FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback

a way of sorting out the unwanted

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

i have an idea to sort out the fakers scammers and nuisances

i only say this as a straight male and genuinely here to experience what life's got to offer do read profiles and do as they request i think that the few genuine men that are on here and do read profiles get ignored or deleted and give up after a few months of getting no where and not finding what they are looking for.

so i propose a solution to free up message boxes. just put a tick box meaning that the person who sent the message has NOT fulfilled what you requested on profile or been overly vulgar and so forth. once the accused has reached a certain amount of messages sent and gets a high amount of ticked boxes the person should be warned and if the ticks keep rolling then bye bye. you can take other factors in to account to like site supporter, verified or not.

so what do you guys think open to other opinions and improvements.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would suggest photo verification be mandatory. Would out most fakers off from the start.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ancs MinxWoman
over a year ago

Burnley


"i have an idea to sort out the fakers scammers and nuisances

i only say this as a straight male and genuinely here to experience what life's got to offer do read profiles and do as they request i think that the few genuine men that are on here and do read profiles get ignored or deleted and give up after a few months of getting no where and not finding what they are looking for.

so i propose a solution to free up message boxes. just put a tick box meaning that the person who sent the message has NOT fulfilled what you requested on profile or been overly vulgar and so forth. once the accused has reached a certain amount of messages sent and gets a high amount of ticked boxes the person should be warned and if the ticks keep rolling then bye bye. you can take other factors in to account to like site supporter, verified or not.

so what do you guys think open to other opinions and improvements. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I would suggest photo verification be mandatory. Would out most fakers off from the start."

You dont think some would use fake pics to get past this do you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ooking4you69Couple
over a year ago

leeds

I think we should be able to name and shame

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What if you couldn't open a free account as a single male, some people would say that's not fair, but maybe everyone should have to pay something anyway, it's not expensive.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What if you couldn't open a free account as a single male, some people would say that's not fair, but maybe everyone should have to pay something anyway, it's not expensive."

Even the most expensive swingers sites have time wasters.

You honestly believe people with money are all genuine ?????

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What if you couldn't open a free account as a single male, some people would say that's not fair, but maybe everyone should have to pay something anyway, it's not expensive.

Even the most expensive swingers sites have time wasters.

You honestly believe people with money are all genuine ?????"
. It would stop a lot of people opening multiple accounts. Comparing it to dating sites, plenty of fish and match affinity for example, when I was dating all my best dates came from match affinity.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I know people that open a new paying account almost every week.

Home from the pub after a few shandies and up for some fun.

£5 for a night of perving is cheap as it comes.

Why does every one think only single guys are time wasters.

There are lots of "couples & single fem" fake profile.

If its a major problem, then maybe you need to check how YOU vet profiles

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

the site works fine, if ur having trouble with fakes..then clearly ur doing something wrong..sorry but its tiresome every week seeing something about new filters,rooms, etc etc just to sort out the 'timewasters' and 'fakes'

do ur homework and u'll find the genuine people for whatever reason u need/want them for

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I know people that open a new paying account almost every week.

Home from the pub after a few shandies and up for some fun.

£5 for a night of perving is cheap as it comes.

Why does every one think only single guys are time wasters.

There are lots of "couples & single fem" fake profile.

If its a major problem, then maybe you need to check how YOU vet profiles

"
I don't have a problem, I didn't bring the subject up.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"i have an idea to sort out the fakers scammers and nuisances

i only say this as a straight male and genuinely here to experience what life's got to offer do read profiles and do as they request i think that the few genuine men that are on here and do read profiles get ignored or deleted and give up after a few months of getting no where and not finding what they are looking for.

so i propose a solution to free up message boxes. just put a tick box meaning that the person who sent the message has NOT fulfilled what you requested on profile or been overly vulgar and so forth. once the accused has reached a certain amount of messages sent and gets a high amount of ticked boxes the person should be warned and if the ticks keep rolling then bye bye. you can take other factors in to account to like site supporter, verified or not.

so what do you guys think open to other opinions and improvements. "

Couldn't see that being adopted here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I would suggest photo verification be mandatory. Would out most fakers off from the start."

nah i reckon we should all be site supporters that would stop fakers having about 5 or 6 different profiles if they gotta pay a fiver per name lol xx and if ppl change name shud have a list of previous names cos thats wot a lot of numpties do xxxx charge us all that might be good cos its a good site

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *renchbambi xWoman
over a year ago

Need to know basis


"the site works fine, if ur having trouble with fakes..then clearly ur doing something wrong..sorry but its tiresome every week seeing something about new filters,rooms, etc etc just to sort out the 'timewasters' and 'fakes'

do ur homework and u'll find the genuine people for whatever reason u need/want them for"

I agree

In fairness to the OP, this part of the Forums is about suggestions and feedback on the site and all posts are welcome. What I find even more tiresome are those who do not even attempt to answer a question/suggestion made on a post.

OP, I do not think your idea would work on here. What you or I may think is rude can be understood very differently by someone else. As mentioned above, doing your homework helps out the timewasters and fakers

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top