FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback

A filter we'd love to have

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Thinking about this for a while now and we would really love to see this filter: 'people who have no safe sex ticked as an interest' and then the usual allow or block them.

Would that be possible?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

agree .... a place in ya profile saying ... no glove lots of love or a space saying no glove no love .... bet 90% will hit the second option lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *habsMan
over a year ago

Fortress of Solitude, Middlesex

Personally, peopel with only webcam/phone verification I'd like to block - suggests they don't meet even though they have green tick. At least if they don't display any verifications then I can still filter them out without worrying.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Personally I think it is pointless talking about webcam/phone verifications if I can't even filter unverified out...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Personally, peopel with only webcam/phone verification I'd like to block - suggests they don't meet even though they have green tick. At least if they don't display any verifications then I can still filter them out without worrying."

i have never met

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Personally, peopel with only webcam/phone verification I'd like to block - suggests they don't meet even though they have green tick. At least if they don't display any verifications then I can still filter them out without worrying."

We've met, erm, lets say more than a few times but not through this site (well not until this weekend coming). I actually wouldn't even think to ask for a review, and I'm not sure I'd want everyone who happened to read our profile to know who we'd banged. Where does that leave us?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emima_puddlefuckCouple
over a year ago

hexham


"Thinking about this for a while now and we would really love to see this filter: 'people who have no safe sex ticked as an interest' and then the usual allow or block them.

Would that be possible? "

probably,but people would lie

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Thinking about this for a while now and we would really love to see this filter: 'people who have no safe sex ticked as an interest' and then the usual allow or block them.

Would that be possible?

probably,but people would lie"

Yes we know, we have further levels of filtering too, but someone who is not interested in safe sex at all is surely not for us so why we can't block them? Come on, you can block people for NOT BEING A SITE SUPPORTER. Wouldn't this make more sense?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I get the gist of your request, but surely as long as any sex that have with you is 'safe' then that negates the need for any such filters ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 17/11/11 16:27:04]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I get the gist of your request, but surely as long as any sex that have with you is 'safe' then that negates the need for any such filters ?"

Why would that? We don't want to play with people who play bareback. Not even if they are willing to play safe with us.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

As someone said above, people lie, so all it would succeed in doing is blocking the people who have been honest (or naive) enough to tick the box

We all have bareback sex at some point - especially those with long term partners (me included), but that doesn't mean I ever engage in (or promote) BB sex with strangers or with people I meet online.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"Personally, peopel with only webcam/phone verification I'd like to block - suggests they don't meet even though they have green tick. At least if they don't display any verifications then I can still filter them out without worrying.

We've met, erm, lets say more than a few times but not through this site (well not until this weekend coming). I actually wouldn't even think to ask for a review, and I'm not sure I'd want everyone who happened to read our profile to know who we'd banged. Where does that leave us?"

i think there could be a compromise here... leave all the different varifications... but stick in a filter that says "those with meet in person" verifications..... doesn't mean you have to show them though...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"As someone said above, people lie, so all it would succeed in doing is blocking the people who have been honest (or naive) enough to tick the box

We all have bareback sex at some point - especially those with long term partners (me included), but that doesn't mean I ever engage in (or promote) BB sex with strangers or with people I meet online."

Ok, let's put it this way: if you are not interested in safe sex we don't want you messaging us at all. We have it on the profile but still getting messages and winks of those who don't read it. Now we don't want that, and we think on a site where we are looking for partners to share our sex-life with it should be more important than filtering out those who can't afford/don't want taking part in financing the site by being a supporter.

Yes, people would lie as some of them lie anyway, it is up to us to filter them further. But we hate our time being wasted by those who don't lie but don't read either.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Personally, peopel with only webcam/phone verification I'd like to block - suggests they don't meet even though they have green tick. At least if they don't display any verifications then I can still filter them out without worrying.

We've met, erm, lets say more than a few times but not through this site (well not until this weekend coming). I actually wouldn't even think to ask for a review, and I'm not sure I'd want everyone who happened to read our profile to know who we'd banged. Where does that leave us?

i think there could be a compromise here... leave all the different varifications... but stick in a filter that says "those with meet in person" verifications..... doesn't mean you have to show them though..."

+1 couldn't agree more

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top