FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback

Video verified

Jump to newest
 

By *ondon_mash OP   Man
over a year ago

London

Nice addition being able to add videos. Just throwing an idea out there.

Add the option to be video verified. And get rid of photo verification.

Clear video of you saying your profile name is a lot more secure and trustworthy then a pic with name written on paper.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ustful HedonistMan
over a year ago

Worsley, Manchester

great idea!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ollydoesWoman
over a year ago

Shangri-La

How so?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he Hussy and The VoyeurCouple
over a year ago

Somewhere Only We Know

Totally agree.

We put that idea forward the day they released the video option.

It makes a lot of sense.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 03/11/19 22:14:44]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Totally agree.

We put that idea forward the day they released the video option.

It makes a lot of sense."

How does it make a lot of sense?

You can’t force someone to photo verify, you can’t force anyone to video verify.

There are fake profiles that have been photo verified, there are some not photo verified that are very real.

To protect people’s anonymity, you don’t have to show your face in the photo verification pic. One assumes that you wouldn’t in any video verification, so what’s to stop people from editing audio onto the video?

The only verification that works is actually meeting the person. Verification from others may not be genuine, unless of course you’ve met those who have verified them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entleman55Man
over a year ago

S’th West Mc/r


"Totally agree.

We put that idea forward the day they released the video option.

It makes a lot of sense.

How does it make a lot of sense?

You can’t force someone to photo verify, you can’t force anyone to video verify.

There are fake profiles that have been photo verified, there are some not photo verified that are very real.

To protect people’s anonymity, you don’t have to show your face in the photo verification pic. One assumes that you wouldn’t in any video verification, so what’s to stop people from editing audio onto the video?

The only verification that works is actually meeting the person. Verification from others may not be genuine, unless of course you’ve met those who have verified them."

Totally agree...in the Admin criteria you need to be “well” verified....I would of thought they should be public and not hidden.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Totally agree.

We put that idea forward the day they released the video option.

It makes a lot of sense.

How does it make a lot of sense?

You can’t force someone to photo verify, you can’t force anyone to video verify.

There are fake profiles that have been photo verified, there are some not photo verified that are very real.

To protect people’s anonymity, you don’t have to show your face in the photo verification pic. One assumes that you wouldn’t in any video verification, so what’s to stop people from editing audio onto the video?

The only verification that works is actually meeting the person. Verification from others may not be genuine, unless of course you’ve met those who have verified them.

Totally agree...in the Admin criteria you need to be “well” verified....I would of thought they should be public and not hidden. "

what should be public?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entleman55Man
over a year ago

S’th West Mc/r


"Totally agree.

We put that idea forward the day they released the video option.

It makes a lot of sense.

How does it make a lot of sense?

You can’t force someone to photo verify, you can’t force anyone to video verify.

There are fake profiles that have been photo verified, there are some not photo verified that are very real.

To protect people’s anonymity, you don’t have to show your face in the photo verification pic. One assumes that you wouldn’t in any video verification, so what’s to stop people from editing audio onto the video?

The only verification that works is actually meeting the person. Verification from others may not be genuine, unless of course you’ve met those who have verified them.

Totally agree...in the Admin criteria you need to be “well” verified....I would of thought they should be public and not hidden.

what should be public?"

Verifications showing the profile to be “well” verified.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Totally agree.

We put that idea forward the day they released the video option.

It makes a lot of sense.

How does it make a lot of sense?

You can’t force someone to photo verify, you can’t force anyone to video verify.

There are fake profiles that have been photo verified, there are some not photo verified that are very real.

To protect people’s anonymity, you don’t have to show your face in the photo verification pic. One assumes that you wouldn’t in any video verification, so what’s to stop people from editing audio onto the video?

The only verification that works is actually meeting the person. Verification from others may not be genuine, unless of course you’ve met those who have verified them.

Totally agree...in the Admin criteria you need to be “well” verified....I would of thought they should be public and not hidden.

what should be public?

Verifications showing the profile to be “well” verified. "

You don’t have to show your verifications, you can choose to show just the numbers of verifications. Not everyone wants people knowing who and how many they have met.

Every feature on here should be useable on an opt in basis. It’s up to everyone else if they want to risk meeting you or not if you’ve opted in to any particular feature or not.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entleman55Man
over a year ago

S’th West Mc/r


"Totally agree.

We put that idea forward the day they released the video option.

It makes a lot of sense.

How does it make a lot of sense?

You can’t force someone to photo verify, you can’t force anyone to video verify.

There are fake profiles that have been photo verified, there are some not photo verified that are very real.

To protect people’s anonymity, you don’t have to show your face in the photo verification pic. One assumes that you wouldn’t in any video verification, so what’s to stop people from editing audio onto the video?

The only verification that works is actually meeting the person. Verification from others may not be genuine, unless of course you’ve met those who have verified them.

Totally agree...in the Admin criteria you need to be “well” verified....I would of thought they should be public and not hidden.

what should be public?

Verifications showing the profile to be “well” verified.

You don’t have to show your verifications, you can choose to show just the numbers of verifications. Not everyone wants people knowing who and how many they have met.

Every feature on here should be useable on an opt in basis. It’s up to everyone else if they want to risk meeting you or not if you’ve opted in to any particular feature or not."

I fully understand that, I’ve been here for many years.

During the trial I’m sure we all need to be reassured that all trial profiles meet the Admin Criteria and aren’t being given privileges beyond the boundaries.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Easier to fake though with someone just clipping a video and superimposing audio.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top