Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well the info would only be available to the site owners wouldn't it! It would just stop picture theives making profiles to stalk and rob pictures! Don't see why it would be a problem as other sites do this! " So if people wish to do so let them join the other sites. You may not see it as a problem and that's your opinion, mine is I wouldn't provide a copy of my ID to any website. Plus the risks of hacking, no thanks. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well the info would only be available to the site owners wouldn't it! It would just stop picture theives making profiles to stalk and rob pictures! Don't see why it would be a problem as other sites do this! " I've been a member of various swinging and dating sites over the last 15 years and not one has ever asked for passport/driving licence details. This is a free site. How long do you think it would stay free if they enacted your requests? And how would they do that and not lose members? Fakes are relatively easy to spot, so maybe use your nouse instead of spoiling the site for others. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So I've sent the owners of the site a message stating that the site needs changing to avoid losing genuine people as the site is made up of fakes! I've recommended that the site ask for the following from users: All users to provide name and address when registering (details only held by site owners) All users to be photo verified and be verified by identity verification such as driving licence or passport! All site users only able to view profiles once the above steps are completed and become site supporters! I think these things would rapidly improve the site! Other sites have these things implemented and they don't seem to have half the trouble with fakes as this site is over run by them and this would help stop the law being broken! Who agrees and let's see if we can get these changes sorted! Real swingers won't have a problem with this as we sure don't!" We agree, The amount of timewasters on here needs to be addressed. It's spoiling it for all the genuine people on here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I like the site as it is, fake profiles and time wasters are easily spotted, but if your struggling use your filters to stop any non verified/new users etc, from contacting you" There's a lot of room for improvement | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So I've sent the owners of the site a message stating that the site needs changing to avoid losing genuine people as the site is made up of fakes! I've recommended that the site ask for the following from users: All users to provide name and address when registering (details only held by site owners) All users to be photo verified and be verified by identity verification such as driving licence or passport! All site users only able to view profiles once the above steps are completed and become site supporters! I think these things would rapidly improve the site! Other sites have these things implemented and they don't seem to have half the trouble with fakes as this site is over run by them and this would help stop the law being broken! Who agrees and let's see if we can get these changes sorted! Real swingers won't have a problem with this as we sure don't!" Am I understanding correctly? The site should be run on the lines that you dictate and if I don't agree I'm not a real swinger? We've never had a no show, plenty of men have contacted us claiming to be a couple but that's so easy to suss. Neither of us want the changes you suggest implemented and we would leave the site if they were. If that means we aren't proper swingers so be it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Something has got to be done The site is becoming a joke fast!" What is your definition of a fake? It may be the same as Admins so there is an option to report it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Think you have now discoverd change is never welcomed in forums or on the site thats why theres no point venting them take this site with a pinch of salt. Yes it does spoil the site but these days to give out any id on a web site isent a good idea." Think you're right there | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Think you have now discoverd change is never welcomed in forums or on the site thats why theres no point venting them take this site with a pinch of salt. Yes it does spoil the site but these days to give out any id on a web site isent a good idea." You contradict yourself there, you say no point asking for change as people dont welcome it in here, then disagree with what she suggested. You didnt welcome it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Suggestions are fine though, thats what this section is for " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well I must not be a real swinger then cos I'd leave if they implemented any of your recommendations. I'D?? Get real! It's a bloody sex site I'm not applying for a passport. If you can't out the fakes using the tools that the site gives you and your own common sense then you only have yourself to blame." I quite agree! This is a fun site there's no way I would provide such personal information. I've been here on/off for 6yrs. Never once had a no show or come across a fake! I think you need to look at how you're using the site!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Think you have now discoverd change is never welcomed in forums or on the site thats why theres no point venting them take this site with a pinch of salt. Yes it does spoil the site but these days to give out any id on a web site isent a good idea. Think you're right there" There you go start your own website between the both of you, you only need to disagree on one point. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So I've sent the owners of the site a message stating that the site needs changing to avoid losing genuine people as the site is made up of fakes! I've recommended that the site ask for the following from users: All users to provide name and address when registering (details only held by site owners) All users to be photo verified and be verified by identity verification such as driving licence or passport! All site users only able to view profiles once the above steps are completed and become site supporters! I think these things would rapidly improve the site! Other sites have these things implemented and they don't seem to have half the trouble with fakes as this site is over run by them and this would help stop the law being broken! Who agrees and let's see if we can get these changes sorted! Real swingers won't have a problem with this as we sure don't!" Fake people can do all those, so how exactly does that stop fakes? Im genuine and wouldnt do any of the above, if this site asked me to do that I would leave, so how does your method make site better, when it will make genuine people leave | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well the info would only be available to the site owners wouldn't it! It would just stop picture theives making profiles to stalk and rob pictures! Don't see why it would be a problem as other sites do this! " And whats to stop hackers getting info. That happens just look at that other site that got hacked and identities revealed | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How is that spoiling the site it would be improving it the way we see it! well maybe if they just implanted the part where you can only view profiles after being verified and becoming a site supporter!" And how do they get verified if cant view profiles to meet someone to get verified. Photo verification is easily faked so thats not the solution. Common sense is only solution | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How is that spoiling the site it would be improving it the way we see it! well maybe if they just implanted the part where you can only view profiles after being verified and becoming a site supporter!" Then how would anyone new ever be able to see, message and meet someone in order to get verified? Only people who have already met would be able to meet. The logic doesn't work. Oh, and if ID were required I would never, ever have joined up. No data is totally secure these days. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So I've sent the owners of the site a message stating that the site needs changing to avoid losing genuine people as the site is made up of fakes! I've recommended that the site ask for the following from users: All users to provide name and address when registering (details only held by site owners) All users to be photo verified and be verified by identity verification such as driving licence or passport! All site users only able to view profiles once the above steps are completed and become site supporters! I think these things would rapidly improve the site! Other sites have these things implemented and they don't seem to have half the trouble with fakes as this site is over run by them and this would help stop the law being broken! Who agrees and let's see if we can get these changes sorted! Real swingers won't have a problem with this as we sure don't!" . Why would anyone be worried about fakes ?. As fakes do not bother writing detailed or interesting profiles with good pictures , no one is compelling you to contact fakes . That is a decision which you made yourself . I prefer to avoid contacting fakes . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"To join clubs you have to give ID so just the same really " Not all clubs require or ask for id | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So I've sent the owners of the site a message stating that the site needs changing to avoid losing genuine people as the site is made up of fakes! I've recommended that the site ask for the following from users: All users to provide name and address when registering (details only held by site owners) All users to be photo verified and be verified by identity verification such as driving licence or passport! All site users only able to view profiles once the above steps are completed and become site supporters! I think these things would rapidly improve the site! Other sites have these things implemented and they don't seem to have half the trouble with fakes as this site is over run by them and this would help stop the law being broken! Who agrees and let's see if we can get these changes sorted! Real swingers won't have a problem with this as we sure don't!" Id have to leave if photo id became compulsory. I don't have any and being photo verified should be enough. Paid up site supporters too. And not fakes either! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How is that spoiling the site it would be improving it the way we see it! well maybe if they just implanted the part where you can only view profiles after being verified and becoming a site supporter!" That didn't take long, 5 comments in and your changing your stance already. Fakes are simple to spot and avoid if you use your eyes and your brain instead of your genitals. I wouldn't join any site that had your demands as a prerequisite for joining. So its a no from me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well the info would only be available to the site owners wouldn't it! It would just stop picture theives making profiles to stalk and rob pictures! Don't see why it would be a problem as other sites do this! " We are/have been members of other sites, but things you have mentioned (like ID validation) are choices, not compulsory - and they are pay sites, who have the income, and the fancy website to boot. As with all sites, they provide tools for the end-user to use to how they want to use the site they are on. But, it still comes down to YOU as to how you pick/choose and find your matches and ensure the people you contact are real or right for you. We dont have any issues with this site as it is, because it's 100% free to use (we have no need to "donate" for extra pictures etc). Don't get this picture stealers either, as anyone who sees your profile will automatically download your images via their browser.. and it stores them (without their knowledge - thats how peados get caught, when they take their computer to go get fixed, and how the police catch peoples illegal online activities) This happens with any picture you see in your browser on the internet - it's how the internet and browsers work. Don't want people to have access to an image, then dont upload any - they are not private in the slightest. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think this problem is easily solved....if you don't like the site and how it's run, use another site that you do like " this says it all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think we fakes should stand united...." or perhaps we should just fake off lol lol lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So I've sent the owners of the site a message stating that the site needs changing to avoid losing genuine people as the site is made up of fakes! I've recommended that the site ask for the following from users: All users to provide name and address when registering (details only held by site owners) All users to be photo verified and be verified by identity verification such as driving licence or passport! All site users only able to view profiles once the above steps are completed and become site supporters! I think these things would rapidly improve the site! Other sites have these things implemented and they don't seem to have half the trouble with fakes as this site is over run by them and this would help stop the law being broken! Who agrees and let's see if we can get these changes sorted! Real swingers won't have a problem with this as we sure don't!" . It will never happen as it opens a huge can of worms with regards to data protection and freedom of information requests from anyone !! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So I've sent the owners of the site a message stating that the site needs changing to avoid losing genuine people as the site is made up of fakes! I've recommended that the site ask for the following from users: All users to provide name and address when registering (details only held by site owners) All users to be photo verified and be verified by identity verification such as driving licence or passport! All site users only able to view profiles once the above steps are completed and become site supporters! I think these things would rapidly improve the site! Other sites have these things implemented and they don't seem to have half the trouble with fakes as this site is over run by them and this would help stop the law being broken! Who agrees and let's see if we can get these changes sorted! Real swingers won't have a problem with this as we sure don't!" On reflection, I think you're right op, so I'm going to start my own brand new site, just for real swingers. Send me copies of your driving licenses, passports, bank account details and 3 seperately documents that prove proof of residence. Of course if you want a couples profile I'll need the driving licenses and passports for both of you. If one of you doesn't drive or doesn't have a passport you're obviously fakes and can fuck off. I'd still like your bank account details and PIN number though. Please submit your application to; Ipromisenottoscamyou.com | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"To join clubs you have to give ID so just the same really " It's not the same at all! At a swingers club, the members have no control over who else is in the club at the same time as them. So I support clubs who ask for ID (as people would think twice about breaking the law if they knew the police could track them down). On Fab, we all have 100% control over who we choose to meet. We do not put ourselves at any risk by merely joining the site. And, as most of the above posters have said, by using the site tools, common sense and our own personal checks we can ensure we don't go anywhere near someone who we aren't 100% sure about. There is no need to impose the burden and cost of this additional and very costly process on the whole site - Fab works fine just as it is. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We think the site is wonderful. Never had a bad meet, people always turn up. Just be sensible, there are plenty of filters to use. Chat on the phone first before agreeing to meet. Fake profiles stand out like a sore thumb. The sites free, just enjoy it " . Excellent post and my thoughts exactly . Who cares about the fakes .. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"To join clubs you have to give ID so just the same really " not all clubs require ID and not all take copies of iD | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"People need to take responsibility for their own actions, if they waste time talking to fakes, who is to blame, the fake, or the person responding to the fake. If people don't take reasonable steps to find out authenticity of a person, then why bitch then that person proves to be not real. People need to stop griping about fakes and start looking at why they converse and attract the fakes in the first place. people also need to stop blaming others, the site etc, take responsibility yourself" Totally agree | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I agree with everything you have said and I don't think the honest straight people on here would object to providing proof of who they are there's so many fakes on here that I'm beginning to think I'm wasting my time and would be better off on some of the other sites around " I don't think you've read through the thread. There are people suggesting making fab a pay site requiring proof of I'D to join, these are the people have been dissapointed with their planned meets. I can't see anyone else agreeing, anywhere. In fact exactly the opposite and stating they would leave. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The site is fine as it is, it provides you with all the tools you need to have fun without much hassle. You want proof? We have been on here over 7 years and have NEVER had a no-show! Treat every single profile as fake unless proven otherwise, and don't be in such a rush to play that it clouds your judgement. " Never had a no show either. It's easy. Just use your common sense! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find the site works fine as it is, and in 4 years on this and other sites, I have never had a 'no-show'. I just use my own common sense and the tools the site has given us, to make sure that I don't engage with the so-called fakes. I'm certainly not going to give my address and ID to the site, as I don't want the site owners spending time and money on actioning your suggestions. This would just lead to the end of Fab being a free site. If other (pay) site work better for you, then you can use those sites. Or you can stay here, and use your filters to prevent people contacting you, if they aren't photo-verified and site supporters. That way, the site works like you want it to. And if you're worried about people robbing your photos then don't put any up that you aren't prepared to have viewed by everyone. This is the internet, and once you've put an image up, it's there forever. There is no way to stop people from copying your pictures, so it's YOUR responsibility for what pictures of you get seen." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never play with people who are non verified or only have been verified by cam. I'd like to see a solid profile and solid verifications, they more times than not indicate that the user(s) are actually here to have fun and therefore not a time waster... Not failed me yet! " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"People need to take responsibility for their own actions, if they waste time talking to fakes, who is to blame, the fake, or the person responding to the fake. If people don't take reasonable steps to find out authenticity of a person, then why bitch then that person proves to be not real. People need to stop griping about fakes and start looking at why they converse and attract the fakes in the first place. people also need to stop blaming others, the site etc, take responsibility yourself" YEP most of this...connie x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I agree with everything you have said and I don't think the honest straight people on here would object to providing proof of who they are there's so many fakes on here that I'm beginning to think I'm wasting my time and would be better off on some of the other sites around I don't think you've read through the thread. There are people suggesting making fab a pay site requiring proof of I'D to join, these are the people have been dissapointed with their planned meets. I can't see anyone else agreeing, anywhere. In fact exactly the opposite and stating they would leave." He could be agreeing with the OP going by the wording of his post. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never play with people who are non verified or only have been verified by cam. I'd like to see a solid profile and solid verifications, they more times than not indicate that the user(s) are actually here to have fun and therefore not a time waster... Not failed me yet! " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I agree with everything you have said and I don't think the honest straight people on here would object to providing proof of who they are there's so many fakes on here that I'm beginning to think I'm wasting my time and would be better off on some of the other sites around " Yes I would most definately refuse point blank to give any details such as passport or personal ID to any " amateur" run website; The risks of ID theft are too great . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well the info would only be available to the site owners wouldn't it! It would just stop picture theives making profiles to stalk and rob pictures! Don't see why it would be a problem as other sites do this! " why don't you just use the other sites then, if they have a better verification system? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I agree with everything you have said and I don't think the honest straight people on here would object to providing proof of who they are there's so many fakes on here that I'm beginning to think I'm wasting my time and would be better off on some of the other sites around " wrong, I am honest, genuine, over the years and over 4 different accounts I have had over 500 verifications, and no way under this sun will I ever photo verify myself or upload my Identification | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So I've sent the owners of the site a message stating that the site needs changing to avoid losing genuine people as the site is made up of fakes! I've recommended that the site ask for the following from users: All users to provide name and address when registering (details only held by site owners) All users to be photo verified and be verified by identity verification such as driving licence or passport! All site users only able to view profiles once the above steps are completed and become site supporters! I think these things would rapidly improve the site! Other sites have these things implemented and they don't seem to have half the trouble with fakes as this site is over run by them and this would help stop the law being broken! Who agrees and let's see if we can get these changes sorted! Real swingers won't have a problem with this as we sure don't!" Hahaah hahhaha funny ...why not ban you and then the problem is solved. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So I've sent the owners of the site a message stating that the site needs changing to avoid losing genuine people as the site is made up of fakes! I've recommended that the site ask for the following from users: All users to provide name and address when registering (details only held by site owners) All users to be photo verified and be verified by identity verification such as driving licence or passport! All site users only able to view profiles once the above steps are completed and become site supporters! I think these things would rapidly improve the site! Other sites have these things implemented and they don't seem to have half the trouble with fakes as this site is over run by them and this would help stop the law being broken! Who agrees and let's see if we can get these changes sorted! Real swingers won't have a problem with this as we sure don't!" Somewhat naive to assume your details would be safe with any site. Have you not seen the Ashley Madison scandal ! Would never trust any site with my full details | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I agree with everything you have said and I don't think the honest straight people on here would object to providing proof of who they are there's so many fakes on here that I'm beginning to think I'm wasting my time and would be better off on some of the other sites around I don't think you've read through the thread. There are people suggesting making fab a pay site requiring proof of I'D to join, these are the people have been dissapointed with their planned meets. I can't see anyone else agreeing, anywhere. In fact exactly the opposite and stating they would leave. He could be agreeing with the OP going by the wording of his post." Good point...... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Well the info would only be available to the site owners wouldn't it! It would just stop picture theives making profiles to stalk and rob pictures! Don't see why it would be a problem as other sites do this! " wouldnt stop any pics from being taken - people take pics off screens with phones - screenshots etc - once your pic is on the net its open to anybody | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well the info would only be available to the site owners wouldn't it! It would just stop picture theives making profiles to stalk and rob pictures! Don't see why it would be a problem as other sites do this! Completely agree I'm not providing a website with details that can be hacked and used for fraud. Fake profiles can quite easily be spotted and blocked . So if people wish to do so let them join the other sites. You may not see it as a problem and that's your opinion, mine is I wouldn't provide a copy of my ID to any website. Plus the risks of hacking, no thanks." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I like the site as it is, fake profiles and time wasters are easily spotted, but if your struggling use your filters to stop any non verified/new users etc, from contacting you" Exactly this And if any do manage to get in contact,you are not obliged to reply to them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How to stop so many fakes??? Simple, charge Everyone a fee....that gets rid of 62% of them, second ban all single profiles..... It's a swing site not a fuck site and yes there is a MASSIVE difference.....job done. Our work here is finished X" But your profile says you are looking for single men | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How to stop so many fakes??? Simple, charge Everyone a fee....that gets rid of 62% of them, second ban all single profiles..... It's a swing site not a fuck site and yes there is a MASSIVE difference.....job done. Our work here is finished X But your profile says you are looking for single men" Never let the details get in the way of a post | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How to stop so many fakes??? Simple, charge Everyone a fee....that gets rid of 62% of them, second ban all single profiles..... It's a swing site not a fuck site and yes there is a MASSIVE difference.....job done. Our work here is finished X But your profile says you are looking for single men" pmsl busted | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How to stop so many fakes??? Simple, charge Everyone a fee....that gets rid of 62% of them, second ban all single profiles..... It's a swing site not a fuck site and yes there is a MASSIVE difference.....job done. Our work here is finished X But your profile says you are looking for single men Never let the details get in the way of a post " Is there a Facepalm emoji? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How to stop so many fakes??? Simple, charge Everyone a fee....that gets rid of 62% of them, second ban all single profiles..... It's a swing site not a fuck site and yes there is a MASSIVE difference.....job done. Our work here is finished X" Swinging IS fucking. Perhaps you are doing it wrong. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"To us the site has certainly changed for the worse since the last time we were on here. Every day in the forums there are new threads about fakers and time wasters. Many are from people who've turned up at meets only to find no one there. Yes, maybe they should have been more cautious, but shame on those who put that person in that position to start with. And shame on those who point the finger at them for being guilty of nothing worse than believing someone was for real. After all this is suppose to be a site to meet people from. In the last few weeks we either had a string of bad luck, or else the number of fakers and time wasters we've come across is clearly indictiative of something being very wrong with the site at the moment. We did post in the forums about our experiences and kept within guidelines for posts. In under 24 hours we had over 50 replies that mostly reflected our own experiences with similar accounts of similar issues before admin deleted the thread. Surly not everyone posting that the site has problems at the moment can be wrong? We would agree with earlier posts that fees would remove some of the fakes. Which would be a start. We've also seen a number of profiles where people are posting eye catching photos of toned abs etc that don't match the photos which are then sent in PMs. That's deception. We've reported two, but as always nothing seems to have been done about it. Photo verification is a nice idea, but does admin ever go back to check that photos then added match up with the photo used to verify a user? We also seen an awful lot more Bi and Bicurious guys on here of late. Now, that fine and everyone has the right to express and enjoy their own sexuality. But in a forum post the other day an openly bi guy made an interesting of observation in that he sees many of the same profiles on gay meet sites and, as he puts it, "these guys are WAY past being curious." There will always be people on fab who have no intention of meeting people and every intention of string people along for whatever kind of pleasure they get out of doing so, but at the moment there seems to be very little interest in trying to redress the balance and get FAB back to what it once was. Sadly we are pretty sure we will get roasted by certain people over what we've written; we might even get a forum posting ban for ruffling feathers, but we have just as much right to express our position as everyone else and to do some without being attacked for doing so. " Why would you get a ban for voicing your thoughts? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"To us the site has certainly changed for the worse since the last time we were on here. Every day in the forums there are new threads about fakers and time wasters. Many are from people who've turned up at meets only to find no one there. Yes, maybe they should have been more cautious, but shame on those who put that person in that position to start with. And shame on those who point the finger at them for being guilty of nothing worse than believing someone was for real. After all this is suppose to be a site to meet people from. In the last few weeks we either had a string of bad luck, or else the number of fakers and time wasters we've come across is clearly indictiative of something being very wrong with the site at the moment. We did post in the forums about our experiences and kept within guidelines for posts. In under 24 hours we had over 50 replies that mostly reflected our own experiences with similar accounts of similar issues before admin deleted the thread. Surly not everyone posting that the site has problems at the moment can be wrong? We would agree with earlier posts that fees would remove some of the fakes. Which would be a start. We've also seen a number of profiles where people are posting eye catching photos of toned abs etc that don't match the photos which are then sent in PMs. That's deception. We've reported two, but as always nothing seems to have been done about it. Photo verification is a nice idea, but does admin ever go back to check that photos then added match up with the photo used to verify a user? We also seen an awful lot more Bi and Bicurious guys on here of late. Now, that fine and everyone has the right to express and enjoy their own sexuality. But in a forum post the other day an openly bi guy made an interesting of observation in that he sees many of the same profiles on gay meet sites and, as he puts it, "these guys are WAY past being curious." There will always be people on fab who have no intention of meeting people and every intention of string people along for whatever kind of pleasure they get out of doing so, but at the moment there seems to be very little interest in trying to redress the balance and get FAB back to what it once was. Sadly we are pretty sure we will get roasted by certain people over what we've written; we might even get a forum posting ban for ruffling feathers, but we have just as much right to express our position as everyone else and to do some without being attacked for doing so. Why would you get a ban for voicing your thoughts?" It's happened to other people in the past when they've been critical of the site or admin. Normally the ban is 2 days. TBH I am surprised this thread has been closed by a moderator or even deleted. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" It's happened to other people in the past when they've been critical of the site or admin. Normally the ban is 2 days. TBH I am surprised this thread has been closed by a moderator or even deleted. g" This thread proves you wrong, on both points | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" It's happened to other people in the past when they've been critical of the site or admin. Normally the ban is 2 days. TBH I am surprised this thread has been closed by a moderator or even deleted. g This thread proves you wrong, on both points " I think someone's looking for a trip to the step just to say "told you so". | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So I've sent the owners of the site a message stating that the site needs changing to avoid losing genuine people as the site is made up of fakes! I've recommended that the site ask for the following from users: All users to provide name and address when registering (details only held by site owners) All users to be photo verified and be verified by identity verification such as driving licence or passport! All site users only able to view profiles once the above steps are completed and become site supporters! I think these things would rapidly improve the site! Other sites have these things implemented and they don't seem to have half the trouble with fakes as this site is over run by them and this would help stop the law being broken! Who agrees and let's see if we can get these changes sorted! Real swingers won't have a problem with this as we sure don't!" good luck ,I wouldn't give my details | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So I've sent the owners of the site a message stating that the site needs changing to avoid losing genuine people as the site is made up of fakes! I've recommended that the site ask for the following from users: All users to provide name and address when registering (details only held by site owners) All users to be photo verified and be verified by identity verification such as driving licence or passport! All site users only able to view profiles once the above steps are completed and become site supporters! I think these things would rapidly improve the site! Other sites have these things implemented and they don't seem to have half the trouble with fakes as this site is over run by them and this would help stop the law being broken! Who agrees and let's see if we can get these changes sorted! Real swingers won't have a problem with this as we sure don't!" Not everyone has a driving licence or passport.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" We also seen an awful lot more Bi and Bicurious guys on here of late. Now, that fine and everyone has the right to express and enjoy their own sexuality. But in a forum post the other day an openly bi guy made an interesting of observation in that he sees many of the same profiles on gay meet sites and, as he puts it, "these guys are WAY past being curious." " You know that bisexual men like both women AND men, right? So being on a gay site wouldn't be unusual for a bisexual man because they like sleeping with men? Or are you just saying that people who forget to update their profiles from bi-curious to bisexual are somehow fake and bad for the site? If so, there are a lot of women you need to get rid of too. I get contacted all the time by bi-curious women who are clearly an awful lot more than just curious. In fact, id say they're very experienced generally. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So I've sent the owners of the site a message stating that the site needs changing to avoid losing genuine people as the site is made up of fakes! I've recommended that the site ask for the following from users: All users to provide name and address when registering (details only held by site owners) All users to be photo verified and be verified by identity verification such as driving licence or passport! All site users only able to view profiles once the above steps are completed and become site supporters! I think these things would rapidly improve the site! Other sites have these things implemented and they don't seem to have half the trouble with fakes as this site is over run by them and this would help stop the law being broken! Who agrees and let's see if we can get these changes sorted! Real swingers won't have a problem with this as we sure don't!" I disagree. I dont see how any of those things will stop timewaster plus everyones definition of a timewaster is different. Plys no way will i give a swingers site my home details !!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Something has got to be done The site is becoming a joke fast!" Well if you feel that way then leave the site, easy peasy You say other sites have the rules you want regarding verification so use those sites instead. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Think you have now discoverd change is never welcomed in forums or on the site thats why theres no point venting them take this site with a pinch of salt. Yes it does spoil the site but these days to give out any id on a web site isent a good idea. Think you're right there" Its not that change is the problem. Although people do grumble. The changes you suggest could be possibly dangerous. One easy change to make is delete accounts that have not been both verified facially and by meet/webcam after a year. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Think you have now discoverd change is never welcomed in forums or on the site thats why theres no point venting them take this site with a pinch of salt. Yes it does spoil the site but these days to give out any id on a web site isent a good idea. Think you're right there Its not that change is the problem. Although people do grumble. The changes you suggest could be possibly dangerous. One easy change to make is delete accounts that have not been both verified facially and by meet/webcam after a year." those are not so much fake as inactive... I think arbitrary deletion of accounts isn't desirable or necessary....filters judgment and common sense are your best tools | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm sure all the details that Ashley Madison kept were solely for the use of the site owners. How did that end up?? " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Think you have now discoverd change is never welcomed in forums or on the site thats why theres no point venting them take this site with a pinch of salt. Yes it does spoil the site but these days to give out any id on a web site isent a good idea. Think you're right there Its not that change is the problem. Although people do grumble. The changes you suggest could be possibly dangerous. One easy change to make is delete accounts that have not been both verified facially and by meet/webcam after a year." Ive spoke to loads of people who arent verified but have met loads they just dont feel the need to tell people they are real, dont see the big problem either, use your common sense when chatting and filters etc ive never had a problem and thats what i do | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" We also seen an awful lot more Bi and Bicurious guys on here of late. Now, that fine and everyone has the right to express and enjoy their own sexuality. But in a forum post the other day an openly bi guy made an interesting of observation in that he sees many of the same profiles on gay meet sites and, as he puts it, "these guys are WAY past being curious." You know that bisexual men like both women AND men, right? So being on a gay site wouldn't be unusual for a bisexual man because they like sleeping with men? Or are you just saying that people who forget to update their profiles from bi-curious to bisexual are somehow fake and bad for the site? If so, there are a lot of women you need to get rid of too. I get contacted all the time by bi-curious women who are clearly an awful lot more than just curious. In fact, id say they're very experienced generally." We didn't say forget. We are talking about deliberate attempts to mislead - and there is a huge difference. Even if they did "forget" that is a breach of the sites T&Cs 5.3 You must ensure that your profile and any other Content is and remains complete, accurate and is not misleading in any way and that you will update it so that it remains so. We didn't once mention bi women in our post and suggest you re-read it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"To us the site has certainly changed for the worse since the last time we were on here. Every day in the forums there are new threads about fakers and time wasters. Many are from people who've turned up at meets only to find no one there. Yes, maybe they should have been more cautious, but shame on those who put that person in that position to start with. And shame on those who point the finger at them for being guilty of nothing worse than believing someone was for real. After all this is suppose to be a site to meet people from. . " I agree with some of your post, it seems to be the in thing to blame the person being let down rather than the person who did the letting down. People get told a lot to change the way they are picking their meets and the common denominator is them etc, but you can't always be blamed for other people being time wasters and I am sure some can be convincing in what they say. The good thing is Admin recognise that some people like to mess others about, so if someone doesnt turn up it is best to report it and let Admin take a look. Another part of your post mentions pics being different than the person turning up....that is slightly harder for Admin to deal with as unless Admin go on the meet with you then they won't know, but, again if you report and it needs monitoring they will | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" We also seen an awful lot more Bi and Bicurious guys on here of late. Now, that fine and everyone has the right to express and enjoy their own sexuality. But in a forum post the other day an openly bi guy made an interesting of observation in that he sees many of the same profiles on gay meet sites and, as he puts it, "these guys are WAY past being curious." You know that bisexual men like both women AND men, right? So being on a gay site wouldn't be unusual for a bisexual man because they like sleeping with men? Or are you just saying that people who forget to update their profiles from bi-curious to bisexual are somehow fake and bad for the site? If so, there are a lot of women you need to get rid of too. I get contacted all the time by bi-curious women who are clearly an awful lot more than just curious. In fact, id say they're very experienced generally. We didn't say forget. We are talking about deliberate attempts to mislead - and there is a huge difference. Even if they did "forget" that is a breach of the sites T&Cs 5.3 You must ensure that your profile and any other Content is and remains complete, accurate and is not misleading in any way and that you will update it so that it remains so. We didn't once mention bi women in our post and suggest you re-read it. " That was my point. You mentioned bi-curious men as being somehow bad or breaking the site rules, but not bi-curious women. I mean, I understand that basically everyone wants to shag women and so nobody wants to put them off by saying they might be breaking rule 5.3, but by suggesting that bi-curious men are breaking rule 5.3 and not bi-curious women, you're being a teensy bit unfair there towards men. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am sure if they introduced a £10 joining fee and make photo verification compulsory it would deter most of the fakes. " And it would deter many who will go on to meet as well. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am sure if they introduced a £10 joining fee and make photo verification compulsory it would deter most of the fakes. " and us...We must be fakes, then... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am sure if they introduced a £10 joining fee and make photo verification compulsory it would deter most of the fakes. " Not in the slightest; Fakes have £10 to spend; and with a bit of effort, can sort a photo verification. It would get rid of about 25-50% of the genuine people, though . In fact I think the proportion of fakes would rise ..... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd leave, no way I am willing to share those details and provide a copy of ID. I am photo verified and meet verified so that's enough for me to prove I'm not a fake. " I fully agree, there's no way I would share license or passport details online, or any other confidential details. Any website asking for those types of details, isn't one worth risking being part of. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How to stop so many fakes??? Simple, charge Everyone a fee....that gets rid of 62% of them, second ban all single profiles..... It's a swing site not a fuck site and yes there is a MASSIVE difference.....job done. Our work here is finished X" Really, without singles you couples wouldn't get your unicorns, oh and from fakes ive discovered and blocked, so far have all been couples accounts | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" We also seen an awful lot more Bi and Bicurious guys on here of late. Now, that fine and everyone has the right to express and enjoy their own sexuality. But in a forum post the other day an openly bi guy made an interesting of observation in that he sees many of the same profiles on gay meet sites and, as he puts it, "these guys are WAY past being curious." You know that bisexual men like both women AND men, right? So being on a gay site wouldn't be unusual for a bisexual man because they like sleeping with men? Or are you just saying that people who forget to update their profiles from bi-curious to bisexual are somehow fake and bad for the site? If so, there are a lot of women you need to get rid of too. I get contacted all the time by bi-curious women who are clearly an awful lot more than just curious. In fact, id say they're very experienced generally. We didn't say forget. We are talking about deliberate attempts to mislead - and there is a huge difference. Even if they did "forget" that is a breach of the sites T&Cs 5.3 You must ensure that your profile and any other Content is and remains complete, accurate and is not misleading in any way and that you will update it so that it remains so. We didn't once mention bi women in our post and suggest you re-read it. " Misleading would be stating they are straight not bi, what does it matter whether says bicurious or bisexual, both terms mean bi | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am sure if they introduced a £10 joining fee and make photo verification compulsory it would deter most of the fakes. " Would deter genuine people to, i wouldn't pay a fee or photo verify yet I meet people | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am sure if they introduced a £10 joining fee and make photo verification compulsory it would deter most of the fakes. " It would also deter many others including us who prefer to keep the site free. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am sure if they introduced a £10 joining fee and make photo verification compulsory it would deter most of the fakes. " As I've said before; I'm going to start my own brand new site, just for real swingers. Send me copies of your driving licenses, passports, bank account details and 3 seperately documents that prove proof of residence. Of course if you want a couples profile I'll need the driving licenses and passports for both of you. If one of you doesn't drive or doesn't have a passport you're obviously fakes and I don't want you on my site. I'd still like your bank account details and PIN number though. Please submit your application to; Ipromisenottoscamyou.com Don't forget to pay your £10 to get your guaranteed meets and Shags. What could possibly go wrong...... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"When I joined five years ago, there were just as many moans about fakes and timewasters as there are now. " this - I don't think there has been any significant variation and I have been on and off for 6 years | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am sure if they introduced a £10 joining fee and make photo verification compulsory it would deter most of the fakes. " I've been on other paysites (LS and SH) and had more issue with timewasters on those than I have ever had on fab | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am sure if they introduced a £10 joining fee and make photo verification compulsory it would deter most of the fakes. I've been on other paysites (LS and SH) and had more issue with timewasters on those than I have ever had on fab" People are more dubious of pay sites due to the number of spam accounts set up by the owners. To do introduce the same to fab would make new members very dubious (as well as existing members) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can i suggest that only site supporters can avail of use of the forum to out fakes and multiple profiles? The reason im asking is that countless times for example one guy has returned under different guises and has said its free! And also forums can only be viewed by site supporters?. Surely those serious about using the site wouldnt mind paying 10 euro every 60 days for the added security. Id welcome this rule if it was introduced. just a suggestion and might need tweaking here and there." Anyone can read the forums. They don't even have to have a profile. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can i suggest that only site supporters can avail of use of the forum to out fakes and multiple profiles? The reason im asking is that countless times for example one guy has returned under different guises and has said its free! And also forums can only be viewed by site supporters?. Surely those serious about using the site wouldnt mind paying 10 euro every 60 days for the added security. Id welcome this rule if it was introduced. just a suggestion and might need tweaking here and there." What on earth are you talking about? What has the forum got to do with so called fakes? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can i suggest that only site supporters can avail of use of the forum to out fakes and multiple profiles? The reason im asking is that countless times for example one guy has returned under different guises and has said its free! And also forums can only be viewed by site supporters?. Surely those serious about using the site wouldnt mind paying 10 euro every 60 days for the added security. Id welcome this rule if it was introduced. just a suggestion and might need tweaking here and there. Anyone can read the forums. They don't even have to have a profile. " Maybe that needs looking at too... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can i suggest that only site supporters can avail of use of the forum to out fakes and multiple profiles? The reason im asking is that countless times for example one guy has returned under different guises and has said its free! And also forums can only be viewed by site supporters?. Surely those serious about using the site wouldnt mind paying 10 euro every 60 days for the added security. Id welcome this rule if it was introduced. just a suggestion and might need tweaking here and there. What on earth are you talking about? What has the forum got to do with so called fakes? " Im not trying to rub you up the wrong way... using ip addresses as account security, might stop the fakes creating countless accounts and curb the fake profiles. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can i suggest that only site supporters can avail of use of the forum to out fakes and multiple profiles? The reason im asking is that countless times for example one guy has returned under different guises and has said its free! And also forums can only be viewed by site supporters?. Surely those serious about using the site wouldnt mind paying 10 euro every 60 days for the added security. Id welcome this rule if it was introduced. just a suggestion and might need tweaking here and there. What on earth are you talking about? What has the forum got to do with so called fakes? Im not trying to rub you up the wrong way... using ip addresses as account security, might stop the fakes creating countless accounts and curb the fake profiles. " I.p. addresses can be changed without too much bother don't believe everything that appears in t.v. shows | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So I've sent the owners of the site a message stating that the site needs changing to avoid losing genuine people as the site is made up of fakes! I've recommended that the site ask for the following from users: All users to provide name and address when registering (details only held by site owners) All users to be photo verified and be verified by identity verification such as driving licence or passport! All site users only able to view profiles once the above steps are completed and become site supporters! I think these things would rapidly improve the site! Other sites have these things implemented and they don't seem to have half the trouble with fakes as this site is over run by them and this would help stop the law being broken! Who agrees and let's see if we can get these changes sorted! Real swingers won't have a problem with this as we sure don't!" And while they are at it, £100 non refundable life membership fee or else you don't see shit, can't do shit. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can i suggest that only site supporters can avail of use of the forum to out fakes and multiple profiles? The reason im asking is that countless times for example one guy has returned under different guises and has said its free! And also forums can only be viewed by site supporters?. Surely those serious about using the site wouldnt mind paying 10 euro every 60 days for the added security. Id welcome this rule if it was introduced. just a suggestion and might need tweaking here and there. What on earth are you talking about? What has the forum got to do with so called fakes? Im not trying to rub you up the wrong way... using ip addresses as account security, might stop the fakes creating countless accounts and curb the fake profiles. I.p. addresses can be changed without too much bother don't believe everything that appears in t.v. shows" Im not saying ip addresses are the be all and end all of everything.id like an answer to the knobs that get banned but come back under different guises. Not only for me as a single woman but for couples too. Your suggestions will be most welcome | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can i suggest that only site supporters can avail of use of the forum to out fakes and multiple profiles? The reason im asking is that countless times for example one guy has returned under different guises and has said its free! And also forums can only be viewed by site supporters?. Surely those serious about using the site wouldnt mind paying 10 euro every 60 days for the added security. Id welcome this rule if it was introduced. just a suggestion and might need tweaking here and there. What on earth are you talking about? What has the forum got to do with so called fakes? Im not trying to rub you up the wrong way... using ip addresses as account security, might stop the fakes creating countless accounts and curb the fake profiles. I.p. addresses can be changed without too much bother don't believe everything that appears in t.v. shows Im not saying ip addresses are the be all and end all of everything.id like an answer to the knobs that get banned but come back under different guises. Not only for me as a single woman but for couples too. Your suggestions will be most welcome " As said in an earlier post I don't have or ever had a problem on this site either as a single or as part of a couple. The site tools are there already we just need to use them blocking newbies is one tool but above all when it comes to dealing with fakes common sense is the key. If its too good to be true then it more than likely is. Fab is a good site and unlike many others your free to make your own choices we just have to be adult about those choices we make. Many other pay sites don't even allow you to use the full site unless you pay more as a "premium" member. Fab has been the one site I have stayed with for nearly a decade with verious profiles where as other more expensive ones haven't lasted the course. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Use your message filters Block non-verified members and non-site supports from contacting you, and bingo you've implanted your own changes OP, it really is that simple. Then remember to merit some common sense, just because they've photo verified and paid a fiver doesn't necessarily mean they'll be genuine " The point I've tried to make but put in a simpler way | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Use your message filters Block non-verified members and non-site supports from contacting you, and bingo you've implanted your own changes OP, it really is that simple. Then remember to merit some common sense, just because they've photo verified and paid a fiver doesn't necessarily mean they'll be genuine " Ill put meself in the shoes as a fake here,which im not. I would not pay 5 sterling or 10 euro to participate in being on the site. Is it not a detterent to charge to be a site supporter?. Im here over a year with filters in place with newbies and unverified users. Yet the knobs wait until they can avail of the forum to mail the ladies commenting!i block like others, profile removed and it goes on and on and the ladies know its the same guy. Pathetic for a guy to do you might say but its happening. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Use your message filters Block non-verified members and non-site supports from contacting you, and bingo you've implanted your own changes OP, it really is that simple. Then remember to merit some common sense, just because they've photo verified and paid a fiver doesn't necessarily mean they'll be genuine Ill put meself in the shoes as a fake here,which im not. I would not pay 5 sterling or 10 euro to participate in being on the site. Is it not a detterent to charge to be a site supporter?. Im here over a year with filters in place with newbies and unverified users. Yet the knobs wait until they can avail of the forum to mail the ladies commenting!i block like others, profile removed and it goes on and on and the ladies know its the same guy. Pathetic for a guy to do you might say but its happening. " You can still use the site, fake or no fake, without paying to be a site supporter....that's not an entry fee. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Use your message filters Block non-verified members and non-site supports from contacting you, and bingo you've implanted your own changes OP, it really is that simple. Then remember to merit some common sense, just because they've photo verified and paid a fiver doesn't necessarily mean they'll be genuine Ill put meself in the shoes as a fake here,which im not. I would not pay 5 sterling or 10 euro to participate in being on the site. Is it not a detterent to charge to be a site supporter?. Im here over a year with filters in place with newbies and unverified users. Yet the knobs wait until they can avail of the forum to mail the ladies commenting!i block like others, profile removed and it goes on and on and the ladies know its the same guy. Pathetic for a guy to do you might say but its happening. You can still use the site, fake or no fake, without paying to be a site supporter....that's not an entry fee." Id pay ten euro to be on the site..truth!! Ive been a site supporter since i joined and miss the facility when it runs out. Would it not stop the fakes and multiple profiles by the same user if this was implemented? Maybe fabswingers shouldnt be a "free" site anymore. It ruins it for the serious folk here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Use your message filters Block non-verified members and non-site supports from contacting you, and bingo you've implanted your own changes OP, it really is that simple. Then remember to merit some common sense, just because they've photo verified and paid a fiver doesn't necessarily mean they'll be genuine Ill put meself in the shoes as a fake here,which im not. I would not pay 5 sterling or 10 euro to participate in being on the site. Is it not a detterent to charge to be a site supporter?. Im here over a year with filters in place with newbies and unverified users. Yet the knobs wait until they can avail of the forum to mail the ladies commenting!i block like others, profile removed and it goes on and on and the ladies know its the same guy. Pathetic for a guy to do you might say but its happening. You can still use the site, fake or no fake, without paying to be a site supporter....that's not an entry fee. Id pay ten euro to be on the site..truth!! Ive been a site supporter since i joined and miss the facility when it runs out. Would it not stop the fakes and multiple profiles by the same user if this was implemented? Maybe fabswingers shouldnt be a "free" site anymore. It ruins it for the serious folk here. " I pay more than ten euros now to be a site supporter. I find the site is fine as it is. No need to throw the baby out with the bath water by charging a high entry fee. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Use your message filters Block non-verified members and non-site supports from contacting you, and bingo you've implanted your own changes OP, it really is that simple. Then remember to merit some common sense, just because they've photo verified and paid a fiver doesn't necessarily mean they'll be genuine Ill put meself in the shoes as a fake here,which im not. I would not pay 5 sterling or 10 euro to participate in being on the site. Is it not a detterent to charge to be a site supporter?. Im here over a year with filters in place with newbies and unverified users. Yet the knobs wait until they can avail of the forum to mail the ladies commenting!i block like others, profile removed and it goes on and on and the ladies know its the same guy. Pathetic for a guy to do you might say but its happening. You can still use the site, fake or no fake, without paying to be a site supporter....that's not an entry fee. Id pay ten euro to be on the site..truth!! Ive been a site supporter since i joined and miss the facility when it runs out. Would it not stop the fakes and multiple profiles by the same user if this was implemented? Maybe fabswingers shouldnt be a "free" site anymore. It ruins it for the serious folk here. I pay more than ten euros now to be a site supporter. I find the site is fine as it is. No need to throw the baby out with the bath water by charging a high entry fee." Agreed so assuming you are here as a serious user,is it not better that 10 euro or 5 sterling is charged on signing up?... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Use your message filters Block non-verified members and non-site supports from contacting you, and bingo you've implanted your own changes OP, it really is that simple. Then remember to merit some common sense, just because they've photo verified and paid a fiver doesn't necessarily mean they'll be genuine Ill put meself in the shoes as a fake here,which im not. I would not pay 5 sterling or 10 euro to participate in being on the site. Is it not a detterent to charge to be a site supporter?. Im here over a year with filters in place with newbies and unverified users. Yet the knobs wait until they can avail of the forum to mail the ladies commenting!i block like others, profile removed and it goes on and on and the ladies know its the same guy. Pathetic for a guy to do you might say but its happening. You can still use the site, fake or no fake, without paying to be a site supporter....that's not an entry fee. Id pay ten euro to be on the site..truth!! Ive been a site supporter since i joined and miss the facility when it runs out. Would it not stop the fakes and multiple profiles by the same user if this was implemented? Maybe fabswingers shouldnt be a "free" site anymore. It ruins it for the serious folk here. I pay more than ten euros now to be a site supporter. I find the site is fine as it is. No need to throw the baby out with the bath water by charging a high entry fee. Agreed so assuming you are here as a serious user,is it not better that 10 euro or 5 sterling is charged on signing up?..." Personally I don't think an entry fee is required, but if one were applied, then it shouldn't be too high as to deter serious users....but then would it be enough to deter fakes? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Use your message filters Block non-verified members and non-site supports from contacting you, and bingo you've implanted your own changes OP, it really is that simple. Then remember to merit some common sense, just because they've photo verified and paid a fiver doesn't necessarily mean they'll be genuine Ill put meself in the shoes as a fake here,which im not. I would not pay 5 sterling or 10 euro to participate in being on the site. Is it not a detterent to charge to be a site supporter?. Im here over a year with filters in place with newbies and unverified users. Yet the knobs wait until they can avail of the forum to mail the ladies commenting!i block like others, profile removed and it goes on and on and the ladies know its the same guy. Pathetic for a guy to do you might say but its happening. You can still use the site, fake or no fake, without paying to be a site supporter....that's not an entry fee. Id pay ten euro to be on the site..truth!! Ive been a site supporter since i joined and miss the facility when it runs out. Would it not stop the fakes and multiple profiles by the same user if this was implemented? Maybe fabswingers shouldnt be a "free" site anymore. It ruins it for the serious folk here. I pay more than ten euros now to be a site supporter. I find the site is fine as it is. No need to throw the baby out with the bath water by charging a high entry fee. Agreed so assuming you are here as a serious user,is it not better that 10 euro or 5 sterling is charged on signing up?... Personally I don't think an entry fee is required, but if one were applied, then it shouldn't be too high as to deter serious users....but then would it be enough to deter fakes? " Fakes create several accounts.. a fee applied would lessen that. Im not saying it would eradicate the problem but if i was a fake and setting up several accounts, id think twice at a 10 euro a pop... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Use your message filters Block non-verified members and non-site supports from contacting you, and bingo you've implanted your own changes OP, it really is that simple. Then remember to merit some common sense, just because they've photo verified and paid a fiver doesn't necessarily mean they'll be genuine Guessing you've not used paid sites fakes account are rude on them these people do it for kicks and you don't think their happy to pay to get said kick, in the same way you choose to use this site to get your kicks Ill put meself in the shoes as a fake here,which im not. I would not pay 5 sterling or 10 euro to participate in being on the site. Is it not a detterent to charge to be a site supporter?. Im here over a year with filters in place with newbies and unverified users. Yet the knobs wait until they can avail of the forum to mail the ladies commenting!i block like others, profile removed and it goes on and on and the ladies know its the same guy. Pathetic for a guy to do you might say but its happening. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can i suggest that only site supporters can avail of use of the forum to out fakes and multiple profiles? The reason im asking is that countless times for example one guy has returned under different guises and has said its free! And also forums can only be viewed by site supporters?. Surely those serious about using the site wouldnt mind paying 10 euro every 60 days for the added security. Id welcome this rule if it was introduced. just a suggestion and might need tweaking here and there. What on earth are you talking about? What has the forum got to do with so called fakes? Im not trying to rub you up the wrong way... using ip addresses as account security, might stop the fakes creating countless accounts and curb the fake profiles. " No it won't : Anyone can change ( or hide) their ip. For different reasons ( personal security/ banking etc) my ip changes every day. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can i suggest that only site supporters can avail of use of the forum to out fakes and multiple profiles? The reason im asking is that countless times for example one guy has returned under different guises and has said its free! And also forums can only be viewed by site supporters?. Surely those serious about using the site wouldnt mind paying 10 euro every 60 days for the added security. Id welcome this rule if it was introduced. just a suggestion and might need tweaking here and there. What on earth are you talking about? What has the forum got to do with so called fakes? Im not trying to rub you up the wrong way... using ip addresses as account security, might stop the fakes creating countless accounts and curb the fake profiles. No it won't : Anyone can change ( or hide) their ip. For different reasons ( personal security/ banking etc) my ip changes every day." Ok suggest another option..im all ears here.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |