Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
| Jump to newest |  |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"95% of members on here are men 3% women and 2% trans" Just checked within 5 miles of me: 69% men 24% couples 5% ladies 2% CD/TS That of course doesn't allow for overlapping profiles, fakes, people inactive etc. However, just taking people who are verified the numbers not a vastly different. People in all categories verified broadly to the same extent so verified members roughly in similar proportion to above. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"its roughtly 100 to one and that can change depending on what area your in as already said bare in mind the women and couples profiles that are just men and then the large amount of account that have not been used for yonks are mainly women and couples .... then also add in how many accounts some guys have 2 /3 /some alot more" This 100 to 1 gets thrown around but nowhere near that near me. More like 10 to 1. I just check two other areas some distance away and got 9 to 1 and 7 to 1. It's obviously hard to really know due to the factors mentioned but is there any evidence to support this 100 to 1 average that gets thrown around? PS if some guys have 2/3 accounts that would actually lower the real m/f ratio | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"its roughtly 100 to one and that can change depending on what area your in as already said bare in mind the women and couples profiles that are just men and then the large amount of account that have not been used for yonks are mainly women and couples .... then also add in how many accounts some guys have 2 /3 /some alot more This 100 to 1 gets thrown around but nowhere near that near me. More like 10 to 1. I just check two other areas some distance away and got 9 to 1 and 7 to 1. It's obviously hard to really know due to the factors mentioned but is there any evidence to support this 100 to 1 average that gets thrown around? PS if some guys have 2/3 accounts that would actually lower the real m/f ratio" as a man you wont get the same view we get as single women or couples you just dont see it as thats how the site is set up ... i agree its a clutching a straws quote as unless the site release those figures then we will never know for real .. but as my single profile and couples profile look outwards thats how we see it in the real sense of of fab in fact i would say 100 to 1 is the lowest i think its acually alot more ... especially when it comes to people who really meet via fab as there a large amount of women and couples who dont use fab to meet then the % really get distorted there is no way that the % is as low as 7 to 1 or 10 to 1 lol no way at all the number of men has double just since covid times .. 30 years ago when i started the yes agree 10 to 1 men had a much easier time but even back then many struggled now most struggle .. and for the record im not against guys infact im happy there are so many yes its a pain at times but generally its better as the selection is easier for getting meets as there is more choice  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
