Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So I've been on Fab on and off. I have sent loads of messages. None have ever replied other than to politely decline, apart from one other response from a homosexual (even though I'm straight!). I'm a reasonably good-looking guy I think, and I think my profile is Ok? I am also British Asian. I am under no illusion that my race/colour will not be to everyone's liking. That's fine. What I don't want to be doing is wasting my time writing emails to women for whom my race is not their cup of tea. I used to be on Match.com and actually had several sexual encounters from there with white women. Each Match profile stated the races that person would consider, and obviously I would not write to those that did not consider Asians. I think each Fab profile also needs to state which races are acceptable. It would save a great deal of time for people like me. Not sure we agree, Race isn’t always the issue people don’t want to meet. " Think your missing OPs point He’s not saying it’s an issue to him as he’s aware he’s not for everyone, he’s putting forward a suggestion for filtering for those that have preferences and thus saving him time and effort Personally it’s a great idea and as fab has had a few updates lately I’d like to see preferences added by way of filtering, just don’t forget to add curvy redheads | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So I've been on Fab on and off. I have sent loads of messages. None have ever replied other than to politely decline, apart from one other response from a homosexual (even though I'm straight!). I'm a reasonably good-looking guy I think, and I think my profile is Ok? I am also British Asian. I am under no illusion that my race/colour will not be to everyone's liking. That's fine. What I don't want to be doing is wasting my time writing emails to women for whom my race is not their cup of tea. I used to be on Match.com and actually had several sexual encounters from there with white women. Each Match profile stated the races that person would consider, and obviously I would not write to those that did not consider Asians. I think each Fab profile also needs to state which races are acceptable. It would save a great deal of time for people like me. Not sure we agree, Race isn’t always the issue people don’t want to meet. Think your missing OPs point He’s not saying it’s an issue to him as he’s aware he’s not for everyone, he’s putting forward a suggestion for filtering for those that have preferences and thus saving him time and effort Personally it’s a great idea and as fab has had a few updates lately I’d like to see preferences added by way of filtering, just don’t forget to add curvy redheads " Yes I agree, more filters would save a lot of time. One of the filters I like is, those who've not blocked single men. However, there could be lots more such as height. Bodyshape is subjective but height and race are not. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All these people saying having a race filter is wrong are ridiculous. It's no different to saying you only want 7+ inches or you only want gym fit, or you want want non smokers or you only want bbw or all these women who only want bbc. It's not racist to have a preference and this OP is fully embracing that and is actively encouraging freedom of choice. " I'd suggest that having a preference based on someone's race (instead of their personality or sexual orientation, for example) is the very definition of racism. I used to be on Match.com and they had a filter like this. I used it as a red flag, and chose never to date anyone who revealed themselves to be racist. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All these people saying having a race filter is wrong are ridiculous. It's no different to saying you only want 7+ inches or you only want gym fit, or you want want non smokers or you only want bbw or all these women who only want bbc. It's not racist to have a preference and this OP is fully embracing that and is actively encouraging freedom of choice. I'd suggest that having a preference based on someone's race (instead of their personality or sexual orientation, for example) is the very definition of racism. I used to be on Match.com and they had a filter like this. I used it as a red flag, and chose never to date anyone who revealed themselves to be racist." Hiya Having a preference isn't being racist it's a choice just as in height some will some won't | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So I've been on Fab on and off. I have sent loads of messages. None have ever replied other than to politely decline, apart from one other response from a homosexual (even though I'm straight!). I'm a reasonably good-looking guy I think, and I think my profile is Ok? I am also British Asian. I am under no illusion that my race/colour will not be to everyone's liking. That's fine. What I don't want to be doing is wasting my time writing emails to women for whom my race is not their cup of tea. I used to be on Match.com and actually had several sexual encounters from there with white women. Each Match profile stated the races that person would consider, and obviously I would not write to those that did not consider Asians. I think each Fab profile also needs to state which races are acceptable. It would save a great deal of time for people like me." Agreed. Stops us from wasting time. I prefer when women and couples, make it clear that they don't want to meet black men. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
". Hiya Having a preference isn't being racist it's a choice just as in height some will some won't " ------------------------- Racists are entitled to their preferences and are likely to express them here. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I assume the issue would arise when the yellow banner appears stating that this person has blocked you based on their racial preferences isn't a good look for the site. Sigh." That could be awkward | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anybody who says what OP is suggesting is ‘racist’ is just jumping on the gravy train of the perpetually offended, or has a lifetime subscription to the virtue signalling association. Opting to block correspondence from any group of people via a third-party service that I pay for, is neither a) prejudiced against, or b) antagonistic towards them… which is the actual definition of racism (not the shite I’ve read in this thread). I’m open to guys of all ethnicities depending on mutual attraction and chemistry. I don’t however allow women, trans people, or guys over 45 to privately message me in the context of a site that I use to meet for sex, because I’m not attracted to them and don’t want to waste their/my time. The dumb-witted binary logic I see in here (all too often), would therefore have me pegged as ageist, sexist, and transphobic, despite me having great relationships with all of those groups in vanilla life. And those who think there are legal barriers… have obviously never set foot near any kind of data collection in public services before, where Ethnicity, Religion, Home Language, National Identity (among other things) are all used to classify people… so there would be no issues with a privately owned website doing it. Personally I’d welcome as many filters as physically possible. Fab is a tool to help me find what I’m looking for and the better I can calibrate it, the more efficient it would be. I’d rather have 1 message every 4 weeks from a good match, than 40 per day from people I’m never going to be interested in." A very detailed and concise response, if I say so myself | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |