FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback

member video clips

Jump to newest
 

By *rnyashellcpl OP   Couple
over a year ago

Haydock

I am sure this topic has been brought up many times (hope this keeps it fresh in the fabs minds) member amatuer clips that can be downloaded to fabs, what are peoples thoughts?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I am sure this topic has been brought up many times (hope this keeps it fresh in the fabs minds) member amatuer clips that can be downloaded to fabs, what are peoples thoughts?"

Quite like the idea, I'd personally pay a couple of quid extra a month for them which I'm sure many would!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rnyashellcpl OP   Couple
over a year ago

Haydock

I don't mean pages of them, one or two per member

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *edangel_2013Woman
over a year ago

southend

Enough fake pictures get through the mods now, imagine how difficult it would be to police videos.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I like this idea and it could be also used to introduce yourself and verify you are genuine. Many dating sites have video profiles so it would be good on here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *verReadyAndMinxyCouple
over a year ago

Blackpool

I like the idea too. Amateur vids are good. With the options like photos of keeping them private or public. Would prob need a blanket ban on faces being shown tho.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Doesn't interest me in the slightest and wouldn't wanna be paying any more than I already do, for a feature I'll never use and most likely be full of fake/stolen videos,

Keep fab as it is.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilandlarryCouple
over a year ago

more north lincs than mids!

I think the man power required to moderate them would be overwhelming.

It's not something we would use either.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No interest either. Use the Internet to jack off to videos!

Why clog the site and give ADMIN and the MOD'S more unnecessary work ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he Queen of TartsWoman
Forum Mod
over a year ago

My Own Little World


"No interest either. Use the Internet to jack off to videos!

Why clog the site and give ADMIN and the MOD'S more unnecessary work ?"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

To be honest, I'm more interested in face-to-face meets than watching video.

I like to see a face pic and read a bit of a description then get chatting and hopefully meet up pretty soon after that.

There are plenty of free porn sites with more than enough amateur content - go and enjoy it and help keep this site "free".

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This one has come up before, and the site owners pitched in on at least one occasion. IIRC, they had no objection to hosting videos in principal. The problem was that the site hosting hardware would have to be upgraded with more storage space and more bandwidth, which would increase the running costs, and that would have to be passed on to the user's, either in higher site supporter fee or a mandatory basic membership fee. The consensus was that the demand wasn't great enough - adding profile videos wasn't likely to bring in many new members, or tempt many free members to become site supporters, certainly not enough to compensate for the supporters and members who would be put off by increased prices.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *j_markCouple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Totteridge/Whetstone


"This one has come up before, and the site owners pitched in on at least one occasion. IIRC, they had no objection to hosting videos in principal. The problem was that the site hosting hardware would have to be upgraded with more storage space and more bandwidth, which would increase the running costs, and that would have to be passed on to the user's, either in higher site supporter fee or a mandatory basic membership fee. The consensus was that the demand wasn't great enough - adding profile videos wasn't likely to bring in many new members, or tempt many free members to become site supporters, certainly not enough to compensate for the supporters and members who would be put off by increased prices."

We can't recall ever saying anything on the lines above. We've not made a substantive comment on it.

Admin x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This one has come up before, and the site owners pitched in on at least one occasion. IIRC, they had no objection to hosting videos in principal. The problem was that the site hosting hardware would have to be upgraded with more storage space and more bandwidth, which would increase the running costs, and that would have to be passed on to the user's, either in higher site supporter fee or a mandatory basic membership fee. The consensus was that the demand wasn't great enough - adding profile videos wasn't likely to bring in many new members, or tempt many free members to become site supporters, certainly not enough to compensate for the supporters and members who would be put off by increased prices.

We can't recall ever saying anything on the lines above. We've not made a substantive comment on it.

Admin x"

I stand corrected.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top