Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"How will you get permission of all concerned in the videos. Will the videos be moderated? I'm just wondering about current photo content rules? Will videos be viewed first to make sure content doesn't infringe or UK rules?" Came here question the same thing. This throws up all kinds of consent and data protection issues. Fab has yet to comply with GDPR as regards privacy notices etc. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How will you get permission of all concerned in the videos. Will the videos be moderated? I'm just wondering about current photo content rules? Will videos be viewed first to make sure content doesn't infringe or UK rules?" Valid points I wonder if you will get an answer? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't have thought there are any more permissions needed for a video than a photo?" I've got the link to upload them and it just says "rules for videos are same as photos: You must clearly be in the video. 18+ only. Nothing nasty/taboo. No other faces in video" But you could lift any old video from another site and post it. At least with pictures we have reverse image search. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't have thought there are any more permissions needed for a video than a photo? I've got the link to upload them and it just says "rules for videos are same as photos: You must clearly be in the video. 18+ only. Nothing nasty/taboo. No other faces in video" But you could lift any old video from another site and post it. At least with pictures we have reverse image search. " This is what I was thinking. Already there is enough profiles with fake pics lifted off the net. Nothing stopping anyone doing it with vids. Also what about vids being put up by guys of conquests that have no idea their private parts are being splashed over the net. With tattoo culture as it is people can be recognised. I know people who have already from pics | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't have thought there are any more permissions needed for a video than a photo? I've got the link to upload them and it just says "rules for videos are same as photos: You must clearly be in the video. 18+ only. Nothing nasty/taboo. No other faces in video" But you could lift any old video from another site and post it. At least with pictures we have reverse image search. " Been saying the same thing, and moderation will be harder and far more time consuming than a simple photo, which already mods seem to struggle with at times. Maybe they'll opt for the apple and Microsoft approach and have it done by the users. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't have thought there are any more permissions needed for a video than a photo? I've got the link to upload them and it just says "rules for videos are same as photos: You must clearly be in the video. 18+ only. Nothing nasty/taboo. No other faces in video" But you could lift any old video from another site and post it. At least with pictures we have reverse image search. This is what I was thinking. Already there is enough profiles with fake pics lifted off the net. Nothing stopping anyone doing it with vids. Also what about vids being put up by guys of conquests that have no idea their private parts are being splashed over the net. With tattoo culture as it is people can be recognised. I know people who have already from pics " No way of editing out faces and identification marks. Be interesting to see how long it lasts and if it will really roll out last beta. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Would love to upload some videos. Please do send us an invite." Go to their forum post and add your name down. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Mmmm can I be invited" Wrong thread to get an invite. The link is further up | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Bad idea to allow them as public better that they can be sent or opened by friends etc as the current pictures are. Showing videos is going to mean more pervs and picture collectors on here as its free swamp the site with more time wasters" They said only sure supporters can see this mitigates your point | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’ve just uploaded my first one, waiting on it to be approved. I think this will be a great feature! Potential meets can see us in the “flesh”. It likely won’t be popular with those who over edit their photos or are using someone else’s pictures though! " What difference is seeing the video to pics? No offence but they are the same tits that are in your pics. Have already seen videos that have clearly used filters. Those using other people’s photos may well already have their videos too to upload. It makes no difference to the site one iota, other than as pointed out above, those here to collect pictures will now be able to collect videos. As site supporter costs are reasonably low, it makes it cheaper than a porn site. Strangely this update came just after the abandonment of the porn ID rules. I’m not slating admin for looking for ways to generate income, I just hope that it is invested back into the site in way of improvements in searches, area location structure, layouts, emojis, chat camera quality etc. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Why not sort out the other issues before this? Like locations for meets etc. Make it county based! " Like that | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Why not sort out the other issues before this? Like locations for meets etc. Make it county based! Like that " Been requested for many many years. Even for NI. Simply to use our post code to prevent getting people from 20 miles across the water appearing instead of local land accessable people. Does my head it getting Scottish, Welsh and mainland England in the midst of locals. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are the videos only available on the mobile site? They don't seem to appear on the desktop site." Mobile only for now D. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’ve just uploaded my first one, waiting on it to be approved. I think this will be a great feature! Potential meets can see us in the “flesh”. It likely won’t be popular with those who over edit their photos or are using someone else’s pictures though! What difference is seeing the video to pics? No offence but they are the same tits that are in your pics. Have already seen videos that have clearly used filters. Those using other people’s photos may well already have their videos too to upload. It makes no difference to the site one iota, other than as pointed out above, those here to collect pictures will now be able to collect videos. As site supporter costs are reasonably low, it makes it cheaper than a porn site. Strangely this update came just after the abandonment of the porn ID rules. I’m not slating admin for looking for ways to generate income, I just hope that it is invested back into the site in way of improvements in searches, area location structure, layouts, emojis, chat camera quality etc." It makes a difference to me, clearly not to you though so simply don’t use the feature, you’re not forced to. Thank you for proving my point though, the same tits you see in the video are the same ones in my pictures which confirms I am who I show myself to be! That’s the whole point. Besides you are not my “target market” so your opinion on my videos doesn’t offend me, nor is it one I’d take on board as I don’t seek couples. I doubt there’s that many fake accounts with a bunch of videos they can upload to dupe people even more. In regards to filters I meant those that make people appear younger & wrinkle free, or photoshop, less likely to happen on video logically. The same with those who attempt to appear several dress sizes slimmer, a video can’t do that for you either. And those who use 10 year old pictures will be less likely to upload videos. No doubt some of us will use the vide feature as a new filter. So there’s plenty positives. I’m sure that all this investment you “hope” for you have written in a feedback report, right? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’m always seeing pics that are against site rules and a lot of them are really obviously against the rules too so I’m guessing the mods struggle with the amount they have to check. I can’t see how adding vids into the mix is going to make this any easier. It will take even more time. " If we are all vigilant and Report or check pictures that we think or feel are fake then we can help the Mods. After all they are only volunteers and the site is trying to do the very best it can to support all of us Not everybody will use all the features and fakes will always find a way through, we just have to do the best we can to look after each other. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not exactly Tarantinos posting at the moment!!" I'm doing my best, but I will post a foot fetish one eventually, Tarantino Style | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Bad idea to allow them as public better that they can be sent or opened by friends etc as the current pictures are. Showing videos is going to mean more pervs and picture collectors on here as its free swamp the site with more time wasters" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Bad idea to allow them as public better that they can be sent or opened by friends etc as the current pictures are. Showing videos is going to mean more pervs and picture collectors on here as its free swamp the site with more time wasters " they will have to be a site supporter , be verified also to be able to upload and view video s , you will have the extra added safety of choosing not to upload any vids or set them to friends only or private , I really don't see a problem with it ,it's a great idea | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’m always seeing pics that are against site rules and a lot of them are really obviously against the rules too so I’m guessing the mods struggle with the amount they have to check. I can’t see how adding vids into the mix is going to make this any easier. It will take even more time. If we are all vigilant and Report or check pictures that we think or feel are fake then we can help the Mods. After all they are only volunteers and the site is trying to do the very best it can to support all of us Not everybody will use all the features and fakes will always find a way through, we just have to do the best we can to look after each other." I do but by the time I’ve reported them and they are taken down you don’t know how many times they have been seen/copied/shared etc which is not good when they are clearly showing other people’s faces. I see loads that get through the mods like that. I’m not a mod and wouldn’t want to be but they are clearly swamped as it is. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Bad idea to allow them as public better that they can be sent or opened by friends etc as the current pictures are. Showing videos is going to mean more pervs and picture collectors on here as its free swamp the site with more time wasters they will have to be a site supporter , be verified also to be able to upload and view video s , you will have the extra added safety of choosing not to upload any vids or set them to friends only or private , I really don't see a problem with it ,it's a great idea " I agree. Video won’t be free reign for everyone, I like the idea of only site supporters being able to view. Of course not all site supporters are “decent” but it’s better than giving the option to anyone. I think if people are worried about privacy or them being downloaded, don’t post any videos that could identify you, or don’t post any at all. X | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Bad idea to allow them as public better that they can be sent or opened by friends etc as the current pictures are. Showing videos is going to mean more pervs and picture collectors on here as its free swamp the site with more time wasters they will have to be a site supporter , be verified also to be able to upload and view video s , you will have the extra added safety of choosing not to upload any vids or set them to friends only or private , I really don't see a problem with it ,it's a great idea " I also think it’s a great idea, if they are kept to videos on profile only and they cannot be sent via message. All those worrying about the dick pics being replaced by cum shots and their messages being bogged down from wank vids have a justified issue, but if they can only upload to profile the only people who will see them are those who choose to D. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Bad idea to allow them as public better that they can be sent or opened by friends etc as the current pictures are. Showing videos is going to mean more pervs and picture collectors on here as its free swamp the site with more time wasters they will have to be a site supporter , be verified also to be able to upload and view video s , you will have the extra added safety of choosing not to upload any vids or set them to friends only or private , I really don't see a problem with it ,it's a great idea I also think it’s a great idea, if they are kept to videos on profile only and they cannot be sent via message. All those worrying about the dick pics being replaced by cum shots and their messages being bogged down from wank vids have a justified issue, but if they can only upload to profile the only people who will see them are those who choose to D." exactly , plus if you get wank vids posted to our mail boxes we have the option to delete unread/watched | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Using the videos as a verification thing would be a brilliant idea in my eyes. Would get rid of so many fake profiles that are somehow verified.. Video of them both saying there fab profile name (no faces of course) same with single fems. That goes for not just new members but current ones too. Shame its just couples and single fems trialling it though " I agree! I’d be more than happy to do a verification that way to prove my authenticity personally. If this feature is rolled out to everyone eventually it could easily become another filter for many of us, which in my eyes is a good idea. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can we be added please we have been site supporters for a long time thanks " Theyve closed the threads where you could apply. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Using the videos as a verification thing would be a brilliant idea in my eyes. Would get rid of so many fake profiles that are somehow verified.. Video of them both saying there fab profile name (no faces of course) same with single fems. That goes for not just new members but current ones too. Shame its just couples and single fems trialling it though I agree! I’d be more than happy to do a verification that way to prove my authenticity personally. If this feature is rolled out to everyone eventually it could easily become another filter for many of us, which in my eyes is a good idea. " Google deepfake Your face is public I could now put your face on any porn clip I wanted to and use that to set up a verified profile impersonating you. This site does not need videos imo. It struggles with moderation of the photo content as it is. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Using the videos as a verification thing would be a brilliant idea in my eyes. Would get rid of so many fake profiles that are somehow verified.. Video of them both saying there fab profile name (no faces of course) same with single fems. That goes for not just new members but current ones too. Shame its just couples and single fems trialling it though I agree! I’d be more than happy to do a verification that way to prove my authenticity personally. If this feature is rolled out to everyone eventually it could easily become another filter for many of us, which in my eyes is a good idea. Google deepfake Your face is public I could now put your face on any porn clip I wanted to and use that to set up a verified profile impersonating you. This site does not need videos imo. It struggles with moderation of the photo content as it is. " We are not talking about videos of people's faces. We are on about men pretending to be women and couples not being couples. A video of just the body clothed holding the sign like we do now saying it vocally would get rid of alot of fakes. Deep fake could happen to anyone with any social media platforms where you have a facepic and end up on any porn site. Not just on this site. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Using the videos as a verification thing would be a brilliant idea in my eyes. Would get rid of so many fake profiles that are somehow verified.. Video of them both saying there fab profile name (no faces of course) same with single fems. That goes for not just new members but current ones too. Shame its just couples and single fems trialling it though I agree! I’d be more than happy to do a verification that way to prove my authenticity personally. If this feature is rolled out to everyone eventually it could easily become another filter for many of us, which in my eyes is a good idea. Google deepfake Your face is public I could now put your face on any porn clip I wanted to and use that to set up a verified profile impersonating you. This site does not need videos imo. It struggles with moderation of the photo content as it is. " I know the consequences that come with posting my face, it could be posted anywhere, but so could my Facebook photos or anything else I’ve ever put on the internet. I’m self employed so my job isn’t a worry, I used to webcam so my family aren’t an issue either. I personally am not worried, if others are, they don’t have to use the feature. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Using the videos as a verification thing would be a brilliant idea in my eyes. Would get rid of so many fake profiles that are somehow verified.. Video of them both saying there fab profile name (no faces of course) same with single fems. That goes for not just new members but current ones too. Shame its just couples and single fems trialling it though I agree! I’d be more than happy to do a verification that way to prove my authenticity personally. If this feature is rolled out to everyone eventually it could easily become another filter for many of us, which in my eyes is a good idea. Google deepfake Your face is public I could now put your face on any porn clip I wanted to and use that to set up a verified profile impersonating you. This site does not need videos imo. It struggles with moderation of the photo content as it is. We are not talking about videos of people's faces. We are on about men pretending to be women and couples not being couples. A video of just the body clothed holding the sign like we do now saying it vocally would get rid of alot of fakes. Deep fake could happen to anyone with any social media platforms where you have a facepic and end up on any porn site. Not just on this site. " Exactly this. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Using the videos as a verification thing would be a brilliant idea in my eyes. Would get rid of so many fake profiles that are somehow verified.. Video of them both saying there fab profile name (no faces of course) same with single fems. That goes for not just new members but current ones too. Shame its just couples and single fems trialling it though I agree! I’d be more than happy to do a verification that way to prove my authenticity personally. If this feature is rolled out to everyone eventually it could easily become another filter for many of us, which in my eyes is a good idea. Google deepfake Your face is public I could now put your face on any porn clip I wanted to and use that to set up a verified profile impersonating you. This site does not need videos imo. It struggles with moderation of the photo content as it is. We are not talking about videos of people's faces. We are on about men pretending to be women and couples not being couples. A video of just the body clothed holding the sign like we do now saying it vocally would get rid of alot of fakes. Deep fake could happen to anyone with any social media platforms where you have a facepic and end up on any porn site. Not just on this site. " I dont see a difference. Videos can be manipulated just like still images can. And you will still get the same idiots posting their verification video public... which can then be downloaded and manipulated resulting in tons of new fakes profiles verified by video. I think its even worse if you are suggesting verie videos dont have faces in them. Then you cant see a mouth moving. Just add your own voice to a stolen video and overwrite the text. Cant see that being difficult in this day and age. The site will just become awash with clips stolen from porn sites. I feel any benefit is far outweighed by the negative. Anyway. I have seen a couple of clips. And honestly. I have no reason to believe they're not anything other than stolen from a porn site. And dont even get me started on consent. I have the new feature on my app. It links to the photo rules. Htf can thw police whether all parties to a video have given consent. Especially if there are more than 2 persons. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Using the videos as a verification thing would be a brilliant idea in my eyes. Would get rid of so many fake profiles that are somehow verified.. Video of them both saying there fab profile name (no faces of course) same with single fems. That goes for not just new members but current ones too. Shame its just couples and single fems trialling it though I agree! I’d be more than happy to do a verification that way to prove my authenticity personally. If this feature is rolled out to everyone eventually it could easily become another filter for many of us, which in my eyes is a good idea. Google deepfake Your face is public I could now put your face on any porn clip I wanted to and use that to set up a verified profile impersonating you. This site does not need videos imo. It struggles with moderation of the photo content as it is. We are not talking about videos of people's faces. We are on about men pretending to be women and couples not being couples. A video of just the body clothed holding the sign like we do now saying it vocally would get rid of alot of fakes. Deep fake could happen to anyone with any social media platforms where you have a facepic and end up on any porn site. Not just on this site. I dont see a difference. Videos can be manipulated just like still images can. And you will still get the same idiots posting their verification video public... which can then be downloaded and manipulated resulting in tons of new fakes profiles verified by video. I think its even worse if you are suggesting verie videos dont have faces in them. Then you cant see a mouth moving. Just add your own voice to a stolen video and overwrite the text. Cant see that being difficult in this day and age. The site will just become awash with clips stolen from porn sites. I feel any benefit is far outweighed by the negative. Anyway. I have seen a couple of clips. And honestly. I have no reason to believe they're not anything other than stolen from a porn site. And dont even get me started on consent. I have the new feature on my app. It links to the photo rules. Htf can thw police whether all parties to a video have given consent. Especially if there are more than 2 persons. " If you really have this much of an issue with it, just don’t use the feature. Simple. Everyone else can make their own decision. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Using the videos as a verification thing would be a brilliant idea in my eyes. Would get rid of so many fake profiles that are somehow verified.. Video of them both saying there fab profile name (no faces of course) same with single fems. That goes for not just new members but current ones too. Shame its just couples and single fems trialling it though I agree! I’d be more than happy to do a verification that way to prove my authenticity personally. If this feature is rolled out to everyone eventually it could easily become another filter for many of us, which in my eyes is a good idea. Google deepfake Your face is public I could now put your face on any porn clip I wanted to and use that to set up a verified profile impersonating you. This site does not need videos imo. It struggles with moderation of the photo content as it is. We are not talking about videos of people's faces. We are on about men pretending to be women and couples not being couples. A video of just the body clothed holding the sign like we do now saying it vocally would get rid of alot of fakes. Deep fake could happen to anyone with any social media platforms where you have a facepic and end up on any porn site. Not just on this site. I dont see a difference. Videos can be manipulated just like still images can. And you will still get the same idiots posting their verification video public... which can then be downloaded and manipulated resulting in tons of new fakes profiles verified by video. I think its even worse if you are suggesting verie videos dont have faces in them. Then you cant see a mouth moving. Just add your own voice to a stolen video and overwrite the text. Cant see that being difficult in this day and age. The site will just become awash with clips stolen from porn sites. I feel any benefit is far outweighed by the negative. Anyway. I have seen a couple of clips. And honestly. I have no reason to believe they're not anything other than stolen from a porn site. And dont even get me started on consent. I have the new feature on my app. It links to the photo rules. Htf can thw police whether all parties to a video have given consent. Especially if there are more than 2 persons. If you really have this much of an issue with it, just don’t use the feature. Simple. Everyone else can make their own decision. " I wont be. But I suspect admin Will be monitoring all feedback across any thread mentioning these videos. My concern isnt about my use of the feature... it's more about how the feature will be detrimental to the site and its genuine users. A perfectly valid point. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Using the videos as a verification thing would be a brilliant idea in my eyes. Would get rid of so many fake profiles that are somehow verified.. Video of them both saying there fab profile name (no faces of course) same with single fems. That goes for not just new members but current ones too. Shame its just couples and single fems trialling it though I agree! I’d be more than happy to do a verification that way to prove my authenticity personally. If this feature is rolled out to everyone eventually it could easily become another filter for many of us, which in my eyes is a good idea. Google deepfake Your face is public I could now put your face on any porn clip I wanted to and use that to set up a verified profile impersonating you. This site does not need videos imo. It struggles with moderation of the photo content as it is. We are not talking about videos of people's faces. We are on about men pretending to be women and couples not being couples. A video of just the body clothed holding the sign like we do now saying it vocally would get rid of alot of fakes. Deep fake could happen to anyone with any social media platforms where you have a facepic and end up on any porn site. Not just on this site. I dont see a difference. Videos can be manipulated just like still images can. And you will still get the same idiots posting their verification video public... which can then be downloaded and manipulated resulting in tons of new fakes profiles verified by video. I think its even worse if you are suggesting verie videos dont have faces in them. Then you cant see a mouth moving. Just add your own voice to a stolen video and overwrite the text. Cant see that being difficult in this day and age. The site will just become awash with clips stolen from porn sites. I feel any benefit is far outweighed by the negative. Anyway. I have seen a couple of clips. And honestly. I have no reason to believe they're not anything other than stolen from a porn site. And dont even get me started on consent. I have the new feature on my app. It links to the photo rules. Htf can thw police whether all parties to a video have given consent. Especially if there are more than 2 persons. " Adding a male voice to a female video for a verification isn't going to work though is it? I'm talking about a male pretending to be female or a male pretending to be a couple. May not get rid of all fakes but will help alot. If people want to upload a video of with there face in it it's there decision isnt it? Verification pics are private so the videos can be too. If you don't like the videos people are posting you don't have to watch them either everyone is different in what they like and want from this site. This site is a swinging site not a dating site it's based around sexual content so videos in my eyes and I alot of others is a good addition. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Using the videos as a verification thing would be a brilliant idea in my eyes. Would get rid of so many fake profiles that are somehow verified.. Video of them both saying there fab profile name (no faces of course) same with single fems. That goes for not just new members but current ones too. Shame its just couples and single fems trialling it though I agree! I’d be more than happy to do a verification that way to prove my authenticity personally. If this feature is rolled out to everyone eventually it could easily become another filter for many of us, which in my eyes is a good idea. Google deepfake Your face is public I could now put your face on any porn clip I wanted to and use that to set up a verified profile impersonating you. This site does not need videos imo. It struggles with moderation of the photo content as it is. We are not talking about videos of people's faces. We are on about men pretending to be women and couples not being couples. A video of just the body clothed holding the sign like we do now saying it vocally would get rid of alot of fakes. Deep fake could happen to anyone with any social media platforms where you have a facepic and end up on any porn site. Not just on this site. I dont see a difference. Videos can be manipulated just like still images can. And you will still get the same idiots posting their verification video public... which can then be downloaded and manipulated resulting in tons of new fakes profiles verified by video. I think its even worse if you are suggesting verie videos dont have faces in them. Then you cant see a mouth moving. Just add your own voice to a stolen video and overwrite the text. Cant see that being difficult in this day and age. The site will just become awash with clips stolen from porn sites. I feel any benefit is far outweighed by the negative. Anyway. I have seen a couple of clips. And honestly. I have no reason to believe they're not anything other than stolen from a porn site. And dont even get me started on consent. I have the new feature on my app. It links to the photo rules. Htf can thw police whether all parties to a video have given consent. Especially if there are more than 2 persons. Adding a male voice to a female video for a verification isn't going to work though is it? I'm talking about a male pretending to be female or a male pretending to be a couple. May not get rid of all fakes but will help alot. If people want to upload a video of with there face in it it's there decision isnt it? Verification pics are private so the videos can be too. If you don't like the videos people are posting you don't have to watch them either everyone is different in what they like and want from this site. This site is a swinging site not a dating site it's based around sexual content so videos in my eyes and I alot of others is a good addition. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Using the videos as a verification thing would be a brilliant idea in my eyes. Would get rid of so many fake profiles that are somehow verified.. Video of them both saying there fab profile name (no faces of course) same with single fems. That goes for not just new members but current ones too. Shame its just couples and single fems trialling it though I agree! I’d be more than happy to do a verification that way to prove my authenticity personally. If this feature is rolled out to everyone eventually it could easily become another filter for many of us, which in my eyes is a good idea. Google deepfake Your face is public I could now put your face on any porn clip I wanted to and use that to set up a verified profile impersonating you. This site does not need videos imo. It struggles with moderation of the photo content as it is. We are not talking about videos of people's faces. We are on about men pretending to be women and couples not being couples. A video of just the body clothed holding the sign like we do now saying it vocally would get rid of alot of fakes. Deep fake could happen to anyone with any social media platforms where you have a facepic and end up on any porn site. Not just on this site. I dont see a difference. Videos can be manipulated just like still images can. And you will still get the same idiots posting their verification video public... which can then be downloaded and manipulated resulting in tons of new fakes profiles verified by video. I think its even worse if you are suggesting verie videos dont have faces in them. Then you cant see a mouth moving. Just add your own voice to a stolen video and overwrite the text. Cant see that being difficult in this day and age. The site will just become awash with clips stolen from porn sites. I feel any benefit is far outweighed by the negative. Anyway. I have seen a couple of clips. And honestly. I have no reason to believe they're not anything other than stolen from a porn site. And dont even get me started on consent. I have the new feature on my app. It links to the photo rules. Htf can thw police whether all parties to a video have given consent. Especially if there are more than 2 persons. Adding a male voice to a female video for a verification isn't going to work though is it? I'm talking about a male pretending to be female or a male pretending to be a couple. May not get rid of all fakes but will help alot. If people want to upload a video of with there face in it it's there decision isnt it? Verification pics are private so the videos can be too. If you don't like the videos people are posting you don't have to watch them either everyone is different in what they like and want from this site. This site is a swinging site not a dating site it's based around sexual content so videos in my eyes and I alot of others is a good addition. " Oh yes. And I forgot to add that voice manipulation has been a thing for decades now. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Using the videos as a verification thing would be a brilliant idea in my eyes. Would get rid of so many fake profiles that are somehow verified.. Video of them both saying there fab profile name (no faces of course) same with single fems. That goes for not just new members but current ones too. Shame its just couples and single fems trialling it though I agree! I’d be more than happy to do a verification that way to prove my authenticity personally. If this feature is rolled out to everyone eventually it could easily become another filter for many of us, which in my eyes is a good idea. Google deepfake Your face is public I could now put your face on any porn clip I wanted to and use that to set up a verified profile impersonating you. This site does not need videos imo. It struggles with moderation of the photo content as it is. We are not talking about videos of people's faces. We are on about men pretending to be women and couples not being couples. A video of just the body clothed holding the sign like we do now saying it vocally would get rid of alot of fakes. Deep fake could happen to anyone with any social media platforms where you have a facepic and end up on any porn site. Not just on this site. I dont see a difference. Videos can be manipulated just like still images can. And you will still get the same idiots posting their verification video public... which can then be downloaded and manipulated resulting in tons of new fakes profiles verified by video. I think its even worse if you are suggesting verie videos dont have faces in them. Then you cant see a mouth moving. Just add your own voice to a stolen video and overwrite the text. Cant see that being difficult in this day and age. The site will just become awash with clips stolen from porn sites. I feel any benefit is far outweighed by the negative. Anyway. I have seen a couple of clips. And honestly. I have no reason to believe they're not anything other than stolen from a porn site. And dont even get me started on consent. I have the new feature on my app. It links to the photo rules. Htf can thw police whether all parties to a video have given consent. Especially if there are more than 2 persons. Adding a male voice to a female video for a verification isn't going to work though is it? I'm talking about a male pretending to be female or a male pretending to be a couple. May not get rid of all fakes but will help alot. If people want to upload a video of with there face in it it's there decision isnt it? Verification pics are private so the videos can be too. If you don't like the videos people are posting you don't have to watch them either everyone is different in what they like and want from this site. This site is a swinging site not a dating site it's based around sexual content so videos in my eyes and I alot of others is a good addition. Oh yes. And I forgot to add that voice manipulation has been a thing for decades now. " How is a man supposed to hold a sign up in a video with there profile name and say he is a women? There is no way round it.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Using the videos as a verification thing would be a brilliant idea in my eyes. Would get rid of so many fake profiles that are somehow verified.. Video of them both saying there fab profile name (no faces of course) same with single fems. That goes for not just new members but current ones too. Shame its just couples and single fems trialling it though I agree! I’d be more than happy to do a verification that way to prove my authenticity personally. If this feature is rolled out to everyone eventually it could easily become another filter for many of us, which in my eyes is a good idea. Google deepfake Your face is public I could now put your face on any porn clip I wanted to and use that to set up a verified profile impersonating you. This site does not need videos imo. It struggles with moderation of the photo content as it is. We are not talking about videos of people's faces. We are on about men pretending to be women and couples not being couples. A video of just the body clothed holding the sign like we do now saying it vocally would get rid of alot of fakes. Deep fake could happen to anyone with any social media platforms where you have a facepic and end up on any porn site. Not just on this site. I dont see a difference. Videos can be manipulated just like still images can. And you will still get the same idiots posting their verification video public... which can then be downloaded and manipulated resulting in tons of new fakes profiles verified by video. I think its even worse if you are suggesting verie videos dont have faces in them. Then you cant see a mouth moving. Just add your own voice to a stolen video and overwrite the text. Cant see that being difficult in this day and age. The site will just become awash with clips stolen from porn sites. I feel any benefit is far outweighed by the negative. Anyway. I have seen a couple of clips. And honestly. I have no reason to believe they're not anything other than stolen from a porn site. And dont even get me started on consent. I have the new feature on my app. It links to the photo rules. Htf can thw police whether all parties to a video have given consent. Especially if there are more than 2 persons. Adding a male voice to a female video for a verification isn't going to work though is it? I'm talking about a male pretending to be female or a male pretending to be a couple. May not get rid of all fakes but will help alot. If people want to upload a video of with there face in it it's there decision isnt it? Verification pics are private so the videos can be too. If you don't like the videos people are posting you don't have to watch them either everyone is different in what they like and want from this site. This site is a swinging site not a dating site it's based around sexual content so videos in my eyes and I alot of others is a good addition. Oh yes. And I forgot to add that voice manipulation has been a thing for decades now. " People have been faking others since the internet came about, adding a video feature won’t stop people faking others nor will it make it any worse than it already is, in my view. If you’re that concerned about these things the best way to avoid any of your pictures being used is don’t post any, on here or social media. Problem solved. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We are slowly rolling out to more people And ironing out bugs And monitoring feedback Please bear with us and thanks for all comments so far Admin x" Tip for video makers: If you are using a mobile phone, shoot the video in landscape rather than holding the phone vertially. That way it will look bigger when uploaded. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We're doing a beta test of videos on profiles. We've invited a small handful of people to try this out, while we work out any kinks and figure how it should work. Videos can be up to 20 seconds long only. Longer ones are cut off at that length. The intention ISN'T to make Fab into a porn site. Far too many other places for that, and not our intention. The intention IS to let people add some life and sound to their profiles. Rules for videos are same as for photos, so profile owner MUST be in video. While in beta: Currently only invited people can add videos (see other thread if you want an invite) Only site supporters can add videos Only site supporters can view When live: Only verified users will be able to add videos Please note: This is beta, test functionality only. It may stay, it may not. Admin x" Is that all verified members or only those verified by meet? It appears to be the latter | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Using the videos as a verification thing would be a brilliant idea in my eyes. Would get rid of so many fake profiles that are somehow verified.. Video of them both saying there fab profile name (no faces of course) same with single fems. That goes for not just new members but current ones too. Shame its just couples and single fems trialling it though I agree! I’d be more than happy to do a verification that way to prove my authenticity personally. If this feature is rolled out to everyone eventually it could easily become another filter for many of us, which in my eyes is a good idea. Google deepfake Your face is public I could now put your face on any porn clip I wanted to and use that to set up a verified profile impersonating you. This site does not need videos imo. It struggles with moderation of the photo content as it is. We are not talking about videos of people's faces. We are on about men pretending to be women and couples not being couples. A video of just the body clothed holding the sign like we do now saying it vocally would get rid of alot of fakes. Deep fake could happen to anyone with any social media platforms where you have a facepic and end up on any porn site. Not just on this site. I dont see a difference. Videos can be manipulated just like still images can. And you will still get the same idiots posting their verification video public... which can then be downloaded and manipulated resulting in tons of new fakes profiles verified by video. I think its even worse if you are suggesting verie videos dont have faces in them. Then you cant see a mouth moving. Just add your own voice to a stolen video and overwrite the text. Cant see that being difficult in this day and age. The site will just become awash with clips stolen from porn sites. I feel any benefit is far outweighed by the negative. Anyway. I have seen a couple of clips. And honestly. I have no reason to believe they're not anything other than stolen from a porn site. And dont even get me started on consent. I have the new feature on my app. It links to the photo rules. Htf can thw police whether all parties to a video have given consent. Especially if there are more than 2 persons. Adding a male voice to a female video for a verification isn't going to work though is it? I'm talking about a male pretending to be female or a male pretending to be a couple. May not get rid of all fakes but will help alot. If people want to upload a video of with there face in it it's there decision isnt it? Verification pics are private so the videos can be too. If you don't like the videos people are posting you don't have to watch them either everyone is different in what they like and want from this site. This site is a swinging site not a dating site it's based around sexual content so videos in my eyes and I alot of others is a good addition. Oh yes. And I forgot to add that voice manipulation has been a thing for decades now. People have been faking others since the internet came about, adding a video feature won’t stop people faking others nor will it make it any worse than it already is, in my view. If you’re that concerned about these things the best way to avoid any of your pictures being used is don’t post any, on here or social media. Problem solved. " It does concern me. I dont do those things already. I dont personally have a problem that needs solving. Posting my feedback in response to what some people consider are benefits is perfectly reasonable for me to do. Just because something has been going on for some time doesnt mean the site needs to be a facilitator. And given the moda cant handle the photo traffic cant really ser how they'll handle the influx of videos. I think I've said enough now. So I'll leave you to it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I agree I don't think video is a good idea, I think it would cheapen the site. ... I know it's a swingers site but it currently has a friendly club type feel, I think video will just make it feel like another porn site... Just my tuppence worth! " then it's simple isn't it , just don't use the feature , just like I choose not to go in the chat rooms | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Using the videos as a verification thing would be a brilliant idea in my eyes. Would get rid of so many fake profiles that are somehow verified.. Video of them both saying there fab profile name (no faces of course) same with single fems. That goes for not just new members but current ones too. Shame its just couples and single fems trialling it though I agree! I’d be more than happy to do a verification that way to prove my authenticity personally. If this feature is rolled out to everyone eventually it could easily become another filter for many of us, which in my eyes is a good idea. Google deepfake Your face is public I could now put your face on any porn clip I wanted to and use that to set up a verified profile impersonating you. This site does not need videos imo. It struggles with moderation of the photo content as it is. We are not talking about videos of people's faces. We are on about men pretending to be women and couples not being couples. A video of just the body clothed holding the sign like we do now saying it vocally would get rid of alot of fakes. Deep fake could happen to anyone with any social media platforms where you have a facepic and end up on any porn site. Not just on this site. I dont see a difference. Videos can be manipulated just like still images can. And you will still get the same idiots posting their verification video public... which can then be downloaded and manipulated resulting in tons of new fakes profiles verified by video. I think its even worse if you are suggesting verie videos dont have faces in them. Then you cant see a mouth moving. Just add your own voice to a stolen video and overwrite the text. Cant see that being difficult in this day and age. The site will just become awash with clips stolen from porn sites. I feel any benefit is far outweighed by the negative. Anyway. I have seen a couple of clips. And honestly. I have no reason to believe they're not anything other than stolen from a porn site. And dont even get me started on consent. I have the new feature on my app. It links to the photo rules. Htf can thw police whether all parties to a video have given consent. Especially if there are more than 2 persons. Adding a male voice to a female video for a verification isn't going to work though is it? I'm talking about a male pretending to be female or a male pretending to be a couple. May not get rid of all fakes but will help alot. If people want to upload a video of with there face in it it's there decision isnt it? Verification pics are private so the videos can be too. If you don't like the videos people are posting you don't have to watch them either everyone is different in what they like and want from this site. This site is a swinging site not a dating site it's based around sexual content so videos in my eyes and I alot of others is a good addition. Oh yes. And I forgot to add that voice manipulation has been a thing for decades now. People have been faking others since the internet came about, adding a video feature won’t stop people faking others nor will it make it any worse than it already is, in my view. If you’re that concerned about these things the best way to avoid any of your pictures being used is don’t post any, on here or social media. Problem solved. It does concern me. I dont do those things already. I dont personally have a problem that needs solving. Posting my feedback in response to what some people consider are benefits is perfectly reasonable for me to do. Just because something has been going on for some time doesnt mean the site needs to be a facilitator. And given the moda cant handle the photo traffic cant really ser how they'll handle the influx of videos. I think I've said enough now. So I'll leave you to it. " This isn’t the place to post feedback though so you’re wasting your time. There’s a feature for that under the “contact” button below. So if you feel so strongly maybe air your views there so they are actually seen. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I agree I don't think video is a good idea, I think it would cheapen the site. ... I know it's a swingers site but it currently has a friendly club type feel, I think video will just make it feel like another porn site... Just my tuppence worth! " I don’t agree. There’s cock pictures on here over toilets and pussy spread with a cock inside, photos that are far far more “porn” like than say a page three type tit video. That in my opinion “cheapens” the site. But each to their own. Some like the explicit photos. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I agree I don't think video is a good idea, I think it would cheapen the site. ... I know it's a swingers site but it currently has a friendly club type feel, I think video will just make it feel like another porn site... Just my tuppence worth! then it's simple isn't it , just don't use the feature , just like I choose not to go in the chat rooms " Agreed. It's what suits the individuals using the facilities available. We have options to choose the people we would like to meet. Options of what sexual experiences we like. Options to state our gender and the option to post photos. So why is the option to post videos any different. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" This isn’t the place to post feedback though so you’re wasting your time. There’s a feature for that under the “contact” button below. So if you feel so strongly maybe air your views there so they are actually seen. " On that point you are entirely wrong. This entire thread is posted in a specific site feedback section of the forum. I'm certainly in the right place. There is nothing wrong with debate either. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" This isn’t the place to post feedback though so you’re wasting your time. There’s a feature for that under the “contact” button below. So if you feel so strongly maybe air your views there so they are actually seen. On that point you are entirely wrong. This entire thread is posted in a specific site feedback section of the forum. I'm certainly in the right place. There is nothing wrong with debate either. " And there’s a bunch of comments that aren’t feedback related, hence why you’d do best using the “contact” link to get your views across. But of course, do as you please. I’d assume with such strong views you’d want to make sure admin gets your views. I don’t recall saying there’s anything wrong with debate, although it you did say you think you’ve said enough... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" This isn’t the place to post feedback though so you’re wasting your time. There’s a feature for that under the “contact” button below. So if you feel so strongly maybe air your views there so they are actually seen. On that point you are entirely wrong. This entire thread is posted in a specific site feedback section of the forum. I'm certainly in the right place. There is nothing wrong with debate either. And there’s a bunch of comments that aren’t feedback related, hence why you’d do best using the “contact” link to get your views across. But of course, do as you please. I’d assume with such strong views you’d want to make sure admin gets your views. I don’t recall saying there’s anything wrong with debate, although it you did say you think you’ve said enough... " Word... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Let's not use this space and time to criticise each other and argue. Different views get different responses and hopefully all will be noted so future decisions can be made on the matter. I would like add that some members posting vids are encouraging members to few vids. This is at individuals requests. We do not need to view videos if we dont like the idea and all have the option to block profiles that we find distasteful or not to our liking. I have always liked this site as it gives people the choices that suits them and the option to not look if it doesn't. Let everyone one have their profile as they please. We are all in control of what we do or do not post and options to show what we want to post." Well said! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Using the videos as a verification thing would be a brilliant idea in my eyes. Would get rid of so many fake profiles that are somehow verified.. Video of them both saying there fab profile name (no faces of course) same with single fems. That goes for not just new members but current ones too. Shame its just couples and single fems trialling it though I agree! I’d be more than happy to do a verification that way to prove my authenticity personally. If this feature is rolled out to everyone eventually it could easily become another filter for many of us, which in my eyes is a good idea. Google deepfake Your face is public I could now put your face on any porn clip I wanted to and use that to set up a verified profile impersonating you. This site does not need videos imo. It struggles with moderation of the photo content as it is. We are not talking about videos of people's faces. We are on about men pretending to be women and couples not being couples. A video of just the body clothed holding the sign like we do now saying it vocally would get rid of alot of fakes. Deep fake could happen to anyone with any social media platforms where you have a facepic and end up on any porn site. Not just on this site. I dont see a difference. Videos can be manipulated just like still images can. And you will still get the same idiots posting their verification video public... which can then be downloaded and manipulated resulting in tons of new fakes profiles verified by video. I think its even worse if you are suggesting verie videos dont have faces in them. Then you cant see a mouth moving. Just add your own voice to a stolen video and overwrite the text. Cant see that being difficult in this day and age. The site will just become awash with clips stolen from porn sites. I feel any benefit is far outweighed by the negative. Anyway. I have seen a couple of clips. And honestly. I have no reason to believe they're not anything other than stolen from a porn site. And dont even get me started on consent. I have the new feature on my app. It links to the photo rules. Htf can thw police whether all parties to a video have given consent. Especially if there are more than 2 persons. Adding a male voice to a female video for a verification isn't going to work though is it? I'm talking about a male pretending to be female or a male pretending to be a couple. May not get rid of all fakes but will help alot. If people want to upload a video of with there face in it it's there decision isnt it? Verification pics are private so the videos can be too. If you don't like the videos people are posting you don't have to watch them either everyone is different in what they like and want from this site. This site is a swinging site not a dating site it's based around sexual content so videos in my eyes and I alot of others is a good addition. Oh yes. And I forgot to add that voice manipulation has been a thing for decades now. " Tesco have got sale on tinfoil... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Let's not use this space and time to criticise each other and argue. Different views get different responses and hopefully all will be noted so future decisions can be made on the matter. I would like add that some members posting vids are encouraging members to few vids. This is at individuals requests. We do not need to view videos if we dont like the idea and all have the option to block profiles that we find distasteful or not to our liking. I have always liked this site as it gives people the choices that suits them and the option to not look if it doesn't. Let everyone one have their profile as they please. We are all in control of what we do or do not post and options to show what we want to post." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't have thought there are any more permissions needed for a video than a photo? I've got the link to upload them and it just says "rules for videos are same as photos: You must clearly be in the video. 18+ only. Nothing nasty/taboo. No other faces in video" But you could lift any old video from another site and post it. At least with pictures we have reverse image search. " I think videos may have a reverse search ability took | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"https://m.fabswingers.com/forum/feedback/939200 This is the link if anyone else wants it." Doesn't guarantee an invite. We requested but didnt get one. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’m a site supporter and I’ve asked to be invited but still haven’t " Neither have we. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’m a site supporter and I’ve asked to be invited but still haven’t Neither have we. " Probably everyone (most?) is requesting an invite, so admin are overloaded with requests. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’m a site supporter and I’ve asked to be invited but still haven’t Neither have we. " They closed it hours ago as they had too many. My guess is that they are concerned with server overloads and mods won't cope. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We're doing a beta test of videos on profiles. We've invited a small handful of people to try this out, while we work out any kinks and figure how it should work. Videos can be up to 20 seconds long only. Longer ones are cut off at that length. The intention ISN'T to make Fab into a porn site. Far too many other places for that, and not our intention. The intention IS to let people add some life and sound to their profiles. Rules for videos are same as for photos, so profile owner MUST be in video. While in beta: Currently only invited people can add videos (see other thread if you want an invite) Only site supporters can add videos Only site supporters can view When live: Only verified users will be able to add videos Please note: This is beta, test functionality only. It may stay, it may not. Admin x" all well and good but been asking about it 2 days with not even a reply or an invite. What’s a man to do lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We're doing a beta test of videos on profiles. We've invited a small handful of people to try this out, while we work out any kinks and figure how it should work. Videos can be up to 20 seconds long only. Longer ones are cut off at that length. The intention ISN'T to make Fab into a porn site. Far too many other places for that, and not our intention. The intention IS to let people add some life and sound to their profiles. Rules for videos are same as for photos, so profile owner MUST be in video. While in beta: Currently only invited people can add videos (see other thread if you want an invite) Only site supporters can add videos Only site supporters can view When live: Only verified users will be able to add videos Please note: This is beta, test functionality only. It may stay, it may not. Admin x all well and good but been asking about it 2 days with not even a reply or an invite. What’s a man to do lol " Me too, but I guess their really busy. I think the ladies are being prioritised | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think it could be used. Even if it’s just writing our fab name live on a body. Can’t get more genuine than that. Got one video up, but still doesn’t show under any searches. I can only see ones added by local people or hotlist (basically the update page). Some good cheeky ones so far. Love it Ken" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I didn't request an invite but just noticed I have the option to add one anyway. " yes seemingly people who didn't request an invite to upload vids are the ones being chosen to use the function , don't make sense to me ,there's loads asked and not got it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We're doing a beta test of videos on profiles. We've invited a small handful of people to try this out, while we work out any kinks and figure how it should work. Videos can be up to 20 seconds long only. Longer ones are cut off at that length. The intention ISN'T to make Fab into a porn site. Far too many other places for that, and not our intention. The intention IS to let people add some life and sound to their profiles. Rules for videos are same as for photos, so profile owner MUST be in video. While in beta: Currently only invited people can add videos (see other thread if you want an invite) Only site supporters can add videos Only site supporters can view When live: Only verified users will be able to add videos Please note: This is beta, test functionality only. It may stay, it may not. Admin x" Thank you Admin I have to spread a good news then | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" What about people's vids being stolen of here too. Not just pic collectors but vid collectors now too " After someone just stole a bunch of my photos (claiming to have been in the action type ones with me) on a popular porn site I'm out of this one. I know it's a risk when I upload them to fab, I'd rather just share them with people I'm going to meet. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I didn't request an invite but just noticed I have the option to add one anyway. yes seemingly people who didn't request an invite to upload vids are the ones being chosen to use the function , don't make sense to me ,there's loads asked and not got it " I was not chosen,so I wonder why random people got sent the link. Whilst perving all the vids on the thread i asked i did a tally 17/58 couples and 11/23 ladies now have vids on The selection process seemed pretty random | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I didn't request an invite but just noticed I have the option to add one anyway. yes seemingly people who didn't request an invite to upload vids are the ones being chosen to use the function , don't make sense to me ,there's loads asked and not got it I was not chosen,so I wonder why random people got sent the link. Whilst perving all the vids on the thread i asked i did a tally 17/58 couples and 11/23 ladies now have vids on The selection process seemed pretty random " plus couple of single men | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I didn't request an invite but just noticed I have the option to add one anyway. yes seemingly people who didn't request an invite to upload vids are the ones being chosen to use the function , don't make sense to me ,there's loads asked and not got it I was not chosen,so I wonder why random people got sent the link. Whilst perving all the vids on the thread i asked i did a tally 17/58 couples and 11/23 ladies now have vids on The selection process seemed pretty random plus couple of single men " Oh blimey I haven't checked the single men,took me long anough to perve that lot | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Videos, if you want porn look in the fab chat rooms most nights, live porn with faces. If some guy/girl/couple want to show a 20 second video of themselves having fun, Good luck to them." I'm guessing that you don't get blocked galore when you view cams in the chat rooms on fab swinger's ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"20 seconds wont show a lot lol " why have you looked ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" This isn’t the place to post feedback though so you’re wasting your time. There’s a feature for that under the “contact” button below. So if you feel so strongly maybe air your views there so they are actually seen. On that point you are entirely wrong. This entire thread is posted in a specific site feedback section of the forum. I'm certainly in the right place. There is nothing wrong with debate either. And there’s a bunch of comments that aren’t feedback related, hence why you’d do best using the “contact” link to get your views across. But of course, do as you please. I’d assume with such strong views you’d want to make sure admin gets your views. I don’t recall saying there’s anything wrong with debate, although it you did say you think you’ve said enough... " An awful lot of opinions on the matter for someone with a hidden profile | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe a freinds only video category could be adopted?? " You can have friends only or public we got the invite today works well x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"20 seconds wont show a lot lol " We think it just enough to tease lots seem to love it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"At least our views are going up with people checking all profiles to see who's got vids." True | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can we be added please.." I think it closed now as so many asked | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |