FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback

Mandatory pic verification

Jump to newest
 

By *allDarkAndTattooed OP   Man
over a year ago

Peterborough

Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it mandatory for picture verification before they can send and receive messages..there are so many people on here that cant be bothered and it takes two min to do.

There are too many fake profiles with fake verifications ( webcam, meeting in person ect )

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it mandatory for picture verification before they can send and receive messages..there are so many people on here that cant be bothered and it takes two min to do.

There are too many fake profiles with fake verifications ( webcam, meeting in person ect ) "

No. As long as people abide by the site rules, they can use this site as they wish. You do not need to interact with anyone if they do not suit your preferences.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ungBlackTopMan
over a year ago

salford

It still won't solve the problem, people will always get around things like that. I don't think there is a remedy for fake profiles.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire

I'm fake and my verifications are fake, would it really make a difference if I was photo verified?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lighty1Woman
over a year ago

You Dont Need to Know, right now


"Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it mandatory for picture verification before they can send and receive messages..there are so many people on here that cant be bothered and it takes two min to do.

There are too many fake profiles with fake verifications ( webcam, meeting in person ect ) "

No to mandatory picture verification. I'm not putting my face or a full-body picture on Fab, as I don't want to be recognised. If you think us non-pic-verified people are fake, then just don't engage with us. Meanwhile, I will go on using my own common sense in ing out the fakes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ordonBennettMan
over a year ago

dover

Avoid those who are not photo verified is the simplest solution.

Ejecting from the site those who choose not to be is not necessary or desirable.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it mandatory for picture verification before they can send and receive messages..there are so many people on here that cant be bothered and it takes two min to do.

There are too many fake profiles with fake verifications ( webcam, meeting in person ect ) "

Nope...no need and utterly pointless...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *at69driveMan
over a year ago

Hertford


"Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it mandatory for picture verification before they can send and receive messages..there are so many people on here that cant be bothered and it takes two min to do.

There are too many fake profiles with fake verifications ( webcam, meeting in person ect ) "
. Surely members have enough common sense to decide for themselves if a profile is fake . All you have to do is read the profile concerned .

I don't think that fakes go to the bother of writing a good profile .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *at69driveMan
over a year ago

Hertford


"Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it mandatory for picture verification before they can send and receive messages..there are so many people on here that cant be bothered and it takes two min to do.

There are too many fake profiles with fake verifications ( webcam, meeting in person ect )

No to mandatory picture verification. I'm not putting my face or a full-body picture on Fab, as I don't want to be recognised. If you think us non-pic-verified people are fake, then just don't engage with us. Meanwhile, I will go on using my own common sense in ing out the fakes."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irtyGirlWoman
over a year ago

Edinburgh

I'm also happy not being photo verified. If you want to do that then the facility is available. I'm all about choices and making my own.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If I had had to upload a face/body pic when I first joined the site I would not have joined. I wanted time to view it, see what it had to offer and decide if I trusted it before I'd upload pictures. I got verified in person quite quickly as someone had recommended the site to me, so I just never bothered with the pic veri as I figured a veri from a real life person meant more. Forcing people to photo verify on sign up may deter some fakes (or you'll get the same one keep using the same name over and over then changing it), but it would also deter genuine users too.

If you don't want unverified members contacting you, use your filters and block them from doing so.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irty Girty From No 30Woman
over a year ago

Burbage


"Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it mandatory for picture verification before they can send and receive messages..there are so many people on here that cant be bothered and it takes two min to do.

There are too many fake profiles with fake verifications ( webcam, meeting in person ect ) "

No, as they can be faked

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *awandOrderCouple
over a year ago

SW London

No way ... I have had a single profile on here for four years, and Mr for two, as well as this couple profile .... we are real and don't need photo verification. I choose not to put my face on here, and I shouldn't have to, leave it as it is ... its easy enough to spot the fakes ...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nope. My partner and I have better things to do than take pictures of ourselves for fabs when we're together.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky-MinxWoman
over a year ago

Grantham

I disagree too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *izzabelle and well hungCouple
over a year ago

Edinburgh.

If it wasn't for all the fakes paying money the site would cost more. The trick is for you to spot them and not pay more for the subscription.

Just have a good old chuckle when you next have a three way with a couple of dirty women off here that some guy pulling himself off in a beer stained vest looking at pictures of your exploits payed for you too meet.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atureandhornyCouple
over a year ago

Liverpool

Fakes are just on here to empty their balls. You can spot them a mile away they usually only chat for 5 mins then they cum and go

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No to photo verification.to help out fakes just spot them. They aren't hard to spot. Plus we don't interact with those with just cam verifications,to us they are the easy ones to fake and pointless anyhow.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rs DCouple
over a year ago

far

Site needs the fakes fivers but tbh its rare that they do pay.i love it when a fake messages me.the fun begins pics if any are a give aways looks like they took pics ov there sister shopping. Or porn pics are sent just google them.an dirty talk is another give away. KIK is another one ...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster

All it proves is you can stand up holding a piece of paper that doesn't make you any more or less likely to meet up

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rs DCouple
over a year ago

far


"All it proves is you can stand up holding a piece of paper that doesn't make you any more or less likely to meet up "
i think it proves that the pics you are uploading are true profile pics.verification for profile pics is a way the site looks after its users. If some one cba to hold a piece ov paper up with there user name on it that will never be shown.its up to them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it mandatory for picture verification before they can send and receive messages..there are so many people on here that cant be bothered and it takes two min to do.

There are too many fake profiles with fake verifications ( webcam, meeting in person ect )

No to mandatory picture verification. I'm not putting my face or a full-body picture on Fab, as I don't want to be recognised. If you think us non-pic-verified people are fake, then just don't engage with us. Meanwhile, I will go on using my own common sense in ing out the fakes."

I think it would help yes.

If that became a rule then it would be abiding by the rules to comply...

you could then put the pic into friend folder but not private.

I don't engage with those who don't have a profile pic just like I would talk with someone who faced away while having a conversation. It's rude. I wouldn't consider meeting someone who remained faceless while engaged in intimate activity either.

It would be a step towards reducing fakes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster


"All it proves is you can stand up holding a piece of paper that doesn't make you any more or less likely to meet up i think it proves that the pics you are uploading are true profile pics.verification for profile pics is a way the site looks after its users. If some one cba to hold a piece ov paper up with there user name on it that will never be shown.its up to them."

I've had a photo verified person contact me who wasn't who his public pics represented him to be. the trouble with photo verification is human error can take place, there's that many pics to authorised they are generally approved sometimes without cross referencing or are simply overlooked, its why you occasionall come across fisting pics that are against site rules but someone approved them or they wouldn't be there.

I couldn't be arsed to do it but I meet so people know who I am anyway

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This site is run by couples and women so it's not really a suggestion for discussion tbh. They don't need verifications to get meets....so its a no vote. But it would reduce fake profiles.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top