Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"of course , when you pay for something you are entitled to more than if you dont." But to be entitled to get away with no reprimand if you break the site rules is not quite the same as a more generous picture allowance or knowing who you have been in contact with previously. And where would the line be drawn? Could gold site supporters be able to be vile and obnoxious whereas silver site supporters only be allowed to be obnoxious? ![]() | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"was banned from a chatroom by an overanxious moderator for a minor infringement. do you think its fair that us as gold or silver supporters are treated the same as no supporters afer handing over our hard earned money to provide for the up keep of this site? after this im tempted to move to another swingers site and demand the money back for my remaining membership." I think all member of the site should be expected to abide by the same set of rules no matter wether they pay for the extra perks or not. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"was banned from a chatroom by an overanxious moderator for a minor infringement. do you think its fair that us as gold or silver supporters are treated the same as no supporters afer handing over our hard earned money to provide for the up keep of this site? after this im tempted to move to another swingers site and demand the money back for my remaining membership." break the rules get punished site supporter or not... | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"of course , when you pay for something you are entitled to more than if you dont." Your "supporter subscription" is and has never in any way been an entitlement to breaking any site rules, nor a "lesser punishment" to any rules broken. That's just a stupid idea itself for ANY site or ANY organisation. That's the same reson the british public have a deep seated contempt for MP's who get away with murder when the public would be punished for the same (you're secretly not an MP are you??) And for the record, your account is the only "membership" you need, the "supporter" subscription is optional. If you don't like how the site operates this policy, you're welcome to close your account membership and seek a site that will allow you to break its rules with a lesser punishment the higher the fees you pay. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"And where would the line be drawn? Could gold site supporters be able to be vile and obnoxious whereas silver site supporters only be allowed to be obnoxious? ![]() Basically, that's exactly what the OP is suggesting. TO simply put it, if he did something that attracts a 24 hr ban (example), then a silver supporter should only get 12 hours and gold supporter 4 hr ban. That kind of scenario. That would be his top reason for taking the site supporter subscription. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"And where would the line be drawn? Could gold site supporters be able to be vile and obnoxious whereas silver site supporters only be allowed to be obnoxious? ![]() And platinum members would get a pat on the shoulder and a fruit basket for being annoyed by the other chat members. ![]() | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Would you like some cheese to go with your whine??? Regardless of your status, the rules are there for the benefit of everyone However I'm delighted to hear the moderators are banning idiots. Keep up the good work" ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I am gold member and had forum bans some justified some not in my view but why should i expect different treatment if rules are deemed to have been broke then mods wjo have difficult job have to make a judgement call. Not sure why you the o p thinks that you are above the non payers." Probably homeowners who think they are above social tenants and it's never them that cause trouble ![]() | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
back to top | ![]() |