FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback

Generic age range

Jump to newest
 

By *onesome swinger OP   Man
20 weeks ago

Belfast

Fab moderators/admin, isn't it about time that the generic age range 18 - 99 for meeting people is removed.

This is so obsolete, untrue and frustrating when it shows on a members profile.

Change this so that new members can only put in the age range of people that they are open to meeting up with and bring fab into the current century.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oomlMan
20 weeks ago

Fareham

I agree. People just can't be bothered to change it when they join so better if they have to do it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *exy PineapplesCouple
20 weeks ago

Basingstoke

You are doing this with a range of 18 - 75, why are you using it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onesome swinger OP   Man
20 weeks ago

Belfast

Hi Sexy pineapples and thank you for your comment, it is much appreciated. Point taken on my lower age range and my age,I will adjust this.

My post about the generic age range 18-99 option is to remove it as it is outdated and members should only be able to put in a lower and upper age of members who they may be open to meeting up with.

I am very aware that members have this option in the "looking for" section of their profile, but give members only this option so fab is more current.

I have no issues with younger seeking older or vice versa i am just suggesting that the generic age range should be removed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
20 weeks ago


"Hi Sexy pineapples and thank you for your comment, it is much appreciated. Point taken on my lower age range and my age,I will adjust this.

My post about the generic age range 18-99 option is to remove it as it is outdated and members should only be able to put in a lower and upper age of members who they may be open to meeting up with.

I am very aware that members have this option in the "looking for" section of their profile, but give members only this option so fab is more current.

I have no issues with younger seeking older or vice versa i am just suggesting that the generic age range should be removed.

"

It works as a filter to alot, if they see the person hasnt bothered to set a realistic age range what else cant they be bothered to do?

I dont see the point in removing it what real change will it make?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ympho6969Woman
20 weeks ago

glasgow


"Hi Sexy pineapples and thank you for your comment, it is much appreciated. Point taken on my lower age range and my age,I will adjust this.

My post about the generic age range 18-99 option is to remove it as it is outdated and members should only be able to put in a lower and upper age of members who they may be open to meeting up with.

I am very aware that members have this option in the "looking for" section of their profile, but give members only this option so fab is more current.

I have no issues with younger seeking older or vice versa i am just suggesting that the generic age range should be removed.

It works as a filter to alot, if they see the person hasnt bothered to set a realistic age range what else cant they be bothered to do?

I dont see the point in removing it what real change will it make? "

I personally see the 18-99 as "ill fuck anyone willing to have me".

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
20 weeks ago


"Hi Sexy pineapples and thank you for your comment, it is much appreciated. Point taken on my lower age range and my age,I will adjust this.

My post about the generic age range 18-99 option is to remove it as it is outdated and members should only be able to put in a lower and upper age of members who they may be open to meeting up with.

I am very aware that members have this option in the "looking for" section of their profile, but give members only this option so fab is more current.

I have no issues with younger seeking older or vice versa i am just suggesting that the generic age range should be removed.

It works as a filter to alot, if they see the person hasnt bothered to set a realistic age range what else cant they be bothered to do?

I dont see the point in removing it what real change will it make?

I personally see the 18-99 as "ill fuck anyone willing to have me". "

Yeah, which is a good filter

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
20 weeks ago

East Sussex

Maybe some people genuinely aren't bothered by age. The possibility of meeting a 99 year old is fairly remote.

It's worth remembering that just because someone's age range is broad doesn't mean they will want to meet everyone within that range

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ipstick KissesWoman
20 weeks ago

Newry


"Maybe some people genuinely aren't bothered by age. The possibility of meeting a 99 year old is fairly remote.

It's worth remembering that just because someone's age range is broad doesn't mean they will want to meet everyone within that range"

Indeed. And also that whilst they might only meet those within a narrower age range, they might still be open to messages from those who fall outwith that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucka39Man
20 weeks ago

Newcastle

[Removed by poster at 19/02/25 11:07:55]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucka39Man
20 weeks ago

Newcastle

I see it as people keeping their own options open on a wider scale as the saying goes you do you and let others do as they please

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acky RacersCouple
20 weeks ago

Lincoln


"Fab moderators/admin, isn't it about time that the generic age range 18 - 99 for meeting people is removed.

This is so obsolete, untrue and frustrating when it shows on a members profile.

Change this so that new members can only put in the age range of people that they are open to meeting up with and bring fab into the current century. "

Am I missing something? It's just a default setting like the generic profile text when you set up. Just change it when you set your profile up?

Do people really need this level of spoon feeding?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eandmrsjones69Couple
20 weeks ago

Middle England

I think an age filter isn't always relevant anyway. We are older (in our 60's). Guys on here might say have an upper age range. But when we go to clubs guys play with Mrs. They don't ask how old are you first!

It's a guide at best. If you put an upper (or lower range) and someone is a few years outside that it that a definite "no" sorry can't see/meet you?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onesome swinger OP   Man
20 weeks ago

Belfast


"I think an age filter isn't always relevant anyway. We are older (in our 60's). Guys on here might say have an upper age range. But when we go to clubs guys play with Mrs. They don't ask how old are you first!

It's a guide at best. If you put an upper (or lower range) and someone is a few years outside that it that a definite "no" sorry can't see/meet you?

"

As you say, an age range on a profile is a guideline only and that is why members do have the option of whether or not to receive messages from those outside their age range.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ealitybitesMan
20 weeks ago

Belfast


"I think an age filter isn't always relevant anyway. We are older (in our 60's). Guys on here might say have an upper age range. But when we go to clubs guys play with Mrs. They don't ask how old are you first!

It's a guide at best. If you put an upper (or lower range) and someone is a few years outside that it that a definite "no" sorry can't see/meet you?

"

I don't see it as a guideline at all. For me it's a hard and fast rule because I won't meet anyone within 10 years of my kids ages.

I don't agree with removing the generic range though. I've no idea how it can be seen as outdated because as others have already said it's a great filter.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *anonfire96Man
20 weeks ago

Mansfield

If I'd have set a specific age range I probably wouldn't have met anyone on here in the three years I've been on. And definitely wouldn't have had the amazing meets with people younger than my youngest child. All my meets have been with people in their 30s and has always been those who have messaged me first.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acky RacersCouple
20 weeks ago

Lincoln


"

As you say, an age range on a profile is a guideline only and that is why members do have the option of whether or not to receive messages from those outside their age range.

"

Not a guideline for us and many of our friends...it's pretty much a hard and fast rule for us with very few exceptions.

We respect others choices on age too..if we're outside of theirs we don't approach them either

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onesome swinger OP   Man
20 weeks ago

Belfast

Thank you all for your responses, I really appreciate the feedback.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple49Couple
20 weeks ago

Cheshire


"Fab moderators/admin, isn't it about time that the generic age range 18 - 99 for meeting people is removed.

This is so obsolete, untrue and frustrating when it shows on a members profile.

Change this so that new members can only put in the age range of people that they are open to meeting up with and bring fab into the current century.

Am I missing something? It's just a default setting like the generic profile text when you set up. Just change it when you set your profile up?

Do people really need this level of spoon feeding?"

Exactly, if taken further you could go on to have ranges and filters for literally thousands of features. Perhaps they could introduce one for cock length, eye colour and preference in Thomas Hardy novels etc?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nesCouple
20 weeks ago

Milton Keynes, city of dreams

Keep it.

Gives me a chuckle when blokes are after anyone aged 18-99 (desperate) and can’t accommodate (cos the Mrs wouldn’t be pleased)

Makes deleting and blocking easier

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *nesCouple
20 weeks ago

Milton Keynes, city of dreams


"Fab moderators/admin, isn't it about time that the generic age range 18 - 99 for meeting people is removed.

This is so obsolete, untrue and frustrating when it shows on a members profile.

Change this so that new members can only put in the age range of people that they are open to meeting up with and bring fab into the current century.

Am I missing something? It's just a default setting like the generic profile text when you set up. Just change it when you set your profile up?

Do people really need this level of spoon feeding?

Exactly, if taken further you could go on to have ranges and filters for literally thousands of features. Perhaps they could introduce one for cock length, eye colour and preference in Thomas Hardy novels etc? "

Jude The Obscure’s a fucking banger.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top