Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would it make sense to add a filter for 'Does not accept messages from married/attached' (maybe tailored to avoid true swingers doing this with their partner's permission)? I obviously fall into the category of married and here in secret - I'm fairly new and finding that a high proportion of profiles I look at say 'no married/attached males'. Of course my request is a selfish one as it would help me find people who aren't turned off by me - on the flipside, surely it would also save people who are turned off by married/naughty a lot of hassle in the form of unwanted messages " Why? You assume people will be open and honest about their status and tick the right box on a profile. It doesn't work if they don't. People lie about all sorts - sexuality, height, dick size, age etc. Why would you think people would happily tick a box that will exclude them from people's searches? A few may. I suspect the majority wouldn't. Filters are only ever as useful as the accuracy of the data they work on. A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would it make sense to add a filter for 'Does not accept messages from married/attached' (maybe tailored to avoid true swingers doing this with their partner's permission)? I obviously fall into the category of married and here in secret - I'm fairly new and finding that a high proportion of profiles I look at say 'no married/attached males'. Of course my request is a selfish one as it would help me find people who aren't turned off by me - on the flipside, surely it would also save people who are turned off by married/naughty a lot of hassle in the form of unwanted messages Why? You assume people will be open and honest about their status and tick the right box on a profile. It doesn't work if they don't. People lie about all sorts - sexuality, height, dick size, age etc. Why would you think people would happily tick a box that will exclude them from people's searches? A few may. I suspect the majority wouldn't. Filters are only ever as useful as the accuracy of the data they work on. A " That aspect wasn't something I'd really considered and yes it makes sense. Maybe I'm a bit naive being new here - my policy is to lay my situation out truthfully, albeit knowing that the majority won't like it, but with a view to finding those who are comfortable engaging with someone like me and hopefully avoiding issues later if someone was put off with what I'd hidden. I can appreciate that others don't necessarily want to narrow the pool of people they're able to reach though | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would it make sense to add a filter for 'Does not accept messages from married/attached' (maybe tailored to avoid true swingers doing this with their partner's permission)? I obviously fall into the category of married and here in secret - I'm fairly new and finding that a high proportion of profiles I look at say 'no married/attached males'. Of course my request is a selfish one as it would help me find people who aren't turned off by me - on the flipside, surely it would also save people who are turned off by married/naughty a lot of hassle in the form of unwanted messages " It's akin to having a filter reading do you tell the truth, yes or no. We're not bothered if the guy is married or not, has wife's permission or not as you can never confirm. Our big no no is if they slag off their wives on a meet. Happened a couple of times. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |