Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Thank you dear @Bucka39 Yes, the site filters are really helpful. However, what I’m talking about is a bit different. The issue isn’t just about not sending photos; sometimes people ask for a photo and then disappear without any explanation. For example, both parties might chat without sharing photos at first, then request photos from each other. One side sends a photo, but the other either doesn’t send theirs or goes silent after asking. This situation can’t be solved by filters alone because it’s about mutual trust and respect. I’m referring not to system filters, but to people’s behavior and communication." You are asking for an objective solution to a subjective problem. We are not the same and expecting everyone to behave the same way is an exercise in futility. Unless individuals break site rules, are insulting or offensive then they shouldn't face any sanctions. It's not nice but its nothing more than that. Just move on, there's plenty more fish in the sea as they say, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Dear @_ouple24669 This message comes across as quite harsh and reflects an approach that views personal boundaries purely through the lens of individual freedom. You’re right that everyone is free to choose what they send and to whom, I absolutely agree with that. But mutual interactions, especially when they involve personal sharing like photos, exist within a social context, not in a vacuum. Saying “you’re not entitled to anything, not even a response” may be technically true, but if we normalize that attitude, it undermines the idea of basic courtesy in any interaction. Respect isn’t just about rights , it’s also about how we treat people when they’ve been open or vulnerable with us. So yes, what I said is an opinion, just like yours is. But opinions shape culture. And I believe a culture where people take 2 seconds to say “no thanks” instead of disappearing is a healthier one. That’s not entitlement. That’s empathy. " It would be great if you were on a site with others that had a primary goal of caring about others feeli gs. Unfortunately you aren't, you are on a sex site and there's plenty on here who dont give a monkeys about not upsetting someone's feeling or playing by a 'higher' moral standard, just so long as they achieve their own primary goal of getting laid. As soon as you come to this realisation that not everyone plays by the same rules, or even the same game, the happier you'll be in relation to this. Whether you like it or not the other poster was quite correct in what they were saying. If people dont match up to your standards just move on, dont give them a seconds thought, they obviously aren't giving you one, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hi @Nortyair Thanks for your input You’re absolutely right that we’re all different, and I agree, we can’t expect everyone to behave the same way. I also understand that not everything unpleasant should result in sanctions, especially if it doesn’t break any site rules.But I think there’s value in distinguishing between “what’s punishable” and “what’s worth reflecting on.” I’m not necessarily asking for admin-imposed rules, I’m inviting a discussion about the social dynamics we create when we ghost people after they’ve been open and respectful.It’s true that the sea is full of fish, but if many are being caught and thrown back without a word, maybe we should at least ask, are we fishing responsibly? ![]() Can I ask why you think that this needs addressing? Why should everyone do or behave as you would like? Isn't that a little narcissistic? People's response on here are their responses. They are not yours, mine or anyone else's and as such they should have equal respect for them. They are just as valid as yours, mine or anyone else's. By suggesting that people should behave in a certain way is to not be showing them and their choices the same level of respect you obviously want people to show yours. Instead of thinking negatively about their choices, take some positive choice and choose to move on. Everyone should be free to behave as they see fit. As for social dynamics and whether its the right way to do things, we've been on the site, on and off, since it started and it works pretty well. As long as this continues you are trying to fix something that's not broken, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So let me get this right.... You were chatting to someone they asked for a face pic which you send. They see the pic decide you are not for them and don't reply. You feel it's rude because they didn't send theirs to you. Why would or should they when you are not their type? Why do you feel they should reply to you? FAQs on the site clearly state no reply = not interested. This can apply at any point in the conversation. As a woman on here telling someone they are not for you very often leads to abuse so I fully understand why they end the conversation at that point. The person has broken no site rules by not repliying to you and they are under no obligation to return a face pic to you either. Just because you dont like it does not make it a reportable ot punishable offence. If your feelings and your trust are so damaged by not getting replies or returned pictures maybe this is not the site for you OP. " I think this sums it up, sometimes you have to have a thick skin and man up if your going to survive this site. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m starting this thread in the hope that it will be useful and raise awareness. I believe it’s time we reflect on how behavior affects others and what this platform stands for. Some actions should no longer be brushed aside, if necessary, they should be reportable and subject to moderation or sanctions. Some users ask you to send a face photo during the initial chat. You politely agree and send yours — but then: • They never send theirs back, • Or they go completely silent after receiving yours. This kind of behavior: • Creates one-sided expectations, • Undermines mutual trust, • And frankly, comes off as rude and disrespectful. On a platform like this, we all seek honest, reciprocal, and respectful communication. This type of ghosting behavior after requesting something personal should no longer be treated as “normal.” My suggestion: • These kinds of interactions should be reportable. • Moderation should consider warnings, temporary limits, or behavior score impacts for repeat offenders. " A system of sanctions for the things that you suggest above is unworkable. Any member would be able to delete messages sent and then claim that the person had ghosted them, not sent a photo ect. So therefore the suggestion of sanctions you make is ridiculous. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m starting this thread in the hope that it will be useful and raise awareness. I believe it’s time we reflect on how behavior affects others and what this platform stands for. Some actions should no longer be brushed aside, if necessary, they should be reportable and subject to moderation or sanctions. Some users ask you to send a face photo during the initial chat. You politely agree and send yours — but then: • They never send theirs back, • Or they go completely silent after receiving yours. This kind of behavior: • Creates one-sided expectations, • Undermines mutual trust, • And frankly, comes off as rude and disrespectful. On a platform like this, we all seek honest, reciprocal, and respectful communication. This type of ghosting behavior after requesting something personal should no longer be treated as “normal.” My suggestion: • These kinds of interactions should be reportable. • Moderation should consider warnings, temporary limits, or behavior score impacts for repeat offenders. " when chatting if they ask for face pic suggest meet up somewhere neutral first. Take it from there. Never ask someone back to mine without this first. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m starting this thread in the hope that it will be useful and raise awareness. I believe it’s time we reflect on how behavior affects others and what this platform stands for. Some actions should no longer be brushed aside, if necessary, they should be reportable and subject to moderation or sanctions. Some users ask you to send a face photo during the initial chat. You politely agree and send yours — but then: • They never send theirs back, • Or they go completely silent after receiving yours. This kind of behavior: • Creates one-sided expectations, • Undermines mutual trust, • And frankly, comes off as rude and disrespectful. On a platform like this, we all seek honest, reciprocal, and respectful communication. This type of ghosting behavior after requesting something personal should no longer be treated as “normal.” My suggestion: • These kinds of interactions should be reportable. • Moderation should consider warnings, temporary limits, or behavior score impacts for repeat offenders. " I am not sure how, after sending a photograph, being explicitly told by the recipient by message that you are not physically attractive enough to them to have sex with is better than the implicit similar message sent by receiving no reply. I would be surprised if anyone on Fab hasn’t experienced similar or at least I hope it’s not just you and me, and I do know it’s me and not my partner! You are a gay man on a site primarily used by straight men. Many of the straightish ones will no doubt get turned on by the thought of male interaction but when it gets to the stage of exchanging photographs, the possibility of taking the interaction from fantasy to reality becomes scary and they perhaps realise they aren’t as bi curious as they thought. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The issue you have is YOU consider it a lack or courtesy and respect. But just because you think that does not make it so. That’s simply your opinion and nothing else. Everyone is free to send what they want or don’t want to send. Just because you send something that doesn’t entitle you to anything…..not even a response. You can take that any way you want but if it bothers you (it clearly does) that’s your problem and no one else’s. " This! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m starting this thread in the hope that it will be useful and raise awareness. I believe it’s time we reflect on how behavior affects others and what this platform stands for. Some actions should no longer be brushed aside, if necessary, they should be reportable and subject to moderation or sanctions. Some users ask you to send a face photo during the initial chat. You politely agree and send yours — but then: • They never send theirs back, • Or they go completely silent after receiving yours. This kind of behavior: • Creates one-sided expectations, • Undermines mutual trust, • And frankly, comes off as rude and disrespectful. On a platform like this, we all seek honest, reciprocal, and respectful communication. This type of ghosting behavior after requesting something personal should no longer be treated as “normal.” My suggestion: • These kinds of interactions should be reportable. • Moderation should consider warnings, temporary limits, or behavior score impacts for repeat offenders. " Just wondering what you do in such a situation OP? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |