FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback

Everyone should be at the very least photo verified

Jump to newest
 

By *k-mrmrs OP   Couple
3 weeks ago

Glasgow

This site would be 100 million times better if you actually had to be at the very least photo verified to make a profile. It literally takes 2 mins to do and doesn’t breach anyone’s privacy if they want to stay anonymous. It would get rid of almost all the fake profiles and save everyone a hell of a lot of time with time wasters. The site is free so it’s not like they would be losing revenue. Don’t understand it tbh 🤷🏼‍♂️

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lainJane23Woman
3 weeks ago

Liverpool

Mmmmm

Last year i sent a man my picture. The next thing Im getting hounded. Turns out, this bloke set u a blag profile saying he was married to me and i wanted a 3sum....

There are very good reason some people dont have pictures on here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

3 weeks ago

East Sussex

Use mail and search filters to exclude unverified people and the site will work how you want it to.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *stwoCouple
3 weeks ago

anywhere

Why?

Just because you want to see pics?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uliette500Woman
3 weeks ago

Hull


"Why?

Just because you want to see pics?"

You can't see verification photos.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aomilatteCouple
3 weeks ago

Midlands

A profile can get photo verified then post photo's of different people, we seen it many times. One profile even had a photo of the late Barbara Windsor and Sid James. Photo verification is best taken with a pinch of salt.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

3 weeks ago

O o O oo

Some people post pictures that they like rather than saying they are dead people , if anyone sees pics like that , if you report they are removed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *izandpaulCouple
3 weeks ago

merseyside


"Some people post pictures that they like rather than saying they are dead people , if anyone sees pics like that , if you report they are removed"

Haha

Can't wait to see a profile with the words.

"Please note the photos are neither recent or of us.

They only show dead people who are unfortunately, like us, timewasters".

🤣🤣🤣

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *anchesterTaurusMan
3 weeks ago

Prestwich

Can't you just ignore non photo verified people?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *anchesterTaurusMan
3 weeks ago

Prestwich

[Removed by poster at 11/06/26 10:42:14]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iHungMan
3 weeks ago

Blackpool


"Mmmmm

Last year i sent a man my picture. The next thing Im getting hounded. Turns out, this bloke set u a blag profile saying he was married to me and i wanted a 3sum....

There are very good reason some people dont have pictures on here "

Being photo verified doesn’t mean you have to have pictures on your profile. Verification pictures are sent to site admin to verify & not displayed on your profile by default.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

3 weeks ago

O o O oo


"Some people post pictures that they like rather than saying they are dead people , if anyone sees pics like that , if you report they are removed

Haha

Can't wait to see a profile with the words.

"Please note the photos are neither recent or of us.

They only show dead people who are unfortunately, like us, timewasters".

🤣🤣🤣"

Anything can happen on here !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lueDressWoman
3 weeks ago

Bath Somerset

I am photo verified. But that photo is not on my profile for the public to see.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hehighlander88Man
3 weeks ago

inverness


"I am photo verified. But that photo is not on my profile for the public to see."

Same here, a lot of fake profiles about though

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illybeachboyMan
3 weeks ago

Guernsey


"This site would be 100 million times better if you actually had to be at the very least photo verified to make a profile. It literally takes 2 mins to do and doesn’t breach anyone’s privacy if they want to stay anonymous. It would get rid of almost all the fake profiles and save everyone a hell of a lot of time with time wasters. The site is free so it’s not like they would be losing revenue. Don’t understand it tbh 🤷🏼‍♂️"

Thats a great idea.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issmorganWoman
2 weeks ago

Calderdale innit


"Mmmmm

Last year i sent a man my picture. The next thing Im getting hounded. Turns out, this bloke set u a blag profile saying he was married to me and i wanted a 3sum....

There are very good reason some people dont have pictures on here "

.

Wow, wtf is wrong with some people?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
2 weeks ago

Central

I think if photo verification if made essential for all new users, would probably reduce the volume of people here.

New.inquisitive people won't typically have the level of trust in Fab that we do, so some of them will be wary of giving much trust away, for a site that they won't even know if it could be any good or relevant to them. It likely means that we could lose some potential users who would fit in perfectly.

Keeping Fab free to use is a great, barrier-free principle and strategy. It helps to sustain it as incredibly popular and to continue to grow. If other barriers are then imposed, this weakens the open nature that drives its success.

Currently, Fab does restrict use to some users, unless they photo verify, so at least has experience of how it may impact use. Plus, as it's computerised, can at least implement greater, selective, scrutiny of newer people.

I lean more towards retaining openness, with strong scrutiny of newer people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkPomPomWoman
2 weeks ago

Isle of Man

😂

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eyeYCouple
2 weeks ago

Nr Leicester


"I think if photo verification if made essential for all new users, would probably reduce the volume of people here.

New.inquisitive people won't typically have the level of trust in Fab that we do, so some of them will be wary of giving much trust away, for a site that they won't even know if it could be any good or relevant to them. It likely means that we could lose some potential users who would fit in perfectly.

Keeping Fab free to use is a great, barrier-free principle and strategy. It helps to sustain it as incredibly popular and to continue to grow. If other barriers are then imposed, this weakens the open nature that drives its success.

Currently, Fab does restrict use to some users, unless they photo verify, so at least has experience of how it may impact use. Plus, as it's computerised, can at least implement greater, selective, scrutiny of newer people.

I lean more towards retaining openness, with strong scrutiny of newer people. "

With respect, we'd disagree.

Volume is not an issue on the site at all in our opinion, appreciate those joining out of curiosity and may not be prepared to take the 'leap'..

But as OP states it's not difficult or invasive, believe those who won't get photo verified should have no access to the pictures of those who have.

Whilst any site is fallible, it does allow tourists and fakes their fix, while increasing the vigilance genuine members have to employ.

X

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eyeYCouple
2 weeks ago

Nr Leicester


"Can't you just ignore non photo verified people?"

Theoretically absolutely!

However they still show and can message and bluntly it's just a symbol displayed, so the number of times we've not registered whether they have or not we'd be guessing at..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uca_BrazzyMan
2 weeks ago

Donegal

Verified yes definitely, but I also think there should be a subscription charge to access the site like on other sites and maybe an actual downloadable app would work alot better.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
2 weeks ago

It's a little odd to me that in the UK porn now requires age verification by numerous means, but this place doesn't.

It's almost like fake accounts are encouraged to bolster the numbers

Almost.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andy IanMan
2 weeks ago

cheshire/Preston

Don’t see a problem with everyone being photo verified it’s not shown on your profile just proves to everyone on site you are genuine. In my opinion it’s a good idea and would cut out fake profiles.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emandDCouple
2 weeks ago

Camberley

I thought photo verification with the fab email address was mandatory for everyone .. really surprised it isn't ... I'm interested to know which categories do and dont ...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

2 weeks ago

O o O oo


"It's a little odd to me that in the UK porn now requires age verification by numerous means, but this place doesn't.

"

Age verification is in place on the site

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

2 weeks ago

O o O oo


"Can't you just ignore non photo verified people?

Theoretically absolutely!

However they still show and can message ."

https://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters

You can use filters to block non verified from messaging you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *utnabout40Man
2 weeks ago

here


"Use mail and search filters to exclude unverified people and the site will work how you want it to. "
Pity there isn’t filters that would allow me to meet with you. Mrs is stunning.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

2 weeks ago

East Sussex


"Use mail and search filters to exclude unverified people and the site will work how you want it to. Pity there isn’t filters that would allow me to meet with you. Mrs is stunning. "
I

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top