Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Fab Admin change single profiles to "couple" if it is reported to them that a man or woman says on the profile they like their partner to watch or join in. It would seem therefore logical to change "straight" to "Bi" where the man has had a 1 on 1 meet with another man for sex. What do you folks think? " it's not up to admin to decide somebody's sexual orientation. Being classed as 'Single' (or not as the case may be) - is a whole different kettle of fish to sexuality | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Fab Admin change single profiles to "couple" if it is reported to them that a man or woman says on the profile they like their partner to watch or join in. It would seem therefore logical to change "straight" to "Bi" where the man has had a 1 on 1 meet with another man for sex. What do you folks think? " Being in a couple or being single is a generally easily measureable characteristic though isn't it? You either meet alone or with someone else there...not really too much grey area in that... Sexuality is a self identified thing on a wide spectrum and is fluid for many people...why should admin make that judgement? Do people here really need that much spoon feeding that they can't work it out for themselves anyway and make decisions based on the evidence presented to them? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Fab Admin change single profiles to "couple" if it is reported to them that a man or woman says on the profile they like their partner to watch or join in. It would seem therefore logical to change "straight" to "Bi" where the man has had a 1 on 1 meet with another man for sex. What do you folks think? Being in a couple or being single is a generally easily measureable characteristic though isn't it? You either meet alone or with someone else there...not really too much grey area in that... Sexuality is a self identified thing on a wide spectrum and is fluid for many people...why should admin make that judgement? Do people here really need that much spoon feeding that they can't work it out for themselves anyway and make decisions based on the evidence presented to them?" The lables people tick about themselves on their profile are used by others to check compatibility so hopefully should be honest. The reason for this post was, quite at random, I came across a single male profile for a "straight" man who had been verified on 5 man on man meets. I just thought his view of his own sexuality was either distorted or misleading. Perhaps there should be a "mind your own bloody business" box? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Fab Admin change single profiles to "couple" if it is reported to them that a man or woman says on the profile they like their partner to watch or join in. It would seem therefore logical to change "straight" to "Bi" where the man has had a 1 on 1 meet with another man for sex. What do you folks think? Being in a couple or being single is a generally easily measureable characteristic though isn't it? You either meet alone or with someone else there...not really too much grey area in that... Sexuality is a self identified thing on a wide spectrum and is fluid for many people...why should admin make that judgement? Do people here really need that much spoon feeding that they can't work it out for themselves anyway and make decisions based on the evidence presented to them? The lables people tick about themselves on their profile are used by others to check compatibility so hopefully should be honest. The reason for this post was, quite at random, I came across a single male profile for a "straight" man who had been verified on 5 man on man meets. I just thought his view of his own sexuality was either distorted or misleading. Perhaps there should be a "mind your own bloody business" box? " Hope you weren't fooled into meeting him; that would have been a disaster, for you | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |