FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback

verifications

Jump to newest
 

By *easing_two OP   Couple
over a year ago

Bristol, Thornbury

Just had a idea of splitting the meet in person verification to play a social so there would be two different meet in person verifications x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uietlyKinkyUsCouple
over a year ago

midlands

Why?

The veri system is to say turned up, looks as their profile.

Private business between people is private until they individually chose to either display a veri or tell someone.

Id never leave a play veri. Its my business who i have sex with & when.

I make clear if i meet someone just socially but that's my choice.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why?

The veri system is to say turned up, looks as their profile.

Private business between people is private until they individually chose to either display a veri or tell someone.

Id never leave a play veri. Its my business who i have sex with & when.

I make clear if i meet someone just socially but that's my choice. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *easing_two OP   Couple
over a year ago

Bristol, Thornbury

Because they are different types of meets.

Just like webcam is not the same neither is play and social

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uietlyKinkyUsCouple
over a year ago

midlands

I disagree, a meet in person; be it of an intimate or social is a meet in person.

I.e they actually turned up to a pre-arranged meet. Unlike webcam where they just showed something on cam.

To me, actually getting ready, making an effort and turning up, is so much more important than flashing a face/cock on a cam at their convenience from say their bedroom.

But that's all they are.

More intimate details are optional, not compulsory.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I disagree, a meet in person; be it of an intimate or social is a meet in person.

I.e they actually turned up to a pre-arranged meet. Unlike webcam where they just showed something on cam.

To me, actually getting ready, making an effort and turning up, is so much more important than flashing a face/cock on a cam at their convenience from say their bedroom.

But that's all they are.

More intimate details are optional, not compulsory. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *obbobeanMan
over a year ago

dagenham


"I disagree, a meet in person; be it of an intimate or social is a meet in person.

I.e they actually turned up to a pre-arranged meet. Unlike webcam where they just showed something on cam.

To me, actually getting ready, making an effort and turning up, is so much more important than flashing a face/cock on a cam at their convenience from say their bedroom.

But that's all they are.

More intimate details are optional, not compulsory. "

Nail on head comes to mind

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *easing_two OP   Couple
over a year ago

Bristol, Thornbury

[Removed by poster at 14/11/13 13:00:09]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just had a idea of splitting the meet in person verification to play a social so there would be two different meet in person verifications x"

Sorry, I totally disagree.

It's no-one's business but OURS, who I have met and played with. I am happy to leave (and display) social verifications. But I will never disclose to the world who I have played with.

Why would you want this?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Totally agree that is optional and people dont want to say the intimate details.But you can choose not to show the veri anyway.

But as people, men especially, dont tend to say they are BI but they do say "genuine" (ha ha), its very hard to actually find them and verify they are actually BI. We all know some say they are then run at the sight of a cock. If there could be some sort of tick box systems, a tick for meet and to say they are genuine, then say a tick if you want to put more.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I disagree, a meet in person; be it of an intimate or social is a meet in person.

I.e they actually turned up to a pre-arranged meet. Unlike webcam where they just showed something on cam.

To me, actually getting ready, making an effort and turning up, is so much more important than flashing a face/cock on a cam at their convenience from say their bedroom.

But that's all they are.

More intimate details are optional, not compulsory.

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top