FabSwingers.com forum: Screen out web images

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

There was a very interesting thread on this subject closed rather hastily I believe by admin. It was suggested that to screen out web pic's making it onto the site automatically would cost the site owners between £70,000 and £80,000 per year thus the idea was pie in sky .

This is simply not true yes that's what it would cost with the Tin-Eye api . TIN-EYE would be the Rolls Royce solution . However the Bing api (Think more Skoda than Rolls Royce )would save us all that false excitement that one of our favorite porn stars had indeed joined fab and even better only lives down the road now from us now for a mere £125 a month .

I know this is a mainly free community and the pic mods are volunteers however the credibility of the site would take a quantum leap forward and the work load of the pic mods would be dramatically reduced if all pic submissions where screened automatically

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *j_markCouple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Totteridge/Whetstone

Mods already use tools like this.

If something has slipped through, hit REPORT and it will be re-reviewed

Just because an image is on fab AND on the web doesn't automatically mean it's not the user. We do have porn stars on her and people who have posted their photos elsewhere

Admin x

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *aytimeDTTV/TS
over a year ago

Peterborough

Just find it funny when you do report and nothing is done...happened twice in as many days now. Here and on fabguys - one is some american actors uncle with instagram location showing someplace in New York state, the other is a canadian (i think) porn star...yet they have both recently moved to the Uk and joined the fab community so its all good

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

Reports can take up to 48 hours to be dealt with. Report again if it is longer than that

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

hi all, why not just make all photos submitted to fab for site use only,

then if the same photos are found on the web they are removed from the user profile. connie x

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"hi all, why not just make all photos submitted to fab for site use only,

then if the same photos are found on the web they are removed from the user profile. connie x

I use the same pictures here as I use on other websites.

Why should I get my pictures removed from here just because that's the case?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Reports can take up to 48 hours to be dealt with. Report again if it is longer than that

I have also noticed that if its a site supporter your reporting for using the picture of a globally famous porn star forget it no action will be taken

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

"Mods already use tools like this.

If something has slipped through, hit REPORT and it will be re-reviewed

Just because an image is on fab AND on the web doesn't automatically mean it's not the user. We do have porn stars on her and people who have posted their photos elsewhere

Admin x"

Bump

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

"Reports can take up to 48 hours to be dealt with. Report again if it is longer than that

I have also noticed that if its a site supporter your reporting for using the picture of a globally famous porn star forget it no action will be taken "

Bumped Admins post for you.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *histler21Man
over a year ago

Ipswich

Some 'web images' are actually owned by the fab member in question. Some - not all...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread