Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why dont you give the new comers at least 5 hours or a day or week to see if there are real or not and then bring them in to the site probley if you know what i men there x like put them in a box sort of thing and then put them back in to the commety " What does that translate to in English? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well they cant post on the forums until verified (photo or met in person) or until 7 days is up and I would assume cam has something similar (I dont use it though, so am guessing) Activate your filters to stop unverifieds from being able to pm you and stop worrying about it. Its 7 days, being verified has nothing to do with posting on the forums. I agree with the filters bit though, never understand why people don't use them but I guess they would have less to moan about wouldn't they " Are you sure that you dont need to be at least photo verified to post on the forums. My understanding is, at least 7 days on this site, and at least photo verified before you can post on these forums... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well they cant post on the forums until verified (photo or met in person) or until 7 days is up and I would assume cam has something similar (I dont use it though, so am guessing) Activate your filters to stop unverifieds from being able to pm you and stop worrying about it. Its 7 days, being verified has nothing to do with posting on the forums. I agree with the filters bit though, never understand why people don't use them but I guess they would have less to moan about wouldn't they Are you sure that you dont need to be at least photo verified to post on the forums. My understanding is, at least 7 days on this site, and at least photo verified before you can post on these forums..." That must be new then as didn't have to when I first joined | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well they cant post on the forums until verified (photo or met in person) or until 7 days is up and I would assume cam has something similar (I dont use it though, so am guessing) Activate your filters to stop unverifieds from being able to pm you and stop worrying about it. Its 7 days, being verified has nothing to do with posting on the forums. I agree with the filters bit though, never understand why people don't use them but I guess they would have less to moan about wouldn't they Are you sure that you dont need to be at least photo verified to post on the forums. My understanding is, at least 7 days on this site, and at least photo verified before you can post on these forums..." Yes, seven days and you have to be verified | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why dont you give the new comers at least 5 hours or a day or week to see if there are real or not and then bring them in to the site probley if you know what i men there x like put them in a box sort of thing and then put them back in to the commety " A box? And how will that prove they're real? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Could joining the site require immediate verification via a photo? If posing as a couple you both need to be in the picture? Take away the verification option via a meet as someone rightly suggested a person might create multiple profiles just to verify a fake?" I think meet verifications are a much more reliable indicator than photo-verification. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Could joining the site require immediate verification via a photo? If posing as a couple you both need to be in the picture? Take away the verification option via a meet as someone rightly suggested a person might create multiple profiles just to verify a fake? How so? If you need to have a hand written note of your username and the site! Would not be easy to get that from a porn site or Google. I think meet verifications are a much more reliable indicator than photo-verification." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Could joining the site require immediate verification via a photo? If posing as a couple you both need to be in the picture? Take away the verification option via a meet as someone rightly suggested a person might create multiple profiles just to verify a fake? I think meet verifications are a much more reliable indicator than photo-verification. How so? If you need to have a hand written note of your username and the site! Would not be easy to get that from a porn site or Google." I'm led to believe that it's not that difficult to forge. But i fail to see why anyone would suggest doing away with meet verifications (which actually take quite a lot of effort to forge), unless it is because they lack them and feel that that is holding them back. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Could joining the site require immediate verification via a photo? If posing as a couple you both need to be in the picture? Take away the verification option via a meet as someone rightly suggested a person might create multiple profiles just to verify a fake? I think meet verifications are a much more reliable indicator than photo-verification. How so? If you need to have a hand written note of your username and the site! Would not be easy to get that from a porn site or Google. I'm led to believe that it's not that difficult to forge. But i fail to see why anyone would suggest doing away with meet verifications (which actually take quite a lot of effort to forge), unless it is because they lack them and feel that that is holding them back. " Did I misunderstand or was that a suggestion at me? Since I have no verifications?. I think its a good feature and I don't believe at any point I said stop them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Could joining the site require immediate verification via a photo? If posing as a couple you both need to be in the picture? Take away the verification option via a meet as someone rightly suggested a person might create multiple profiles just to verify a fake? I think meet verifications are a much more reliable indicator than photo-verification. How so? If you need to have a hand written note of your username and the site! Would not be easy to get that from a porn site or Google. I'm led to believe that it's not that difficult to forge. But i fail to see why anyone would suggest doing away with meet verifications (which actually take quite a lot of effort to forge), unless it is because they lack them and feel that that is holding them back. Did I misunderstand or was that a suggestion at me? Since I have no verifications?. I think its a good feature and I don't believe at any point I said stop them." Err you just said: "Take away the verification option via a meet as someone rightly suggested a person might create multiple profiles just to verify a fake?" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Could joining the site require immediate verification via a photo? If posing as a couple you both need to be in the picture? Take away the verification option via a meet as someone rightly suggested a person might create multiple profiles just to verify a fake? I simply meant when first joining put the emphasis on picture verification. I think meet verifications are a much more reliable indicator than photo-verification. How so? If you need to have a hand written note of your username and the site! Would not be easy to get that from a porn site or Google. I'm led to believe that it's not that difficult to forge. But i fail to see why anyone would suggest doing away with meet verifications (which actually take quite a lot of effort to forge), unless it is because they lack them and feel that that is holding them back. Did I misunderstand or was that a suggestion at me? Since I have no verifications?. I think its a good feature and I don't believe at any point I said stop them. Err you just said: Take away the verification option via a meet as someone rightly suggested a person might create multiple profiles just to verify a fake?" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Could joining the site require immediate verification via a photo? If posing as a couple you both need to be in the picture? Take away the verification option via a meet as someone rightly suggested a person might create multiple profiles just to verify a fake? I think meet verifications are a much more reliable indicator than photo-verification. Hi how are you both and would you like to chat and meet us 2 men oneday x How so? If you need to have a hand written note of your username and the site! Would not be easy to get that from a porn site or Google. I'm led to believe that it's not that difficult to forge. But i fail to see why anyone would suggest doing away with meet verifications (which actually take quite a lot of effort to forge), unless it is because they lack them and feel that that is holding them back. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was reading this thread with interest and came to the above post!!!! lol this is funny shiite" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was reading this thread with interest and came to the above post!!!! lol this is funny shiite " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was reading this thread with interest and came to the above post!!!! lol this is funny shiite " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Contender for worst thread of the year?" . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |