Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But the ones complaining are still here, just saying " Not complaining, just giving feedback. We're on plenty of other sites and the feedback has always been well received. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hotel Stoke anyone? " It's rude to post jump pal ideally make your own post | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hotel fun now I’m at the Hilton double tree for a meet up " You are posting in the wrong section pal | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Need to get the map sorted as they put essex in Midlands lol" Lol yes! Norwich is in the East Midlands too apparently! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hotel Stoke anyone? " Is that Stoke in the South West (well it might be according to the Fab compass)? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's odd that so many say the site is outdated, lacks functionality and there are far better options out there....yet they're still here. And if improvements are so simple and easy why has nobody else created their own site or app? Many rival sites have been attempted. Few remain and none are as popular as Fab. Maybe there's actually little wrong with it at all and it offers all that's needed to enjoy a happy swinging life, if the tools and functions it offers are used efficiently and effectively? A" I agree that the the site is fine generally and does what it says on the tin. But it is very clunky in terms of menu design and could really do with an update in terms of the graphic design of the site. It really has a 'dial up modem' feel to it imo. Also agree with the point that a Fab swingers app would be most welcome. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's odd that so many say the site is outdated, lacks functionality and there are far better options out there....yet they're still here. And if improvements are so simple and easy why has nobody else created their own site or app? Many rival sites have been attempted. Few remain and none are as popular as Fab. Maybe there's actually little wrong with it at all and it offers all that's needed to enjoy a happy swinging life, if the tools and functions it offers are used efficiently and effectively? A I agree that the the site is fine generally and does what it says on the tin. But it is very clunky in terms of menu design and could really do with an update in terms of the graphic design of the site. It really has a 'dial up modem' feel to it imo. Also agree with the point that a Fab swingers app would be most welcome. " Is the motivation behind any desire for change just about the aesthetic look and feel of the site or the notion that changes will improve people's odds of meeting? Because the former won't affect the latter one bit and most won't care how it looks if they're getting meets. A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the basic format is ok. It doesn't matter what is changed, unless people put effort in profiles, are honest in their dealings, no amount of bells and whistles are going to improve chances of getting a meet. If you are lucky enough to be not male, I can understand why you might want more filters etc, but for us blokes would it make a difference? Minimum word count on profiles? people will just type hdhdhhhdhhhxwkjweudbrbshdh to get the letter count up. Photo verification won't stop people using fab to fill the wank bank. 30,000 people on average online isn't a bad haul. replicating other apps might lose some of fabs charm." This says it all | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's odd that so many say the site is outdated, lacks functionality and there are far better options out there....yet they're still here. And if improvements are so simple and easy why has nobody else created their own site or app? Many rival sites have been attempted. Few remain and none are as popular as Fab. Maybe there's actually little wrong with it at all and it offers all that's needed to enjoy a happy swinging life, if the tools and functions it offers are used efficiently and effectively? A I agree that the the site is fine generally and does what it says on the tin. But it is very clunky in terms of menu design and could really do with an update in terms of the graphic design of the site. It really has a 'dial up modem' feel to it imo. Also agree with the point that a Fab swingers app would be most welcome. Is the motivation behind any desire for change just about the aesthetic look and feel of the site or the notion that changes will improve people's odds of meeting? Because the former won't affect the latter one bit and most won't care how it looks if they're getting meets. A" That's a fair point. Maybe I'm just an aesthetics man lol! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |