Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Google reverse search every single picture? And then sort out who's still genuine when a hit comes up (people put pictures on multiple sites) Then go through the complaints when they make the wrong decisions.. Seems like a massive minefield to me. Look after your own ends and don't rely on others to sort people out for you " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Google reverse search every single picture? And then sort out who's still genuine when a hit comes up (people put pictures on multiple sites) Then go through the complaints when they make the wrong decisions.. Seems like a massive minefield to me. Look after your own ends and don't rely on others to sort people out for you " It takes 3 seconds and they do have a verification process , I'd suggest there are plenty of complaints with regards to denied content , I've read a number of threads . Who cares if a pic is rude or not so what is the validation process required for ? So back to the premise , for a start it can be coded thus no time , second I'd suggest most "hits" are genuine stolen pics and quite worth while the site attempting to prohibit . Third not every user me fab is computer literate and surely that's not fair to them or should the less well informed have to suffer their simple desire just to meet or chat without knowing all the tricks ? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Google reverse search every single picture? And then sort out who's still genuine when a hit comes up (people put pictures on multiple sites) Then go through the complaints when they make the wrong decisions.. Seems like a massive minefield to me. Look after your own ends and don't rely on others to sort people out for you It takes 3 seconds and they do have a verification process , I'd suggest there are plenty of complaints with regards to denied content , I've read a number of threads . Who cares if a pic is rude or not so what is the validation process required for ? So back to the premise , for a start it can be coded thus no time , second I'd suggest most "hits" are genuine stolen pics and quite worth while the site attempting to prohibit . Third not every user me fab is computer literate and surely that's not fair to them or should the less well informed have to suffer their simple desire just to meet or chat without knowing all the tricks ? " You have it sorted then. Message admin | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Google reverse search every single picture? And then sort out who's still genuine when a hit comes up (people put pictures on multiple sites) Then go through the complaints when they make the wrong decisions.. Seems like a massive minefield to me. Look after your own ends and don't rely on others to sort people out for you " Aw so caring I Google reverse everything I don't need fab to do anything for me , but golly gosh there are a lot of Russian porn queens here . It is of course wise advice to be self vigilant but that's assuming all people have these skills and are not blinded by lust and clunge | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"The photo mods are volunteers. Just watch how many pics are uploaded in just one hour. I think they have more than enough work to keep them going without expecting more from them. " I genuinely think this is a fair comment however When a photo is uploaded , we are told it is verified x some will understandably wrongly assume this is a verification or a partial validation Perhaps a suggestion would be a tips page suggesting how to self verify I will still note that every pic uploaded could simply be checked with code and any match then referred to a mod for scrutiny ? They were keen to reject my sunset picture I wanted to share before the new system lol and I thought that reasonable xxx | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Volunteer to be a pic mod then you can effect change from within " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Volunteer to be a pic mod then you can effect change from within " How could I do that I would disagree with most of their rules and would struggle to maintain their standards x | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Volunteer to be a pic mod then you can effect change from within " And although my coding skills are improving by the day I don't think fab would give me access to their site to implement the code x | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Google reverse search every single picture? And then sort out who's still genuine when a hit comes up (people put pictures on multiple sites) Then go through the complaints when they make the wrong decisions.. Seems like a massive minefield to me. Look after your own ends and don't rely on others to sort people out for you Aw so caring I Google reverse everything I don't need fab to do anything for me , but golly gosh there are a lot of Russian porn queens here . It is of course wise advice to be self vigilant but that's assuming all people have these skills and are not blinded by lust and clunge " Well they'll soon learn not to be blinded by lust and clunge won't they. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Google reverse search every single picture? And then sort out who's still genuine when a hit comes up (people put pictures on multiple sites) Then go through the complaints when they make the wrong decisions.. Seems like a massive minefield to me. Look after your own ends and don't rely on others to sort people out for you Aw so caring I Google reverse everything I don't need fab to do anything for me , but golly gosh there are a lot of Russian porn queens here . It is of course wise advice to be self vigilant but that's assuming all people have these skills and are not blinded by lust and clunge Well they'll soon learn not to be blinded by lust and clunge won't they." See I'm having issues with tough love xxx | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Google reverse search every single picture? And then sort out who's still genuine when a hit comes up (people put pictures on multiple sites) Then go through the complaints when they make the wrong decisions.. Seems like a massive minefield to me. Look after your own ends and don't rely on others to sort people out for you Aw so caring I Google reverse everything I don't need fab to do anything for me , but golly gosh there are a lot of Russian porn queens here . It is of course wise advice to be self vigilant but that's assuming all people have these skills and are not blinded by lust and clunge Well they'll soon learn not to be blinded by lust and clunge won't they. See I'm having issues with tough love xxx" Well don't,we all need it at time's | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Pic mods already use google reverse if they think a pic is suspect" Of course they do it's sensible x and a most sensible response x | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Google reverse search every single picture? And then sort out who's still genuine when a hit comes up (people put pictures on multiple sites) Then go through the complaints when they make the wrong decisions.. Seems like a massive minefield to me. Look after your own ends and don't rely on others to sort people out for you Aw so caring I Google reverse everything I don't need fab to do anything for me , but golly gosh there are a lot of Russian porn queens here . It is of course wise advice to be self vigilant but that's assuming all people have these skills and are not blinded by lust and clunge Well they'll soon learn not to be blinded by lust and clunge won't they. See I'm having issues with tough love xxx Well don't,we all need it at time's " At times maybe however I'm exceptionally robust and self sufficient but I need to learn and advocate that not all humans are , hence the wise necessity of health and safety and understanding that not all are emotionally robust enough to take it or understand it x | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"No I don't agree that Fab should Google reverse pictures. I would refer you to Fab picture rules, you have to be in each picture, pictures with animals and children are banned, so are some extreme sex photos. Go and read the rules because you don't seem to know them. As for your sunset picture, were you in it, I doubt it, hence it's disallowed. Seems like your sulking coz your own picture was not allowed. " Aw bless I don't sulk , that was 3 years ago , think I made clear I understood the rules ? Yes some pics are banned quite wisely I agree with the list as you point out there is a list the list has been devised using logic and reasoning thus I'm sure using the same logic and reasoning posting a pic that is highly likely not to be the profile holder could quite logically be placed upon said list and using logic I was suggesting as people were discussing time and what may be appropriate. that using a reasoned logic stealing a pic of Sally big tits from porn hub is a tad more unhelpful to the sites aims than one of a sunset It seems a wise moderator has already mentioned that they do indeed apply the wise use of reverse search . Pretty much making your pointless rant to me not only obsolete but incorrect xxx | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"No I don't agree that Fab should Google reverse pictures. I would refer you to Fab picture rules, you have to be in each picture, pictures with animals and children are banned, so are some extreme sex photos. Go and read the rules because you don't seem to know them. As for your sunset picture, were you in it, I doubt it, hence it's disallowed. Seems like your sulking coz your own picture was not allowed. " Also your attempt at being condescending (that is where a person trys to belittle or deride anothers intelligence or knowledge) was not only futile but perhaps an indication you were unable to read my op or certainly lack the ability to understand it's clear curious however non complaining tone . The aggression vented towards my pretty innocent musing is far more telling of those biting than any negativity or moaning from my side Bless you | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Google reverse search every single picture? And then sort out who's still genuine when a hit comes up (people put pictures on multiple sites) Then go through the complaints when they make the wrong decisions.. Seems like a massive minefield to me. Look after your own ends and don't rely on others to sort people out for you Aw so caring I Google reverse everything I don't need fab to do anything for me , but golly gosh there are a lot of Russian porn queens here . It is of course wise advice to be self vigilant but that's assuming all people have these skills and are not blinded by lust and clunge Well they'll soon learn not to be blinded by lust and clunge won't they. See I'm having issues with tough love xxx Well don't,we all need it at time's At times maybe however I'm exceptionally robust and self sufficient but I need to learn and advocate that not all humans are , hence the wise necessity of health and safety and understanding that not all are emotionally robust enough to take it or understand it x " Holding their hands won't help. Hand holding just breeds more needy idiots | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"do Facebook good reverse every image put on their site NO so why should fab " Has anyone missed ruby the voice of reason already telling us that fab does ! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"No I don't agree that Fab should Google reverse pictures. I would refer you to Fab picture rules, you have to be in each picture, pictures with animals and children are banned, so are some extreme sex photos. Go and read the rules because you don't seem to know them. As for your sunset picture, were you in it, I doubt it, hence it's disallowed. Seems like your sulking coz your own picture was not allowed. Also your attempt at being condescending (that is where a person trys to belittle or deride anothers intelligence or knowledge) was not only futile but perhaps an indication you were unable to read my op or certainly lack the ability to understand it's clear curious however non complaining tone . The aggression vented towards my pretty innocent musing is far more telling of those biting than any negativity or moaning from my side Bless you " Aww big words I bet you do joined up writing too | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"No I don't agree that Fab should Google reverse pictures. I would refer you to Fab picture rules, you have to be in each picture, pictures with animals and children are banned, so are some extreme sex photos. Go and read the rules because you don't seem to know them. As for your sunset picture, were you in it, I doubt it, hence it's disallowed. Seems like your sulking coz your own picture was not allowed. Also your attempt at being condescending (that is where a person trys to belittle or deride anothers intelligence or knowledge) was not only futile but perhaps an indication you were unable to read my op or certainly lack the ability to understand it's clear curious however non complaining tone . The aggression vented towards my pretty innocent musing is far more telling of those biting than any negativity or moaning from my side Bless you Aww big words I bet you do joined up writing too " Aw my lovely x Those are not big words I knew you would be reading so I kept it simple x | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
back to top |