FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback

Non photo- verified profiles

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

I think that getting photo-verified within a certain time frame e.g. a week, should be mandatory.

I like the fact that this site is free and users can use it how they like, to a varying level of seriousness, but I think this would filter out a lot of the dodgy profiles on here (to the benefit of all the 'real' users).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
Forum Mod

over a year ago

Why don't you just ignore the profiles that don't have photo verifications instead?

I don't think it's fair to force people to anything when there are ways of avoiding profiles you don't want to deal with

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyKellyCDTV/TS
over a year ago

Coventry


"Why don't you just ignore the profiles that don't have photo verifications instead?

I don't think it's fair to force people to anything when there are ways of avoiding profiles you don't want to deal with "

Agreeed! Only takes a sec to delete any message without the little tick next to the name

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *thwalescplCouple
over a year ago

brecon


"I think that getting photo-verified within a certain time frame e.g. a week, should be mandatory.

I like the fact that this site is free and users can use it how they like, to a varying level of seriousness, but I think this would filter out a lot of the dodgy profiles on here (to the benefit of all the 'real' users)."

So, we are not "real" users then?

Photo veries are not worth the pixels they are showing.

Even a relative tech Neanderthal like me could fake one, the only veri that really demonstrates someone is likely to be more genuine is a play meet one.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issBehavingxxWoman
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Why don't you just ignore the profiles that don't have photo verifications instead?

I don't think it's fair to force people to anything when there are ways of avoiding profiles you don't want to deal with "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think that getting photo-verified within a certain time frame e.g. a week, should be mandatory.

I like the fact that this site is free and users can use it how they like, to a varying level of seriousness, but I think this would filter out a lot of the dodgy profiles on here (to the benefit of all the 'real' users)."

We're real, a lot realer than the photo verified users we traveled an 80 mile round trip to meet and then who didn't appear!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

I should have explained what I meant more thoroughly, I meant 'at least photo-verified', if not physically verified.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Or... you could just ignore the profiles that aren't photo verified....

No-one forces you to mail them do they?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Or... you could just ignore the profiles that aren't photo verified....

No-one forces you to mail them do they?"

No, no one forces me to do anything.

This is the site feedback forum darlings...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think that getting photo-verified within a certain time frame e.g. a week, should be mandatory.

I like the fact that this site is free and users can use it how they like, to a varying level of seriousness, but I think this would filter out a lot of the dodgy profiles on here (to the benefit of all the 'real' users)."

Why? Time wasters can still photo verify

I'm not photo verified test have lot meet in person verifications, do I need to leave site then

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I should have explained what I meant more thoroughly, I meant 'at least photo-verified', if not physically verified.

"

I totally agree with you,everyone should be face verified,it is a private photo,within a certain time frame.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm verified but not photo verified and have no plans to change that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issHottieBottieWoman
over a year ago

Kent

Just filter out non verified users from contacting you. Then it's not a problem.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just filter out non verified users from contacting you. Then it's not a problem. "

If you block non verified people from contacting you and they really want to contact you then they'll get photo verified. I've had a couple of guys do it to enable them to message me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Im not photo verified and never thought it mattered because i have personal verifications if somebody doesnt want to talk to me or suspects i'm not "real" because i don't have a photo veri then, oh well! Lol. X

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iggerooooCouple
over a year ago

Conwy

We are not photo verified and don't see the point.

I'm a Web / graphics designer by trade and I have proved this point on certain sites that I can get any picture verified ... With less than a few minutes in photoshop.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think that getting photo-verified within a certain time frame e.g. a week, should be mandatory.

I like the fact that this site is free and users can use it how they like, to a varying level of seriousness, but I think this would filter out a lot of the dodgy profiles on here (to the benefit of all the 'real' users).

We're real, a lot realer than the photo verified users we traveled an 80 mile round trip to meet and then who didn't appear!

"

sorry the hamster got toothache

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Plenty of tools already on the site to aid you...I think they might charge a little more for a service that includes ensuring you choose more wisely...if that was even possible.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I should have explained what I meant more thoroughly, I meant 'at least photo-verified', if not physically verified.

I totally agree with you,everyone should be face verified,it is a private photo,within a certain time frame."

Nope. Shan't. It's pointless, proves nothing and we can't see the point.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top