Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does looking SOLELY A for a regular fb on here warrant a membership? You can dress that up how you wish but seldom do fuck buddies remain just that. Maybe there should be a vetting process to make sure that people are on here are looking for swinging related activity .. think it would enhance the site and sense of being in a swinging community... there are other sites to do that right? But I guess fab gets its fair share of people who just don't have any luck on other sites (cat got cream ) Also I'm sure most people wouldn't mind paying ten pounds a month if it meant getting rid of messers etc.. Finally what about only being able to have a public profile by having minimum 3 verified in person meets .. You earn your stripes by messaging and meeting or going to a clubs.. Not playing with the idea .. Sending a few messages ( for free) and then bottling out.. In the words of Mrs merton .."Lets have a heated debate" ![]() ![]() ![]() And exactly how much would you be prepared to pay for this service? Cos a fiver every couple of months ain't going to cut it for the number of staff and systems you'd have to have to administer this vetting. Who will decide on the criteria you would be vetted under? Considering everyone has a different definition of what swinging constitutes...would you require proof that actual meets have taken place? That play occurred? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does looking SOLELY A for a regular fb on here warrant a membership? You can dress that up how you wish but seldom do fuck buddies remain just that. Maybe there should be a vetting process to make sure that people are on here are looking for swinging related activity .. think it would enhance the site and sense of being in a swinging community... there are other sites to do that right? But I guess fab gets its fair share of people who just don't have any luck on other sites (cat got cream ) Also I'm sure most people wouldn't mind paying ten pounds a month if it meant getting rid of messers etc.. Finally what about only being able to have a public profile by having minimum 3 verified in person meets .. You earn your stripes by messaging and meeting or going to a clubs.. Not playing with the idea .. Sending a few messages ( for free) and then bottling out.. In the words of Mrs merton .."Lets have a heated debate" ![]() ![]() ![]() Do you have a list of said 'swinging related activity'? Just so we can all be sure we're doing it right | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"... just an idea to get people that meet and don't time waste which creates huge problems..." Timewasters don't cause any problems for me, let alone 'huge' problems. Yes, I talk to people who it turns out aren't a good match with me, but that's not time wasting - that's just getting to know them. In 4+ years on this and other sites, I have never had a problem with a time-waster (which I define as someone who arranges a meet and then doesn't show, without warning). So Fab is working fine for me. Then again, as a single woman, I probably don't fit YOUR definition of a swinger, so I'm doubtless one of the people you want to throw off this site, for 'spoiling it' for the rest. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So the sites perfect .. and it's better to pick holes and hate rather than try and join in a constructive conversation about how to make the site better? " People are expressing where your plan has downfalls. Fix those downfalls and you'll have more of a solid plan. Or just throw a tantrum because people disagree with you | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So the sites perfect .. and it's better to pick holes and hate rather than try and join in a constructive conversation about how to make the site better? " I never said the site was perfect, however I don't believe your ideas hold much water in reality. We are giving you a constructive conversation, your choosing to ignore that and take it all as criticism instead. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so anyway .. lets just say all my ideas are rubbish - does anyone have any interest in talking about ways to improve the site and sharing ideas ?" Someone asked you earlier if you could list the swinging activities etc, how would you vet the membership of the site yourself? If you explain this then possibly a debate could take place, however you haven't so I'm at a lose as to how that would occur. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does looking SOLELY A for a regular fb on here warrant a membership? You can dress that up how you wish but seldom do fuck buddies remain just that. Maybe there should be a vetting process to make sure that people are on here are looking for swinging related activity .. think it would enhance the site and sense of being in a swinging community... there are other sites to do that right? But I guess fab gets its fair share of people who just don't have any luck on other sites (cat got cream ) Also I'm sure most people wouldn't mind paying ten pounds a month if it meant getting rid of messers etc.. Finally what about only being able to have a public profile by having minimum 3 verified in person meets .. You earn your stripes by messaging and meeting or going to a clubs.. Not playing with the idea .. Sending a few messages ( for free) and then bottling out.. In the words of Mrs merton .."Lets have a heated debate" ![]() ![]() ![]() I wouldn't be interested in paying that's why I came here in first place and surely picking a person for regular sexual encounters is all in the meeting and their being a mutual attraction ,paying would make no difference to that process ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So the sites perfect .. and it's better to pick holes and hate rather than try and join in a constructive conversation about how to make the site better? " Not hating or trying to pick holes, just trying to get a better understanding of what you actually mean and how it would work...so, what criteria would you suggest they vet on? And how would that be administered? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |