FabSwingers.com forum: AI images and Fab

By *j_mark OP Couple
Forum Mod
4 weeks ago

Totteridge/Whetstone

Post feedback here

Admin x

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *arylRMan
4 weeks ago

Excellent idea, wish more sites would be as sensible as this.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ifeyBJQueenCouple
4 weeks ago

dublin

Brilliant idea

I’ve only recently had contact with a page that was supposed to be female from Ireland but the only pics they would send where the same three of a bum in a thong that looked very unreal and the chat we had was in broken English no a good change it wasn’t a genuine account so I did report it and they blocked me

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ipstick KissesWoman
4 weeks ago

Newry

Totally supportive of this

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ompeylad58Man
4 weeks ago

portsmouth

Absolutely support....will the heavy edited pics that slip through the net be able to be reported like the other rules for photos. So many pics recently are so heavily edited it looks like a. Mannequin head

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ear_TinkerbellCouple
4 weeks ago

The lost village

Whilst its a great idea it may be a little late and 'horse bolted, stable door' now. Especially as AI improves and it will be nigh on impossible to tell the difference between AI created and well edited pictures. Maybe a consideration is a photo tag that could be applied of AI edited or suspected that could be applied by the photo mods.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *he Beverage GoblinsCouple
4 weeks ago

Cheltenham

Good idea but can mods also check photos for ones that have clearly been taken from the web.

We have called out so many users just from a simple Google lens search

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *omeotherguyMan
4 weeks ago

Sheffield/London/Derbyshire

Be sensible about it, for instance using AI to remove something from the photo should be perfectly acceptable, especially if everything such as face, likeness or whatever is untouched.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
4 weeks ago

O o O oo

"Be sensible about it, for instance using AI to remove something from the photo should be perfectly acceptable, especially if everything such as face, likeness or whatever is untouched."

It mentions this in the post on this thread

https://www.fabswingers.com/forum/feedback/1792751

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *P28Woman
4 weeks ago

Portsmouth

Excellent news!!

I insist on Unfiltered pictures only. I also don't like it when people use old photos and no longer look anything like the face/body image.

No AI images is a very positive way forward, thank you 😁

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *airyHariboMan
4 weeks ago

Eastbourne

Excellent.

I've reported so much AI slop.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *j188Couple
4 weeks ago

aberdeenshire

Definitely a good move

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *P28Woman
4 weeks ago

Portsmouth

"Brilliant idea

I think you are automatically blocked after reporting a profile, just from my experience

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *etstalk69Man
4 weeks ago

Liverpool

Great news team fab. Thanks for this.

Fully support.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *reolush98Man
4 weeks ago

Manchester

Perhaps if you are using AI images for whatever reason they should come with a watermark to let the viewer know they are looking at an AI generated photo.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *eliWoman
4 weeks ago

I think it's a really good idea. Actively dislike AI images and they're always quite obvious.

Hopefully over the coming weeks the site will have far fewer.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *forfuntimesCouple
4 weeks ago

Sheffield

"Good idea but can mods also check photos for ones that have clearly been taken from the web.

We have called out so many users just from a simple Google lens search "

Same here…sometimes it is very obvious that the pics are fake…or heavily enhanced…

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
4 weeks ago

But it's not just Ai.

It's also filters

Then you have people who use ancient photos of themselves.

Or crossdrssers who use photos of themselves from professional dressing services but they themselves can't do makeup so when you meet them they look ridiculous. (Has happened to me numerous times).

For me the only way before a meet is to exchange recent clear face photos by WhatsApp

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *onicZMan
4 weeks ago

Nottinghamshire

Am I missing something on the mobile site?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ollypop9Woman
4 weeks ago

wouldn't you like to know

Could I get some feedback please ?

When i came to fab first, I was shy about posting pictures. Then a friend showed me different photo apps.

I use them to frame my pics, give them a theme and put my profile name on them..It felt like asafety net., and it kind of became my thing..I never use them to change my appearance, apart from removing tattoos or faces.

Is that still aloud now, or do I need to stop ?

I totally agree with the whole AI stuff being bad and that pictures should show the real person.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
4 weeks ago

O o O oo

It mentions what is and not allowed on this thread

https://www.fabswingers.com/forum/feedback/1792751

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *an SummersMan
4 weeks ago

Huddersfield

Can this cover image filters too? Only joking

Ai images have no place here though. I think the phot verification process needs to be a little more thorough than a piece of paper with the username and Fabswingers written on it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *inaTitzTV/TS
4 weeks ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

This is a big step forwards.

However, I feel that you need more photo mods to keep up with the workload as it can take days before any action is taken.

In the past I've reported AI pics and the site has dealt with it by just blocking the profile from me. I'd rather this not happen.

I see a lot of this with Tgirls that I know personally and simply wouldn't recognise from their AI improved pics and these not only are unfair on anyone who wants to meet the image they present, but also make it tricky for us that don't AI our faces to look 20 years younger and a lot more feminine, as we don't look anywhere near as good

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
4 weeks ago

O o O oo

However, I feel that you need more photo mods to keep up with the workload as it can take days before any action is taken.

Pic mods don't deal with reports. Admin can take up to 48 hours for reports to be dealt with, longer if especially busy

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ase4122Man
4 weeks ago

Lancashire

"Good idea but can mods also check photos for ones that have clearly been taken from the web.

We have called out so many users just from a simple Google lens search "

100% this. The amount of people I've seen using fake pics picked straight from websites using reverse image tool.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *CExeCouple
4 weeks ago

Hong-Kong/Exeter

"Good idea but can mods also check photos for ones that have clearly been taken from the web.

We have called out so many users just from a simple Google lens search

100% this. The amount of people I've seen using fake pics picked straight from websites using reverse image tool. "

Yep, it's prolific these days. There's about 10 blokes with the same cock pic 🤣

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *olaSlutTV/TS
4 weeks ago

Birmingham

I'm all for playing with photos and having some fun with them but the AI slop is awful, it'll be good to have less or none of it at all.

L X

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *morousCouple8Couple
4 weeks ago

Cumbria

Is there a way to report people who do not look like their photos?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ike933Man
4 weeks ago

Wrexham

Good idea I deleted all my photos that older than 12 months

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *BWSugarWoman
4 weeks ago

Greater Manchester

It's a positive step but what is fab doing about all of the people catfishing? I report several men per day who end up in my inbox, one quick Google image search on my phone proves they are a catfish. I report yet so many of them are still active on fab. Imagine rocking up to meet someone who is a completely different person to the photo, there's even more of them 'cockfishing'

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *inaTitzTV/TS
4 weeks ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

"It's a positive step but what is fab doing about all of the people catfishing? I report several men per day who end up in my inbox, one quick Google image search on my phone proves they are a catfish. I report yet so many of them are still active on fab. Imagine rocking up to meet someone who is a completely different person to the photo, there's even more of them 'cockfishing' "

I agree - removal is often lacking.

I've reported the same person a few times for having AI pics and even now, 72 hours later, their AI face pics are still up.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
4 weeks ago

O o O oo

Admin can take up to 48 hours for reports to be dealt with, longer if especially busy"

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iltsTSgirlTV/TS
3 weeks ago

Chichester

The problem with reverse image search is there are lots of people on here win are adult models (that’s no issue at all ) they may use same pics across their social media and here. As long as they srnt promoting in here then it’s no issue but the issue is if they make a point in profile giving a heads up they are. Content creators they likely get banned.

Equally if users reverse image search sometimes the picture might pull from their social media under their model name.

Point being Inage tools need to be taken in context from admin when flagged and appealed

There needs a more simpler way for people in this bracket to engage with admin rather than just given warnings first fake photos which aren’t

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
3 weeks ago

O o O oo

Point being Inage tools need to be taken in context from admin when flagged and appealed

They do take this into account yes

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *moothpussyMan
3 weeks ago

Glasgow

I don't understand why people feel the need to use ai images. I mean you would spot it irl. But I think this is a great idea.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *xonalternativeMan
3 weeks ago

wallingford

The problem for me is when people clearly use it for verification photos… then suddenly you’ve got a fake profile that’s photo verified.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
3 weeks ago

O o O oo

"The problem for me is when people clearly use it for verification photos… then suddenly you’ve got a fake profile that’s photo verified. "

You wouldn't be able to see peoples verification photo's to say they were Ai

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *xonalternativeMan
3 weeks ago

wallingford

"The problem for me is when people clearly use it for verification photos… then suddenly you’ve got a fake profile that’s photo verified.

You wouldn't be able to see peoples verification photo's to say they were Ai"

This is the problem! I could find a pic of someone on the internet holding a piece of paper and use ai to put my username on it. Nobody would be able to tell. Even photoshop can do that. There is a serious flaw with the current outdated system that needs to be addressed in my opinion. It’s not 2003 anymore.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *oufouCouple
3 weeks ago

Somerset

Ideally, Fab should read the metadata for the picture when uploaded and reject anything AI generated or more than 5 years old.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *morousCouple8Couple
3 weeks ago

Cumbria

"Ideally, Fab should read the metadata for the picture when uploaded and reject anything AI generated or more than 5 years old. "

I’d pay an extra fiver for that

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
3 weeks ago

O o O oo

"The problem for me is when people clearly use it for verification photos… then suddenly you’ve got a fake profile that’s photo verified.

You wouldn't be able to see peoples verification photo's to say they were Ai

This is the problem! I could find a pic of someone on the internet holding a piece of paper and use ai to put my username on it. Nobody would be able to tell. "

You can tell it is Ai

I thought you meant you had seen lots of PV's on here so why I said you wouldn't be able to see those to make a judgement.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *xonalternativeMan
3 weeks ago

wallingford

"The problem for me is when people clearly use it for verification photos… then suddenly you’ve got a fake profile that’s photo verified.

You wouldn't be able to see peoples verification photo's to say they were Ai

This is the problem! I could find a pic of someone on the internet holding a piece of paper and use ai to put my username on it. Nobody would be able to tell.

You can tell it is Ai

I thought you meant you had seen lots of PV's on here so why I said you wouldn't be able to see those to make a judgement."

I’ve seen a lot of ‘photo verified’ profiles that I know for a fact are fake, just by using google lens. I even recognised one girl as someone who used to be on here, I asked her and she had no idea someone was using her pics on a new profile. It’s genuinely scary how crap the system is.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *lizaDay91Woman
3 weeks ago

It'sASecret

"Good idea but can mods also check photos for ones that have clearly been taken from the web.

We have called out so many users just from a simple Google lens search "

Same! I've reported a couple of single male profiles for using images of a porn star. It didn't seem like the person got removed, even though I'd used reverse image search to find this out. I get that it probably takes a few days to actually read the report though.

I don't know why these people think we won't guess they're using someone else's photos! If someone looks too good to be true and they've been on a while with no verifications they like are too good to be true!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *lizaDay91Woman
3 weeks ago

It'sASecret

"The problem for me is when people clearly use it for verification photos… then suddenly you’ve got a fake profile that’s photo verified.

You wouldn't be able to see peoples verification photo's to say they were Ai

This is the problem! I could find a pic of someone on the internet holding a piece of paper and use ai to put my username on it. Nobody would be able to tell.

You can tell it is Ai

I thought you meant you had seen lots of PV's on here so why I said you wouldn't be able to see those to make a judgement.

I've been called fake quite a few times on here and it's pretty obvious my photos aren't AI or taken from another's profile ( I've got a s*** body ), so I don't know if people are that good at working out when someone is using someone else's images. I've been told I've been reported for being a bot despite being meet verified, because if you're a woman with standards who can't meet easily that somehow makes you fake. My photos are all watermarked so I don't understand how I'm a bot?

I get there are a lot of catfishes on here though. I used to get on hot photos on a previous profile, and people keep telling me they remember me so I can only assume some think I'm taken photos from my old profile.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
3 weeks ago

O o O oo

"The problem for me is when people clearly use it for verification photos… then suddenly you’ve got a fake profile that’s photo verified.

You wouldn't be able to see peoples verification photo's to say they were Ai

This is the problem! I could find a pic of someone on the internet holding a piece of paper and use ai to put my username on it. Nobody would be able to tell.

You can tell it is Ai

I thought you meant you had seen lots of PV's on here so why I said you wouldn't be able to see those to make a judgement.

I am a bit confused to be honest, first I thought you said that you can see peoples PV's, then you said you could make a fake PV and now that people have a PV but are fake. I am not sure how you would know that without seeing their PV, which non of us can.

Asking someone in real life if they are on a site called Fabswingers would make me say no too. Not everyone wants questioned this way in real life due to discretion. In fact I would be wary of people who do this.

For info, there are many thousands of people on the site. If any of them are fake I think it would be minimal to the amount of members on here.

However if you think any of them are fake, report and they will be checked out.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
3 weeks ago

O o O oo

Shall we get back to Admins feedback thread now please. If you think something should be reported then by all means click on the link. You are helping Admin by doing this. Please be aware that people do have pics on other sites too.

Reports do take time to be dealt with so please don't do multiple reports on the same person as it could slow down the process.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *heshire fun couple 123Couple
3 weeks ago

Nantwich

Easiest way to reduce a lot of the nonsense is to introduce a pay wall to see anything other than a profile pic.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *inky_RagnarCouple
2 weeks ago

Peterborough

What about robosexuals?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread

AI images and Fab - feedback