FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback

SHOULD FAB INCREASE FEES?

Jump to newest
 

By *woamigos OP   Couple
16 weeks ago

harrow

should fab increase the fees to disuade the timewasters, fakes and pic collectors?

a fiver is naff all for most people these days

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ir tootMan
16 weeks ago

Burton-on-Trent

Would paying dissuade picture collectors though?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

16 weeks ago

East Sussex

No. It's free to use if you can't or don't want to pay so it wouldn't stop people.

I think it's good that there's something we can enjoy that costs so little and time wasters have money too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
16 weeks ago

Paradise, Herts

How would that work. You don’t have to pay

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *r Mrs FuckableCouple
16 weeks ago

Stoke

Definitely. Should be a fiver to sign up and a fiver monthly compulsory membership to deter the fakes and time wasters.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *viatrixWoman
16 weeks ago

Redhill

I have been here for 6 years and I still have to see fakers or timewasters… 🤷‍♀️

No, I am quite happy paying my fiver and drowning in cock thank you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sttimehere18Woman
16 weeks ago

Fy

I am sure women pay more than men!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entleman_spyMan
16 weeks ago

nearby

I do think that a charge before you are able to send messages would help a little bit. Would it eliminate time wasters, no, but I think it would reduce the number of time wasters and fakes some what.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

16 weeks ago

East Sussex

Personally I think an awful lot of problems around unwanted mail, people wanting pictures etc who he solved by judicious use of mail filters, enthusiastic use of the block button and detailed use of the search feature

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

16 weeks ago

East Sussex

^^ could be solved 🤦

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *am8312Man
16 weeks ago

Brighton


"I have been here for 6 years and I still have to see fakers or timewasters… 🤷‍♀️

No, I am quite happy paying my fiver and drowning in cock thank you. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *am8312Man
16 weeks ago

Brighton


"No. It's free to use if you can't or don't want to pay so it wouldn't stop people.

I think it's good that there's something we can enjoy that costs so little and time wasters have money too"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
16 weeks ago

No they shouldn't increase their price

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *CExeCouple
16 weeks ago

Lincoln/Exeter

Absolutely this. Use of the filters and advanced search option makes the site so much better.

Free to use is definitely best, though maybe a verified and members only forum would be good.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod

16 weeks ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"should fab increase the fees to disuade the timewasters, fakes and pic collectors?

a fiver is naff all for most people these days"

I've never met a fake or a timewaster. All the people I've met have definitely been real as I made physical contact with them, whether just a handshake, a peck on the cheek or more.

As for pic collectors? Anything I've posted publicly is there for all to see. I'm more choosy about who sees anything else so don't really fall foul to collectors.

Fees aren't the magic wand some think they are. A tub of Lurpak (other butters/spreads are also available) I'd as pricey ad a month on Fab. There's also a big wife world of nudity and porn on the Internet, some of which costs way more and yet people still pay for it.

Just be sensible in who you engage with and how. That will solve most of the issues with disingenuous folk. 🤷‍♂️

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tephanie63Woman
16 weeks ago

BRIDGWATER


"should fab increase the fees to disuade the timewasters, fakes and pic collectors?

a fiver is naff all for most people these days"

No I don't think they should increase the fees.

Most Fabsters are not fakes. A fiver is not naff all to some people.

How do you know people are picture collectors, most probably just perv the photos and why shouldn't they if they are there?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eynard_ArgentMan
16 weeks ago

Witham


"I have been here for 6 years and I still have to see fakers or timewasters… 🤷‍♀️

No, I am quite happy paying my fiver and drowning in cock thank you. "

love it !!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enelope2UWoman
16 weeks ago

Fife

No they should just moderate better

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uzzleMan
16 weeks ago

Hastings

I don't think raising the fees would increase membership or stop timewasters.

The biggest flaw on this site is the cock to pussy ratio. Its the same at naturist beach, guys are happy to get their cock out and wonder round, women are less inclinded to get naked.

If you increase fees, I think single guys especially will be put off which will make the cock to pussy ratio worse than it is now!

Plus it needs to be an increase across the board and not just for single males, otherwise I think you will get more guys creating a couples profile where the female is 'unavailable'.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entleman_spyMan
16 weeks ago

nearby


"I don't think raising the fees would increase membership or stop timewasters.

The biggest flaw on this site is the cock to pussy ratio. Its the same at naturist beach, guys are happy to get their cock out and wonder round, women are less inclinded to get naked.

If you increase fees, I think single guys especially will be put off which will make the cock to pussy ratio worse than it is now!

Plus it needs to be an increase across the board and not just for single males, otherwise I think you will get more guys creating a couples profile where the female is 'unavailable'....."

Surely if you put off single guys the cock to pussy ratio will be better ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uzzleMan
16 weeks ago

Hastings


"I don't think raising the fees would increase membership or stop timewasters.

The biggest flaw on this site is the cock to pussy ratio. Its the same at naturist beach, guys are happy to get their cock out and wonder round, women are less inclinded to get naked.

If you increase fees, I think single guys especially will be put off which will make the cock to pussy ratio worse than it is now!

Plus it needs to be an increase across the board and not just for single males, otherwise I think you will get more guys creating a couples profile where the female is 'unavailable'.....

Surely if you put off single guys the cock to pussy ratio will be better ? "

It won't be better, it will be stagnant and may eventually lead to the closure of Fab. Single guys won't pay to join or send messages because its a waste of time now. Definetly a waste of time to be paying for it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittleMissCali_MrDJCouple
16 weeks ago

wonderland.

Spending more money won't stop fakes or timewasters but may stop real people that would be on here from being on here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucka39Man
16 weeks ago

Newcastle

It's fine as it is

Using your own knowledge, works better, should I shouldn't I,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itygamesMan
16 weeks ago

UK

NO but we should have to show a utility bill or drivers licence to stop folk opening umpteen accounts etc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hismMan
16 weeks ago

Ballygonowhere


"should fab increase the fees to disuade the timewasters, fakes and pic collectors?

a fiver is naff all for most people these days"

As far as I'm aware,fab doesn't charge folk,unless they want the extra features available

I'm quite happy paying nothing for the limited features I get

It's not like I'm messaging or wanting to message every woman/couple on the site

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *revaunanceCouple
16 weeks ago

Exeter


"should fab increase the fees to disuade the timewasters, fakes and pic collectors?"

I'm not sure I understand the logic here. To dissuade pic collectors, timewasters and so called fakes from operating a free account, you want us as site supporters to pay more?

Have you really thought that through?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top