FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback

age limiting

Jump to newest
 

By *earded Beast OP   Man
48 weeks ago

durham

what about gender specific age limiting fir users allow to give one age for male, female etc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucka39Man
48 weeks ago

Newcastle

Hi op

This is something that a user could pacifically add as additional information within the bio as a preference or requirement

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igsaw93Woman
48 weeks ago

Glasgow

It's been asked for many times. For some reason Fab still hasn't done it. Would be a great and straightforward addition

Jigs x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
47 weeks ago

Are we the only ones who think the user interface is very dated and confusing? The menus are guesswork and navigating to and from messages, to profiles and hotlists etc is not user friendly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eekin NSAMan
47 weeks ago

Ireland /Kilkenny areas

Wondering why it’s Cut off for ladies is 50 years old Why not older 55 years

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
47 weeks ago


"Wondering why it’s Cut off for ladies is 50 years old Why not older 55 years "

What cut off

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eekin NSAMan
47 weeks ago

Ireland /Kilkenny areas

Lots a women used the age limit as 20/50 looking for persons

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *earded Beast OP   Man
47 weeks ago

durham

I know like said above you can put in bio but in bio dose not stop the ones you don't want messaging as alot think that they exception to your rule

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
47 weeks ago


"Wondering why it’s Cut off for ladies is 50 years old Why not older 55 years "

Because they don't want to meet 55 year olds.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ixel_TuttyCouple
46 weeks ago

Halesowen

Mines 26/46 10 years older and 10 years younger then myself

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wistedTooCouple
46 weeks ago

Frimley


"Are we the only ones who think the user interface is very dated and confusing? The menus are guesswork and navigating to and from messages, to profiles and hotlists etc is not user friendly."

Fab is a useful site but the UI was developed somewhere around 1996 in a university coding lab. It’s the online swinging equivalent of keys in a bowl. Keeping retro alive :P

I mean, I’m messing around but it still does do the job though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *loria JamesTV/TS
46 weeks ago

Durham

It must obviously be an issue as most people on this thread hardly meet.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
46 weeks ago


"It must obviously be an issue as most people on this thread hardly meet."

How do you know?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
46 weeks ago

This needs to be a feature! Being able to stop TVs/Men over 28 from messaging would be great! I needed this feature! It would actively make this site about 80% more enjoyable.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *penbicoupleCouple
45 weeks ago

Northampton


"Are we the only ones who think the user interface is very dated and confusing? The menus are guesswork and navigating to and from messages, to profiles and hotlists etc is not user friendly.

Fab is a useful site but the UI was developed somewhere around 1996 in a university coding lab. It’s the online swinging equivalent of keys in a bowl. Keeping retro alive :P

I mean, I’m messing around but it still does do the job though."

The UI is utterly abysmal. And there's no reason it needs to be so naff.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *xposedInTheMaleMan
45 weeks ago

Cap d'Agde


"The UI is utterly abysmal. And there's no reason it needs to be so naff. "

Are you going to personally pay for the programming and testing time to improve it? If not, then there obviously is a reason!

I doubt a site like this has any full-time testing and programming staff, so it becomes a trade-off. And any significant changes will lead to more bugs, and there will almost certainly be a huge group that hates the new UI and loudly demands their old UI back.

Adding more options to an existing list is far more likely to happen.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ixel_TuttyCouple
41 weeks ago

Halesowen

[Removed by poster at 03/02/24 19:33:05]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *adCherriesCouple
41 weeks ago

Cheshire/Northwest

I like this site. Its easy to use and does everything we need it to do. Its also cheap for a membership

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *reechoicesMan
40 weeks ago

Bristol


"Are we the only ones who think the user interface is very dated and confusing? The menus are guesswork and navigating to and from messages, to profiles and hotlists etc is not user friendly.

Fab is a useful site but the UI was developed somewhere around 1996 in a university coding lab. It’s the online swinging equivalent of keys in a bowl. Keeping retro alive :P

I mean, I’m messing around but it still does do the job though."

Ha ha, so true. Not seen a site using this forum code/UI in years. It's like Facebook and the like never existed for the Fab designers. (ooh the irony)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
38 weeks ago


"Are we the only ones who think the user interface is very dated and confusing? The menus are guesswork and navigating to and from messages, to profiles and hotlists etc is not user friendly."

The whole site is ancient with postage stamp cams and 1 minute videos. I'm not paying anymore. I been on here since the start

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
38 weeks ago


"Are we the only ones who think the user interface is very dated and confusing? The menus are guesswork and navigating to and from messages, to profiles and hotlists etc is not user friendly.

The whole site is ancient with postage stamp cams and 1 minute videos. I'm not paying anymore. I been on here since the start"

You dont have to pay to use the site.. the site is free u just pay if u want extras

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *wistedTooCouple
38 weeks ago

Frimley


"Are we the only ones who think the user interface is very dated and confusing? The menus are guesswork and navigating to and from messages, to profiles and hotlists etc is not user friendly."

No, for sure, Fab is a site that echo’s the age of the dial up modem. I expect it’s a style choice… maybe… lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top