Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
![]() ![]() | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I very rarely use the chat rooms so maybe shouldn't stick my oar in. But I will anyway, because I'm bored and I haven't yet had enough coffee to start work ![]() personally I don't think there are cliques in chatrooms. Naturally there are people who will chat to each other. The more you chat, and have social meets, the more you get to know each other. The more you get to know each other the more you chat. I'm sorry if that comes across as cliquey but it's not ... it's friendship and familiarity. We were all newbies at one point and all had to make the effort to get to know people. It's not up to those in the room already to draw people into the conversations. You only get out of this site what you put in, and that includes in the chatroom. I am a chatroom mod and I will never allow another member to bully/talk bad etc about another member, especially if they are not in the room. If you have a problem with someone then you need to block them, not cause bitchfests and name calling. We are all adults and should be able to understand that we are never going to get on with every single person we come across. If, however, you are in chat and you feel a mod is not doing his/her "job" properly and allowing anything untoward to go on then you MUST use the report button and let admin know. If you don't tell them then they won't know. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"how would it be enforced? should everyone go on cam so that it can be confirmed that it is, in fact, a couple on cam and not some single male or female wanting to see what happens?" Lil, I am guessing that mods like yourself would need to do a cam check to see that it is a couple in a couples only chat room, you might need to pop back to their cam every 5 minutes though because some of the more sneaky couples might just do the first cam check and then one or other of them could go off to do other stuff. Shocking, I know, but there is a life away from the chat rooms for some people! ![]() ![]() | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"we have found that certain single males can happily sit in chat rooms 9-10 hours a day 'being everyones friend' and then when they don't like that you wont meet them they actively campaign against you. We know there are decent single guys. We know there are decent single fems. This is NOT a debate about that. This is simply that a free site has attracted a certain 'dick in hand'single male element who sit in chat rooms all day and thats not really anything to do with swinging. We have witnessed them try and 'control' rooms by pm'ing others about cpls and often there is an agenda based on them not having any success with meets. This problem is evident in the regional rooms in particular. Blocking is not an answer to this. Most of the conversation is purile 'i'd give her one' chat between these males as well. The is a big difference between people who might swing flirting in chat and a room having masses of single males being crude and boorish. The utility of chatrooms is thus greatly diminished for cpls. Having a cpls only room would quickly solve that. After all regardless of 'good singles' we surely all agree that swinging is prima facie a COUPLES endeavour. If you had a scotish cpls room, a welsh cpls room etc the site would be alot more cpl friendly and we know several cpls who would return to chat." Blocking isn't ineffective, it will block anyone who's chat you don't want to see. If you blocked every single male you can be left with just couples or females if that is what you wish. What you might think is purile chat is fun for another person. I am not sure how or why you think single men control rooms by PM each other, but it seems very far fetched to me. As this thread has proved, single men seem way down on the list of lots of peoples pecking orders. Us, we like single men as they are our source of fun and as they get penalised enough by these type of sites by people who think they are superior to them, and the sex industry itself, then I think segregation this way isn't a good idea. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Blocking is totally ineffective - we've seen and been subject to pm's from single males saying 'do you agree with that X says... speak up' etc. Manytimes inproperly formed whispers land in the general chatroom because they have forgotten the final '' and the content of those private messages are astounding. Real playground bullying stuff. Nothing in our suggestion stops cpls who want to talk / meet single males - we're not suggesting stopping the other chatrooms. Again asking for something FOR cpls who want to meet cpls has been hijacked by the 'single male' brigade and turned into one of their crusades. Hilarious. " I am not sure what you expected to be honest. Single men and women are members here also and probably don't like the suggestion that they are what you say they are. I am still not sure why you think blocking is not effective. If you have them blocked, they can't mail you to ask you anything and you can't see any of their chat, including failed whispers. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"We've made clear why blocking an individual does nothing to address the issue of singles sitting in chat all day forming cliques and making the room 'theirs' and consequently unwelcoming to the majority of cpls who come in at night and don't 'play their game'. No point in repeating this ad infinitum. We've also answered the 'would both need to be there' above. Again No point in repeating this ad infinitum. Seems openly verified cpls can't make a suggestion about how to improve how the site caters for them without raising the backs of the singles. Strange. We'd have no objection to a singles only room or a 'cpls for singles' room. Other sites have cpls only rooms so its not like we're suggesting Fabs reinvent the wheel. (btw -if the last line tempts you to answer 'well why don't you go there' then resist the urge - that really isn't the point and your contribution would be tellingly pointless and offensive). " Would I be so tempted? noooo ![]() | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"how on earth does 'block all' actually help make the chatroom a place that cpls would like to use to meet cpls? You're wanting to reduce this to 'us vs single males' which is totally missing the point. Why you pesist in this is baffling. And your 'roll eyes' smiley was a purile and offensive gesture." ok will leave you to it now, before I really do roll my eyes for real. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"i dont know how many times we can repeat that blocking does nothing to address the issue. We're talking about creating a positive environment for cpls to communicate with the prople they are trying to meet and blocking EVERY SINGLE SINGLE who might come into a room is laborious, impractical and still does nothing to rectify the issue and create an environment many cpls seek. " "creating apositive environment" ,ie only single males being a negative influence? ie only couples are positive influence? Maybe I'm reading that wrong. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
back to top | ![]() |