Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
| Jump to newest |  |
A | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Asked about this last year. The response was... less than satisfactory." What was the response? A | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Asked about this last year. The response was... less than satisfactory. What was the response? A" Basically along the lines of 'single males are the most likely to get filtered out so we make sure they know when they aren't welcome on a profile'. Still not sure why admin think couples and females shouldn't get the same treatment. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hi Admin. Hope all's well with you! Any chance of an adjustment to the 'Not looking for......' message that appears when users block mail from single men? A few points. 1. The message only appears when a filter is applied to prevent men messaging. None appears saying "Not looking for couples/single women/TV/TS/MM/FF". Should a similar message not appear in those circumstances, else it seems a tad unfair? 2. Why not just remove the message altogether and have the same message appear that does when you attempt to message someone who has age/gender filters - the "sorry, you can't message this profile as they're not looking for...." one. Or an simple alternative that says "This profile has chosen not to receive messages from men" (see point 4). 3. Users are given the option to display the groups their looking for. Either of the above two options would fit nicely with those preference settings without appearing to discriminate against only one demographic. 4. At present many users apply the filter to stop incoming messages as they prefer to search themselves - the current system can be confusing (see the endless threads in the forums!) to men seeking women/couples who find themselves looking at what appears a contradictory profile - one stating they are seeking men get with the words "Not looking for single men". Think that sums up my thoughts. Have a nice evening.
A"could,nt agree more.... Time and time and again have written msg go to send.. Unable to.,. The odd occassion when have had ask a 3 rd party to message them for me.. Only to find they were unaware of filter setting.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hi Admin. Hope all's well with you! Any chance of an adjustment to the 'Not looking for......' message that appears when users block mail from single men? A few points. 1. The message only appears when a filter is applied to prevent men messaging. None appears saying "Not looking for couples/single women/TV/TS/MM/FF". Should a similar message not appear in those circumstances, else it seems a tad unfair? 2. Why not just remove the message altogether and have the same message appear that does when you attempt to message someone who has age/gender filters - the "sorry, you can't message this profile as they're not looking for...." one. Or an simple alternative that says "This profile has chosen not to receive messages from men" (see point 4). 3. Users are given the option to display the groups their looking for. Either of the above two options would fit nicely with those preference settings without appearing to discriminate against only one demographic. 4. At present many users apply the filter to stop incoming messages as they prefer to search themselves - the current system can be confusing (see the endless threads in the forums!) to men seeking women/couples who find themselves looking at what appears a contradictory profile - one stating they are seeking men get with the words "Not looking for single men". Think that sums up my thoughts. Have a nice evening.
A could,nt agree more.... Time and time and again have written msg go to send..
Unable to.,. The odd occassion when have had ask a 3 rd party to message them for me.. Only to find they were unaware of filter setting..
"Also sometimes couples contact us.. attempt to msg only to be blocked... So they assume i,m either uninterested or rude... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Also sometimes couples contact us.. attempt to msg only to be blocked... So they assume i,m either uninterested or rude..." If they've contacted you, you can always reply. Admin x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
