Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Are you saying that the person being verified isn't the gender they say they are in their profile? That is the main reason for veris, to prove the gender of the profile holder, not if they meet and suck like a Dyson. But if you find a falsely verified profile or one that charges, please report so Admin can take a look." I do report fake accounts, It is obvious which are fakes(In the local area) However if no interaction is made between myself and a fake (eg messages) I doubt admin would look closely into the report There is a huge number of accounts that have joined in the last month in my local area, Alot of them verified by cam only. Most are adult workers joining due to upcoming local events. The rest do seem to be guys making fake profiles that are verified by cam to form a air of legitimacy. If verification by camera is gotten rid of, There would be a substanstial drop in fake profiles. My reasoning behind that is : By removing veri by cam, fake profiles will be slower to be verified/created (unless by meet). This will in turn give admin a longer period of tracking fake verified accounts & reducing numbers across site. (If site users report fakes) I guess a simple analogy is that the admins are bailing a boat filling with water from 2 holes, and by removing cam, you just plugged one of said holes....lol | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"99.9% of so called 'verified' accounts are FAKE anyway. For example, a person been on (fab) for 2 minutes. Claimed by another (fabber) to 'have met in person' yet distance between the 2 accounts is like (300+) miles from each other. Yeah, yeah 'Jackanory' lol." I was verified by a former meet when i came back on the site.. so no its not jackanory, they might have met them before and asked them to reverify them | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"99.9% of so called 'verified' accounts are FAKE anyway. For example, a person been on (fab) for 2 minutes. Claimed by another (fabber) to 'have met in person' yet distance between the 2 accounts is like (300+) miles from each other. Yeah, yeah 'Jackanory' lol." I've met people from the other end of the country, does this mean I am fake? Or could it be that people look for play mates while taking a holiday in another part of the country. Doesn't seem impossible to me. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"99.9% of so called 'verified' accounts are FAKE anyway. For example, a person been on (fab) for 2 minutes. Claimed by another (fabber) to 'have met in person' yet distance between the 2 accounts is like (300+) miles from each other. Yeah, yeah 'Jackanory' lol." Even if all the verifications like the ones you point out are fake,(even though I know they are not as I have reverified alot of new accounts that are guys returning to the site) how does that make 99.9% of all verified accounts fake? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"99.9% of so called 'verified' accounts are FAKE anyway. For example, a person been on (fab) for 2 minutes. Claimed by another (fabber) to 'have met in person' yet distance between the 2 accounts is like (300+) miles from each other. Yeah, yeah 'Jackanory' lol." Perhaps they were on holiday?! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"This has gone from cam verifications to newbies being verified....please read the original post...." Working girls as you say could also be swingers and are on looking for a shag like the rest of us | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"99.9% of so called 'verified' accounts are FAKE anyway. For example, a person been on (fab) for 2 minutes. Claimed by another (fabber) to 'have met in person' yet distance between the 2 accounts is like (300+) miles from each other. Yeah, yeah 'Jackanory' lol." So, when we went to the Newport social on Saturday, with over one hundred verified swingers there, does that mean that 99% were fake? Blimey, sneaky little buggers, dancing, drinking, chatting... and all the time they were fake... who knew! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"This has gone from cam verifications to newbies being verified....please read the original post...." Still relevant as they are cam veris. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"How does site admin not realize this function is being abused the same way as verification by phonecall? Hundreds of fake accounts now verified by cam & working girls verified!! Now before i get some forum nerd who rarely ventures out into the real world....This is a swinging site...where most people meet in real life. " And rude for calling us forum nerds. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I disregard webcam verifications as it simply means they aren't meeting people which is what I'm here to do. Webcam veris matter to some people but mean absolutely nothing to me. Just be glad that the site tells you what kind of verification it is. " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"This has gone from cam verifications to newbies being verified....please read the original post.... Still relevant as they are cam veris. " Not really...The thread is about fake profiles...Not newbies with cam veris. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"How does site admin not realize this function is being abused the same way as verification by phonecall? Hundreds of fake accounts now verified by cam & working girls verified!! Now before i get some forum nerd who rarely ventures out into the real world....This is a swinging site...where most people meet in real life. And rude for calling us forum nerds. " As the firest gatteau said...I disregard cam veris....Due to most fake accounts being verified by cam... Now you can see the point of this thread? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"How does site admin not realize this function is being abused the same way as verification by phonecall? Hundreds of fake accounts now verified by cam & working girls verified!! Now before i get some forum nerd who rarely ventures out into the real world....This is a swinging site...where most people meet in real life. And rude for calling us forum nerds. As the firest gatteau said...I disregard cam veris....Due to most fake accounts being verified by cam... Now you can see the point of this thread?" Yep, I think all the points made were relevant. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Are you saying that the person being verified isn't the gender they say they are in their profile? That is the main reason for veris, to prove the gender of the profile holder, not if they meet and suck like a Dyson. But if you find a falsely verified profile or one that charges, please report so Admin can take a look. I do report fake accounts, It is obvious which are fakes(In the local area) However if no interaction is made between myself and a fake (eg messages) I doubt admin would look closely into the report There is a huge number of accounts that have joined in the last month in my local area, Alot of them verified by cam only. Most are adult workers joining due to upcoming local events. The rest do seem to be guys making fake profiles that are verified by cam to form a air of legitimacy. If verification by camera is gotten rid of, There would be a substanstial drop in fake profiles. My reasoning behind that is : By removing veri by cam, fake profiles will be slower to be verified/created (unless by meet). This will in turn give admin a longer period of tracking fake verified accounts & reducing numbers across site. (If site users report fakes) I guess a simple analogy is that the admins are bailing a boat filling with water from 2 holes, and by removing cam, you just plugged one of said holes....lol" If you can spot them all, then surely you can avoid them? So who would this benefit? If overnight all suspected fakes and prostitutes were culled from the site, do you think your swinging experience would be any better? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Are you saying that the person being verified isn't the gender they say they are in their profile? That is the main reason for veris, to prove the gender of the profile holder, not if they meet and suck like a Dyson. But if you find a falsely verified profile or one that charges, please report so Admin can take a look. I do report fake accounts, It is obvious which are fakes(In the local area) However if no interaction is made between myself and a fake (eg messages) I doubt admin would look closely into the report There is a huge number of accounts that have joined in the last month in my local area, Alot of them verified by cam only. Most are adult workers joining due to upcoming local events. The rest do seem to be guys making fake profiles that are verified by cam to form a air of legitimacy. If verification by camera is gotten rid of, There would be a substanstial drop in fake profiles. My reasoning behind that is : By removing veri by cam, fake profiles will be slower to be verified/created (unless by meet). This will in turn give admin a longer period of tracking fake verified accounts & reducing numbers across site. (If site users report fakes) I guess a simple analogy is that the admins are bailing a boat filling with water from 2 holes, and by removing cam, you just plugged one of said holes....lol If you can spot them all, then surely you can avoid them? So who would this benefit? If overnight all suspected fakes and prostitutes were culled from the site, do you think your swinging experience would be any better? " Your logic of "let them be" seems stupid to me. Why should people waste time on messaging someone who is fake? Well actually yes i do think this would improve the swinging experience as : 1)It leaves only genuine users 2)It stops fake accounts robbing people at meets. 3)By leaving only real people or creates a local swinging community and not some weirdo pic or vid collecting. 4)Fab is for swingers not prostitutes..They should stick to their networking sites. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Are you saying that the person being verified isn't the gender they say they are in their profile? That is the main reason for veris, to prove the gender of the profile holder, not if they meet and suck like a Dyson. But if you find a falsely verified profile or one that charges, please report so Admin can take a look. I do report fake accounts, It is obvious which are fakes(In the local area) However if no interaction is made between myself and a fake (eg messages) I doubt admin would look closely into the report There is a huge number of accounts that have joined in the last month in my local area, Alot of them verified by cam only. Most are adult workers joining due to upcoming local events. The rest do seem to be guys making fake profiles that are verified by cam to form a air of legitimacy. If verification by camera is gotten rid of, There would be a substanstial drop in fake profiles. My reasoning behind that is : By removing veri by cam, fake profiles will be slower to be verified/created (unless by meet). This will in turn give admin a longer period of tracking fake verified accounts & reducing numbers across site. (If site users report fakes) I guess a simple analogy is that the admins are bailing a boat filling with water from 2 holes, and by removing cam, you just plugged one of said holes....lol If you can spot them all, then surely you can avoid them? So who would this benefit? If overnight all suspected fakes and prostitutes were culled from the site, do you think your swinging experience would be any better? Your logic of "let them be" seems stupid to me. Why should people waste time on messaging someone who is fake? Well actually yes i do think this would improve the swinging experience as : 1)It leaves only genuine users 2)It stops fake accounts robbing people at meets. 3)By leaving only real people or creates a local swinging community and not some weirdo pic or vid collecting. 4)Fab is for swingers not prostitutes..They should stick to their networking sites." So are "prostitutes" your words not allowed to meet people for fun? There are plenty of people male and female on fab who are from the escort industry but choose to meet on fab for fun. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Are you saying that the person being verified isn't the gender they say they are in their profile? That is the main reason for veris, to prove the gender of the profile holder, not if they meet and suck like a Dyson. But if you find a falsely verified profile or one that charges, please report so Admin can take a look. I do report fake accounts, It is obvious which are fakes(In the local area) However if no interaction is made between myself and a fake (eg messages) I doubt admin would look closely into the report There is a huge number of accounts that have joined in the last month in my local area, Alot of them verified by cam only. Most are adult workers joining due to upcoming local events. The rest do seem to be guys making fake profiles that are verified by cam to form a air of legitimacy. If verification by camera is gotten rid of, There would be a substanstial drop in fake profiles. My reasoning behind that is : By removing veri by cam, fake profiles will be slower to be verified/created (unless by meet). This will in turn give admin a longer period of tracking fake verified accounts & reducing numbers across site. (If site users report fakes) I guess a simple analogy is that the admins are bailing a boat filling with water from 2 holes, and by removing cam, you just plugged one of said holes....lol If you can spot them all, then surely you can avoid them? So who would this benefit? If overnight all suspected fakes and prostitutes were culled from the site, do you think your swinging experience would be any better? Your logic of "let them be" seems stupid to me. Why should people waste time on messaging someone who is fake? Well actually yes i do think this would improve the swinging experience as : 1)It leaves only genuine users 2)It stops fake accounts robbing people at meets. 3)By leaving only real people or creates a local swinging community and not some weirdo pic or vid collecting. 4)Fab is for swingers not prostitutes..They should stick to their networking sites." People are perfectly free to use fab in any way they wish. Who are we to judge? If they just want to use the cam rooms, forums and not meet that's their business. There's no rule anywhere on fab that says you must meet people for sex. Obviously if you find someone charging for services on here then report them as this is against site rules. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"OP put your energy into finding a genuine person rather than telling admin how to run the site, I've been here ten years and never been fooled by a fake, it's your own selection process that is failing you. PS I ignore verifications and draw my own conclusions on people." | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"OP put your energy into finding a genuine person rather than telling admin how to run the site, I've been here ten years and never been fooled by a fake, it's your own selection process that is failing you. PS I ignore verifications and draw my own conclusions on people." Its easy to find real people...i live 10minutes from a club lol Telling me to keep my opinions to myself is not the same as telling admin how to run the site... Re: My selection process...you mean using the local search function. wow must need fixing. So i shouldn't care about verifications? heres a thought: So a couple that hasn't met in 5 years & hasn't uploaded a picture of the female...yet plenty of the male in that time period & Typical fake couple statuses being posted. I should not care and meet this person? Or how about the "Verified" couples that are actually just gay dudes? Should i meet them also? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"OP put your energy into finding a genuine person rather than telling admin how to run the site, I've been here ten years and never been fooled by a fake, it's your own selection process that is failing you. PS I ignore verifications and draw my own conclusions on people. Its easy to find real people...i live 10minutes from a club lol Telling me to keep my opinions to myself is not the same as telling admin how to run the site... Re: My selection process...you mean using the local search function. wow must need fixing. So i shouldn't care about verifications? heres a thought: So a couple that hasn't met in 5 years & hasn't uploaded a picture of the female...yet plenty of the male in that time period & Typical fake couple statuses being posted. I should not care and meet this person? Or how about the "Verified" couples that are actually just gay dudes? Should i meet them also? " She didn't say YOU should ignore veris, she said SHE ignores veris and draws her own conclusions. Have to say I do pretty much the same, you can normally tell by chatting with someone or even reading their profile, if they are worth the effort. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"OP put your energy into finding a genuine person rather than telling admin how to run the site, I've been here ten years and never been fooled by a fake, it's your own selection process that is failing you. PS I ignore verifications and draw my own conclusions on people. Its easy to find real people...i live 10minutes from a club lol Telling me to keep my opinions to myself is not the same as telling admin how to run the site... Re: My selection process...you mean using the local search function. wow must need fixing. So i shouldn't care about verifications? heres a thought: So a couple that hasn't met in 5 years & hasn't uploaded a picture of the female...yet plenty of the male in that time period & Typical fake couple statuses being posted. I should not care and meet this person? Or how about the "Verified" couples that are actually just gay dudes? Should i meet them also? " you seem to be able to spot fakes so just avoid them? don't understand why you are getting so uptight about this | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" Your logic of "let them be" seems stupid to me. Why should people waste time on messaging someone who is fake? Well actually yes i do think this would improve the swinging experience as : 1)It leaves only genuine users 2)It stops fake accounts robbing people at meets. 3)By leaving only real people or creates a local swinging community and not some weirdo pic or vid collecting. 4)Fab is for swingers not prostitutes..They should stick to their networking sites." 1) define a genuine user? In your opinion. Do they have to be verified by meet every month to prove they are active for example? 2) Do you know that these accounts are purely for the purpose of robbing someone? Has this happened to you? 3) As you yourself have said, there is a swinging community. You said there was a club down the road. Bet you won't find many fakes there. Not at the many socials that happen every month. If these people are your definition of "genuine", then stop browsing fake profiles and go out to meet them. 4) Prostitutes. I'm a Dominatrix. Am I not allowed to use this site for my own fun just because reverse image search will show that my pics are used elsewhere? When I've never asked for a penny from any of the many verifications I have. It seems akin to asking the government to legislate against stupidity. If people can't make common sense decisions based on what is in front of their eyes, then they deserve to get their time wasted. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Are you saying that the person being verified isn't the gender they say they are in their profile? That is the main reason for veris, to prove the gender of the profile holder, not if they meet and suck like a Dyson. But if you find a falsely verified profile or one that charges, please report so Admin can take a look. I do report fake accounts, It is obvious which are fakes(In the local area) However if no interaction is made between myself and a fake (eg messages) I doubt admin would look closely into the report There is a huge number of accounts that have joined in the last month in my local area, Alot of them verified by cam only. Most are adult workers joining due to upcoming local events. The rest do seem to be guys making fake profiles that are verified by cam to form a air of legitimacy. If verification by camera is gotten rid of, There would be a substanstial drop in fake profiles. My reasoning behind that is : By removing veri by cam, fake profiles will be slower to be verified/created (unless by meet). This will in turn give admin a longer period of tracking fake verified accounts & reducing numbers across site. (If site users report fakes) I guess a simple analogy is that the admins are bailing a boat filling with water from 2 holes, and by removing cam, you just plugged one of said holes....lol If you can spot them all, then surely you can avoid them? So who would this benefit? If overnight all suspected fakes and prostitutes were culled from the site, do you think your swinging experience would be any better? Your logic of "let them be" seems stupid to me. Why should people waste time on messaging someone who is fake? Well actually yes i do think this would improve the swinging experience as : 1)It leaves only genuine users 2)It stops fake accounts robbing people at meets. 3)By leaving only real people or creates a local swinging community and not some weirdo pic or vid collecting. 4)Fab is for swingers not prostitutes..They should stick to their networking sites." If they fake how can they rob you at a meet (point no2) and surely if you robbed at a meet it a police matter not a forum thread point to make | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" Your logic of "let them be" seems stupid to me. Why should people waste time on messaging someone who is fake? Well actually yes i do think this would improve the swinging experience as : 1)It leaves only genuine users 2)It stops fake accounts robbing people at meets. 3)By leaving only real people or creates a local swinging community and not some weirdo pic or vid collecting. 4)Fab is for swingers not prostitutes..They should stick to their networking sites. 1) define a genuine user? In your opinion. Do they have to be verified by meet every month to prove they are active for example? 2) Do you know that these accounts are purely for the purpose of robbing someone? Has this happened to you? 3) As you yourself have said, there is a swinging community. You said there was a club down the road. Bet you won't find many fakes there. Not at the many socials that happen every month. If these people are your definition of "genuine", then stop browsing fake profiles and go out to meet them. 4) Prostitutes. I'm a Dominatrix. Am I not allowed to use this site for my own fun just because reverse image search will show that my pics are used elsewhere? When I've never asked for a penny from any of the many verifications I have. It seems akin to asking the government to legislate against stupidity. If people can't make common sense decisions based on what is in front of their eyes, then they deserve to get their time wasted. " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Are you saying that the person being verified isn't the gender they say they are in their profile? That is the main reason for veris, to prove the gender of the profile holder, not if they meet and suck like a Dyson. But if you find a falsely verified profile or one that charges, please report so Admin can take a look. I do report fake accounts, It is obvious which are fakes(In the local area) However if no interaction is made between myself and a fake (eg messages) I doubt admin would look closely into the report There is a huge number of accounts that have joined in the last month in my local area, Alot of them verified by cam only. Most are adult workers joining due to upcoming local events. The rest do seem to be guys making fake profiles that are verified by cam to form a air of legitimacy. If verification by camera is gotten rid of, There would be a substanstial drop in fake profiles. My reasoning behind that is : By removing veri by cam, fake profiles will be slower to be verified/created (unless by meet). This will in turn give admin a longer period of tracking fake verified accounts & reducing numbers across site. (If site users report fakes) I guess a simple analogy is that the admins are bailing a boat filling with water from 2 holes, and by removing cam, you just plugged one of said holes....lol If you can spot them all, then surely you can avoid them? So who would this benefit? If overnight all suspected fakes and prostitutes were culled from the site, do you think your swinging experience would be any better? Your logic of "let them be" seems stupid to me. Why should people waste time on messaging someone who is fake? Well actually yes i do think this would improve the swinging experience as : 1)It leaves only genuine users 2)It stops fake accounts robbing people at meets. 3)By leaving only real people or creates a local swinging community and not some weirdo pic or vid collecting. 4)Fab is for swingers not prostitutes..They should stick to their networking sites. If they fake how can they rob you at a meet (point no2) and surely if you robbed at a meet it a police matter not a forum thread point to make " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"OP put your energy into finding a genuine person rather than telling admin how to run the site, I've been here ten years and never been fooled by a fake, it's your own selection process that is failing you. PS I ignore verifications and draw my own conclusions on people. Its easy to find real people...i live 10minutes from a club lol Telling me to keep my opinions to myself is not the same as telling admin how to run the site... Re: My selection process...you mean using the local search function. wow must need fixing. So i shouldn't care about verifications? heres a thought: So a couple that hasn't met in 5 years & hasn't uploaded a picture of the female...yet plenty of the male in that time period & Typical fake couple statuses being posted. I should not care and meet this person? Or how about the "Verified" couples that are actually just gay dudes? Should i meet them also? you seem to be able to spot fakes so just avoid them? don't understand why you are getting so uptight about this " When my feed is littered with "skint" & "follow me on SC" and other general advertising statuses it's a pain...may aswell just look at a site for hookers.. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" 1) define a genuine user? In your opinion. Do they have to be verified by meet every month to prove they are active for example? 2) Do you know that these accounts are purely for the purpose of robbing someone? Has this happened to you? 3) As you yourself have said, there is a swinging community. You said there was a club down the road. Bet you won't find many fakes there. Not at the many socials that happen every month. If these people are your definition of "genuine", then stop browsing fake profiles and go out to meet them. 4) Prostitutes. I'm a Dominatrix. Am I not allowed to use this site for my own fun just because reverse image search will show that my pics are used elsewhere? When I've never asked for a penny from any of the many verifications I have. It seems akin to asking the government to legislate against stupidity. If people can't make common sense decisions based on what is in front of their eyes, then they deserve to get their time wasted. " 1) Someone who has met another Well verified couple in the last 12 months. simple. 2)No...that was used as an extreme example. using a search engine to search for robberies & fabswingers returns alot of results. But a fake profile last year was asking people to meet in a rough area in a dingey park so... 3)So because i have a problem with fakes...I must go and spend £30 entry just to speak to other swingers? I can't have a swinging social media because i have a problem with fakes? 4)Do you advertise on fab that a booking hasnt turned up / "In need of $$$"....I doubt it you seem a sane person who abides by fab rules. For your last part...If only the goverment would ban stupidity... So for the genuine new people who join fab...and have their time wasted/ lured to a meet/ robbed... that is their fault for not knowing the difference? When i first joined i thought all swingers looked like models etc...Far from it...Now think of a naive guy meeting a fake account be that prostitute/robber/timewaster | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" If they fake how can they rob you at a meet (point no2) and surely if you robbed at a meet it a police matter not a forum thread point to make " It's quite simple if you actually think about it... they make a fake account verify it entice/lure someone to a meet Rob the person. as previously said just google search fab swingers and robberies.. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" 1) define a genuine user? In your opinion. Do they have to be verified by meet every month to prove they are active for example? 2) Do you know that these accounts are purely for the purpose of robbing someone? Has this happened to you? 3) As you yourself have said, there is a swinging community. You said there was a club down the road. Bet you won't find many fakes there. Not at the many socials that happen every month. If these people are your definition of "genuine", then stop browsing fake profiles and go out to meet them. 4) Prostitutes. I'm a Dominatrix. Am I not allowed to use this site for my own fun just because reverse image search will show that my pics are used elsewhere? When I've never asked for a penny from any of the many verifications I have. It seems akin to asking the government to legislate against stupidity. If people can't make common sense decisions based on what is in front of their eyes, then they deserve to get their time wasted. 1) Someone who has met another Well verified couple in the last 12 months. simple. 2)No...that was used as an extreme example. using a search engine to search for robberies & fabswingers returns alot of results. But a fake profile last year was asking people to meet in a rough area in a dingey park so... 3)So because i have a problem with fakes...I must go and spend £30 entry just to speak to other swingers? I can't have a swinging social media because i have a problem with fakes? 4)Do you advertise on fab that a booking hasnt turned up / "In need of $$$"....I doubt it you seem a sane person who abides by fab rules. For your last part...If only the goverment would ban stupidity... So for the genuine new people who join fab...and have their time wasted/ lured to a meet/ robbed... that is their fault for not knowing the difference? When i first joined i thought all swingers looked like models etc...Far from it...Now think of a naive guy meeting a fake account be that prostitute/robber/timewaster" I don't show who gave me my veris - how do you know how long the people have been on the site. Am I a fake? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" 1) define a genuine user? In your opinion. Do they have to be verified by meet every month to prove they are active for example? 2) Do you know that these accounts are purely for the purpose of robbing someone? Has this happened to you? 3) As you yourself have said, there is a swinging community. You said there was a club down the road. Bet you won't find many fakes there. Not at the many socials that happen every month. If these people are your definition of "genuine", then stop browsing fake profiles and go out to meet them. 4) Prostitutes. I'm a Dominatrix. Am I not allowed to use this site for my own fun just because reverse image search will show that my pics are used elsewhere? When I've never asked for a penny from any of the many verifications I have. It seems akin to asking the government to legislate against stupidity. If people can't make common sense decisions based on what is in front of their eyes, then they deserve to get their time wasted. 1) Someone who has met another Well verified couple in the last 12 months. simple. 2)No...that was used as an extreme example. using a search engine to search for robberies & fabswingers returns alot of results. But a fake profile last year was asking people to meet in a rough area in a dingey park so... 3)So because i have a problem with fakes...I must go and spend £30 entry just to speak to other swingers? I can't have a swinging social media because i have a problem with fakes? 4)Do you advertise on fab that a booking hasnt turned up / "In need of $$$"....I doubt it you seem a sane person who abides by fab rules. For your last part...If only the goverment would ban stupidity... So for the genuine new people who join fab...and have their time wasted/ lured to a meet/ robbed... that is their fault for not knowing the difference? When i first joined i thought all swingers looked like models etc...Far from it...Now think of a naive guy meeting a fake account be that prostitute/robber/timewaster I don't show who gave me my veris - how do you know how long the people have been on the site. Am I a fake?" You do actually...verified by 4 people..3 men 1 couple by 5 meet. I would assume real. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Op you're clearly not enjoying your time on the site? don't know what you expected? we all need to take a bit of responsibility for ourselves on here " Clearly not enjoyig myself? I've mentioned a problem with the site on the FEEDBACK forum... Every single poster has detracted from the issue with "Ifs & Buts" and hypothetical exceptions to removing verification by cam. So i take responsibility for fake accounts? That makes sense. Also of all the posters. Make a male profile...same age & preferences as myself and look at the difference in your news feeds. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
back to top |