Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We have seen quite a few couples profiles on here lately that have been on a while but are still not even photo verified. No big deal as we usually just avoid them, as our thoughts are that if you are happy to have naked photos on your profile then it should not be a big deal getting photo verified. What is concerning though is the couples profiles that are not verified in any way but have face pictures in their public gallery. Not saying its always the case but we tend to think if you are a genuine couple you would be at least photo verified within a few weeks (especially if you have naked photos and face pics in public gallery). Could there not be a rule whereas you can't upload face pics till you are photo verified, could be a small step to help combat the fakes and stop unwilling women having there photos on a swinging siteWe have seen quite a few couples profiles on here lately that have been on a while but are still not even photo verified. No big deal as we usually just avoid them, as our thoughts are that if you are happy to have naked photos on your profile then it should not be a big deal getting photo verified. What is concerning though is the couples profiles that are not verified in any way but have face pictures in their public gallery. Not saying its always the case but we tend to think if you are a genuine couple you would be at least photo verified within a few weeks (especially if you have naked photos and face pics in public gallery). Could there not be a rule whereas you can't upload face pics till you are photo verified, could be a small step to help combat the fakes and stop unwilling women having there photos on a swinging site." Why? Im not photo verified and never will be. Photo verification can be faked very easily | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Agree with a lot of your points but our issue was specifically wif couples who don't have any kind of verification but have face pics public, surely if u r happy to have ur face public as a couple on a swingers site then u wouldn't have a problem getting photo verified??? We r the opposite nd r photo nd meet verified but only show our face privately. Not saying everyone is a fake, just trying to help get rid of th ones that are "Showing face on public doesnt mean someone is fake | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not sure how that post came out like that lol, it should have read We have seen quite a few couples profiles on here lately that have been on a while but are still not even photo verified. No big deal as we usually just avoid them, as our thoughts are that if you are happy to have naked photos on your profile then it should not be a big deal getting photo verified. What is concerning though is the couples profiles that are not verified in any way but have face pictures in their public gallery. Not saying its always the case but we tend to think if you are a genuine couple you would be at least photo verified within a few weeks (especially if you have naked photos and face pics in public gallery). Could there not be a rule whereas you can't upload face pics till you are photo verified, could be a small step to help combat the fakes and stop unwilling women having there photos on a swinging site." I'm not getting the connection with having naked and face pictures in public and having/should be photo verified  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not sure how that post came out like that lol, it should have read We have seen quite a few couples profiles on here lately that have been on a while but are still not even photo verified. No big deal as we usually just avoid them, as our thoughts are that if you are happy to have naked photos on your profile then it should not be a big deal getting photo verified. What is concerning though is the couples profiles that are not verified in any way but have face pictures in their public gallery. Not saying its always the case but we tend to think if you are a genuine couple you would be at least photo verified within a few weeks (especially if you have naked photos and face pics in public gallery). Could there not be a rule whereas you can't upload face pics till you are photo verified, could be a small step to help combat the fakes and stop unwilling women having there photos on a swinging site. I'm not getting the connection with having naked and face pictures in public and having/should be photo verified "Me either | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Im not photo verified and dont intend on getting it ive been here on a different profile for 7 years, fakes and timewasters can get photo verified too so i dont see the big problem, i go with gut instinct when im meeting" Same here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not getting the connection with having naked and face pictures in public and having/should be photo verified "I think they are suggesting that people who aren't photo-verified via a face-pic, shouldn't be allowed to upload face-pics, as admins can't cross verify the faces. In other words, they may 'steal' and upload someone else's face, to pass off as their own. There are 3 things wrong with this:- 1) photo-verification doesn't have to be face, it can be full body nude pic. And this is good, because very many people (like me) won't put their face-pics on a swingers site. 2) the same operates in reverse - if someone doesn't verify via a naked full-length body pic, they may steal someone else's body pics and pass them off as their own. ) there are 10,000+ pictures uploaded daily, and the picture mods (who are volunteers) don't have the time to cross reference new pictures with existing pictures, to ensure that they are of the same person. Yes, the mods use reverse image searches, to try to identify stolen pictures, but there is a limit to how much time we can expect them to put into checking pictures. The solution is... if you see a profile whose pictures you are doubtful about, report, block, and don't engage with them. Use your common sense, ask for them to show themselves on cam, arrange a social meet first, to make sure they look like you expect. People really should worry less about thinking up convoluted schemes to out the so-called 'fakes and timewasters', and worry more about engaging with the people who they DO want to meet. The site owners have been doing this for many years, and they are the best people to decide how they want to run their site. My system of common sense works fine, and in four years on this and other sites, I have never had a single fake or timewaster. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not getting the connection with having naked and face pictures in public and having/should be photo verified
I think they are suggesting that people who aren't photo-verified via a face-pic, shouldn't be allowed to upload face-pics, as admins can't cross verify the faces. In other words, they may 'steal' and upload someone else's face, to pass off as their own.
There are 3 things wrong with this:-
1) photo-verification doesn't have to be face, it can be full body nude pic. And this is good, because very many people (like me) won't put their face-pics on a swingers site.
2) the same operates in reverse - if someone doesn't verify via a naked full-length body pic, they may steal someone else's body pics and pass them off as their own.
) there are 10,000+ pictures uploaded daily, and the picture mods (who are volunteers) don't have the time to cross reference new pictures with existing pictures, to ensure that they are of the same person. Yes, the mods use reverse image searches, to try to identify stolen pictures, but there is a limit to how much time we can expect them to put into checking pictures.
The solution is... if you see a profile whose pictures you are doubtful about, report, block, and don't engage with them. Use your common sense, ask for them to show themselves on cam, arrange a social meet first, to make sure they look like you expect.
People really should worry less about thinking up convoluted schemes to out the so-called 'fakes and timewasters', and worry more about engaging with the people who they DO want to meet. The site owners have been doing this for many years, and they are the best people to decide how they want to run their site. My system of common sense works fine, and in four years on this and other sites, I have never had a single fake or timewaster."Agree why cant people just use gut instinct and common sense instead forcing there idea of what they think will work on others | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not getting the connection with having naked and face pictures in public and having/should be photo verified
I think they are suggesting that people who aren't photo-verified via a face-pic, shouldn't be allowed to upload face-pics, as admins can't cross verify the faces. In other words, they may 'steal' and upload someone else's face, to pass off as their own.
There are 3 things wrong with this:-
1) photo-verification doesn't have to be face, it can be full body nude pic. And this is good, because very many people (like me) won't put their face-pics on a swingers site.
2) the same operates in reverse - if someone doesn't verify via a naked full-length body pic, they may steal someone else's body pics and pass them off as their own.
) there are 10,000+ pictures uploaded daily, and the picture mods (who are volunteers) don't have the time to cross reference new pictures with existing pictures, to ensure that they are of the same person. Yes, the mods use reverse image searches, to try to identify stolen pictures, but there is a limit to how much time we can expect them to put into checking pictures.
The solution is... if you see a profile whose pictures you are doubtful about, report, block, and don't engage with them. Use your common sense, ask for them to show themselves on cam, arrange a social meet first, to make sure they look like you expect.
People really should worry less about thinking up convoluted schemes to out the so-called 'fakes and timewasters', and worry more about engaging with the people who they DO want to meet. The site owners have been doing this for many years, and they are the best people to decide how they want to run their site. My system of common sense works fine, and in four years on this and other sites, I have never had a single fake or timewaster."We said in the original post that we don't engage with these profiles as we also use our common sense. Maybe we weren't clear enough in our explanation. We, like most others can spot a fake and single men pretending to be couples, we were just saying that maybe couples should be verified as a couple before they could put on public face pics. It's easy to take a face pic off the internet and upload here but not so easy to put a photo of a couple holding a sign with their username on. We get that they still maybe not the couple they show on their profile but at least they wouldn't be a single man uploading couples face pics who have no idea they are on here. We are not FACE verified other than by our meets, so in a sense no one is guaranteed we are the people in our photos and we get that. We are however verified as a couple (standing with username) so at least the site owners could be a little more sure we are the photos we use. We know the site creators do a great job but it is a feedback section so people can give their thoughts and ideas, we were just giving our thoughts on a way to maybe help stop single (pic collector) men making couples profiles and using unsuspecting peoples photo's. Maybe it's just us lol but we won't agree with some other forum posts so hey ho each to their own   | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We're not photo verified, never felt the need as we were verified by meetings. A photo verification doesn't prove anything except if it's a man in the profile it's a man in the pics. It doesn't necessarily mean it's the same man. If I was a single guy I could easily steal a great body pic from anywhere then get verified with my face pic and a piece of paper then only show the great body pic and be photo verified. So to us photo verifications prove very little. Mr" We have been on Fab for "ages" never photo verified - so does that mean we are time wasters ? Or just ghost of Fab... We prefer 1:1 meets and verifications as those say more then a picture created by Photoshop | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We're not photo verified, never felt the need as we were verified by meetings. A photo verification doesn't prove anything except if it's a man in the profile it's a man in the pics. It doesn't necessarily mean it's the same man. If I was a single guy I could easily steal a great body pic from anywhere then get verified with my face pic and a piece of paper then only show the great body pic and be photo verified. So to us photo verifications prove very little. Mr We have been on Fab for "ages" never photo verified - so does that mean we are time wasters ? Or just ghost of Fab... We prefer 1:1 meets and verifications as those say more then a picture created by Photoshop"course you are helly lol your the biggest figment of my imagination on fab yet as for monster well hes a robot named brian ... i hear he can save me cash lol nooo ooops thats me eh lol mwaaah .... now give ma bridge back ... woman lol x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
