and those aren't the rules. Which is why we are raising the questions " You're not though, your questions have been answered, you just keep making more arguments as to why they are wrong, you also accused to picture mods of being lazy for not doing what you think they should do. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Nope I suggested that the photo mods need to up their game because of the amount of photos of Feet Legs Close up bums Close up cleavage Filtered photos Photos that do not show the actual person you’re hoping to meet, it’s as bad as the Blurry Dick pics Pictures of the back of people heads All of these are clogging up the servers But people (and this includes us) have pictures declined because they look like they are an internet photo, or a photo of a photo, or a screen shot " Those pictures don't break the rules though, pics of pics do. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I simply answered the original post with information that would help you, you responded with a bad attitude which was unnecessary. As I said, if you don't want people responding, contact admin privately, they don't respond personally to feedback messages but they will read them. Again, it seems to be a site glitch, nothing that you or us or the others so far that have commented can fix Hence why we politely pointed out that unless you can fix it, there really is no point in commenting And there really isn’t, we can all have ideas as to fix things or have an opinion that will differ from ours But There really is no point on this thread, the reason we ask about the photos is that, how can they be a representation of the person who has posted the profile, they could be of anything or anyone, Kim Kardashian’s left arse cheek for all we know, yet people who have obviously filtered the life out of themselves are allowed to post too It seems the photo mods are being very lazy, if we had the job we would reverse image search every single photo, at least one full body pic on every profile of each person, no filters In this day and age of catfish and internet fraud surely fab should be on the ball especially when there are naked photos of the genuine people at stake I just use my common sense in judging pics and if I don’t like them I just don’t reply or block. No biggie. I’ve seen awful pics on here but yhe rules say as long as your in a pic then it’s ok. I wouldn’t work yourselves up over what pictures people put up or are allowed. " No one is worked up lol | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"But there are still hundreds of pics of pics that are on profiles " That wasn't what you were originally complaining about. You're honestly just looking for faults now. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I’d say More than 12 are just body parts, a few are just arms and legs or tongue and boobs. Where do you draw the line OP? " Really don’t know who’s profile you’re looking at cos it isn’t ours then | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Nope I suggested that the photo mods need to up their game because of the amount of photos of Feet Legs Close up bums Close up cleavage Filtered photos Photos that do not show the actual person you’re hoping to meet, it’s as bad as the Blurry Dick pics Pictures of the back of people heads All of these are clogging up the servers But people (and this includes us) have pictures declined because they look like they are an internet photo, or a photo of a photo, or a screen shot " Feet, legs , arms all you state are a huge fetish for some people. What your saying is your personal preferences which is rather narrow minded. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I’d say More than 12 are just body parts, a few are just arms and legs or tongue and boobs. Where do you draw the line OP? Really don’t know who’s profile you’re looking at cos it isn’t ours then "Yep yours | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"But there are still hundreds of pics of pics that are on profiles That wasn't what you were originally complaining about. You're honestly just looking for faults now. " Again no My original questions still stand, although you and others have offered solutions The other replies are answers to yours and other replies which is why We asked for people not to comment because again All it’s done is clog up the servers So instead of one defining answer from the site builders we now have a full thread of possible answers and people throwing accusations of attitude around | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I’d say More than 12 are just body parts, a few are just arms and legs or tongue and boobs. Where do you draw the line OP? Really don’t know who’s profile you’re looking at cos it isn’t ours then
Yep yours "So which photos do you claim to be more than the 12 as close ups showing no more than one body part ? And thanks for highlighting another site glitch People who hide their profiles don’t show up as having looked at your profile Very very sneaky if you were that way inclined | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"But there are still hundreds of pics of pics that are on profiles That wasn't what you were originally complaining about. You're honestly just looking for faults now. Again no My original questions still stand, although you and others have offered solutions The other replies are answers to yours and other replies which is why We asked for people not to comment because again All it’s done is clog up the servers So instead of one defining answer from the site builders we now have a full thread of possible answers and people throwing accusations of attitude around " I stand by what I've said, you're expecting pic mods to filter pictures based upon what you want to see, it doesn't work like that. Those pictures are allowed whether you like it or not. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I’d say More than 12 are just body parts, a few are just arms and legs or tongue and boobs. Where do you draw the line OP? Really don’t know who’s profile you’re looking at cos it isn’t ours then
Yep yours
So which photos do you claim to be more than the 12 as close ups showing no more than one body part ?
And thanks for highlighting another site glitch
People who hide their profiles don’t show up as having looked at your profile
Very very sneaky if you were that way inclined "Ffs, you can look at profiles in stealth mode. You can't just blame everything you don't like on a glitch.  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I’d say More than 12 are just body parts, a few are just arms and legs or tongue and boobs. Where do you draw the line OP? Really don’t know who’s profile you’re looking at cos it isn’t ours then
Yep yours
So which photos do you claim to be more than the 12 as close ups showing no more than one body part ?
And thanks for highlighting another site glitch
People who hide their profiles don’t show up as having looked at your profile
Very very sneaky if you were that way inclined "I hide my profile when I’m not meeting or looking to meet. Personal preference!! I’ve looked at your profile and again I choose not to show up on who’s looked at me, again my personal preference. See where I’m going with this ? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"But there are still hundreds of pics of pics that are on profiles That wasn't what you were originally complaining about. You're honestly just looking for faults now. Again no My original questions still stand, although you and others have offered solutions The other replies are answers to yours and other replies which is why We asked for people not to comment because again All it’s done is clog up the servers So instead of one defining answer from the site builders we now have a full thread of possible answers and people throwing accusations of attitude around " Well you did post in a public forum... so the public responded | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I’d say More than 12 are just body parts, a few are just arms and legs or tongue and boobs. Where do you draw the line OP? Really don’t know who’s profile you’re looking at cos it isn’t ours then
Yep yours
So which photos do you claim to be more than the 12 as close ups showing no more than one body part ?
And thanks for highlighting another site glitch
People who hide their profiles don’t show up as having looked at your profile
Very very sneaky if you were that way inclined
Ffs, you can look at profiles in stealth mode. You can't just blame everything you don't like on a glitch. "Again, is stealth mode something that is highlited on the desktop version of the site? It raises the issue of “if you hide your profile, why should you be allowed to access to someone else’s” If that doesn’t give a big red alarm sign to anyone on the site team then what will Hey jimmy I’ve just screen shot this woman’s pussy pics and she won’t even know I did it, right Paul let get them up and pretend we’re a couple  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"But there are still hundreds of pics of pics that are on profiles That wasn't what you were originally complaining about. You're honestly just looking for faults now. Again no My original questions still stand, although you and others have offered solutions The other replies are answers to yours and other replies which is why We asked for people not to comment because again All it’s done is clog up the servers So instead of one defining answer from the site builders we now have a full thread of possible answers and people throwing accusations of attitude around Well you did post in a public forum... so the public responded "We posted in the - site feedback, thread of the forum Which the public have clearly hijacked | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yes and we have no issues with personal preferences Which is why we hit block on hidden profiles " Again that’s fine. But people hide profiles for a multitude of reasons, you could block someone and said person unhides profile when they are wanting to meet and miss out on an absolutely amazing person just because they hid their profile. But again we all have preferences and do what works for us, that’s the beauty of it I guess. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
" I’d say More than 12 are just body parts, a few are just arms and legs or tongue and boobs. Where do you draw the line OP? Really don’t know who’s profile you’re looking at cos it isn’t ours then
Yep yours
So which photos do you claim to be more than the 12 as close ups showing no more than one body part ?
And thanks for highlighting another site glitch
People who hide their profiles don’t show up as having looked at your profile
Very very sneaky if you were that way inclined
Ffs, you can look at profiles in stealth mode. You can't just blame everything you don't like on a glitch.
Again, is stealth mode something that is highlited on the desktop version of the site?
It raises the issue of “if you hide your profile, why should you be allowed to access to someone else’s”
If that doesn’t give a big red alarm sign to anyone on the site team then what will
Hey jimmy I’ve just screen shot this woman’s pussy pics and she won’t even know I did it, right Paul let get them up and pretend we’re a couple "It's an option in your privacy settings. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I’d say More than 12 are just body parts, a few are just arms and legs or tongue and boobs. Where do you draw the line OP? Really don’t know who’s profile you’re looking at cos it isn’t ours then
Yep yours
So which photos do you claim to be more than the 12 as close ups showing no more than one body part ?
And thanks for highlighting another site glitch
People who hide their profiles don’t show up as having looked at your profile
Very very sneaky if you were that way inclined
Ffs, you can look at profiles in stealth mode. You can't just blame everything you don't like on a glitch.
Again, is stealth mode something that is highlited on the desktop version of the site?
It raises the issue of “if you hide your profile, why should you be allowed to access to someone else’s”
If that doesn’t give a big red alarm sign to anyone on the site team then what will
Hey jimmy I’ve just screen shot this woman’s pussy pics and she won’t even know I did it, right Paul let get them up and pretend we’re a couple "Big red alarm bells! Rather dramatic. I hide my profile as I usually receive on average 60-100 messages when on public view so I’d rather not have to trawl through messages when I’m not looking for a meet. People I know can still messsge me or from a forum post. Again I use this site as I see fit not how others think it should be used or ran! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I stand by what I've said, you're expecting pic mods to filter pictures based upon what you want to see, it doesn't work like that. Those pictures are allowed whether you like it or not." Would you meet a man if the only photo he has is 21 angles of his cock? And let’s be honest, it’s a no How about 6 photos of his ankle with a chain on it, again no How about 30 photos of his legs, some in a bath, some on a bed, then back in a bath etc, it would be a no How about 11 photos of his left arse cheek, no 4 photos of his hand, no His fingernails, no His shoe, no Is our point clear enough now? Although not against the site rules, there should be a tighter restriction on the type of photos that can be uploaded If say you don’t have a full body photo uploaded, it isn’t giving a true representation of the body shape, size, look that you actually are and that’s devious That’s wasting people’s time should they meet you and you don’t match their personal preferences | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I stand by what I've said, you're expecting pic mods to filter pictures based upon what you want to see, it doesn't work like that. Those pictures are allowed whether you like it or not. Would you meet a man if the only photo he has is 21 angles of his cock? And let’s be honest, it’s a no How about 6 photos of his ankle with a chain on it, again no How about 30 photos of his legs, some in a bath, some on a bed, then back in a bath etc, it would be a no How about 11 photos of his left arse cheek, no 4 photos of his hand, no His fingernails, no His shoe, no Is our point clear enough now? Although not against the site rules, there should be a tighter restriction on the type of photos that can be uploaded If say you don’t have a full body photo uploaded, it isn’t giving a true representation of the body shape, size, look that you actually are and that’s devious That’s wasting people’s time should they meet you and you don’t match their personal preferences " OK I'll make it clear since you seem to be having issues. The site is not run based on what you want, it's not up to you which pictures people post and every option you don't like isn't a glitch. If you don't like people's pictures don't look at them. I'm not going to respond anymore as you're not going to see sense, you'll just keep bitching about a free site not being up to your hypocritical standards. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I stand by what I've said, you're expecting pic mods to filter pictures based upon what you want to see, it doesn't work like that. Those pictures are allowed whether you like it or not. Would you meet a man if the only photo he has is 21 angles of his cock? And let’s be honest, it’s a no How about 6 photos of his ankle with a chain on it, again no How about 30 photos of his legs, some in a bath, some on a bed, then back in a bath etc, it would be a no How about 11 photos of his left arse cheek, no 4 photos of his hand, no His fingernails, no His shoe, no Is our point clear enough now? Although not against the site rules, there should be a tighter restriction on the type of photos that can be uploaded If say you don’t have a full body photo uploaded, it isn’t giving a true representation of the body shape, size, look that you actually are and that’s devious That’s wasting people’s time should they meet you and you don’t match their personal preferences " So what about face pics? Should they be compulsory? As I always ask for one regardless what is on profile, that’s what private pics and PM is for you talk and ask for pics. You can’t honestly say ban all pics of random body parts. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I stand by what I've said, you're expecting pic mods to filter pictures based upon what you want to see, it doesn't work like that. Those pictures are allowed whether you like it or not. Would you meet a man if the only photo he has is 21 angles of his cock? And let’s be honest, it’s a no How about 6 photos of his ankle with a chain on it, again no How about 30 photos of his legs, some in a bath, some on a bed, then back in a bath etc, it would be a no How about 11 photos of his left arse cheek, no 4 photos of his hand, no His fingernails, no His shoe, no Is our point clear enough now? Although not against the site rules, there should be a tighter restriction on the type of photos that can be uploaded If say you don’t have a full body photo uploaded, it isn’t giving a true representation of the body shape, size, look that you actually are and that’s devious That’s wasting people’s time should they meet you and you don’t match their personal preferences OK I'll make it clear since you seem to be having issues. The site is not run based on what you want, it's not up to you which pictures people post and every option you don't like isn't a glitch. If you don't like people's pictures don't look at them. I'm not going to respond anymore as you're not going to see sense, you'll just keep bitching about a free site not being up to your hypocritical standards." I agree completely!! I don’t like full open pussy pics “ hey admin can we ban them? They aren’t a true representation of the person ,, Jeez  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"OP I think that you need to re-read the site rules, particularly around pictures and posting in the forums. You might find it helpful "Have read them thoroughly which is why we posted here to the site owners/admin/mods And not on the discussion pages of the forum | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It's an option in your privacy settings. Just looked are our privacy settings and it’s not there " It's the first option I show on "who's looked at me" pages (you don't) | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" But There really is no point on this thread, the reason we ask about the photos is that, how can they be a representation of the person who has posted the profile, they could be of anything or anyone, Kim Kardashian’s left arse cheek for all we know, yet people who have obviously filtered the life out of themselves are allowed to post too It seems the photo mods are being very lazy, if we had the job we would reverse image search every single photo, at least one full body pic on every profile of each person, no filters " The mods are not being lazy. They are approving pics that are within pic rules, you don't have to have every part of yourself on show | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |  |
