FabSwingers.com forum: My photo has received enough Fabs in the last two hours to be in Men's hot pics

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Why does it not show despite having enough Fabs to be on page 1?

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

As predicted after being approved for 2 years 5 months my silhouette photograph has been rejected. This is fucking ridiculous

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 13/05/17 00:50:51]

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

It seems that one by one pictures that I spent considerable time and effort creating are now one by one being banned.

I am deeply dismayed that photos that are a bit different, creative, humorous and enjoyed by others are outlawed in favour of an endless stream of unadulterated cock, arse and boob pictures not to mention the more graphic ones.

I would expect this site to actually wish to encourage a bit of originality and creativity rather than crush it through indiscriminate policing of the pictures users create.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor

You'll never get an answer!

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"You'll never get an answer!"

Maybe not. But maybe the users can make enough noise to be heard?

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *iss.HoneyWoman
over a year ago

...

Doesnt make any sense how one person can approve a photo and then later it gets removed.

Your photos are good.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Doesnt make any sense how one person can approve a photo and then later it gets removed.

Your photos are good. "

It appears they aren't good enough for this site anymore

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We the one you are showing now breakes fab photo rules so shouls be deleted. Try reading the rules and you will find out why

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor

"You'll never get an answer!

Maybe not. But maybe the users can make enough noise to be heard?

Nar I doubt it unfortunately

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor

"We the one you are showing now breakes fab photo rules so shouls be deleted. Try reading the rules and you will find out why"

If that's the case then it shouldn't have been approved in the first place!

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL

"We the one you are showing now breakes fab photo rules so shouls be deleted. Try reading the rules and you will find out why

If that's the case then it shouldn't have been approved in the first place!"

This...my cat received 15 fabs in 10 minutes after being approved then got rejected lol

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 13/05/17 07:20:02]

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"We the one you are showing now breakes fab photo rules so shouls be deleted. Try reading the rules and you will find out why"

I've read the rules why should it be deleted?

It is a picture of my cock with the bus and London Bridge as a background- no different to having a backround of any other sort.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"We the one you are showing now breakes fab photo rules so shouls be deleted. Try reading the rules and you will find out why

If that's the case then it shouldn't have been approved in the first place!"

You can only have the members face showing in any photos. If you look at that one it shows at least five other faces

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

In the photo it shows at least five peoples faces

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

It was approved on 1st February has received 61 Fabs in total. Reached page 1 of hot pics when it was first posted and has received 8 Fabs in the last hour but it doesn't show on Men's Hot Pics. I would like to know what has changed in the interpretation of the rules and why....

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nothing has changed in the rules. If you blurr all the peoples faces who can been seen it would be fine. I do think its a good photo

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"We the one you are showing now breakes fab photo rules so shouls be deleted. Try reading the rules and you will find out why

If that's the case then it shouldn't have been approved in the first place!

You can only have the members face showing in any photos. If you look at that one it shows at least five other faces"

If they are clear enough to be seen hen it should be rejected. But they have been there since February and weren't deemed problematic then. They aren't clear. However I would accept that as a reason for rejection. The balloon picture and my silhouette picture only had me on them.

I've asked for all my pics to be checked for compliance so we will see what happens

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Nothing has changed in the rules. If you blurr all the peoples faces who can been seen it would be fine. I do think its a good photo "

They are blurry

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor

"We the one you are showing now breakes fab photo rules so shouls be deleted. Try reading the rules and you will find out why

If that's the case then it shouldn't have been approved in the first place!

You can only have the members face showing in any photos. If you look at that one it shows at least five other faces"

Then they need to be more observant before they approve a pic,saves everyone time later.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Nothing has changed in the rules. If you blurr all the peoples faces who can been seen it would be fine. I do think its a good photo

They are blurry"

I am only looking on my phone and they do not look blurred on there.

You will find that people have repored it

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Then they need to be more observant before they approve a pic,saves everyone time later."

Yes totally agree with you. A

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Nothing has changed in the rules. If you blurr all the peoples faces who can been seen it would be fine. I do think its a good photo

They are blurry

I am only looking on my phone and they do not look blurred on there.

You will find that people have repored it"

Let's see what happens...still not beeen rejected yet

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *awty40_xxWoman
over a year ago

north lanarkshire

Pic moderators are human and humans make mistakes plus these people do this job voluntary and can you imagine the amount of pics they have to go through?? Some will get missed.. stick to the rules and you wont get pics rejected

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

I fully expect this pic to be rejected retrospectively based on the rules.....let's see what happens....

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *awty40_xxWoman
over a year ago

north lanarkshire

Why continue to break the pic rules then?

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Why continue to break the pic rules then?"

I didn't realise I had at the time. Nor did any moderator at that time.

On the basis of the pictures I've had rejected in the last week all my pictures break the rules and should be rejected as they aren't originals...they have been edited in some way.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor

"Why continue to break the pic rules then?

I didn't realise I had at the time. Nor did any moderator at that time.

On the basis of the pictures I've had rejected in the last week all my pictures break the rules and should be rejected as they aren't originals...they have been edited in some way."

That's a lot of mistakes then isn't it really,yeah we know the mods are volunteers etc,but to now have everyone rejected is a little strange.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ost SockMan
over a year ago

West Wales and Cardiff

"Pic moderators are human and humans make mistakes plus these people do this job voluntary and can you imagine the amount of pics they have to go through?? Some will get missed.. stick to the rules and you wont get pics rejected"

Agree with with.

I had one rejected when there was only a small part of someone's face visible.

Could they be identified - no, but Fab is always going to err massively on the side of caution with photos. Rightly so.

Obviously you see plenty that slip through, or get picked up much later. Just think how many photos need to be dealt with - I'm actually amazed they do as good, quick and thorough job as they do in the whole.

FWIW - I think the people in it are clear enough in my device for Fab to err on the side of caution. I'd reject it if I was a mod. Sorry!

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Agree with with.

I had one rejected when there was only a small part of someone's face visible.

Could they be identified - no, but Fab is always going to err massively on the side of caution with photos. Rightly so.

FWIW - I think the people in it are clear enough in my device for Fab to err on the side of caution. I'd reject it if I was a mod. Sorry!"

I agree it should be rejected....let's see if it is

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *s.KerryTV/TS
over a year ago

Blackpool

It will, shows children in the background....

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ost SockMan
over a year ago

West Wales and Cardiff

Agree with with.

I had one rejected when there was only a small part of someone's face visible.

Could they be identified - no, but Fab is always going to err massively on the side of caution with photos. Rightly so.

FWIW - I think the people in it are clear enough in my device for Fab to err on the side of caution. I'd reject it if I was a mod. Sorry!

I agree it should be rejected....let's see if it is"

Sorry - think I'm getting confused. Too early on a Saturday!

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

It has been rejected but this one shouldn't be...

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"It will, shows children in the background...."

That is the correct reason for it being rejected and the reason given - clarity

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

As always , leave the rejected pics in your gallery and ask Admin to review for you from the CONTACT button rather than on the forum

Thanks

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

"You'll never get an answer!"

He will if he does as advised and ask from the contact button. Admin will either approve the pic or send a mail with a pointer of why it was rejected.

Also if people look in their gallery there will be a reason next to the pic as to why it was rejected.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately